FYI for those of you running Outlook XP...
Since I'm working on a migration from Sendmail to Exchange I have been
testing the various functions that I have been selling to management and the
likes.
There is an extreme difference in the way XP Recovers Deleted Items. It
used to be in O2K that
If they want free why not just use ntbackup?
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
What does this button do? - Famous
So you 'must' say it, or you 'have' to say it? Which is it Don!?
Regards,
Sean Martin, MCSE
Network Administrator
Ribelin Lowell Company
Insurance Brokers, Inc.
3111 C Street, Suite 300
Anchorage, Alaska 99503
Ph: (907) 561-1250
Fax: (907) 561-4315
Cell: (907) 229-0885
Email: [EMAIL
I knew I repeated myself somewhere... ;o)
-Original Message-
From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle bin
So you 'must' say it, or you 'have' to say it?
I hate ArcServe. We had to do a reinstall on one of our servers and it
would not accept the key. Went through some iterations with Tech Support
and they assured us all was well. It wasn't. The product stopped
functioning due to a licensing error. It is working now, but I am holding
my breath
Yes, you will use a forwarder to reslove all external DNS names.
Another suggestion would be using a sub-domain as your internal DNS tree
like corp.ghtravel.com.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Smallwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday,
I'm testing it right now.
William
-Original Message-
From: Rick Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Retrospect Exchange Agent
Is anyone using the Retrospect Exchange backup agent? I have a customer that
is
Public folders definitely fits what you want to accomplish there. You
can simply use permissions to give only smaller pilot group the tastes
of what you have set up. Make sure that you take the top-folder create
permission off of the default setting, which allows everyone to create.
Also,
Title: RE: Strange occurrance
Did you run any utilities lately?
Eugene Pesochin
Systems Manager
ClubMom, Inc.
200 Madison Ave. 6th Fl
New York, New York 10016
tel 646.435.6565
fax 646.435.6600
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.clubmom.com
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Ambrose
Title: Firewall Configuration
Many
firewalls have 3 NICs. Often the 3rd NIC is referred to as the DMZ and it is
protected by the firewall too. The inside NIC is often referred to as the
trusted interface.
Do you
have users outside the firewall trying to access Exchange? If so, it is
Everything else is fine but this one were
trying for 4 days, and it's not the first time.
Eugene Pesochin
Systems Manager
ClubMom, Inc.
200 Madison Ave. 6th Fl
New York, New York 10016
tel
646.435.6565
fax
646.435.6600
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.clubmom.com
-Original
Don,
Um, that is the same article I sent, but thanks! Now I have it in my sent
item view and inbox!!
I did read it, perhaps I didn't explain my point well. Hard deleted items
do not go to the deleted items folder, which in fact is the ONLY folder by
default that is covered by deleted item
Aaa... My bad. I'm having a b!tch of a time with them right now
running on Outlook XP.
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Smallwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle
If there is enough space I would leave it
to optimizer.
Eugene Pesochin
Systems Manager
ClubMom, Inc.
200 Madison Ave. 6th Fl
New York, New York
10016
tel
646.435.6565
fax
646.435.6600
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.clubmom.com
-Original Message-
From: Micciche Robert
Hey, now I'm confused. I read the articles on DAO and I got the impression
that Hard deleted items still go into the deleted items recovery folder.
Did I misunderstand?
Murray
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Smallwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:02 PM
The difficulty comes with tying in the script to the creation of the
mailbox. Ignoring the possibility of creating an add-on in Exchange Admin,
either you have to redesign the mailbox creation process and use a
script/program to do it or you have to come up with a backend process that
assigns
Yes you did. Hard deleted items bypass the deleted items folder.
-Original Message-
From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle bin
Hey, now I'm confused.
I have Outlook XP with the DumpsterAlwaysOn entry enabled and I am able to
recover deleted items from any folder.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Retrieval of deleted item
I wish I could say the same. I've got it working on the Deleted Items
folder, but nothing else. I have the reg hack in place and still no joy.
Getting irritated now!
-Original Message-
From: Andy Cottrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:07 AM
To:
Title: RE: admin training - Exchange 5.5
Most people trying to get training for Exchange 2000 not for 5.5 and that's why it is the problem to find.
Eugene Pesochin
Systems Manager
ClubMom, Inc.
200 Madison Ave. 6th Fl
New York, New York 10016
tel 646.435.6565
fax 646.435.6600
[EMAIL
nothing discourages spammers
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
The hardness of the butter is inversely
No, that just receives mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
All generalizations are
Aw shucks William, don't go to all that trouble just for me. ;-) BTW
they're running NT 4 SP6a w/ Exchange Server 5.5 SP4. What are you testing
on?
Rick Collins
RCNetwork Management
http://www.rcnetman.com
561-336-0059
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL
Thank you to Andrew and Derek!
Share point looks good but may be overkill I will have to give it a try.
The use of Public Folders looks the easiest but with no real interface
(not without creating it anyway).
Thanks guys, you confirmed my suspicions and I know what I need to do
now.
Daniel
As long as new users are added to existing DLs once a week through a backend
process the company will not have nearly as many users missing mass
distributions. I just did an export and there are 350 mailboxes that are
not members of any DL. This tool will be of great benefit.
Thanks,
Rick
Is there a way to block a Distribution List from being available from the
outside?
I'm running NT4.0 Server SP6a, Exchange 5.5 SP4
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
You can remove the smtp address from it's properties. That way out side
senders will not be able to send to it.
-Original Message-
From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Internal Distribution Lists
It will probably explode again 30 days from last licensing dance. IMHO
licensing was the worst aspect of CAI products. Make that 2nd worst, after
tech support.
I became a BackupExec convert.
- Bob Peitzke
-Original Message-
From: Karen Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
Yes
Set delivery restrictions on the DL (accept messages from)
Ricki
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Oktober 2001 20:29
An: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Betreff: Internal Distribution Lists
Is there a way to block a
You hate ARCServe? Can't understand why. Don't you like being pummeled by
a brain-dead licensing and registration process that's just an extra added
bit of torture?
What the heck, after all, getting your licensing in order is simply a matter
of making sure you have your 8-digit CA customer ID
Hey you are in Houston. Call up Compaq, they have lots of exchange 5.5
experts with real exchange teaching experience. After HP takes over, many of
them would love to have on their resume they provide education for your
organizations.
Generally, I do not assist law firms but this is my one
ah yes, the happy days of Cheyenne and Novell.
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
Pinky, are you pondering what
Yes? Some of us are still stuck in those days.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
ah yes, the happy days of Cheyenne and Novell.
-Michèle
Immigration
Hi
everyone,
I am just wondering
if anyone has used Arcserve 2000 Exchange Backup Agent for their daily backup
schedule? I am thinking about implementing it with our Exchange 5.5 SP4
server and want to know if there are any problems this agent may give
me.
My biggest concern
is does it
Trying it on Exchange2000. Haven't run it yet.
I got their spam a few days ago.
William
-Original Message-
From: Rick Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Retrospect Exchange Agent
Aw shucks William,
This was discussed not long ago.
Can't say for sure, but not how I would implement control.
If I were to write a virus, I would put some sort of error checking to
prevent the thing from being detected. Go abouts preventing viruses by
implementing a little more trustworthy means. Just a hint...
Do any of you know if this deleted items recovery works in an Exchange 5.0
Client? (as opposed to Outlook 97,98,2K,XP)...
Anyone tested this? I've got a couple of exec's who are hell bent on not
upgrading their 5.0 clients. They are killing me.
Heidi
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely
Thanks... will give it a try... the only other thing I can think of is to
delete the user and re-create... or rebuild the BO2K from scratch... which I
don't want to do! Too many tweaks done!
Thanks again
Shauna
- Original Message -
From: Robin Lawrie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange
Is SP4 cumulative? Or do I need to apply any other services packs or fixes
to a new installation of Exchange 5.5?
Thanks,
Dan Munley
Keyence Corporation of America
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Bruce,
the 2
NIC configuration I am aware of, but the 3rd nic set up as a "DMZ", how does
that work? How, if at all, does it fuction with the firewall,
NAT
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
yes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Is SP4 cumulative?
Is SP4 cumulative? Or do I need to apply any other services packs or fixes
to a new installation of Exchange 5.5?
Um...I'm not totally sure but the last time I did a send all (all my
contacts in the TO field) everyone with a valid address got the message
and the email addresses that were misspelled or outdated generated the
some or all of your recipients type message with a list of the
addresses and reasons
Title: RE: EXCHANGE 2000
John is absolutely right, whatever you do, do it from To-Do List, do not go where you usually go to add users, printers even share a folder. Do everything from To-Do List.
Eugene Pesochin
Systems Manager
ClubMom, Inc.
200 Madison Ave. 6th Fl
New York, New York 10016
NT Backup baby! I've had nothing but trouble with that POS agent of
theirs...
-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:24 PM
To: 'Don Ely '
Subject: RE: Arcserve 2000 Exchange Backup Agent
Good luck indeed. I'm using
Entropy?
Novell's greatest downside... It can't run Exchange.
Hey... like my new mug?
http://www.cafepress.com/cp/store/productdetail.aspx?prodno=998356zoom=yes
**CONTENT ADVISORY FOR HTE LANGUAGE SENSITIVE**
-Original Message-
From: Charles Whitby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
It's a sporadic problem.
I just send 2 (two) reply's and one
went through and another stuck in queue as host unreachable.
Eugene Pesochin
Systems Manager
ClubMom, Inc.
200 Madison Ave. 6th Fl
New York, New York
10016
tel
646.435.6565
fax
646.435.6600
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a 3
NIC configuration, you can often set up NAT on the DMZ port, but normally, the
DMZ is used for public servers - thus they need public IP addresses anyway - so
why use NAT there. You do get to specify rules which allow traffic to/from the
DMZ port just like you would for the
Dan,
We are using the 2000 agent for exchange and it does have to be baby-sat.
It will work about 75% of the time. Usually the error we get is the
Backup agent RPC craps out. The other problem I've had is that everytime
you install a patch to either server, I have to re-establish the dbagent
This really has me stumped. I am finishing up a migration from one server
to another. Current situation: 2 back-end, win2k sp2, e2k sp1 servers.
One of the servers is a Compaq Proliant 3000 - this is the original
server. The other server is a Compaq CL380 two-node active/passive
cluster -
And this is what can happen when you run eseutil indiscriminately:
http://www.cafepress.com/cp/store/productdetail.aspx?prodno=998358zoom=yes
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Go with Dell, HP, or IBM , 3-18 gig disk or 4-9 gig Raid. P3/866 with 1
meg. More memory is better. Four disks give smoother transitions if one
fails. It will cost about 5K which includes three years of service.
Compaq cost to much (about $1,200 more), limits your ability to use third
party
I don't think anyone has replied to this one yet...
I have used them in a past small-biz environment and they worked quite well.
The Team-Folders add-in does a lot of quite kick arse things. However, you
are capable of doing it all on your own, this add-in is just MS doing the
developing for
IMO, The server size tool is more of a marketing gimmick because Compaq does
not even use it for providing services in their own regional offices. It is
also aimed at large multisite organizations. I am still looking for the
sizing information for offices with less then 200 user.
ellery
Isn't it better to have one container setup as a mirror for OS drive core
EXCHANGE installation and another RAID 5 container setup for logs, store,
etc.
I thought I read a tip here from someone noting not to RAID 5 the whole
shaabang because the pagefile changes so much that it costs you more
For performance and disaster recovery, without going into detail, the most
important installation aspect in my mind is to maintain the logs and
databases on separate spindles.
William
-Original Message-
From: Ratini Heidi - IL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001
Yes, it is better but not needed and provides no significant benefit in this
situation.
ellery
-Original Message-
From: Ratini Heidi - IL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 3:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Server sizing
Isn't it better to have
I bet name resolution has something to do with it. How's your GC
placed? Have they had the updated information on the new server? Make
sure that you clear all the cached DNS from the troubled client. And
all other relevent DDNS records pertaining to the new server.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT W2K) +
We easily run 150 users per Exchange server with on Dell 2300
(P400/256MB/HW-RAID5) with average utilization below 20%, meaning that you
can run 30 users on darn near anything that is considered a low-level
server. Just check the list FAQ for suggestions on disk allocation and
virus software.
William I understand your point and agree - to a point.
In a small organization 30 people - who do daily backups (and everyone
should do daily backups). The chances of the database HD getting corrupted,
realizing that is the only issue, then restoring it - is very slim in a
small shop or even in
For a small business, those separate spindles can even be separate, single
IDE drives.
William
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 2:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Server sizing
William I understand your point
Title: RE: Simple Outlook Question
You
obviously aren't smart enough to know about it or to smart to need it..
-Original Message-From: David N. Precht
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001
10:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Simple
Has anyone played with the newer motherboards that support onboard IDE raid?
I was looking at one a week or two back which supported 4 IDE channels. It
was around $AU300, so its probably around $US100 stateside?
A nice solution for a small office might be 4 IDE drives (one per channel)
forming 2
Sure ... have built several white-box server systems that are now in a few
small offices, utilizing promise ide raid technology underneath w2k-s
exchange ... nary a problem (but haven't turned off backup schemes at this
stage :)
Tried abit (highpoint ide raid) msi (promise ide raid)
This may or may not work for you, but this is what I have found...and
unfortunately I don't know the detailed mechanics of it to explain what
must or must not be enabled to get the same results...
When composing a new message I enter the fist few letters of a
recipients (already in global
I thought about that, but it is actually his personal information. He kept
his personal information, like phone numbers of daughters teachers, etc.
He really wants that information. He had gotten rid of the company stuff
before he left. Not sure why he didn't have them transfer it to a pst
before
Thank you so much! I'll get it and give it a try.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
101 - 166 of 166 matches
Mail list logo