Title: Message
Happy
Systems Administrators Appreciation Day to all the wonderful systems
administrators on this list :)
Sherry Abercrombie - FQLAN
Administrator"Never give in."- Winston
Churchill
-Original Message-From:
Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday,
What do their MX records look like?
Jay Personette
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mavtech.com/
(281) 455-3993
-Original Message-
From: Bao, Gang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Problem in sending mail to specific host
Management would like to see the number of unread messages in a Public Folder. The
same way that Inbox folders indicate the number of unread messages:
Inbox (14)
Sales (12)
Marketing (9)
I have run across Q292484 and the PostToNote program from IvaSoft which references
this problem. Neither
Or add the public folder to the user's favorites in Outlook
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 1:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public Folder: Unread message indicator
Management would like to see the number
Add the PF to the Outlook bar. You may need to add it to favorites first,
it's been a while... Simple.
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Bodnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 1:23 PM
Subject: Public Folder: Unread
Until you realized the futility and now delegate it to bored staff?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 12:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Tracking SPAM (Was: Problem in sending mail to specific host)
Is that the one by Blue Ocean (or something like that)?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 11:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problem in sending mail to specific host
Not so, Ben. Dunno if you want to look in
Delegate nothing. Ignore it or filter it. But learning how to read
SMTP headers is important for any email administrator, and spammers
throwing in all sorts of curveballs makes it into a more challenging
(and therefore more interesting) exercise.
-Original Message-
From: William
Yeah. It's not bad, actually. I just don't like call tracking software
in general. Long story. Suffice it to say that sometimes managers
think that the quality of work can be judged solely by the sheer number
of calls closed within a given time period. So rebuild entire AD
infrastructure
Happy Friday!
We are running Exchange 5.5 SP 4 on NT 4.0 SP 6a in production. I am
testing our DR abilities. We use Backup Exec 8.5 to perform online backups
with the Exchange agent. We have 3 mail servers: mail1 (first in site),
mail2, and macmail.
I built a little test network. I built a
Thanks, Jay. I didn't find the MX record that I am looking for. But I can
telnet to the host's 25. I believe they don't have a MX record.
I am not sure about lowest priority on port 25, i just telnet the host
with port 25.
Bao
-Original Message-
From: Jay Personette
Event 5000:
Unable to initialize the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service.
Error Database is in inconsistent state.
The problem occurs when the Information Store stops abnormally and the
Eseutil.exe hard repair option (/P) is run against the Priv.edb file to
return it to a state in
Hehe - don't have an MX record. That's a good one. Gang, FYI, DNS requires
and MX record for a company (or host) to receive any inbound mail. If you
would like to give us the domain name of the company you are having problems
sending to, I'm sure there are plenty of us here that would be
Hi All,
When a user sends a message to a bunch of distribution lists (all users in
the list are internal users) and he CCs an external user, he gets an NDR
for the external user with the error message The recipient was detected
looping within the message transfer service.
Has anyone seen this?
I did that, and I get a -1181 JET_errFileNotFound error.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 recovery/restore questions...
Event 5000:
Unable to initialize the
Not so, Ben. Dunno if you want to look in RFC's, and dunno if it's even
in there, but most mailers will drop back to an A record quite nicely,
and only poop if they don't find the A record. But now I'm curious,
so I'll probably quit messing with my stupid Track-IT! Software[1][2]
and go start
No, I think that's the whole point - it's not standard. You should only
apply hotfixes if you experience a particular problem.
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 July 2002 11:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange SP4
Standard
We use it here - - Why dont we just use this list?
Here's my first post:
Anyone sick of using Track-It?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 2:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problem in sending mail to specific
version?
SP?
Q185024?
Mal Sasalu
Information Systems Facilities
Phone: (403) 295-4914 NovAtel Inc.
Fax: (403) 295-4501 1120 68th
Avenue NE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Calgary,
Could be worse.
Could be Remedy.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 02:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problem in sending mail to specific host
We use it here - - Why dont we just use this list?
Here's
Dang. Now I gotta finish screwing with the stupid helpdesk software.
Sorry about the Remedy crack - it wasn't directed at you. It's my
honest opinion as a bitter but recovering ex-customer.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002
The name is listserv.cfund.org
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 2:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problem in sending mail to specific host
Hehe - don't have an MX record. That's a good one. Gang,
Like I care about Remedy AR software. I've never used it. I certainly
didn't take it personally.
Ben Winzenz
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 2:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
It seems that a lot of mail servers will just go to the A record for the
Domain if there is not an MX record listed in DNS, but My Exchange server
running on NT4 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP4 would not make that adjustment. If
running the nslookup with the query set = to MX gives no result, that is
Yes, as do some older versions of Sendmail. Most of the time it just takes
it a while to figure out where it is supposed to go.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 3:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problem in
Another thought, unless the content of the existing domain is an issue.
1. Build the new Win2K DC as an NT4 BDC in the old domain.
2. Promote him to PDC
3. Build a second BDC (could be a desktop) and /net accounts sync
4. Pull the second BDC off the wire during migration as safety
5. Upgrade the
Hey Tom... I'm implementing Track-It over here and not having too bad of a time with
it. Why don't you drop me a line and I'd be more than happy to save you some
headaches.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 3:10 PM
To:
That's the problem Jay. I've seen it here a few times. We're running Exchange 2k and
would have problems with domains that had similar configs. If they had an MX record
for listservs.cfund.org everything would prolly run smoothly.
-Original Message-
From: Jay Personette
I implemented it a few years ago and it's working fine^H^H^H^Has
designed. No headaches. I just hate mundane work.
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 02:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problem in
It seems faster, now if I could just figure
out the queues life would be good.
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: it's over - thank god
w000!!
Version is Exchange 5.5 SP4 on windows NT SP6a.
That Q article doesn't apply. I wonder if there is a limit with the number
of recipients in an email?
Thanks,
Rodney
version?
SP?
Q185024?
Mal Sasalu
Information Systems Facilities
Phone: (403) 295-4914
I do!
Can you explain to me the Theory of Relativity?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 8:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF
Do you have a question?
-Original
You call everyone a**holes and not you're smiling? H
-Original Message-
From: Frey, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 8:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF
What is store.exe?
:)
Does anyone know what the hell Symantec calls their content
filter?
Thanks.
Garland Mac Neill
Systems Administrator
Solbourne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Grain of something anyway...
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 9:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF
Grain of salt?
Right, William ?
-Original Message-
And no one asked you either :P
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 9:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF
I agree. I am still learning. I never said I had
Title: Message
All
Crap Aside. :p
http://enterprisesecurity.symantec.com/products/products.cfm?ProductID=66
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002
4:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Content
filtering -
Title: Message
Symantec AntiVirus/Filtering for Microsoft Exchange
I
almost got stuck with this crap but luckily we had a last minute end of year
money and I actually was asked which A/V I would choose if I had to choose
today. I chose Antigen to replace InoculateIT. Hopefully they signed
Title: Message
Symantec Web Security 2.5 (HTTP/FTP)
Symantec Mail-Gear (SMTP)
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002
16:17To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Content
filtering - Symantec Style
Does anyone
Hey Don,
You can turn off the rule/event script/com add-in/macro* that responds to
every Prechtism with a Elyism! We get the point! ;-)
*Delete as appropriate
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 July 2002 13:07
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
It was one of those bad moments we all have. After re-reading my
post, I felt I may have been a little harsh. There are only a couple of
hang lows.
Flame away, I say. I can take it. And if I ask a stupid question,
well, then I guess I'll expect a stopid answer . . .
-Original
Very true, Don.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 08:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF
Somebody's corn flakes turned yellow I see...
One ought not say things like the below or
Title: Message
are you sure that's what they call it?
hehehe
Matt
- Original Message -
From:
Martin Blackstone
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 1:19 PM
Subject: RE: Content filtering - Symantec
Style
Crap
-Original
Title: Message
Yeah well, until this damn contract is
over, Im screwed with them. So Im trying to make the best of it.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 2:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
Title: Message
Yep
got that as well. Nice surprise. I love Antigen, wife is a little
jealous though.
-Original Message-From: Preston Jeffares
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 4:43
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Content
filtering -
Hey!! That's a script I can live off of! ;o)
D
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF
Try this:
Select Case Mood
Tasks can be assigned a rating based on difficulty or estimated time
required.
Level 1 tasks to be completed in xx minutes (mail-enable a public folder
[1]).
Level 5 tasks might have a goal of 5 days (deploy E2K sp3 [1]).
That can be fine tuned to your org as well. Manager training aside.
Try this:
Select Case Mood
Case Bored
Beer.Drink
TV.Watch
Case Randy
Beer.Drink
Goto Club
Women.Watch
Beer.Drink
Women.Chat
Beer.Drink
Oh no, we don't give stupid answers, well most of us don't anyway. We give
well thought out sarcastic answers that may or may not have any bearing on
your current problem. ;o)
D
-Original Message-
From: Frey, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 8:36 AM
To:
Q155509
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 8:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Odd question
Odd question I know but perhaps someone can answer.
Can you rebuild mailboxes/exchange if you only have the priv.edb and
Title: Message
Right back at ya..
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 2:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content filtering -
Symantec Style
Happy Systems
Administrators Appreciation Day to all
Title: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
You can see it in action on this list:
For every dumba$$ comment there is a huge flame :o)
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 July
You've had this experience???
AB burns any britches he can get his hands on...
D
-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF
AB Only
Or was it all a dream?.that to install and utilize Exchange 2000 on a
quad-processor server there is a reg hack to perform? If so, does anyone
have it?
David Kopec* Electronic Messaging Specialist
Technology Services Solutions
500 Boylston Street * Boston, MA 02116-3741
Email: [EMAIL
I can handle that.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 8:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF
Oh no, we don't give stupid answers, well most of us don't anyway. We
give
well
I've seen it, after 6 Guinness everything's aflame.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 9:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF
You've had this experience???
AB burns any
Thanks Jim.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 9:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF
No kidding!
James,
Don't be afraid to be flamed. I've gotten my britches burned quite
Service packs are regression tested (but MS cannot duplicate every
environment, and a few of 'em have just plain sucked). Hot fixes should
never ever ever be applied without a really really good reason.
And we all test all patches in our labs, right?
- Original Message -
From: Randal,
I've often used old desktops. They're better than nothing.
- Original Message -
From: Randal, Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 10:08 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange SP4
At this precise moment I have an Exchange 5.5 server in
Title: Message
No that would be you.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 11:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: it's over - thank god
You da man.
-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac
Me thinks your dreaming..
jlc
-Original Message-
From: Kopec, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 9:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Anyone heard of this?
Or was it all a dream?.that to install and utilize Exchange 2000 on
a
quad-processor
Title: Message
Mine is sitting at 1.8 gb mem and 10% cpu,
does that mean I win?
-Original Message-
From: Brent Hudson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 2:17
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my
server die
Mine is at 410..
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q266096
This does not address Multi-processor. Addresses a different Issue.
Worth a look
KC
-Original Message-
From: Kopec, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 9:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Exchange
2k
When adding an
additionaldomain name to the Recipient Policies I receive the following
error.
Network Path was not
found.
Facility:
Win32
ID no:
c0070035
Exchange System
Manager
Anyone have any
ideas?
Thanks,
Keith
List Charter and FAQ at:
Title: Message
Q290284
-Original Message-From: Keith Johnson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 11:21
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Additional SMTP
Address
Exchange
2k
When adding an
additionaldomain name to the Recipient
Title: Message
That's
it!
Thanks
Andy
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 11:24
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Additional
SMTP Address
Q290284
-Original Message-From: Keith
Title: Message
Yep Im thinking of putting a picture
of a black hole with money falling in it on the cover of next years budget
requests.
-Original Message-
From: Brent Hudson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 10:13
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
67 matches
Mail list logo
