Re: Any Help : Installing .msi on remote servers

Hai, > > Any idea, how to install .msi on Remote Servers. > > msiexec.exe is working fine locally. When am wrapping this with > 1. copying the .msi remotely to \\server\d$\code\ 2. wrapping with psexec .. psexec -u trmx\sriniv @servers.txt msiexec /i /qn /quiet d:\code\test.msi /norestart this

Any Help : Installing .msi on remote servers

Hai, Any idea, how to install .msi on Remote Servers. msiexec.exe is working fine locally. When am wrapping this with PSEXEC @SERVERS.TXT -- --Srinivas Guru Krupaahee Keevalam--- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware

Re: [OT] Thursday Funny

You might be right. There's an old stock market saying - the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent. Heh. However, I think, as Ben points out, that an adjustment in client license prices or even a new type of licensing agreement might be in order. Of course, lawmakers wi

RE: [OT] Thursday Funny

There are already "cloud CALs" and have been at least since 1999 when MSFT introduced their "Service Provider Licensing Agreement" and hosted Exchange and hosted Windows were available. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michae

Re: [OT] Thursday Funny

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:54 PM, William Lefkovics wrote: > My point was not whether it is a good or bad move, but rather that the cloud, > SaaS, hosted services, etc, will have an impact on overall future sales for > software vendors including Microsoft. Of course, in the past, Microsoft has c

RE: [OT] Thursday Funny

I appreciate your point. It is certainly not for everyone and it is not even an option for some. But in some cases, a hosting company can provide more control and not less. And it is not an 'all-or-nothing' thing. Some aspects of the business can be moved to a service model. My point was not w

Re: [OT] Thursday Funny

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:00 PM, William Lefkovics wrote: > "The cloud", Software-as-a-Service, Hosted Solutions, whatever you want to > call it, is part of the evolution of networking. They are not _worried_ > about it; they are embracing it ... I'm sorta with Kurt on this one. While I'm s

Re: [OT] Thursday Funny

It may be part of the evolution of networking, but I think it's a dead end. If you don't have the bits under your direct physical control, you don't own them or control them at all. Data breaches may not be unexpected, but they can and will hurt a lot more in the future than they do now, as they h

RE: [OT] Thursday Funny

"The cloud", Software-as-a-Service, Hosted Solutions, whatever you want to call it, is part of the evolution of networking. They are not _worried_ about it; they are embracing it (groove.com, mesh.com, office.live.com). However, it means fewer installed instances of Windows Server, Office, Exc

RE: Changed the FQDN on the Exchange SMTP

Never mind. Got it. From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 3:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Changed the FQDN on the Exchange SMTP Do I need to reboot the server for the changes to take effect? Eric Wittersheim American

Changed the FQDN on the Exchange SMTP

Do I need to reboot the server for the changes to take effect? Eric Wittersheim American Academy of Sleep Medicine One Westbrook Corporate Center Suite 920 Westchester, IL. 60185 Ph. 708-492-0930 Fax. 708-492-0943 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~

Re: [OT] Thursday Funny

For most companies (read, those that aren't rich enough to do it in house) "the cloud" is just another form of outsourcing, and a particularly bad one. Folks will come to realize that pretty quickly once the data breaches start happening in the cloud, just like they do inside of the company. I thi

RE: Lyris on Exchange

Lyris isn't "supported" on Exchange however you can make it work. For a truly integrated Exchange listserv, look at Ikakura www.ikakura.com. I've used it in the past with great success. They have a version for 5.5/2000/2003 published. Their 2007 version is in beta, i

Lyris on Exchange

I was asked today a question that I know I used to know the answer for, but I don't seem to know anymore. How do I make exchange be my listserv server... what do I need to add. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja

RE: [OT] Thursday Funny

I think the sentiment is that the worst is yet to come and the increased trend toward the cloud (argh... i used a buzzword! I'm doomed!) means fewer physical 'seats' for their products. They answer to their shareholders, not their employees or their customers (though obviously ignoring the latt

Re: Return address

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Troy Meyer wrote: > Those people wouldn't be able to send to the list (receiving still would work > fine)... > But that might put the kabash on that one. H... what if you created Exchange Mail-Enabled "Contact" objects in Active Directory, with email addres

RE: Return address

Those people wouldn't be able to send to the list (receiving still would work fine)... But that might put the kabash on that one. -troy -Original Message- From: Jim Dandy [mailto:jda...@asmail.ucdavis.edu] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 10:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:

RE: Return address

I think this will limit those users who can SEND to the list, not receive from the list - or is this intended to be a free for all where anybody on the list should be able to send to all? -Original Message- From: Jim Dandy [mailto:jda...@asmail.ucdavis.edu] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 200

RE: Return address

Is that possible if people on the list don't have an exchange mailbox? > -Original Message- > From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:59 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Return address > > You allow your department distribu

RE: [OT] Thursday Funny

What a justification for clearing out marginal employees. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 10:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] Thursday Funny I don't quite get their gloom

RE: [OT] Thursday Funny

No, they are not bitching about 4billion. They are bitching that they didn't get the extra 500 million they were expecting. Cutting 5000 jobs will save them 5000*(70,000*2) or $700,000,000 a year. Of course I am wildly guessing the $70k/year is the average salary accross all 5000 employees, an

RE: [OT] Thursday Funny

I don't quite get their gloom and doom though. From that article: The company says profit slipped to $4.17 billion, or 47 cents per share, from year-ago earnings of $4.71 billion, or 50 cents per share. It says total revenue edged up 2 percent to $16.63 billion, as software for corporate compu

re: [OT] Thursday Funny

Really, almost as good as the original. Not so funny Thursday tidbit: Microsoft to cut up to 5,000 jobs http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28791669/ From: "Michael B. Smith" Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:06 AM To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" Subject: [OT]

Re: [OT] Thursday Funny

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv5iEK-IEzw&feature=related This is good too... On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Jonathan Link wrote: > Funny, but wrong. So, so wrong. > > 2009/1/22 Michael B. Smith > >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb2GmBkkaTU >> >> >> >> >> > > > ~ Ninja Email Security w

RE: Return address

You allow your department distribution lists to receive mail from external senders? Seems like the easiest way around this one is to create a group and only allow that people in that group to send to your distro list. -troy -Original Message- From: Jim Dandy [mailto:jda...@asmail.ucd

Re: [OT] Thursday Funny

Funny, but wrong. So, so wrong. 2009/1/22 Michael B. Smith > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb2GmBkkaTU > > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Return address

I use Messaging Ninja for spam filtering. Ninja can only filter spam that is sent to a mailbox. Mail that is sent to a distribution list is not filtered. Spammers have discovered my distribution list address and now are spamming my whole department. Some of the people on the distribution list h

[OT] Thursday Funny

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb2GmBkkaTU ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007

Not to my knowledge. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php -Original Message- From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Thursd

RE: Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007

Set-TransportServer -MessageTrackingLogMaxAge - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+, HP APS Senior Network/Systems Administrator E-mail Administrator UW - Green Bay Voice: 920.465.5014 Fax: 920.465.2864 kretc...@uwgb.edu Be green, keep it on the screen

RE: Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007

Nothing in the GUI other than changing the path of the log files. Check out http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997984.aspx for more information on Message Tracking logs in Exchange 2007. - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+, HP APS Senior N

RE: Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007

Is there a GUI version? -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:kretc...@uwgb.edu] Sent: 22 January 2009 14:31 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007 Set-TransportServer -MessageTrackingLogMaxAge ---

Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007

Hi chaps Anyone know how i can change the amount of time that subject logging log files are kept for in Exchange 2007? That is, the log files that are searchable using the message tracking feature of exchange 2007. Thanks Olly -- G2 Support Online Backups Email:  oliver.marsh...@g2support.c

RE: BES Question

And don't forget you can hide the icon on the device, but it's not through policy and any savvy user can get it back again. Just use the Blackberry button (not sure what else to call it!) on the icon, you'll get a popup menu allowing you to select Hide. -Original Message- From: bounce-8