ke to be able to know what's
happening rather than make assumptions about what's happening somewhere
beyond my control.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
>
yes, used it for a year and a bit and it's rock-solid and does a hell of a
lot for the money.
not used the spam side of it for a long time (got postfix/spamassassin for
that now) but i don't know of many windows products that do as much for that
sort of money - logging's one of the best features I
I do mostly "cause i can", my strategy purely from a "how quick can i get
this working if it breaks" p.o.v is to do a full backup nightly using
ntbackup to dump to a file on a removable SCSI drive wihch then gets dumped
to tape. I also do an incremental to get the logs at lunchtime, the store
and
Not sure how feasible this is, but could you have something at the remote
sites like vpop that polls all mail for that sites users over pop3 they then
get it locally?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL
looks like isb.paknet.com.pk isn't configured to accept mail for
mul.paknet.com.pk even though it's listed as an MX record.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Ori
Whose server is identixps08.identix.com? It doesn't resolve to anything in
DNS using several online lookup tools and it doesn't appear as an MX record
for visionics.com.
regards,
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 November 2003 17:26
>
I'm sure I read somewhere about some explot/vuln that involved DAV (which I
noticed in the headers) - maybe that has something to do with it?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROT
eatures to later
versions.
The one thing I do like about it is the logging - we use 5.5 and smtp
logging sucks, this logs everything to text, and the important info to csv
and all sort of stuff.. well worth a try IMHO.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24
I'll also chime in and suggest spamassassin, I've used both this and Xwall
and they are both excellent products.
I should stress that I haven't used its bayes functionallity, but Xwall is a
very nice product for the money, in fact I still use it as a gateway between
our LAN and our DMZ, but I st
take a look at psloglist in conjunction with something like blat - that
should be able to do it.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Holtzclaw [
> Since Xwall has no knowledge of the users on the system, it
> accepts ALL
> stinking e-mail messages, and then forwards them to the Exchange box.
> Since spammers use blind name lists, attempting to get lucky, and hit
> all the possible [EMAIL PROTECTED], the Exchange Server wants
> to send NDR
company listed purely
because our netblock is known to be assigned to the UK.
Basically don't assume your mail is being refused because of something
you/your IP address has done.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mai
I would guess so, if all they say is "Access Denied" it could be any reason,
but the DNS lists are a good place to start.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Ori
gt;
>
> Kind regards,
> Kim Schotanus
> ===
> Kim Schotanus
> Information Systems Manager
>
> INTAS
> Avenue des Arts 58
> B-1000 Brussels
> Belgium
>
> T. +32 2 549 01 11
> F. +32 2 549 01 56
>
> ==
Because it's refusing the connection right away? If I use sam spade to test
smtp connectivity to that address it accepts mail from work ("proper" static
IP) whilst at home I get the same as you, presumably because although I'm on
a static IP it's in an IP range that's publicly known to be home ADS
I guess this might sound flippant, but basically, it works.
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 October 2003 20:28
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: High Memory Usage for Store.exe
>
>
> What's so different (superior) about thei
Keep an eye on the logs during the next online maintenance window for 1221
events for the private store and it'll show the white space that can be
re-used within the database.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
m
Exchange 5.5sp4 running on Windows 2000 SP3, 180 day deleted item retention
enabled on public and private stores.
We have a public folder with around 2000 contacts in it. Recently the
people who look after those contacts have been making a lot of changes, and
a couple of times have managed to stu
Well, I'm no expert but doing a netstat only shows a session active on
https, nothing at all on http, so I'd guess it's just the way IE shows
things..
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[
My understanding was that if you open any connection as https:// that any
authentication is encrypted even though the padlock doesn't appear until
they authenticate (or don't).
Are you sure that's not happening?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel
L PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: Recovering 5.5 pub.edb from online backup done with Windows
2000 ntbackup
> You don't have an online backup? That you could
> restore to a box with a
That should be doable as I have a spare drive large enough to put in the
recovery server, I'm just a little surprised that ntbackup for Windows 2000
doesn't give the option of restoring either/or database?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24
I've read the
disaster whitepapers but they appear to assume you want to recover the lot,
onto the original box (which is the scenario I'd taken into account).
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fa
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1918.html may be worth a look.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12
ups about a registry patch
that increases the simultaneous connections/performance?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Sirius F. Crackhoe [mailto:[E
nse when trying to execute against even the maximum number of
free supported servers has prompted me to look elsewhere for a solution
I'd invest $ in. YMMV
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:45 AM
Posted To: swynk
C
As subject really, trialling it now on some of our servers and it looks
quite impressive for the cost (which isn't very much).
Anyone using it and have any good experiences or any horror stories using
it?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635
;ll never get all of them but if we can cover the bigger ones it's
a start..
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List
In a manner of speaking - osirusoft is dead and I don't think it'll be back
for quite a white.
I don't know the exact sequence, but the blacklisting of everyone was Joes
way of letting people know :-)
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24
Not that I know of, or have ever found. The forums at arstechnica.com are
fairly useful, but not at all specific to one product.
Anything specific in mind?
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, A
Either, we run it on our proxy, but I guess some places don't have multiple
boxes so you can also run it on the exchange box on port 25 and have the IMS
listen on port 24. I'm assuming it'd handle the load, we're a pretty small
outfit in the grand scheme of things but it works fine for us, and fro
MTP virus scanners?
BTW, we're a non-profit, so free is best.
Thanks,
Erick
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 12:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Port 25 failing on IMC due to SOBIG.
>
>
&g
I'd stick my neck out and suggest xwall from www.dataenter.at, only costs
around $300 and there's a demo so you can try it whilst you've the immediate
problem to deal with.
Other option is a *nix gateway, I'm a Windows person but found it pretty
simple to set something up (what we currently use).
We use two, Scanmail on the Exchange boxes and F-Prot on one of our
gateways.
In fairness Scanmail's never missed anything, but for $20 it seemed sensible
to double-up.
Not sure I'd be comfortable not scanning internal IS traffic though?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Adm
copy of F-Prot and you also have inbound and outbound smtp virus
scanning.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
&
What will they accept as a valid reason? Not wishing to sound funny there,
but if they won't take that just about every reference you find to it
involves problems of some sort what will they take?
regards,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As others have intimated, you need to download at least some of it to check
it, and without checking the message body you're fairly limited in what you
can test for.
I'd give SAProxy a try from http://saproxy.bloomba.com - it's free, and it
uses the spamassassin engine which is pretty damned good
I would read up on the ADC, but we upgraded our domain (Exchange was on NT4
member servers, now Windows 2000) without any Exchange problems whatsoever,
we didn't have to do _anything_ to keep it running.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378
> I am not sure what kind of Antivirus and Antispam software to purchase and
> where to put it. As I understand it, Computer Assoc. does not sell a
> product that will scan just the IMC. Trend has a product called Interscan
> Messaging Security Suite that will scan the IMC box as mail comes and g
Yes, but if (assuming for whatever reason the desktop AV doesn't kick in)
someone downloads and runs something nasty, what would stop god knows what
from being sent to all your internal users, even if the gateway AV traps it
on the way out to the Internet?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Ne
Oh, and to somewhat attempt to answer the question, RAV and Vexira (the
latter in particular) seem to be highly thought of, RAV maybe less so as of
late due to uncertainty after the MS takeover.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635
I'm kind of in a similar position, I just can't help but think that whatever
you have at the gateway there's a bit of added reassurance having something
like Scanmail on the Exchange box, given the file blocking capabilities and
all.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administ
Sorry to jump in but try
http://www.advosys.ca/papers/printable/postfix-filtering.html - I did using
Redhat 8.0 and Postfix and it works a charm (seriously, I am _very_
impressed and would be if it cost many $000's).
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024
r
what you gain.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 June 2003 15:32
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subje
m: "Ward, Stuart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 5:06 PM
Subject: RE: ScanMail missing tricks?
> Why would it need to?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
No problems here with 3.81 - one thing I wish it did do was to scan
attachments blocked by extention blocking - we've had loads of bugbears
quarantined for being .exe's , but it doesn't seem to actually scan them as
well.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIR
nyone does find anything!
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 June 2003 20:33
> To: Exchange Discussions
> S
Managing Exchange Server by Paul Robichaux would be my choice, bit of a
bible IMHO.
It's published by O'Reilly.
regards
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 June 2003 17:35
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Suggested reading for Exchange 5
news.admin.net-abuse.* you'll get an idea.
Main thing is get of any lists you're on because you were an open relay,
short of changing IPs or ISPs you can't do much about the others.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 0
and the likes.
Some lists you'll be able to get removed from, some you're stuck on simply
for being with QWest.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From:
Nope, rejects relay attempts using sam spade.
If you've not already done so check your outbound queue - you don't want to
find there's 10,000 spams in there :-)
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[
I think the "Hosts and clients connecting to these internal addresses" is
your problem - you don't need it ticked (or I should say it isn't ticked
here and doesn't affect inbound email).
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378,
would pretty much be that barring some tweaking.
Just a personal opinion but I'd be tempted to use a third party for a
secondary MX - the one I use is dirt cheap and deadly reliable so I'd sooner
not worry about another box to look after..
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administ
Still looks to be open
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 May 2003 15:23
> To: Exchange Discussions
&
I think that's the only way of doing it, unless it's buried in the registry
somewhere.
If you can run to a small amount of money look at Xwall from
www.dataenter.at, or if you've the time/vocation to do so look at linux with
spamassassin - free and works damn well IME.
regard
, but AFAIK it's more difficult to
integrate it with any sort of Windows SMTP server.
I'd be interested to know what sort of pricing Mcafee are likely to come up
with when they release their Windows product.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635
pt any mail for the mira.co.uk domain and forward it to
otherserver.mira.co.uk do I use virtual domains or, as I think, transport
mappings?
Reason I ask is that the transport mappings don't appear to work if I use
the format domain.com smtp:[otherserver.mira.co.uk]
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchi
I think I'll have a play with Redhat 8 tomorrow as we have the CDs at work,
last time I installed it I used Webmin to configure Postfix and it seemed
fairly straightforward to get the basics working.
http://advosys.ca/papers/printable/postfix-filtering.html seems fairly
idiot-proof for the spamass
> I recommend qmail, which is not only highly secure - it has
> NEVER had a security breach - but is also at least 4-5 times
> as fast as Sendmail, and much, much easier to set up and configure.
I know this question always stirs up a bit of a hornets nest amongst *nix
users, but which distro wou
t but has anyone done this, and if so did it
all go "by the book"?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting
much by
rather than just seeing the database file grow as one item.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:
Yes, used it for six months, it suits our needs really well and IMHO does a
hell of a lot for the money considering what most Windows products cost.
The author is very helpful as well, if I have questions I tend to get an
answer within an hour or so (we're both in Europe so the time zones don't
ca
likes, but not if it means a reinstall/restore.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swi
date as a name, but I can't find anything on how the "save as"
could be automated.
Failing that, any other solutions to log mailbox sizes on a daily/weekly
basis (other than remembering to do it manually!)
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7
n but
the filters won't touch it.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 March 2003 14:59
> To
I use xwall from www.dataenter.at - used it for six months and love it.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:
e's always a few stragglers with this sort of
thing...
regards
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: h
emails you that it didn't
originate from your servers that's about as good as it gets AFAIK.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[
Not sure - the more I read it seems it's most likely due to the fact that
the old servers started off with Exchange 5.5 and went through all the
service packs as they were released - I believe there were issues with item
counts that only got fixed with SP4.
My guess at this point is that as this n
I've just started moving mailboxes from one of our servers, figured I'd do
the largest malboxes first and I've noticed something with the first mailbox
moved that I didn't expect.
When I look at the pre/post move mailbox size and number of items there is a
discrepancy - the pre move size and numbe
Not a "plug-in" filter, but we use Xwall from www.dataenter.at - can run on
your Exchange box, but I use it as a perimeter relay.
IMHO it's cheap for all that it does, and it works perfectly from the six
months we've been using it.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Adm
Well, FWIW no compaints with Scanmail in three or so years. I think most
people would say trend and Sybari are the best so far as Exchange AV.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa E. Senyuz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 February 2003 10:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Antivir
I'd guess company policy, not sure if there any legal requirements for
certain types of business to do this - I can't imagine anyone would want to
do it for "the hell of it", would they?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax:
n the they run setup and it all goes
exactly as planned, but there's so much bad press on Google groups that I'm
wary of installing it - any thoughts?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mai
I'm misunderstanding it - didn't know you could do that!
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 19
specific
files/folders is to set a backup job that includes all the files/folders
that you do want... you add a new folder for some reason, forget to add it
to the backup...
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[
I know your email says you've deleted the Calendar, but have you tried
deleting it by logging on using an IMAP client, and then using Outlook with
the /ResetFolders option?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[
Thanks Heiko - pretty sure that's not the case, but I'll check with our SQL
chap who's the only one likely to have been playing with that..
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
are there some
exchange files that I really want to be backing up that aren't backed up by
an online exchange backup?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mai
No, what you said made sense - I guess I'm not that clear on what doing that
way does different to doing it on the Public IS "instances" settings,
assuming that all the existing public folders are only located on one
server.
If that's the way to do it then fair enough, it just seemed it will take
as to
do their things and then make the changes to the home server.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, February 17, 2003 11:21 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion
section of Exchange Admin and recurse it, or if it's better
to do it using the Public Store properties on the new server?
The aim is to rehome the existing folders, and have all new folders
automagically be created on the new server.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd
Does anyone know of an Exchange 5.5 message tracking FAQ?
I'd like a short rundown on what I should be able to monitor when I don't
have a specific message ID to track.
When I have a message ID I can use "advanced" and track the flow of the
message on each server, however if I don't have a specif
I asked a couple of days ago on the official stance on which is "best"
between Scanmail for Exchange 3.52 and 3.8 - this is the reply my vendor
came back with (Trend don't provide direct support in the UK any more).
I've read the readme's, and the comparison document on the Trend website and
it's
iscussions
Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc]
The IMS requires the store.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul
utting down the Information
Store service accomplish the same thing? (Unless the services you are
running depend on the IS?)
Thanks,
Jim
-Original Message-----
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:14 AM
Posted To: Exchange Technic
Subject: EventID 1188
From: Paul Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.exchange.admin
Gt the following on my server (located in England):
Event Type: Error
Event Source: MSExchangeIS
Event Category: General
Event ID: 1188
Date: 14/02/200
.
Any ideas, or can it just not be done?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/e
m scratch with these new boxes.
Oh, and I'm talking crap, I do have a v5 client CAB files, I haven't
installed it (still don't know if I should or not!), but I've extracted the
exchng32.exe and it's version is 5.0.1457.3.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administ
Thanks Paul - do you know if that's downloadable (legitimately)? I remember
looking for it a while back and I just couldn't find it anywhere.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
;ve also just mailed Trend to get their take on Scanmail mapi/avapi vs.
Scanmail ESE - I believe there are still potential Microsoft support issues
with ESE scanners?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
'm wondering if
it would be better to install it prior to installing Exchange?
Presumably Outlook is the only Windows 2000 Mapi client as Windows 2000
doesn't come with the old slim line Exchange Client AFAIK?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635
y software
will be Trend Scanmail and a Rightfax connector on one of the boxes.
Right now I think I'm ready to stick the Exchange CD in and get going, but I
guess better safe than sorry - can anyone think of anything obvious that
I've forgotten?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Adm
y software
will be Trend Scanmail and a Rightfax connector on one of the boxes.
Right now I think I'm ready to stick the Exchange CD in and get going, but I
guess better safe than sorry - can anyone think of anything obvious that
I've forgotten?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Adm
Don't have one (a Client directory). The CD is a Nov 98 MS Select Server
CD.
rgds
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sen
I'd rather not put Outlook on a server, however I can't find the 32-bit
Exchange Client for NT anywhere, Technet has plenty of updates but not the
base installation.
Can anyone provide a link, or a means of getting the file?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Adminis
I know this doesn't attempt to answer your question but on every occasion
I've dealt with them Trend's support have been very quick and almost always
spot on with their suggestions - I'd definately email them with the relevent
info and a description of the problem.
rgds
Paul
-Original Messag
97 matches
Mail list logo