Title: Message
Hi,
Thickie questionwhere do you go to hide stuff
within the GAL?
Cheers ta, Ian.
- Original Message -
From:
William Lefkovics
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 9:46 PM
Subject: RE: Forward to external email
account
Title: Message
Advanced-Hide from Address Book checkbox
-Original Message-From: Ian Clark
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 14 May 2002 07:59To:
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Forward to external email
account
Hi,
Thickie questionwhere do you go to hide stuff
Title: Message
Advanced tab on the properties on the object,
usually.
There
is a little checkbox.
William
-Original Message-From: Ian Clark
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 11:59
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Forward to
external emai
Hi all,
Here is the background :
EXCH 5.5 (SP4) on NT4 Server (SP6a)
The entire IS has was restored from backups due to corruption. The restored
server has come back online with a number of distribution lists missing i.e.
not visible from the EXCH admin GUI. The missing distrubution lists st
What happens if you do a Directory export of the container for these DLs? Do
they show up? Are they in the GAL in Outlook? Raw Directory Mode?
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Neil Rozario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 May 2002 09:58
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Missing Dist
The String Value is actually 101e0390. Microsoft's KB is wrong.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Dawn R. Ashford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 May 2002 15:58
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: clear the "open other users folder" MRU in O2K
I'm trying to clear out the "Open other
Is it from all of the admin GUIs ?
Same result from a new install of the GUI ?
-Original Message-
From: Neil Rozario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 04:58
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Missing Distrubution List Address Objects
Hi all,
Here is the backg
I know what you mean but at least you have a login page for Exch 5.5 to
use but not for exch 2K..
Kelvin ngo
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 7:13 PM
Subject: RE: How to add the login page for Exch 2K to IIS 5 (index.htm)
A
I'm using a Dell PowerEdge 1650 server as webserver and trying to install
Outlook Web Access on it, but get this error when running the setup
program saying "the application did not initialize properly" and no option
except closing the dialog box and quitting the setup. The OS is Win2K but
Dell mo
Good checklist of what's good :
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/migrate/default.asp
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 23:23
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Server 2000 advantages?
Hi All,
Can someone help me, pls.
Title: Message
dont
CR to aol, yahoo, etc.
-Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, Peter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002
16:14 To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Forward to
external email account
Ok know this has been covered here in the
past but I can
Title: Message
Why
not?
Using
a CR generally helps prevent the dreaded mail loop.
-Original Message-From: Precht, David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 8:56
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forward to
external email account
dont
C
Are all the DLs missing or just some?
I am curious on what steps you took in the recover process.
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Missing Distrubution List Address Obje
Title: Copy of a mailbox
Copy
of a mailbox by PST is very simple.
-Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 15:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Copy of a
mailbox
This may sound like a dumb question to most of
you
Title: Message
Mailbox size limits, usually.
--
Michael Leone, Systems Administrator
Philadelphia Contributionship
210 S. 4th Street, Philadelphia, PA
19106
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
V: 215-627-1752 x1282
F: 215-627-5354
-Ori
Title: Message
Which
is why you want to use a CR or mail-enabled contact to
forward.
-Original Message-From: Leone, Michael
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002
9:02 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forward
to external email account
Mail
What
version of Exchange ?
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 14:22
To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Multiple
Servers
What is the best set up for
multiple servers in a single site?
Any pointers to
Title: Message
I
meant mailbox size limits at AOL, Yahoo, etc. Resulting in a bouncing mail
loop.
--
Michael Leone, Systems Administrator
Philadelphia Contributionship
210 S. 4th Street, Philadelphia, PA
19106
mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Title: Message
Are you sure?
Do I need it to have the same IP as the
old one???
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 5:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Moving ...
If the users are
connecting v
Title: Message
So did I.
Which
is why you want to use a CR or mail-enabled contact to
forward.
-Original Message-From: Leone, Michael
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002
9:42 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forward
to external email accoun
Title: Message
Its
like magic!
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002
9:42 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving
...
Are you
sure?
Do I need it to have
the same IP as the old one???
Title: Message
Yes
this does work. No you don't need the same IP. The only caution is
that you have to wait long enough for the Directory Service to update before the
client attempts to log on.
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday,
Title: Message
I recently did this and it worked like a
charm. All the clients were updated invisible to the user. I did
come across two problems. I also must add that I may have done something
wrong too so be aware of that as well. This was my first server move.
Some Outlook clien
Title: Message
So please allow me to sum up for my own
edification:
Do Ed Crowley's move method.
Take the original server offline, and the
clients' profiles will be updated by the new server automatically?
Is that accurate? The update must be
occurring before the original is remov
Title: Message
I
believe William said that both servers must be available when the client
attempts to log on.
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:16
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving
...
So
Title: Message
ERm if I am correct you want to keep the old server online for a
bit. The clients MAPI profiles currently point to that server. If my
memory serves me right, after their mailbox is moved they will initially
hit the old server... and it will redirect them to the new server
Title: Message
Yeah... I've done a couple of moves and it always works fine. I
occaisionally mess up and create a mailbox on the wrong server in the wrong site
and the clients always redirect. *sometimes* i've had to close and reopen
outlook to get the profile to switch... but thats about t
Here's step 8 of Ed's method that I've cut & pasted from the Swinc FAQ.
8. Leave the old server up for a while so MAPI clients connect to the
new server automatically. It's true! You don't have to do anything to
MAPI clients!
Does that make it any clearer for you?
Neil
-Original Message---
Title: Message
Well I will be dammed
I did a test by moving my own mailbox to
the new server. When I checked the profile setting on Outlook, sure enough, the
server had changed to the new one. I am amazed. Man I love learning new
things!! Thank you everyone
-Original Message---
Title: Message
I am not sure about OL but when I do this process,
I go to MSExchange,
Create the CR, then go to the MSExchange User's
Acct., Go to Delivery Option Tab, and Set the CR info here.
Hope this helps,
JRiley
- Original Message -
From:
Hotchkiss, Peter
To: MS-E
In Ed Crowley's paper, he mentions that a 30+ day
retention of deleted items is a great route to go.
Quick question: Do items in retention stay in the store,
thereby still counting against the max store size? TIA
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchang
They stay in the store, and so count towards the overall size of the
database, but they don't count towards the size of the individual
mailbox.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 14 May 2002 15:59
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conver
Yes. The downside to increasing the deleted item retention days is
more stuff in the store.
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 7:59
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Retention
Times
In Ed Crowley's paper
I've got one user that is showing up in the global
address list as first last name. Everyone else is shows up as last,
first name. I've looked in the mailbox properties till I'm blue in the
face. I can't seem to find the difference between the user and everyone
else. This is a big proble
Title: Message
When
you look at the mailbox properties, what does the field for "Display Name" have
in it?
-Original Message-From: Matt Moore
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 11:02
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: display
names
I've got one
In Canada, you may want to try soltrus.com (formerly CIBC). They have been
very helpful for me in the past.
Andrew.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 4:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA and Verisign certi
Hi,
Is there anyone out there that is using mail essentials or mail security from GFi as
their only antivirus solution for exchange? Mail security seems to have everything I
need and then some. Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Jonathan
*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
This email and any files transmi
Title: Message
If you
have a TechNet subscription, check the online seminars CDs - there is a TON of
information on upgrading/migrating to Exchange 2000.
-Original Message-From: Le Hong Phong
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 10:30
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin Is
I got mine from DirectNIC. $99
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA and Verisign certificate
In Canada, you may want to try soltrus.com (formerly CIBC). They have be
I finally migrated my Exchange server to a new server. Everything is
working (functional), but when authenticating through OWA or POP3 the user
must enter their username in the DOMAIN\username form for it to authenticate
successfully. How can change this so that the server will accept the
userna
The OWA uses the domain that the server is a member of. We use a single OWA
server for multiple sites, and those people who are in the same domain as
the OWA server, do not have to enter their name as DOMAINx\Username. For all
others, they need the fully qualified user name.
-Original Message
Good afternoon,
I am having a problem with Microsoft Exchange (5.5 - SP3) reporting
a different mailbox size than what Outlook is reporting. If I go to
properties on the user's mailbox, it reports a size of @ 133MEGS. If I go
through the list of the individual objects in the mailbox and
So even for POP3 access the full qualified logon name must be used? I had
thought that Exchange would default to the domain that it resides in. Is
there no way around this?
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 1:24 PM
To:
Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, we do not keep deleted items, i.e.,
the user cannot recover deleted items.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 1:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Incorrect Mailbox
View deleted items retention...
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Robison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: E
Our company is in the process of moving to a new building. They want this
done as usual with as little user down time as possible and without buying
any new equipment. We are scheduling the move of our exchange server. We
currently have our exchange 5.5 W2K server in building 1 connected to
intern
I have the same problem, and it's definitely not deleted Item retention. I
have never gotten a good answer as to why it happens.
We use PST files, and always have. To give an example I have one user who
has no emails in any of the folders of his server box, no calendar entries,
not tasks, no jou
Is his mail delivery point a pst?
Add the DumpsterAlwaysOn reg tweak to your Outlook client and look under
"Recover Deleted Items" under his inbox. I bet you'll find something there.
-Original Message-
From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 1:5
I bet you have it on, in the view to see mailbox size add the deleted
items column and see.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Robison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, Ma
What is the correct procedure to rename an Exchange 2000 server?
I am familiar with the procedure to rename an Exchange 5.5 server, which is NOT a
whole lotta fun. Is it similar with Exchange 2000?
I have a customer that needs to change the name of his Exchange 2000 server because
it's presen
If you're running XP you can report on individual folders within the
mailbox. Each one counts against the mailbox size. That includes Journal and
Calendar. We've had a number of people who don't archive mail have 30 or
more MB of attachments sitting in the Calendar. They'll sit their till Andy
cha
Use SendMail...
Seriously, it's the way authentication is handled. IIRC, the username has
to be in the form Domain\Username\MailboxAlias.
-Original Message-
From: Nickolaos Fotopoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: R
??? Does the NetBIOS name or the DNS name need to be changed? Would it not
be easier to add an MX record with the new name (in addition to the current
name) and add the appropriate DNS name for Inbound Routing?
-Original Message-
From: Clack, William J (Bill) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Title: Message
Which can and will crash your Exchange
server if you don't notice it in time.
-Original Message-
From: Leone, Michael
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 7:42
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Forward to external
email account
Title: Message
Have
you seen what a CR does to an e-mail when it passes through it? The e-mail
enters you system and is forwarded to the CR SMTP address. The original senders
address is sent as the return path in the mail. So if the mail were to bounce
because of limits, it would attempt to
The change in the mx record is going to take 24-48 hours to propogate around the
internet.
I would grab an old workstation and make it a relay on the old side. Then move the
exchange server to the other side and configure it with the new IP addressing scheme.
Point the relay to the new IP
Title: Message
Thanks Sherry!
I've looked at it so many times I looked right
pased it. ;4}
Matt
- Original Message -
From:
Abercrombie,
Sherry
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:17 AM
Subject: RE: display names
When
you look at the
When you migrated the Exchange server, did you rename it? Check out Q244850
for some issues. I wonder if this could be related.
-Original Message-
From: Nickolaos Fotopoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 1:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: username form
Title: Message
Your
welcome. I can't tell you how many times I've created a new mailbox, gone
back to make changes on the properties and can't find the stupid thing, then
finally find it listed by First Last Name in precisely correct alphabetical
ordergeeze, you'd think there was a nut
We are in the process of migrating our exchange 5.5 users to exchange
2000. We are successful in adding ADC and all other stuff so they are now
both in the exchange 5.5 site. We moved a couple of mailboxes to the
exchange 2000 server and so far everything is working except on some
distribution l
His mail delivery point is a PST. I have installed the DumpsterAlwaysOn
tweak and opened several mailboxes. I have removed the items in the Deleted
Item Retention in the Sent Items, Outbox, Inbox, and deleted Items folders.
This has gotten rid of the Deleted Item Retention number, but the mailbox
Ok so I got my Exchange 5.5 server migrated to 2000 now to
fine tune it.
In 5.5 they had a perfwiz tool to optimize/configure your
server, were can I get one of these for exch2k?
I have read http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/TechNet/prodtechnol/exchange/
DL's need to remain on both. E2K users must use the AD to lookup address
book information and 5.5. users need to have the entry in the 5.5 directory.
They don't share a common directory.
And more details on the users trying to send or the population of the DL
would be helpful.
-Original Mess
I was told that in the GAL, users can no longer see the
recipients in 2 DLs (not all of them). I checked in my Outlook, and I can not
either. The DLs still work, and I can see all recipients in the Admin. I am
going to recreate them and see if that is a fix. I am not sure what could cause
t
We are running Exchange 5.5 SP 3, users have Outlook 2000 from Small
Business Edition no patches. Both users are remote accessing email via VPN.
Both users have a .pst. One user has a second email account (POP3) he also
accesses.
The other day we had a problem and the Internet Mail Connector s
NM. I just saw that all the members are
hidden from the address book.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:27
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Disappearring DL list
I was told that in the GAL, users
can
Title: Message
Are
the members of the DL hidden from the GAL? That will cause this scenario.
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002
3:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
Disappearring DL list
I was to
Title: Message
Yeah that was it. Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:33
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Disappearring DL list
Are the members of the DL
hidden from the GAL? That will c
Title: Message
"because store was crashing."? Please clarify
this. Exchange 2000 will use the greater of available memory and whatever
memory it needs. This is by design. Through a process aclled dynamic
buffer allocation, exchange will surrender memory to other apps as
needed.
There
I need to change the NetBIOS name of the Exchange 2000 machine.
In Exchange 5.5 the process is quite difficult. It is described in Q155269 in detail.
Question is what is the process on a Exchange 2000 server to change the NetBIOS name.
Not concerned about the DNS and mx records at this time.
For so long as you have active users on both 5.5 and 2000, then the DL's
would need to reside on both. If you have a two way replication
agreement, this is likely happening.
But I am under the belief that the ADC (with E2K running) is a migration
tool and not a co-existence tool. The faster you
Sounds good to me.
I would want the new DNS propogated prior to the actual move, too. :o)
-Original Message-
From: Yurchuk, Michael W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 11:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Server Move
Our company is in the pro
Start looking at patching some of the things listed to latest rev
Are there any errors in event viewer to indicate problems with ID's etc...
Can you telnet to the Exchange server and send mail as them?
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
"Who's watching your network?"
www.
nope, it is using the same name, ips, and settings. The only difference
really is that the OS is 2000 instead of NT4.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 4:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: username format
Wh
Title: Message
In my
experience, a 30 day retention period will account for roughly 30-35% of actual
store content.
William
-Original Message-From: Ray Zorz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 8:18
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Retention
Sweet!
Good service as well?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA and Verisign certificate
I got mine from DirectNIC. $99
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL P
Assumptions:
When testing on another PC, you did not copy the user's PST across and use it.
When creating new profiles, you kept the user's existing PST.
If so, you need to eliminate the PST as the cause of this problem.
Either create a new empty PST or run SCANPST on the existing one.
Carl
--
The users both have Windows 98, no errors on the Exchange system. And I can
send email as them just fine from any system but theirs.
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 1:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail stuck
Title: Message
Yes,
I'm sure. I've done it many, many, many times. You will have to
manually change profiles for POP or IMAP users, but with MAPI the directory
query will redirect the user and update the username resolution in the
profile.
Try
it. Create a dummy mailbox on server1. Us
Title: Message
Guess
that would depend on volume and how much you're increasing it.
-Original Message-From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 1:56
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Retention
Times
In
my experience, a 30 d
Title: Message
Oh
absolutely. I'm just offering that as a rough
guideline.
If
your users have small mailbox quotas and do a good job of keeping their mailbox
empty in spite of decent volume flowing through it, the amount of items in
deleted item retention could be a much greater ratio.
In the absence of a real operating system can you confirm WINS or
LMHOSTS entries for the Exchange server on those clients?
-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 1:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail stuck in Out
Can you telnet from their PC to the Exchange box and send mail from Telnet?
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
"Who's watching your network?"
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax
The data furnished in connection with this document
That is how I would do it.
The name must be really bad before I'd take that kind of time. ;o)
So, what did you call it? C'mon...share...
-Original Message-
From: Clack, William J (Bill) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 1:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subjec
To answer a host of questions asked. WINS (I've checked it) is fine they
can receive email just not send it.
I cannot test the telnet because the users are in remote locations. Perhaps
tomorrow I can try that.
I've had them attempt to connect with no .pst attached and the same problem
exists s
Title: Message
LOL
Nice joke William...
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 4:10
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Retention Times
Oh absolutely. I'm
just offering that as a rough guidelin
Ya know, the last time this happened to me, I stopped and restarted the
anti-virus on the Exchange server and that cleared it up. Don't ask me why,
it just did.
-sp
-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 2:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange
So, they are relaying SMTP off your IMS. Any IMS restrictions
preventing that? Can they telnet to port 25 from wherever they are?
Have you turned up diagnostics logging on the IMS too see what's
happening?
-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tues
In any problem like this there cannot be too much detail about the details. It's what
you HAVEN'T told us that will lead to a solution. And most importantly, it's what
makes the working test machine different from the broken production machine that is
key.
Are both test and production client
I have done all of this. One point that I may not have emphasized is that
this was working fine and then suddenly not. My gut tells me there is
something with MAPI that is causing the problem. On one user he is using
the same connection, same setup, just a different machine and it works fine.
T
Anyone know, if the General Scanning option in Norton's for Exchange effect
performance allot? I'm not really sure if I should enable the Use
Bloodhound scanning or what? I currently have it on High, because I figured
"Hey better safe than sorry!" Any suggestions on this?
Nick
List Charter an
MAPI? I'm sorry, I thought they were having mail delivered to .pst
files.
Why not offline folders? (.ost)?
-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 2:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail stuck in Outbox
I have do
Norton usually suggest Med, but what will hog your performance is subject
blocking the more you have ,it will slow down the email coming into your
Exchange system because it will take longer to search for each subject...
-Original Message-
From: Nickolaos Fotopoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
I have seen two of these lately.
One was a corrupted user profile, but you've checked that.
The other was simply the delivery options (tools -> services -> delivery).
Some ancient Win95 fax application had added a MS-Mail based entry to the
top of the order, before the MSExchange transport optio
Title: Message
that's me
Matt
- Original Message -
From:
Abercrombie,
Sherry
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 1:06 PM
Subject: RE: display names
Your
welcome. I can't tell you how many times I've created a new mailbox,
gone back
For our W2K Exchange 5.5 OWA server is there any point in using two
network cards if the computer is going to be on the same subnet? Perhaps
just for IP filtering?? Thanks!
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
no. Far more trouble than its worth imho.
Cheers,
Marty
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:11 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Two NICs
>
>
>
>
> For our W2K Exchange 5.5 OWA server is there any point in u
Can you team them for better throughput? :o)
-Original Message-
From: Jan Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 7:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Two NICs
For our W2K Exchange 5.5 OWA server is there any point in using two
network cards if the co
yes, tried a reinstall - same problem
>From: "Precht, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Missing Distrubution List Address Objects
>Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 07:49:33 -0400
>
>Is it
not all - just a few.
as for the recovery process - i can't really say as it was not done by
myself.
>From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Missing Distrubution List A
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
