You must have both the internal and the external name in the registry entries,
otherwise it doesn't work. Trying to condense the registry entries will not
work, and I don't see much point in it.
Do remember to make the change on the domain controllers and ensure that you
are pointing the
Which diagnostic logging option is the best one to turn on if we want to
try to determine whether SMTP sessions to a Windows box are being cut
off before the attachments are being received?
We are being swamped with corrupt attachments and are struggling to find
a thing wrong.
Olly
~ Ninja
Er, this might help, finding any weird mailboxes that still seem to be
connected to the store
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555147/en-us
worked for me (after replication kicked in).
-Original Message-
From: Jim Dandy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 January 2008 00:50
To:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb690955.aspx - see the
DomainName explanation.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Alex Fontana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Thanks for the tip on Issue #1
Regarding Issue #2...I'm just going by what our BES admin has told us. I'm
supposed to be become her backup this quarter...so maybe I'll find out what the
issue really is... :-)
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 6:13 PM
To:
We have a couple of users who deliver two Out Of Office messages when they turn
the option on. The first one is a recent Out Of Office from today, the second
one is an Old Of Office from the last time they used the feature (December for
example).
Has anybody else seen this? (Exchange 2007
What's the number? You only get that warning when you are within 20% of the
maximum limit.
You need to figure out what's creating the named properties.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Make sure the BES server has all of the same patches that Exchange does...
BES makes mapi connections, those are reconnected when the service
resumes...
On Jan 22, 2008 5:48 AM, Brown, Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the tip on Issue #1
Regarding Issue #2…I'm just going by what
I'm getting this logged in Application log of one of our EX2K3 servers.
I found a Technet article (
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb851495.aspx) that tells you to
look for some registry values, which I cannot find.
How can I fix this or it's not serious and I should just leave it
Those are certainly valid concerns. As William pointed out, DNSBLs
have grown up. Many that have started out as a particular admins
method of protecting his own site from what he considered spam have
evolved into reputable public-use minded sites that take more factors
into consideration when
Ive had a CCR implementation with 10 storage groups and about 200gb of data
running on RTM code since last August with no issues. Works great, smooth and
reliable failover ..so far. Why is CCR falling out of favor ? I can see where
it adds some complexity in setup but the MNS style clustering
I have a franchised client who right now gets all pop3 mail via outlook.
They have exchange 2003 and use it just for internal mail and pop off their
company mail. The parent company uses Lotus or Domino or something other
than Exchange Im told.
I was thinking I could pop off the mail
If you're referring to the number after quota limit, it's 8192. There are
like 6 or 7 of these events with unique named properties in the APP log.
From the named properties, it seems that it has something to do with our
spam appliance.
Thanks
On Jan 22, 2008 9:38 AM, Michael B. Smith [EMAIL
The best bet to retain your sanity is the Lotus Notes connector if they
really are using that. But you may not have enough rights to set up the
other side
Tom McCarty
_
From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange
Im told I will have no rights to anything, so I have to treat this as an
outside connection. Im looking at under smtp the forward to unresolved
recipients. Im thinking this will not work on internal mail of which Im
supposed to be the domain. Im testing it now.
_
From: Tom McCarty
It looks like its working. I did both an SMTP connector and fwd unresolved
hosts in SMTP. I'm not sure which one is doing the workhorse, most likely
the SMTP. We aren't accepting any mail on SMTP from the outside, although
when I get to corporate tomorrow I'm going to see about creating an smtp
This almost certainly means that it is creating a custom X-* header. It
shouldn't do that.
To eliminate the properties, you can move a mailbox that contains the
properties to another store.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Alex
CCR = Credence Clearwater Revival
SCR = Me not know.
LCR = Me still not know, feeling real dumb about now.
SCC = Does anyone have a listing of these TLA's?
Geodispersion = Geoclustering? If so, watch out for split brain
operations.
John H. Matteson, Jr.
Systems Administrator/ITT Systems
List,
I have a response from Lucid8 concerning their GoExchange product and
the questions that were posted a week or so back. I've tried to post the
response here but the Lyris server says its too large so if anyone want
to read their response, please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I'll
Here are the named properties it's trying to create:
X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID
X-Content-Filtered-By
X-Original-Date
X-TFF-CGPSA-Filter
X-TFF-CGPSA-Version
X-Puresend
X-Fantasy-No-Post
X-filenames
By it do you mean EXCH or the spam appliance? According to the event log,
the user attempting to create
I don't recall what page it was, but when I read this product was designed
because most IT people don't know what order to run these utilities,
etc...; my opinion was quickly formed...
That said, if you don't know how to administer Exchange and have no
intention of learning, this product is for
Very constructive comment there Don. Thanks!
Tom
One of the Stupid People
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: GoExchange Response
Summary of the 9 pages...
This product
Sorry, I got carried away with the explanation and didn't answer the
questions.
I would guess that the spam appliance is creating the custom properties, but
I don't know that for certain. Using MFCMAPI to examine the properties is
likely a good way to identify that.
Most Exchange Services
Don,
I can take constructive criticism and welcome it if its done in a
positive light, but classifying anyone as stupid just because they use
a program you disagree with is very unprofessional.
I DO know Exchange and how to use the utilities (manually), learned the
hard way. I didn't want to
I would say that clustering is falling out of favor, not CCR specifically.
Clustering adds a lot of cost and a fair bit of maintenance complexity to
get a very small up-time improvement. And if your operations folks aren't
good - it can lead to worse up-time instead of improved up-time.
I'm of
If so, watch out for split brain operations.
Especially around falling bombs!!
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Geoclustering = Shook
brain = butt
-Original Message-
From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 11:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using CCR in production?
CCR = Credence Clearwater Revival
SCR
Summary of the 9 pages...
This product was created for stupid people who don't read the documentation
or listen to PSSS...
On Jan 22, 2008 9:48 AM, Tom Strader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
List,
I have a response from Lucid8 concerning their GoExchange product and the
questions that were
In general, any message accepted via SMTP (or via drop/pickup folders) is a
non-promoted message until it is processed by the store. This means that it
gets stored into the STM file in an Exchange 2003 database (this is an
optimization for IMAP and POP3, but not for Outlook clients). There is no
Yes ;)
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: GoExchange Response
To clarify, I did NOT say you were stupid because you used the
program...
I said This product was
CCR = Credence Clearwater Revival
SCR - Sheryl Crowe Revival
LCR = Lenny Cravitz Revival (no... wait... that's a K)
SCC = Sonny and Cher Revival
-Original Message-
From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 11:57 AM
HA!!
Well, in my 19-20 years in this field, I agree it's been far and few
between the number of times I have had to use the so called exchange
utilities, however, when I came on board, this company was using DEMO
backup software to backup files, but no Exchange backup so ANDY, you are
correct, if
I wasn't in an uproar... :P
And just for the record, the other day I was talking to myself because I
couldn't remember where the config file for NTOP was and I said, self, you
fscking idiot, stop being so stupid!.
On Jan 22, 2008 10:56 AM, Tom Strader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HA!!
Well, in
To clarify, I did NOT say you were stupid because you used the program...
I said This product was created for stupid people who don't read the
documentation or listen to PSS... So, that wasn't necessarily directed at
you. Apparently, it was more appropriately directed at your predecessor and
I think Single Node clusters are falling out of favor. :P
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using CCR in production?
I would say that clustering is falling out of favor, not CCR
2007 SP1 will fire events when named properties are created.
I think the only option is moving mailboxes to another store as you have stated.
Something like:
Event Type:Information
Event Source:MSExchangeIS
Event Category:General
Event ID: 9873
Date:
If Dane Cue would like to join this forum (or another that is not vendor
controlled) I'll be happy to discuss each and every point. Otherwise, why
bother? I've seen much of the material in that response before. I think a
number of other MVPs would agree.
He can call me crazy or out in left
I get that way daily sir!!
I learned a Lo time back just how little I do know compared to
some of the excellent list members here, including our hosts, Sunbelt
Software and all their team.
NOW, THOSE PEOPLE ROCK
Please Don, keep the comments coming, it makes one think and rethink
I think you two need to get a room.
From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 11:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: GoExchange Response
I get that way daily sir!!
I learned a Lo time back just how little I do know compared to
Shook would be that tool.
From: Jeff Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: GoExchange Response
I wondered what tool you were going to use to thicken you skin...
On Jan 22, 2008 1:30 PM, Tom Strader [EMAIL
Continued membership on this list would probably do it ;)
From: Jeff Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 11:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: GoExchange Response
I wondered what tool you were going to use to
U...no
How do I spell 'gay'? T-V-K
Shook
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andyshook
From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 2:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: GoExchange Response
Shook
I wondered what tool you were going to use to thicken you skin...
On Jan 22, 2008 1:30 PM, Tom Strader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*I get that way daily sir!!*
**
*I learned a Lo time back just how little I do know compared to
some of the excellent list members here, including our
Ya get the feeling these guys don't get enough of it at home, they gotta
get it here.
To each his own I guess.
From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 2:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: GoExchange Response
Hi chaps,
We are still getting ongoing problems with attachments being corrupt. In
a group of about 15 people we see maybe two or three a day that get
corrupted.
As I've said before, im 100% certain it's not exchange as I can't find a
thing wrong, no error logs, no proof of corruption, no
Can you provide more detail to what corrupt means in these cases?
Which client software is being used for sending? Which encoding is
being used?
On Jan 22, 2008 4:14 PM, Oliver Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi chaps,
We are still getting ongoing problems with attachments being
My believe is that the attachments are getting corrupt before it hits
their network. Their .co.uk name goes through an ISPs mail sevrer
where it’s filtering for spam and virus before being forward on.
It's likely virus/attachment filtering software that's mangling things.
You'll need the help
Emails come in from too many (too large) sources to have them all rar'd.
There's no AV on the exchange server, and having spoken to the ISP it's a
typically response (no one else is having problems) and their logs don’t show
anything to them outta the norm (their AV logs don’t show any
No need to apologize...in fact I should thank you for taking the time to
educate me...Now I know how much I don't know!
As for MFCMAPI, I downloaded the tool, but I'm not sure how to use it. Do I
need to install it on EXCH box or on a client
and what option would I have to choose to see
These messages that get corrupted - what do they look like on your
end? Any attachments? Any odd names?
On Jan 22, 2008 4:55 PM, Oliver Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Emails come in from too many (too large) sources to have them all rar'd.
There's no AV on the exchange server, and having
These messages that get corrupted - what do they look like on your
end? Any attachments? Any odd names?
Nope, nothing. The file sizes are believable (don't know what they were
before they were encoded) and aren't out of the realms of what you would
expect.
We have had the odd report of
Corrupt means, in the case of zip files, they refuse to open in any zip
package due to the archive being corrupt. Repairing them often recovers
*some* of the info. PDF files refuse to open, though in the latest Adobe
Reader you can open them but find that parts of pages are missing. JPG's
either
Have someone do an MD5 checksum on the file before sending it, and see
if your receive it the same.
On Jan 22, 2008 5:12 PM, Oliver Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Corrupt means, in the case of zip files, they refuse to open in any zip
package due to the archive being corrupt. Repairing them
Alas it's not *that* reproducible. I'm on 85 attachments so far tonight,
and nothing yet. However, i'll quickly knock up a checksum on the file
i'm sending now just incase it happens.
Olly
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 January 2008 22:15
The very first words of the response summarizes the niche market they have
created..
Fear of loss compels us to protect ourselves.
The perceived fear has nothing to do with the actual potential or occurrence
of loss.
I recommend NoExchange. Because messaging is important, you must
We ran into this where small attachments never had a problem. Start
sending large attachments and it was reproducible. Ended up being a bad
NIC at some level. Put a new NIC and the problem went away. Dell came
out and swapped the system board and that fixed it permanently.
From:
I second the notion on the NIC. If you're using MB NICs, see if there's
updated drivers, or put in a good Intel card or similar and try it
again. BTDT.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 4:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange
Why, that's configured in /etc/rc.conf, if you're doing it in FreeBSD,
silly english knigget!
Here's the snippet from mine:
ntop_enable=YES
ntop_flags=-d -u ntop -P /home/ntop/databases -K -L -t 4 -o -i fxp0
-w 192.168.24.239:3000 -W 0 -D mycompany.com -L
If you're looking for the script
This was on the Debian install from OSSIM... :P
On Jan 22, 2008 5:33 PM, Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why, that's configured in /etc/rc.conf, if you're doing it in FreeBSD,
silly english knigget!
Here's the snippet from mine:
ntop_enable=YES
ntop_flags=-d -u ntop -P
This one has me stumped so far. Party A sends a message with a small
attachment to party B. Party A receives a NDR with this error message:
This message is larger than the current system limit or the recipient's
mailbox is full. Create a shorter message body or remove attachments
and try
We had a vaguely similar situation but with http downloads of .exe files
through a cisco proxy. Our network folks said it only dropped a few
packets during heavy load conditions and the next version might fix it.
We started using FTP, external DSL connections etc. - the network folks
have lots of
Haven't had a chance to touch that yet, dang it.
I'm too busy setting the community version of SSL-Explorer, along with
learning how to install it in a FreeBSD Jail, if I can make it do that
(shouldn't be too hard, but I've never jailed anything before, though
the docs make it sound easy),
Thanks for the response William. I'll definitely look into that.
Tom
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 6:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: GoExchange Response
The very first words of the
U, look into what exactly?
On Jan 22, 2008 8:40 PM, Tom Strader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the response William. I'll definitely look into that.
Tom
--
*From:* William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 22, 2008
The imaginary customer responses Don. Can't you read?
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 11:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: GoExchange Response
U, look into what exactly?
On Jan 22, 2008 8:40 PM,
3rd'd considering the file size issue that Gary mentioned. Seen that
before too.
On Jan 22, 2008 7:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I second the notion on the NIC. If you're using MB NICs, see if there's
updated drivers, or put in a good Intel card or similar and try it again.
BTDT.
SCC= Sonny and Cher Revival
Only if you have an impersonator or a medium. Sonny wrapped
himself around a tree several years ago while skiing.
John H. Matteson, Jr.
Systems Administrator/ITT Systems
FOB Orgun-E
Afghanistan
DSN - 318 431 8000
VoSIP - (308) 431 -
Iridium -
Disney animatronics... :-)
-Original Message-
From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 12:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using CCR in production?
SCC= Sonny and Cher Revival
Only
68 matches
Mail list logo
