o\ ( 9 9 ) /o)
> \ \( (Y) )/ /
> \ ) ( /
> / \
> _/ )_( \
> =_==( (===) )=_=
> | \ ) ( / |
> \|vVv(__/,v#\__)V/|/|#..
>
> Nikki
>
> From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thu
kki
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:40 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Name of sender
I'm not a fan of either the OOOs or the lack of sender names. But I've been
concerned about the
s included.
____
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:27 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion
I've started a new thread, because my manager is n
Talk to your Verizon rep, I don't see them listed but I know they have them
because we have users who have them...
On Dec 27, 2007 10:11 AM, wrote:
>
>
>
> Well, unfortunately, the Curve is not listed on Verizon's website for BB
> devices.
>
>
>
> Jo
Well, unfortunately, the Curve is not listed on Verizon’s website for BB
devices.
Joe Heaton
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:10 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: EAS vs. BB - new thread
? Our provider lists
> the following on their site:
>
>
>
> 7130e
>
> Pearl 8130
>
> 8703e
>
> 8830 World Edition
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Joe Heaton
>
>
>
> *From:* exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTE
Any BB model that people would recommend over others? Our provider lists the
following on their site:
7130e
Pearl 8130
8703e
8830 World Edition
Thanks,
Joe Heaton
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:34 AM
MAS
Formerly of Microsoft<http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/>, now powered by
3Sharp<http://www.3sharp.com/>, Always
WLK<http://pics.wlkmmas.org/>MMAS<http://www.hedonists.ca/>
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 20
Perhaps.
But its about the number of users, their User IOPS profile and the number of
IOPS the storage can handle. Don't forget to include Communicator and Modular
Messaging in your calculations.
Andy
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [
to
have blacklisted everyone who has let an OOO slip through. In my
opinion, that hurts the community more than missing the sender name.
Blocking the OOOs at least alleviates that phenomenon. That said, I do
hope we can have the best of both worlds.
Bill Songstad
-Original Message
> -Original Message-
> From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 11:03 AM
> True but this does prevent any ooo's back to the sender.
> Doesn't everybody have a sig in place? (maybe not for replies)
One might ask: doesn
This new style stinks! Put it back the original way. It's hard to tell
who's talking...
-Original Message-----
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 12:24
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: R
This setting seriously sucks Dan - how does Lyris determine
inappropriate content? - can't you add a key phrase or 2 to that list
causing a rejection? - or just leave the OOO's if this is the cost?
____
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mai
1. Yes
2. Yes, excedt BB doesn't do so hot on PDF's yet
3. BB User proof, WM not so much
On Dec 27, 2007 9:27 AM, wrote:
>
>
>
> I've started a new thread, because my manager is now asking me to create
> a proposal document for our Director, in order to recommend the "best"
> solution. I
Well, there is NO indication that it is charging. If it were even a
trickle charge, he'd be ok. His previous PDA he'd leave on USB
throughout the workday.
-Ed
-Original Message-----
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December
This got me thinking: Charging via USB is typically a "trickle
charge" right? Perhaps the CEO doesn't understand that a trickle
charge is a much slower charging process.
On Dec 27, 2007 11:52 AM, wrote:
> It has its quirks, but I have always been able to charge it over USB on
> my laptop (and
I’ve started a new thread, because my manager is now asking me to create a
proposal document for our Director, in order to recommend the “best” solution.
I have a few specific questions that may or may not have been covered in the
last thread.
1) Does the BB, if I have BES installe
Don
-Original Message-
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:23 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Name of sender
Sure, but who are you? :-P
On Dec 27, 2007 12:17 PM,
wrote
Andy
____
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 12:03 PM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Name of sender
True but this does prevent any ooo's back to the sender. Doesn't
eve
Sure, but who are you? :-P
On Dec 27, 2007 12:17 PM, wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Agree – my vote = put it back and investigate another method.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Agree - put it back, please.
Paul Maglinger
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 11:18 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Name of sender
Agree - my vote = put
Agreed!
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:17 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Name of sender
Takes away a bit from the community feeling too, to
Now THAT sounds like Verizon!
-Original Message-
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:14 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Blackberry question (Moto Q)
I've had the 760 since the day i
Echo that!!
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:15 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: R: Name of sender
Please revisit it
GuidoElia
HELPPC
If just for one person, I'd seriously recommend the BES express running
on a virtual or even desktop - if it looks like a viable option, that's
the time to see if the requestor can justify the full blown server.
-Original Message-----
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.c
So can I PAUL :P
On Dec 27, 2007 9:16 AM, wrote:
>
>
>
> I can, DON!!!
>
> --
> *From:* exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 27, 2007 11:08 AM
> *To:* exchangel
"I don't think men had much to do with it."
On Dec 27, 2007 11:34 AM, wrote:
>
>
>
> LOL - the best laid plans of mice and men...
>
> Keep trying, tho... we really need it!
>
>
>
> On Dec 27, 2007 8:24 AM, wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > So much for intelligent systems... yes I did receive
Agree - my vote = put it back and investigate another method.
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:14 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Name of sender
Yeah
I can, DON!!!
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 11:08 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Blackberry question
I can't see them... :P
On Dec 27, 2007 9:
Takes away a bit from the community feeling too, to be honest. When I have to
depend on either signatures, or looking at headers to figure out who said what…
Joe Heaton
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:14 AM
To
Who said that?
Nikki
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:14 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Name of sender
No, not everybody has a sig in place - and it is helpful to be able to
respond to
Oooo... anonymous cracking...
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 11:01 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Blackberry question
You want to crack on somebody
Please revisit it
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: giovedì 27 dicembre 2007 18.03
A: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Oggetto: Re: Name of sender
True but this does prevent any ooo's back to the s
Right, I'd thought of that also, but really don't like the idea of desktops
being left on with Outlook open 24/7... but I do see the benefit if it's just
for one person.
Joe Heaton
-Original Message-
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:[EMAIL P
ocked unless I need to install something and then it's via BT.
-Original Message-----
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:52 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Blackberry question (Moto Q)
I
You're quick...
On Dec 27, 2007 9:12 AM, wrote:
>
>
>
> I'd know who sent that one even without the headers….Don.
>
>
>
> *From:* exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:02 AM
> *T
No, not everybody has a sig in place - and it is helpful to be able to
respond to the poster off-list by grabbing their email address from the
display From:
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27
y
> have a sig in place? (maybe not for replies)
>
> So... I'm going to leave the setting as it is for a little bit. You guys
> keep discussing Exchange related issues for the time being. Later today I'll
> revisit this.
>
> Dan
>
> Btw, I usually get the Ly
and they are happy that they can show off to people how
they can do email anywhere.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 12:02
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
I’d know who sent that one even without the headers….Don.
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:02 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Blackberry question
NooBs
On Dec 27, 2007 9:00 AM
True - it's there, but not great.
-Original Message-
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:00 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Blackberry question
Word and excel is cool. PDFs, not so
I can't see them... :P
On Dec 27, 2007 9:05 AM, wrote:
>
>
>
> If you REALLY need to know, look at the internet headers.
>
>
> --
>
> *From:* exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Thu
If you REALLY need to know, look at the internet headers.
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:00 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Blackberry question
t this.
Dan
Btw, I usually get the Lyris lists via RSS and not via email.
On 12/27/07, exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com <
exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> But we don't see the sender anymore !
>
> *GuidoElia*
> *HELPPC*
>
I think all vendors support that since it's a RIM provided service - at
least the AT&T 8820 works fine with it and AT&T support can help if
problems.
But that only gives some experience with the device itself, not its
corporate connectivity benefits.
-Original Message-
From:
Shook, Shook, he's our man, if he can't take it, no one can!!!
On Dec 27, 2007 9:01 AM, Don Ely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NooBs
>
>
> On Dec 27, 2007 9:00 AM, wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > I was just thinking the same thing Shook…
&
NooBs
On Dec 27, 2007 9:00 AM, wrote:
>
>
>
> I was just thinking the same thing Shook…
>
>
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> *From:* exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:00 AM
> *To:* exchangeli
hook
>
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/andyshook
> --
>
> *From:* exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 27, 2007 11:54 AM
> *To:* exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
> *Subject:* Re: Blac
I was just thinking the same thing Shook…
Joe
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:00 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Blackberry question
I can’t freakin’ see the sender so I
Word and excel is cool. PDFs, not so cool.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 11:59 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Blackberry question
Dang, hit send too soon
I can't freakin' see the sender so I don't know who to crack on. My
guess is TVK but I have to tailor my response; I would appreciate you
fixing this...
Shook
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andyshook
____
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-softw
Dang, hit send too soon. One other question my boss asked me was concerning
e-mail attachments. Are there any issues with the BB being able to open
attached documents? Such as Word/Excel docs?
-Original Message-
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
The Q sucks major donkey balls. The Q sucks so badly you couldn't get it to
crawl in bed with Shook and let's not even get started on Blackstone...
On Dec 27, 2007 7:55 AM, Joe Heaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I appreciate the suggestion, but the Treo 700wx is twice the cost of the
> Q. Also
I've had my Motorola Q for 1.5 years now, and have upgraded the software
(downloadable from Motorola's site) 4x now. It has been fine for e-mail
this entire time, hooks into my Exchange 2003 SP2 server, updates tasks,
contacts, etc. I reply to e-mails and text on it mostly.
It has its quirks, but
It doesn't. Its BIS.
It just queries OWA and pulls down new mail about every 15 min. There is no
wireless contact / calendar / etc sync.
-Original Message-
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 8:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blac
That sounds like just the issue we're having. Not sure why the device wouldn't
charge for our Director at home, but it did charge just fine here on my
coworker's desk. I spoke with my manager this morning, discussing all these
replies from you guys, and our official word to the Director is tha
Fyi, looks like you are overwriting the display headers, not the
envelope headers - these are just user friendly text fields, not
anything that is usable in message sending.
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
But we don't see the sender anymore !
GuidoElia
HELPPC
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Rewriting the "from" and the "to" and the "reply-to" to all be the list's
address is _not_ a good idea, imo.
M. Trittipo
Minneapolis, MN
<<<<
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
List-U
Too much of an overwrite, I think. Everyone is coming through as exchangelist
now..
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 8:25 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: No more OOOs? (was TEST POST 2
Can you just have Lyris return them to the sender with a no thanks?
From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 8:25 AM
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: No more OOOs? (was
Well, that should never be an issue here. Even if everyone in the organization
was given BBs, that would total less than 100. I think last count there were a
total of 85 people working for this department.
From: Kat Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 8:15 A
No experience with the Q but Verizon devices in general seem to have far
worse battery life than virtually identical devices from other vendors -
my understanding of this is that Verizon get their vaunted network
connectivity and performance by increasing the power to the modem thus
draining the ba
Test post 2... waiting for ooo's
FWIW I did not receive any ooo's for my first gmail test.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
LOL - the best laid plans of mice and men...
Keep trying, tho... we really need it!
On Dec 27, 2007 8:24 AM, wrote:
>
>
>
> So much for intelligent systems... yes I did receive the usual flood of
> ooo's from a different address.
>
> Looks like I need to really overwrite the from and reply to f
Post 1, yet from a different email address...
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Estare ausente de la Oficina hasta el 2 de Enero, Cualquier comunicacion
Urgente enviela a Mauricio Lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED] si me es posible estaré
chequeando mi correo desde afuera. Gracias
I will be out of office unitl 2 of januaryif you need urgent assintance please
send email to Maurici
So much for intelligent systems... yes I did receive the usual flood of
ooo's from a different address.
Looks like I need to really overwrite the from and reply to fields...
let's see.
Regards,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
68 matches
Mail list logo
