I ran performance optimizer yesterday evening and the highlights of the
process were its proposal to change # Information Store Buffers from 12068
to 32622 and # Directory Buffers from 100(sic) to 32622. Other numbers also
changed, some upwards some downwards. Deleting multiple items is now not
on
Have you applied the OWA patch Q301361 ?
-Original Message-
From: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 6:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OWA SSL problem
you wanna accept a mondo wordpad of screen shots?
Title: RE: DCs, Exchange and not recommemnded?
MS Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery White Paper for one. You will cry if the Exchange server goes down and it is your PDC and there are no BDC's. Even if it is your BDC, it is still a bad choice.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
It would be better just to build a new win2k base server in the new
domain and migrate.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:22 PM
To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Subject: moving exchange 5.5 server to new
If you look on page 107, "Defining Your Servers role" in " Microsoft Exchange Server
5.5 Administrator's Companion", Microsoft press, ISBN 0-7356-0646-3, it clearly states
that you should not run your Exchange Server on a PDC or BDC.
Joe Friess
-Original Message-
From: MS-Exchange Adm
Has anyone used the chgdisplay.vbs script that microsoft gives in Q277717 to change
the AD/Exchange 2k display name from Firstname Lastname to Lastname, Firstname?
I'm having a problem with OU's that have a space in them, my single word OU's
converted fine.
The article says that "OU must be enc
Like everything else however, I prefer my own real life experiences and
wisdom/opinions of people I trust rather than relying on a passage in a book
(not necessarily disagreeing with the statement mind you) - however, in very
small environments, I could easily see an Exchange Server running quite
Title: Message
thanks benjamin. i dont need any information
off the old server. it was a demo/test. do i need to reinstall the
ADC from the new server?
- Original Message -
From:
Benjamin Zachary
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:53
PM
OK. I changed the Calendar options "Publish" setting to 0 months, and
indeed, you now can not see what is on the users calendar that you are
trying to schedule an appointment with. But, what I'm trying to do is get
that calendar blocked out entirely, so it is impossible to even send the
person a
It can be achieved but I guess it depends how far you want to go and which
client you have. I'm not sure it's achievable using rules but certainly is
using macros or a COM Add-in.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 June 2002 14:47
To: MS-E
Get new management or employees. What an ignorant fscking request!!
Personally, I'd have told them "NO"...
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 9:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Appointments.
OK. I change
Do you care to elaborate on that?
Stuart K.
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 June 2002 15:59
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Circular
On what?
-Original Message-
From: Kahn, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 June 2002 15:22
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Circular logging?
Do you care to elaborate on that?
Stuart K.
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S
Title: RE: Appointments.
Class
isn't supported in all versions of Outlook but is certainly an option. IMHO, the
form option doesn't work.
-Original
Message-From: Nikki Peterson - ITCX
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 June 2002
15:17To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Appoi
I know it's a bad idea, but for some reason if we don't backup on the
weekends which we usually don't, some of our clients fill up 3-5 gigs of
hard disk space. So I had to turn it on in a few places. I don't manage
huge (over 250) user bases in exchange for most of our clients, so not
sure how imp
We all know it works .. That's not the question. The question is what
paper MCSE+I student is consulting them stating it is a good idea.
Especially since he/she is also getting less work out of it by only
installing one server and not two. You may really want to re-consider
your consultant as not
Didnt Isscan from the ilove you tool kit do this?
Nope never mind it does attachments, brain working slow this morning.
What did you want to accomplish with this ability?
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Origin
A mail box server will benefit for the ability to have a roll forward
recovery. Where you can restore from Back then roll the current logs
from the time of back up against the database. Thus loosing no data. A
gateway server that has no mailboxes on it, And is only really doing
routing or relaying
On your statement "It's a particularly bad idea on a server
which contains mailboxes"
Stuart K.
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 June 2002 16:08
Charlotte,
Check at www.slipstick.com. If you don't find anything, check back. You're
simply after a tool that can run through the IS mailboxes for a particular
sender or recipient, right? That should be quite easy to code. I'll give it
a crack if you can't find anything on slipstick
Kevin
I refer to my learned colleague, Mr Miller's missive.
-Original Message-
From: Kahn, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 June 2002 15:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Circular logging?
On your statement "It's a particularly bad idea on a server
which c
I suggest you try the question on the Outlook list at www.slipstick.com,
although Nikki seems to be outstanding on Outlook.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 7:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Appointments.
Get
That wasn't sarcasm from Don, now was it?
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 10:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Circular logging?
Yes, and file level AV S
That's just Martin standing behind you.
-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Two Issues
You know there are days I would think that people on this list just don't
get along
I was wondering what type of machine i would need
for OWA on Exchange 2000. i want to put owa on our dmz and have our
exchange server be internal to our network. we are going to have 2000
users but the most concurrent users through OWA at any given time will be max
400. any insights on th
In that case you wouldnt feel it.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Two Issues
That's just Martin standing behind you.
-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill
AB???
Rut Ro Shaggy.
j/k
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 9:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Two Issues
That's just Martin standing behind you.
-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [m
Me? Sarcastic? Never!!!
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Circular logging?
That wasn't sarcasm from Don, now was it?
-Original Message-
From: E
Title: Message
I
can't tell you that. It's classified.
-Original Message-From: Erik Sojka
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 17:41To:
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for More
Advice
And
who are you?
-Original Message-From:
Title: OWA SSL problem
I'm
trying a couple of things this morning. I'll let you know if I'm
successful.
SH
-Original Message-From: Brent Hudson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:57
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA SSL
problem
Guys
Hello -
I have an Exchange 5.5 environment currently, with one Exchange 5.5 server
on an NT 4.0 server, and another Exchange 5.5 server on a Windows 2000
Advanced Server. The domain is running in mixed mode with the Windows 2000
Advanced Server as the Domain Controller and the NT 4.0 server as a
Title: Message
As
long as "sandersons.com" is not a cover-up for "arthuranderson.com" you're
probably okay.
Sherry Abercrombie
Data Center Administration
Team Information
Technology "With sufficient
thrust, pigs fly just fine."
-Original Message-From: Les Bessant
[mai
Title: RE: OWA SSL problem
I have now. Thanks.
(Didn't fix the problem, but I probably prevented others.)
SH
-Original Message-
From: Joe Friess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA SSL problem
Have yo
Hello all!
The URL I posted 18 months ago is dead: Try this one instead:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/pr
odtech/mailexch/excrelay.asp
(probably needs to be unwrapped)
Cheers!
Dan
Please CC any replies to me
Title: Message
All,
I found a
registry entry that can be changed:
HKCU\Software\Office\9.0\Outlook\Preferences\FBPublishRange
= 12
--
Matt Lathrum
General Dynamics
Decision Systems
When cryptography is outlawed,
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir c
Why do we care?
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:48 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Relay
>
>
>
> Hello all!
>
> The URL I posted 18 months ago is dead: Try this one instead:
>
> h
Title: Message
I know its off
topic.. but im in an aguement today.
When you have a DMZ,
and a proxy server, shouldnt your proxy server have 2 nics, one internal and one
external??
shouldnt your LAT be
set to not have any external IP addresses in it?
just lookin for some
advice.
List Chart
I didn't get a response the first time. Thought I might try again...
I need to consolidate two separate email domains to a single domain. The
configuration is as follows:
Domain 1. Company.com
NT4.0 Domain
Exchange 5.5 SP4 (6 Servers in 6 sites)
1000 user
Title: Message
LT., I have top secret clearance. The government
sees to it that I know more than you……
-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002
3:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Looking for More
Advice
Title: Message
Funny,
you don't look like Kelly McGillis.
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26,
2002 1:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Looking for More Advice
LT., I have top
secret clearance.
Title: Message
I some how knew someone was going to say
that….
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Looking for More
Advice
Funny, you don't look
like Kelly McG
Yes a month has flown by already.
So on the topic of defragmentations, exchange does this nightly because it
is awesome. Got that part. Now if I have 2GB of free space after this
nightly process takes place, that is all white space that exchange uses
before the priv.edb would grow larger? Is this
Quite accurate.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Defrag
Yes a month has flown by already.
So on the topic of defragmentations, exchange does this nightly because it
is awesome
On target. Fire for effect.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Defrag
Yes a month has flown by already.
So on the topic of defragmentations, exchange does this nightly because it
Afternoon folks,
Someone mentioned there was a list of folks that concerned themselves with
Outlook programming. Can some who has a better memory than I please repost
it. I searched the archives but couldn't remember the subject line.
Thxs,
Mike Johnson, GWOTC,KIA,AAGG
Network Dude
Gelfand, Renn
www.slipstick.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook programming
Afternoon folks,
Someone mentioned there was a list of folks that concerned themselves with
Outl
http://www.cdolive.com/start.htm
The site is under re-construction... but here is a link to the old content. I think
this is what you want.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Title: RE: OWA SSL problem
Steve,
dummy me
may have missed something...
Your
certserv is the OWA box? 2K?
What name
did you give the cert for 'common name?'
It may be
nothing, but it should match the OWA box not the Exch box.
Also, is
the IIS box sitting in the DMZ? If so, you may nee
Title: RE: Outlook programming
Outlook Development Group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/outlook-dev/
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook programming
http://www
Right on the Money my man!!
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Defrag
Yes a month has flown by already.
So on the topic of defragmentations, exchange does this nightly because it
Title: RE: Outlook programming
Thats
the one, thanks to all that responded.
MJ
-Original Message-From: Nikki Peterson - ITCX
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, June 26,
2002 11:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Outlook programming
Outlook Development Gr
--
After logging onto OWA I am getting the error message 'HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server
Error'
--
I appear to be logging on to the server, because the left side of the OWA screen
shows my inbox, contacts, etc.
The large right window displays the error- HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error and
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q255402
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q275520
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q316349
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q256360
-Origin
Lovely response... How long did it take you to find all of those Davie Boy?
Jason,
You mentioned the IIS lockdown tool and you mention that nothing has
changed. When was the lockdown tool applied? Did you happen to lockdown
your ASP scripting capabilities as well. The lockdown tool is notori
Title: RE: OWA SSL problem
The
common name matches the OWA box. The OWA box is inside the
firewall.
After
rerunning URLScan everything is working from other subnets and from outside the
firewall. It's still not working from this subnet, however. I get the untrusted
certificate box, then a
The IIS lockdown tool was applied months and months ago. There were no problems up
until yesterday.
Thanks for the quick responses all.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA
No event log warnings or anything? Everything else is working as
advertised?
-Original Message-
From: Jason Juillerat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA problems
The IIS lockdown tool was applied months and m
Or IIS logs?
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA problems
No event log warnings or anything? Everything else is working as
advertised?
-Original Message-
From: Jason
I got 77 Gigs of white space can anyone beat that?
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Adm
There is nothing in the event logs or IIS logs at all. Everything else is working
properly.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA problems
No event log warnings or anything
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
I've run into a problem during two GW to Exchange migrations.
Both migrations were fairly small organizations. Coexistance was not an issue, so we
simply ran the GW migration tool. In both instances, things went fairly smooth using
the GW Migration tool, however, the tasks didn't seem to come
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
WTF???
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Cross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defrag
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to
Exchange. The message has been automatically forwarded t
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
Title: RE: Groupwise Migration and tasks
Lotus bloats strikes again!!!
Jim Zangara, MCSE+I A+
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer
Premiere Radio Networks
A Division of Clear Channel Communications
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
Direct: (818) 461-8620
mailto:[EMAIL
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The
message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.
Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may
have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting
Dear lord, forgiving father, please forgive this poor soul and protect us from the
dark clouds of hellfire and brimstone that are looming above.
May god help you Thomas Cross...
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:53 PM
To: MS-Ex
Title: RE: Defrag
He's just lucky it doesn't say Exchange to Groupwise.
FWIW, I've sent him an email off-list about this.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
Title: Message
Yeah,
well I sent an email to Stu asking him to be unsubbed...
-Original Message-From: Steve Hart
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 6:38
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Defrag
He's just lucky it doesn't say Exchange to G
I call upon you all to witness the effect and impact of a D'oh!
Furthermore, please note that the auto-d'oh has a faster and less
recoverable impact. :)
Imagine, if you will a man, a normal man arriving to work after a pleasant
night. Totally unaware what fate has bestowed upon him. As he opens
*ROTHFLMAO!!! Oh, to be a fly on the wall today!
---Original Message---
From: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Date: Wednesday, June
26, 2002 5:34:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Subject: RE:
Defrag
OH sh*t!!! We've got another girl on
the list
a/s/l got pic?
heheeeheh
-Original Message-From: Maggie Whitton
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 6:59
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Defrag
*ROTHFLMAO!!! Oh
*LOL
---Original Message---
From: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Date: Wednesday, June
26, 2002 5:02:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Subject: RE:
Defrag
The person you have sent mail to has be
Title: RE: OWA SSL problem
Just
for sh*ts and grins, I would pop NT4 Optionpack 4 onto the exchange box and see
if it works there. Is that an option for you?
Maybe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
PSS? I have never had the issue you describe. The hardest
thing I've ever had to do to get OWA running
Title: Message
Well,
it seems the migration went well at least...
-Original Message-From: Ely, Don
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 6:31
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Defrag
Yeah, well I sent an email to Stu asking him to be
unsubb
Title: Message
Yeah,
looks like. Anymore of these, and I would have had to begin testing his
hardware to see if it could handle some real volume...
:P
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002
7:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admi
There's also the notion of remaining 'supported' however.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DCs, Exchange and not recommemnded?
Like everything else however, I prefer my own re
I would not wish SBS on anyone.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 7:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DCs, Exchange and not recommemnded?
We all know it works .. That's not the question. The question is wha
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
