Title: Message
Q326322 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q326322
MS02-037: The Server Response to an SMTP
Client EHLO Command Causes a Buffer Overrun
I
could not find a discussion on this one. Has anyone applied this
patch? If so, how did it go?
Thanks!
Jackye
List
Title: Message
tongueincheekPeople here don't apply patches unless their servers
are broken/tongueincheek
Applied here as soon as I knew about it. No adverse effects so
far.
Phil
-Phil
RandalNetwork EngineerHerefordshire CouncilHereford, UK
Title: Message
Do you
have a SMTP relay in front if your IMS?
-Original Message-From: Moody,
Jacqueline [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July
30, 2002 7:58 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
Exchange 5.5 post SP4 patch
Q326322
Title: NDR problem
From last week, I have been receiving
MsOffice attachments with strange names. For instance: a mail had an attached
word 97 document Graduation letter.doc. When I
double-click on it, I get the confirmation to open the
docmentGraduation letter.26494DEFANGED-doc which
of
Title: NDR problem
Are
you running an A/V software?
-Original Message-From: Patrick King'ori Kariuki
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 8:21
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Strange
Attachment Names
From last week, I have been receiving
Title: Message
I have
a Sendmail gateway infront of the IMS but I still applied this
patch.
So far
no problem. The hacking can be from internal also.
The
patch is listed in http://www.microsoft.com/security
as a security patch.
Personally I applied all security patches from Microsoft, pls
Title: Message
The
DEFANGED part of the filename suggests that something mangles with the file(s).
AV or CM?
-Original Message-From: Frey, James
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30. juli 2002 14:21To:
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange Attachment
Names
Are
Title: NDR problem
I have
AVG Antivirus running on the clients, but I have stopped the Exchange
scanner.
-Original Message-From: Frey, James
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 3:21
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange
Attachment Names
Title: Message
That's
Procmail E-Mail Sanitizer.
http://www.impsec.org/email-tools/procmail-security.html
That
program adds the Defanged part to attachments.
-Original Message-From: Patrick King'ori
Kariuki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002
5:21 AMTo:
Google, find me 10 sites with defanged and attachment
http://www.colorado.edu/its/security/defanged.html
http://www.impsec.org/email-tools/sanitizer-unmangle.html
http://help.guntersvilleboe.com/Email/Defanged%20.shtml
-Original Message-
From: Patrick King'ori Kariuki [mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Message
I
think disabling reverse lookup is a viable alternative as
well.
-Original Message-From: ONG Liang Bu
(CSC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 8:22
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
post SP4 patch
I
have a
Or add them to the Outlook Today page
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 July 2002 18:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Public Folder: Unread message indicator
Add the PF to the Outlook bar. You may need to add it to favorites
Title: Message
No, I
don't have the SMTP relay in front of the IMS.
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 8:05
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
post SP4 patch
Do
you have a SMTP relay in
Joe,
Have you used the PFAdmin tool in Exchange 5.5?
Use of this creates a second listing of the PF in our organisation.
Best regards
Ric
UK Regional Exchange Administration
Pilkington I. S. Group Services
Head Office, Prescot Road, St Helens, Merseyside, WA10 3TT United Kingdom
e-mail
Title: NDR problem
Hi
Our customer have Sybari antigen and it's doing a
very good job for viruses... it's Content filtering feature also help for
purging email with subject like viagra, make a million etc
but our customer is receiving a lot of junk " porn
" emAil from some japannese
I belong to three Exchange mailing lists, 2 of which I've seen you on
for over a year. All three of them have discussed this FAQ in depth
this week.
Having said this, I'm an advocate for taking all machines off the
Internet completely until the admins and users take a class. I plaster
my
Title: NDR problem
Praetor, Mail Marshal, Mail Essentials
- Original Message -
From:
Jean-Francois Bourdeau
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 8:39
AM
Subject: Good software against mail abuse
(spamming etc)
Hi
Our customer have
Tom, do you ALWAYS just sit there and bash people? I have never heard you
say anything nice.
Have a Guinness and chill out.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 8:44 AM
Subject: RE: Good
Title: Message
Thanks
to everyone! I'll go ahead and take the plunge.
Jackye
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 8:46
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
post SP4 patch
I
think disabling
Title: NDR problem
Interesting that only one user has this problem.. maybe its their fault,
like giving out that email address to the wrong sites etc..
B
-Original Message-From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 30 July 2002
15:40To: MS-Exchange Admin
Title: Message
Matthew, are you using Mail essentials?
If so,
what version?
Mark.
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30,
2002 3:45 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re:
Good software against mail abuse (spamming
so this has set off a few content scanners:
Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content.
Place = MS-Exchange Admin Issues; ; ; MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sender = Brent Hudson
Subject = RE: Good software against mail abuse (spamming etc)
Delivery Time = July 30, 2002 (Tuesday)
Okay if I have a Shiner Bock instead? Gotta support the central Texas
economy, you know.
How about sorting on my name and seeing if you find some helpful and
knowledgeable responses? That should answer your question.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Message
We use Praetor, and I love it. Great support, and
flexible. They have already implemented several ideas I had into new
releases.
www.cmsconnect.com
- Original Message -
From:
mark verschaeve
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002
I live in central Texas too...but I refuse to support bad beer...lol
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 8:54 AM
Subject: RE: Good software against mail abuse (spamming etc)
Okay if I
Yeah, that gives a good idea of which content scanner NOT to use, eh?
Or at least how easy it is to trashcan the valid emails because they
contain the word [p o r n]. That's why my bashing session (which is
actually my opinion, and my enterprise's practice) was put forth.
-Original
But that's exactly what causes it. The users filling out every web form on
the internet.
One of my users was complaing that she was getting 100 SPAMs a day. I asked
her if she has been filling out forms. Only the ones I get for free credit
cards.
User educaction is the first step.
Title: Message
Thanks to all for your answers
Does anyone use surf Control or WebSense product ?
JF
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Title: Message
We use
WebSense -- or we did, for a short time before we figured out our server wasn't
beefy enough for it. We have a new one ordered and on the
way.
Karen
Palmer
SCJD
-Original Message-From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 30,
Title: Message
Can anyone settle a
bet?
I have a coworker
who is saying a workgroup is more secure than a domain, I say its the otherway
around.
He is also betting
me that any servers setup in your DMZ should be setup in workgoups and not
domains...
List Charter and FAQ at:
ok. I am brain dead today. I have forgotten how to view the header info from
outlook 2000. Can someone throw me a bone and remind me?
thanks
Liz
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Title: Message
That's
a wide open question. Are you talking for an internal network or just for
a DMZ deployment?
A box
in the DMZ should be in its own separate thing (domain or WG, doesn't matter
which). If that box gets compromised, then the damage is only limited to
that box. The
Right click on the message and choose options
-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: brain dead:header info
ok. I am brain dead today. I have forgotten how to view the header
Right-click on the message and choose options.
-Jim
Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com
We bring innovation to interactive communication.
Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.
-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth
Thank You!!
Liz
-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: brain dead:header info
Right click on the message and choose options
-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth
Title: Message
Good
gawd!
Y'all
not have anything better to do? Why not find out who is better at hacking
the network? Or hack each others workstations?
If a
"hacker" is worth his salt, he won't care if your computer is a member of the
domain or not. This is usually because, we don't
open e-mail... view... options.
-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: brain dead:header info
ok. I am brain dead today. I have forgotten how to view the header info from
Title: Message
Domains are more secure.
Workgroups in DMZs.
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:17
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
domain
Can anyone settle
a bet?
I have a coworker
who
Open the message, then select Options from the View menu.
-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: brain dead:header info
ok. I am brain dead today. I have forgotten
What end of the thread with no mention of sunbelts ihatespam?
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 July 2002 15:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Good software against mail abuse (spamming etc)
Thanks to all for your answers
Title: Message
"If
that box gets compromised, then the damage is only limited to that
box."
Not
necessarily... VBEG
-Original Message-From: Erik Sojka
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:19
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
domain
Title: Message
what
if youre dual homed. and your internal nic doesnt have a default gateway
assigned to it? and Netbios is disabled on the external nic?
-Original Message-From: Erik Sojka
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:27
AMTo: MS-Exchange
Title: Message
Ok,
but if you have an exchange server, or ISA server on your DMZ, how to you equate
it to the production domain?
A
front end exchange server would have to be in your production Domain.. I would
think you would dual home the server, and thus done properly would give you some
Title: Message
Ok,
but if you have an exchange server, or ISA server on your DMZ, how to you equate
it to the production domain?
A
front end exchange server would have to be in your production Domain.. I would
think you would dual home the server, and thus done properly would give you some
Title: Message
Martin
is dual-homed.
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:29
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
domain
what
if youre dual homed. and your internal nic doesnt have a default
Title: Message
Dual-homing is an invite to your internal network... regardless of
gateway or disabling NetBios.
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:29
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
domain
There are also degrees of difference depending on whether you're talking
about an AD domain or a WinNT domain. In AD the forest itself is your
security boundary.
Although a domain is in fact a security boundary when considering the
management aspects of Active Directory, it does not provide
Title: Message
A... this is true...
-Original Message-From: Erik Sojka
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:27
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
domain
True; I only meant that the attacker doesn't get default or
passthru access to
Title: Message
If
you're putting a FE server in your DMZ, you might as well take the DMZ out of
the picture. You are punching far too many holes in your FW to even
consider it a FW in this scenario...
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Title: Message
and??
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002
10:38 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
domain
Martin is dual-homed.
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross)
Title: Message
But if
you are interested in security at all, you don't put an Exchange server on your
DMZ. Or any box that has to authenticate with the internal domain, for
that matter. It is just dumb. Even with FE/BE, you don't need to put
the FE server on the DMZ. You would enable SSL
Title: Message
how
so?
-Original Message-From: Ely, Don
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:23
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
domain
Dual-homing is an invite to your internal network... regardless
of gateway or disabling NetBios.
Title: Message
Depends on how you look at it. Is having $100 in one bank more or
less secure than having $1 each in 100 different banks?
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:17
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
Title: Message
I did
this for a customer once. Don't remember exactly what he was doing with
it, but he insisted he had to have it.
Ended
up using null modem/RAS/netbios. Connection could only be initiated from
the internal network, on a short fuse idle timeout. Best I
could come up with
I have a user who changed her signature in Outlook 2000 (Tools -- Options
-- Mail Format -- Signature). When she responds to an internal email the
message includes the new (revised) signature. When she reponds to a message
from outside our organization, Outlook uses the old signature.
Within
You need to edit the signature for both Rich Text and Plain Text entries. They are
stored separately, from what I can tell. I had that same problem.
--
Matt Lathrum
General Dynamics Decision Systems
When cryptography is outlawed,
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir
Does anyone use or ever heard of MX-Contact by ExchangeWise? They are located at
http://www.exchangewise.com. I'd be interested in some off-list discussions if you
have.
Thanks,
Jim
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Their website is really slow. Not a good sign.
-Original Message-
From: Frey, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Somewhat Off-Topic
Does anyone use or ever heard of MX-Contact by ExchangeWise? They are
located
Good day,
We're running Exchange 2K sp2 on a Win2K sp2 member server.
Until late last week, users were able to access their email via the
virtual IMAP server, but something has changed. Users are now prompted
for credentials when they attempt to access their mailboxes via IMAP,
but the
As other have already said, put the PF up in the FAVORITES to get the unread
messages listing. Be warned though, this only the number of unread messages
BY THAT PARTICULAR USER, not in the PF taken as a whole.
I only say this because you identified the people that wanted this
information as
Title: Message
Sorry,
I don't disclose that kind of information. Let's just say if you
dual-homed a machine and I was scanning your network and found it... well,
it would bea fun time had by all...
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
Title: Message
Now
that's an interesting configuration... :o)
-Original Message-From: Campbell, Rob
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30,
2002 12:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
domain
I
did this for a customer once. Don't remember
Why?
E-mail disclaimers are essentially un-enforceable, and only serve to make
lawyers feel useful and important.
Barristers in your case.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
I live in my own little world. They know me here. -
You're from Texas, that's your normal state of being, isn't it?
You guys have been ticked at the world since you had to join the United
States.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
I live in my own little world. They know me
Being as close to Washington DC as you are, you're allowed at least one
brain dead day a week.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
I live in my own little world. They know me here. - Unknown
-Original Message-
From:
Title: Large attachments / Emails vanishing
We have an Exchange 5.5 server sp4 running on NT4 sp6a the seems to be losing emails that are large in size( haven't determined exact size yet - seem to fluctuate). There is nothing in the event viewer indicating an error, the file is gone from the
Title: Message
Do you
have delivery restrictions on the IMC?
-Original Message-From: Craig Sterley
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 1:26
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Large attachments
/ Emails vanishing
We have an Exchange 5.5 server
Right click the email and go to options.
Or with the email open, go to View - Options
-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:21
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: brain dead:header info
ok. I am brain dead today. I
Title: Message
any
a/v on the exchange and/or client?
-Original Message-From: Patrick King'ori
Kariuki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002
08:21To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Strange
Attachment Names
From last week, I have been receiving
Title: RE: Content filtering - Symantec Style
Irregardless of what the rest of the world thinks, it is still the Republic of Texas, and don't you forget it either!
Sherry Abercrombie - FQ
Data Center Administrator
Information Technology
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.
Many antivirus/content gateways are configurable to toss oversized
messages into the bit-bucket. They may or may not notify the
sender/recipient/administrator, usually at the discretion of the gateway
admin. There's one suspect to rule out.
-Original Message-
From: Craig Sterley
Praetor
www.cmsconnect.com
- Original Message -
From: John Matteson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 12:49 PM
Subject: RE: Email Signature
Why?
E-mail disclaimers are essentially un-enforceable, and only serve to make
Title: Message
Or it
could be that where it is going to has inbound mail size
restrictions.
Sherry
Abercrombie -
FQData Center
Administrator Information
Technology "With sufficient thrust,
pigs fly just fine."
-Original Message-From:
Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Title: Message
Just
found it. Apparently in the firewall there is a limitation that can be set
for mail size. Things now work fine. THanks
-Original Message-From: Erik Sojka
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:04
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
Title: Message
Using
Checkpoint?
-Original Message-From: Craig Sterley
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 1:37
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Large
attachments / Emails vanishing - Resolved
Just
found it. Apparently in the firewall
Title: Message
ZoneAlarm
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002
11:21 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Large
attachments / Emails vanishing - Resolved
Using Checkpoint?
-Original
Title: Message
Someone pull on your thong again?
-Original Message-From: Martin
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday,
July 30, 2002 2:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: Large attachments / Emails vanishing -
Resolved
ZoneAlarm
Title: RE: Content filtering - Symantec Style
Yea that's great. Texas is
wonderful:
http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/07/29/afterlife.argument.reut/index.html
Glad to see those good ol' fashioned family values
hard at work...
"Abercrombie, Sherry" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
Title: Message
I'm sending it to
be re-chromed for MEC
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002
11:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Large
attachments / Emails vanishing - Resolved
Someone pull on your thong
Title: RE: Content filtering - Symantec Style
Thats not
family values at work, just natural selection
Jay Personette
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mavtech.com/
(281) 455-3993
-Original
Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30,
I have a 5.5 sp4 and nt4 domain. users have win2k and outlook2k.
I have a dept that has 12 pc's and there are 25 people all day/night that
share these pc's ( Pharmacy at my hospital). They all have email profiles
set up but use OWA. Works just fine. They now have an app that requires
their be
Title: RE: Content filtering - Symantec Style
lol... but which one goes to heaven?
What is it again... Thou shalt not bust a cap in thy neighbors
ass?
"Jay Personette" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:280520@exchangelist...
ThatÂ’s
not family values at work, just natural
Title: RE: Content filtering - Symantec Style
Something like that, but as to Which one goes to heaven? no commentnot
a safe topic to discuss in Texas based on the evidence. Even if I am a long way
from Dallas-Ft.Worth
Jay Personette
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mavtech.com/
(281)
you could try the Profile Wizard from the Office Resource Kit.
HTH
Jack
-Original Message-
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 July 2002 19:48
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Copying outlook profiles
THIS MESSAGE ORIGINATED ON THE INTERNET - Please read the
Yeah, it is. On earth as it is in Austin
http://homeadvisor.msn.com/Move/BestPlacestoLive0.aspx
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 01:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Content filtering - Symantec
Roaming profiles?
-Original Message-
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Copying outlook profiles
I have a 5.5 sp4 and nt4 domain. users have win2k and outlook2k.
I have a dept that has 12 pc's
Hi Guys,
Has anyone else received similar email from vendors after you evaluated their
software. I was somewhat surprised at the tone...especially the part about avoiding
further legal action. I evaluated the software on a test network and removed it when I
found it didn't fit what I was
and here i was just about to buy that software..
-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: Software Compliance OT
Hi Guys,
Has anyone else received similar email from
This is a rather new tactic that appears to be making the rounds.
NAI has their notorious renew your contract or delete our software message
-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 12:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sounds like some trash talking to me. I'd be scanning my network and
looking at logs to see if they actually were tracking it. I'd also send
them a nasty-gram telling them to FSCK OFF due to the fact that they sent me
this lame a$$ email.
D
-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel,
Maybe it's your gateway.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Somewhat Off-Topic
Their website is really slow. Not a good sign.
-Original Message-
From: Frey,
Title: Message
I
would like to see them separate. Where do I sign?
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie,
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:07
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Content
filtering - Symantec Style
Irregardless of
I like it. What's the problem?
-Original Message-
From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 12:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Software Compliance OT
and here i was just about to buy that software..
-Original Message-
Title: Message
Here Here. Give
Texas back to Mexcio
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 1:56
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content filtering -
Symantec Style
I would like to see them
separate.
Ha...did all that. If they were tracking it then they would know I am not running it.
The product might be fine but their sales tactics blow...
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 3:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
Why didn't you answer their emails?
Thanks, I haven't installed it yet. I'll let you know.
-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 1:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Software Compliance OT
Ha...did all
Nah, its the site. Its slow to load.
William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:280575@exchangelist...
Maybe it's your gateway.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Ive seen worse.
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Somewhat Off-Topic
Nah, its the site. Its slow to load.
William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
I musta got them at a good time.
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 1:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Somewhat Off-Topic
Nah, its the site. Its slow to load.
William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
william, william, william..always the devil's advocate. The software maybe
ok,,,but the dude who emailed the trash would not be making any commission off of me,
I would at least find another vendor.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
