Hello,
I have a particullar problem due to the historie in our compagny.
All the people in our compagny speak eitehr dutch or french, so in the
beginning of Exchange and Outlook ( 5 years ago), all the people got a
mailbox in dutch or french version. A few years later they changed the
policy
Title: Messages stuck in Pending
We had our exchange server blow a HDD last week and had all sorts of problems getting it back on line, well that's now history and things seem to be working very well once again. One thing we have is several messages stuck in the inbound meessages awaiting
We use Exchange 5.5 sp4 on SBS 4.5. Clients outlook
2000.
We are having problems sending mail to some domains.
The messages that we can not send are bounced immediately.
This leads me to suspect there is an incorrect setting in
exchange or a DNS issue on our site.
Has anyone
I've had a query come in that I wanted to check before I get back to the
guy. Does anyone know if there's a maximum number of contacts that can be
stored in a users mailbox? Mailbox residing on EX55, client OL2K.
Any help appreciated, as always
Tim
I find Trinitron is worth an extra 2 in size
IIRC, the inbound messages awaiting delivery area corresponds to the
MTS-IN folder, so you'll probably have to look at using the mdbvue
utility.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Craig Sterley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 19 December 2001 10:59
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
You could try using the restest.exe file (on the Exchange CD in the
support directory I think), which uses the same process that the IMS
uses to resolve hostnames.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Paul Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 19 December 2001 11:34
Posted To: Sunbelt
Assuming you're not using a PST, then I don't think there is a limit, as
it's the same theory on how much mail a user can store. It would more
than likely be a practical limit.
If you are using a PST, then there's a limit of 16k items per folder as
standard, 64k if you upgrade to large tables.
First thing I would recommend is to re-do your certificate so that it is
correct. You can't fix the last warning about not being issued by a trusted
company, because Verisign or another CA didn't issue it, but you can correct
the first part, although you can add your site to the list of trusted
Hi folks,
How can I automatically change my exchange server name on Outlook client PC?
Exchange 5.5 upgrading to 2000 and Outlook 2000.
Many thanks
Frank
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
whats
the error message you are receiving?
Brian
-Original Message-From: Paul Williams
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday,
December 19, 2001 6:34 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: NDR
We use Exchange 5.5 sp4 on SBS
4.5. Clients outlook 2000.
We are
Title: Message
Paul
the most of Cases for Troubleshotting problems of Outbound mails is by DNS
problems.
Exchange when send external email check DNS and search MX of remote
Domain then connect to MX by port 25 to remote Domain.
I
think is a problem with ISP.
test
youtelnet port 25 to
Hello? Hello? Is there anyone there??? You asked this the other
weekdidn't you like any of the answers?? :-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 19 December 2001 13:28
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Change Exchange
Can anyone point me in the direction of fully understanding Client
Permission Roles when it comes to Forms. Default Accounts when it comes to
the Organizational Forms Folder is set to Author. Do normal users need it
set like this so they can work with the forms, or should it be changed.
Chris
Exist tool called Profgen.exe y Newprof.exe
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 11:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Change Exchange Server Name on Clients
Hello? Hello? Is there anyone there??? You asked
And you need to remap your keyboard. It would appear that your S in MS
has been mapped to the $. I must say that's a pretty weird mapping.
D
Sacrifice: Your role may be thankless, but if you're willing to give it
your all, you just might bring success to those who outlast you. - -
Is there a way of blocking an entire domain from connecting to IMC?
Michael Duebner
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Sure is.. What version of Exchange you gotz? Any firewall in the middle?
Firewalls are just swinging when it comes blocking.
--
Dr. Milton R. Dogg
Of the Dogg Foundation
-Original Message-
From: Duebner, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:56
Running 5.5 here I was hoping to do it in exchange, rather thank in the
Firewall. Only one place to look then. I turned on some logging and found
the domain that its coming from, but not even the user that is sending it to
us. Its a virus that comes over every 2 to 3 minutes.
Thanks for
Tom is very much right about this being an up hill battle.
Configuration | Connections | SMTP connector | Connections | Advanced |
add one and pick reject.
--
Dr. Milton R. Dogg
Of the Dogg Foundation
-Original Message-
From: Duebner, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Just woke up and read all your suggestions. Thanks all not sure how I missed
them in the first place. I'll try them out.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 December 2001 14:18
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Change Exchange Server
I had a similar problem. Rather than using message filtering to trash mail from the
domain, I found the IP address of the offending mail servers and rejected connections.
You could do this at the firewall as well. To reject connections in the IMC...
Go to the Connections tab
Click on
This is
the error message that I recieve.
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended
recipients.Subject:
test from onpSent: 19/12/2001
15:41
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 19/12/2001 15:41
The recipient name is not recognized
The
Title: Message
1
definition down. I would rephrase my question. I understand why it wasn't
detected. I don't understands why it was quietly sitting for 10 days, but as
soon as we change profile it become active again?
Leon Raskin Sr. LAN Analyst Peoples Energy Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ben, thanks for your reply. I have re-done my certificate 5 or 6 times
now and I keep getting the same problems. I have tried making the CA
Name, Organization, and CA Description all the same as the site name
and it does not correct my problem. Maybe I am misunderstanding what is
being used as
If your users are coming in from the Internet are you using the fully
qualified domain name (exchange.mycompany.com owa.mycompany.com
whatever.mycompany.com ...) as the common name?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Paul Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001
Title: Message
If Im
reading it correctly, the domain was found but that username doesnt exist.
-Original Message-From: Kevan Dickinson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,
December 19, 2001 10:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: NDR
I may have come up with a solution to this. I have been experiencing the
same problem sending to other Exchange servers. Another problem I hav
seen is Protocol Error NDR's that contain an error similar to Polite
people say HELO first.
These errors are usually when sending to non-Exchange
That's fine, but I fail to see how a whitepaper on Multiple Sclerosis will
assist in this case.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restoring the private edb
And you need to
Title: Message
I am using ssl and
owa to access my exchange 2kbox remotely. It is extremely slow
logging in, once logged in the systems run quite fast. I then tried to
access the exchange box onsite using owa and it is still very slow. Any
thoughts or ideas?
Thanks,
Jonathan
List Charter
The
receiving mail server accepts the connection, but is unable to find a mailbox by
that name. bursar.secretary does not exist. The domain pmb.ox.ac.uk
is correct, though.
William
-Original Message-From: Kevan Dickinson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday,
December 19,
The website, from what I remember. I'm not in front of my server at the
moment, so I can't give you exact details how I set mine up, but I think
that the site you would put in is the http://servername/exchange site. In
terms of saving the cert, I don't know what to tell you. With the version
of
Title: Message
Yeah... it's resolving the name and contacting the server... but the
recipient address is not found on the remote mail server. Check the
recipient name.
-Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 19,
2001 11:24
Title: Message
It's the SSL overhead. It takes a
while.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems
Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan K
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001
11:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
#@$#*$(*@#*@($*%#@#
Always a smart a$$ in the crowd. :P
D
Success usually comes to those who are too busy to be looking for it.
-Henry David Thoreau
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 8:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange
I got his in my event logany ideas
Event Type: Error
Event Source: MSExchangeIS Private
Event Category: Transport Sending
Event ID: 2078
Date: 12/19/2001
Time: 11:46:29 AM
User: N/A
Computer: JAG_EXCHANGE2
Description:
Unable to submit, send,
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=2078source=
- Original Message -
From: Brian Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 12:07
Subject: Unable to submit, send, or transfer out a message. Check PR_RESPO
NSIBILITY. -
Title: Message
That's
what it looks like, but there are other email addresses at the same domain that
I know are correct and I am still getting an NDR about 5 seconds after
sending.
Kevan
-Original Message-From: Preston Jeffares
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 19 December
Title: Message
Then
their might be a problem at the recipient server not being able to query its
directory.
You
could telnet and try the VRFY command.
-Original Message-From: Kevan Dickinson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday,
December 19, 2001 9:31 AMTo: MS-Exchange
Title: Message
I havealot
Outlook 2000 SP2 clients connecting to an Exchange 5.5
server.
A few of these pc's
are pegging the CPU at 100% when you force a synchronization with the ost
file.
This also happens
whenever the client itself syncs up with the OST file..
anyone have any
ideas?
Title: Message
Aunty
Virus?
William Lefkovics, MCSE,
A+
---
Why just ride, when you can
fly?
http://www.airborne.net
---
Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Title: Message
could
be.. we are using NAV CE on all the clients...
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,
December 19, 2001 11:48 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch
Aunty Virus?
Title: Message
Can
you turn it off and test?
William Lefkovics, MCSE,
A+
---
Why just ride, when you can
fly?
http://www.airborne.net
---
Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Message
With the Exchange/Outlook add-on or no?
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems
Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001
12:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Title: Message
Yes,
with the Outloook\exchange option...
-Original Message-From: Benjamin Winzenz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19,
2001 11:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
100% CPU when Synch
With the
Exchange/Outlook add-on
Title: Message
If you have AV on your Exchange server as
well, turn that option off on the clients. Think of it this way. Your
Exchange AV program and your desktop AV (NAV-CE) are basically fighting to see
who gets to scan the e-mail. Whoever gets to it first locks it and the other
one
I'm not sure I buy this analysis...if a LOCAL virus-scanning utility is
scanning email hosted on an Exchange system that also has virus software
active, the ability of the client machine to request the next item for
synchronization is REDUCED by the local overhead of scanning the item. If
Title: Send as functionaliy for non-GAL user
We have a contracter who currently uses Outlook 2000 in corporate mode for his primary place of work, and retrieves his mail from us via POP3 using the same profile. He has a rule setup so that mail coming to [EMAIL PROTECTED] goes into a seperate
It doesn't reduce the overhead because the Exchange-based is trying to scan
every piece of mail before it gets to the client. In the case of a synch,
you are dumping massive amounts of e-mail to a local .ost file. If you have
both Exchange and client AV software fighting to get to the same
Title: Exchange 2k Password Reset Gone...
We just installed Exchange 2k and we are in the process of testing it. All of the sudden for no apparent reason certain user properties and functions disappeared. for example, we can not reset the password any more. the option has been disappeared. We
Title: Exchange 5.5 problem on 2000 server
Windows 2000 sp2
Exchange 5.5 sp4
Late last week I moved the last of my mail users from an older Alpha NT 4 box onto the new Windows 2000 server and removed the Alpha from the site. These last users are the only users that connect thru POP3 access,
Title: Exchange 5.5 problem on 2000 server
Any filter apps or AV apps?
- Original Message -
From:
Eric
Wittenberg
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 13:34
Subject: Exchange 5.5 problem on 2000
server
Windows 2000 sp2
Title: Message
Any AV
software on the server? odd settings on the Client end? Firewall? event log
entrees? this sounds like a very hard to track down error.
--
Dr. Milton R.
Dogg
Of the Dogg
Foundation
-Original Message-From: Eric Wittenberg
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Title: Message
Well,
we killed NAVCE on the client turned it off.. not running at
all..
and
its still doing it
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,
December 19, 2001 11:48 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject:
Title: Message
Perhaps then a corrupt OST file, or
corrupt e-mail profile. I would whack the OST file, then re-create it and
re-synch, and if the symptoms still exhibit, delete and re-create the mail
profile.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems
Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
Title: Message
I have set
logging to maximum and there are no errors.
Eric Wittenberg,
MCSE CNA ASE
Technical
Systems Analyst
3D Computer
Services Ltd.
Edmonton,
Alberta
(780)484 9788
Fax (780) 484 9811
e-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL
www.3dcomp.com
-Original
Good afternoon,
Exchange 5.5 Sp4 and Outlook 98
For some reason the distribution list called #1 became attached to several
CCed messages today? This caused 6 messages that we know of going to the
wrong users. The users say they didn't do anything special. Please advise.
Regards,
Mike
Title: RE: Distribution lists blues
When you look in their sent mail, I assume that the DL is showing up on the CC line. If thats the case, It'd seem that someone let the DL resolve, rather than the intended name.
Danny Cahoon
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Exchange 5.5 problem on 2000 server
McAfee
GroupShield for AV for Exchange, no filter apps. The old Alpha also had the
same version of Groupshield. File AV is done by Norton CE.
Eric Wittenberg,
MCSE CNA ASE
Technical
Systems Analyst
3D Computer Services
Ltd.
Edmonton,
I have been attempting in install OWA for Ex 5.5. I am getting the error
message that I don't have some of the neccessary NT hotfixes in order to
complete the installation. Just for the heck of it I tried to install the
NT fixes listed in the release notes, but of course they wouldn't install
on
It's more fun to use NTFSDOS Pro, rename user manager to the default logon
screensaver, boot the machine and wait a few minutes for user manager to
popup..
Fun stuff...
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:19 AM
To:
Title: Message
damn..
i killed nav... deleted the OST file..
opened
outlook. .whammo.. same thing.. 100% outlook .exe.
Now,
when I setup a profile for this user on another pc all is
fine.
I even
deleted his outlook profile.. same thing...
im
getting desperate.
-Original
Event Type: Warning
Event Source: MSExchangeMTA
Event Category: Interface
Event ID: 9318
Date: 12/19/2001
Time: 3:42:43 PM
User: N/A
Computer: JAG_EXCHANGE2
Description:
An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality
Table
Q261251, Q170056
--
Dr. Milton R. Dogg
Of the Dogg Foundation
-Original Message-
From: Brian Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 12:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: An RPC communications error occurred...PLEASE HELP
Event Type:
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=9318source=
--
Dr. Milton R. Dogg
Of the Dogg Foundation
-Original Message-
From: Brian Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 12:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: An RPC communications error
Title: Message
damn.. i
killed nav... deleted the OST file..
opened
outlook. .whammo.. same thing.. 100% outlook .exe.
Now, when
I setup a profile for this user on another pc all is fine.
I even
deleted his outlook profile.. same thing...
im getting
desperate.
-Original
Title: Message
Internal originated e-mail is affected also. Only Outlook Express so
far. Groupshield for Exchange Server.
Eric Wittenberg, MCSE
CNA ASE
Technical
Systems Analyst
3D
Computer Services Ltd.
Edmonton,
Alberta
(780)484
9788 Fax (780) 484 9811
e-mail
[EMAIL
The server and client don't fight for the messages--the client tells the
server to send a message, the server sends it (whether the server first
scans it or not is irrelevant) and the client then scans it. The more CPU
cycles spent scanning by the client, the less cycles are available to
request
Check this link, This error is by problem networking. 1722 indicate RCP
problems, use RPCping for check conectivity
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=9318+source=MSExchangeMTA
-Original Message-
From: Brian Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001
Good afternoon to you all:
We just went through a very interesting evolution regarding our
Exchange server (NT4.0 SP6, Exchange 5.5 latest SP and patches). Our
firewall admin was seeing UDP packets, bound for various port numbers,
attempting to depart for the Internet. These packets were
Title: Message
Have you applied SR1 to Office?
See http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q249762
Hope it helps.
Bob Fronk, MCSE
President /Consultant
BTR Technologies, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: www.btrtech.com
I agree, running a somewhat smaller mail system here, but last March we
ended up with a corrupt Inf Store every time I tried to do anything with the
boss' mailbox. A few restores later, and my entire day Good Friday, I got
the Information Store up, took care of that one, very large mailbox,
Just remember that there is a hard limit for PST files, which is set at 2GB.
You hit that, the PST is toast. Can't open it any more.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Title: Microsoft Exchange Move Server Wizard
We are preparing to merge with another firm that is also using Exchange v5.5. We are all W2K SP2 with Exchange v5.5 SP4, and they are all NT6 SP6 with Exchange v5.5 SP4. Once we have joined NT domains we will need a tool to combine the two Exchange
Title: Microsoft Exchange Move Server Wizard
I
prefer exmerge.
William Lefkovics, MCSE,
A+
---
Why just ride, when you can
fly?
http://www.airborne.net
---
Rent this space:
Title: Employee Departures
What is your general policy for the time between a employee being let go and the removal of his mailbox? I just finished an audit of the size of the disk usage on my exchange server and noticed that there are at least 2GB of old users who have left the company.
Title: Message
30
days for the successor to go through the mailbox, then you blow it
away.
I'd
love to be able to do that. Hopefully our policy will end up like
that.
W
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,
December 19,
I'm not going to sit here and argue with you. I will admit that I don't
always present things in a matter which explains every nit-picking detail.
I do know that it was explained to me some time ago exactly why we do not
enable client-based Exchange AV here and while I can't remember every
Title: Message
Employee leaves.
Mailbox accessis granted to supervisor.
After
30 days mailbox is either:
1)
deleted
2)
balance archived to .pst
SMTP
alias is then added to 'ex-employee' mailbox list of aliases for stray
emails.
William Lefkovics, MCSE,
A+
I believe we're all free to counter bad advice. And I gave several
suggestions, here and offline. I seriously doubt that there is a single AV
vendor who makes client- and server-end AV products who says they shouldn't
be used simultaneously. Not allowing POP access doesn't prevent the user
Not allowing POP access doesn't prevent the user from configuring it
anyway
If it doesn't, then you're preventing it wrong ;)
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
---
Why just ride, when you can fly?
http://www.airborne.net
Title: Employee Departures
Typically when the supervisor is finished
reviewing it. However, we disable the account and that prevents new email from
coming in to fill the box.
-Original Message-
From: William Smith
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001
Title: Message
How large
should an admin set quotas for psts.
Many people like them real big not realizing the consequences for
storage. Thanks
Crossan W. Hays, Jr.
Border Health
Initiative
148 East 30th
Street Suite Up-South
National City, CA
91950
(619)791-2609
Fax:
Preventing and not allowing are different indeed. And I'll bet that your
site doesn't disable local virus scanning just because you block the POP
ports.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange
Title: Message
I like
this question because there really is no wrong answer.
William Lefkovics, MCSE,
A+
---
Why just ride, when you can
fly?
http://www.airborne.net
---
Rent
Title: Message
I bet
I could come up with something
--
Dr. Milton R.
Dogg
Of the Dogg
Foundation
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,
December 19, 2001 3:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: Employee
Title: Message
How do
you handle inbound residual email to that SMTP address?
William Lefkovics, MCSE,
A+
---
Why just ride, when you can
fly?
http://www.airborne.net
---
Rent
Michael,
So far no one has suggested this on the list so I think I will. Maybe
the install of outlook is corrupted (its probably a longshot). You might
want to try to uninstall Outlook/Office and the reinstall it.
Keith Nelson
Network Administrator
Orange County High School of the Arts
[EMAIL
Title: Message
Barkin' up the wrong tree, Mr Dogg.
Oh
look over there... is that a hydrant??
-Original Message-From: Milton R. Dogg
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001
3:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Employee
Departures
I bet
I could come
Block the POP ports, diable the POP protocol on the server, etc, etc, yes.
And we certainly do not disable local scanning so long as the user has
email, internet access, or a friggin' floppy drive for that matter.
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Title: Message
I
don't. They left. Why should their email still be
deliverable?
I
appreciate that this model would not work for a lot of companies - probably most
of them, in fact. The way we work with our customers though, it works well for
us.
-Original Message-From:
Title: Message
I was
just curious. We have some employees that get tonnes of email (there is a
new perfmon counter MSExchangeIMS_EmailMass).
You
don't even do the DL black hole thing?
William Lefkovics, MCSE,
A+
---
Why just ride,
Don't forget :
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q239938
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q247674
- Original Message -
From: Keith Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001
Title: Message
Oh,
and we get all the NDR's to an admin mailbox. Given the efficiency with
which you dispose of old mailboxes, I suspect you do not look at NDR's
perhaps
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001
Title: Message
Are you on Exchange ?
- Original Message -
From:
Lefkovics, William
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 18:16
Subject: RE: Employee Departures- a
question not exactly related
Can
you set quota for a pst?
Title: Message
So far
I havereceived 577 for the day. Total blocked files for the last 7 days
with my extension filtering is at 4,897 a total of about 1.9
gig.
--
Dr. Milton R.
Dogg
Of the Dogg
Foundation
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Message
No, we
haven't gone public yet. We're thinking quarter3 2002.
-Original Message-From: David N. Precht
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:46
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Employee
Departures- a question not exactly related
Are
Title: Message
No,
he's on Computer Associates newly release email system.
:P
D
"It was when I found out I could make mistakes that I knew I
was on to something." -Ornette Coleman
-Original Message-From: David N. Precht
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December
Title: Message
I
don't look at them personally, but I make sure my helpdesk staff do on a regular
basis. :)
I'll
have to add that perfmon counter to my monitoring box. Thanks for the
tip.
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19
Title: Message
Yep! That's the one... It's backed up by
ArcWreckIT...
D
"UNIX is an operating system, OS/2 is half an operating system,
Windows is a shell, and DOS is a boot partition virus." -Peter H. Coffin
-Original Message-From: Milton R. Dogg
[mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Message
What is everybody's policy for setting up
disables/deletes of NT/Exchange accounts ?
- Original Message -
From:
Martin
Reilly
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 18:51
Subject: RE: Employee Departures
I
don't
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
