RE: Postini

"How do we de-google ourselves?" From: Wulff Jr, Ronald J. [mailto:rwu...@reedsmith.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 4:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Postini I am going to light them on fire. Anyone else getting a lot of question from management today after their inc

RE: Postini

That's basically what I am being asked. They weren't happy that we didn't have a "quick" solution to start getting mail routed another way yesterday From: William Lefkovics [mailto:will...@lefkovics.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 7:15 AM To: MS-Exchange

RE: Postini

You don't have control over your DNS? That's what I did for my clients. Just routed them directly... From: Wulff Jr, Ronald J. [rwu...@reedsmith.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 7:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Postini That’s

RE: Postini

those actually making it through to us. Adding all that traffic to our network would have been a bigger issue From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 7:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Postini You don't have control

Re: Postini

09 7:27 AM > > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Postini > > > > You don't have control over your DNS? > > > > That's what I did for my clients. Just routed them directly... > > > -- > > *Fro

RE: Postini

root cause analysis and corrective and preventative actions, within the next 48 business hours. From: Andrew Levicki [mailto:and...@levicki.me.uk] Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 7:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Postini Hi everyone, We had a problem about 3 months ago

Re: Postini

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Wulff Jr, Ronald J. wrote: > We experienced an issue that caused significant delays to inbound mail > delivery for users on System 7. "System 7"? Google's running Postini on a classic Macintosh? ;-) -- Ben

RE: Postini

That would explain the outage lol -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Postini On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Wulff Jr, Ronald J. wrote: > We experienced an issue t

RE: Postini

Typically the server is set up to only talk to Postini in and out. Dns all pointed to postini. Very poor to no cust service. I used to have the setup doc around but I can't seem to find it. Bet you could download it from them.. M From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Wednesday,

Re: Postini

Yes but you'll configure routing within GoogleApps\Users & Organizations\groups. Very easy. On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:39 AM, KevinM wrote: > I have never worked with Postini and I am prepping for a customer > consolidation where Postini is involved – > > > > My question – Can I do per user ema

RE: Postini

Postini used to have pretty good customer service, at least in Europe... US management and then finally Google killed off the team though which was a real shame. From: Matt Moore [mailto:mattmoore...@hotmail.com] Sent: 11 May 2011 18:56 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Postini

RE: Postini

o:ntur...@caci.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 4:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Postini Postini used to have pretty good customer service, at least in Europe... US management and then finally Google killed off the team though which was a real shame. From: Matt Moore [mailto:mat

Re: postini & backscatter

Our Corp uses Postini and I can with out a doubt it's the worst 3rd party spam filter I've ever been involved with. They lose trouble tickets and take a long time to address any issues and by the time they do all they ever say is it's not us. Many issues with Customers not able to send through

RE: postini & backscatter

Don't see how it could be the BES - all that does is act like a client to the mailbox server. From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 5:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: postini & backscatter I

RE: postini & backscatter

with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: postini & backscatter Don't see how it could be the BES - all that does is act like a clien

RE: Postini Quarantine

We dumped Postini because of reasons such as this. Don Guyer Systems Engineer - Information Services Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group 431 W. Lancaster Avenue Devon, PA 19333 Direct: (610) 993-3299 Fax: (610) 650-5306 don.gu...@prufoxroach.com

Re: Postini Quarantine

And what are you using now? On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Don Guyer wrote: > We dumped Postini because of reasons such as this. > > > > Don Guyer > > Systems Engineer - Information Services > > Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group > > 431 W. Lancaster Avenue > > Devon, PA 19333 > > Direct: (

RE: Postini Quarantine

n.gu...@prufoxroach.com <mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com> From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 2:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Postini Quarantine And what are you using now? On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Don Guyer

Re: Postini Quarantine

We use IronPort. Wound up costing us much less to go down that road... On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Jonathan Link wrote: > And what are you using now? > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Don Guyer wrote: > >> We dumped Postini because of reasons such as this. >> >> >> >> Don Guyer >> >>

RE: Postini Quarantine

don't want to get too aggressive, though... John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 2:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Re: Postini Quarantine

… > > > > > > > > John Hornbuckle > > MIS Department > > Taylor County School District > > 318 North Clark Street > > Perry, FL 32347 > > > > www.taylor.k12.fl.us > > > > > > > > *From:* Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufo

RE: Postini Quarantine

: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 2:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Postini Quarantine We had looked at them, but they were considerably more expensive than Postini. And, frankly, we trusted the Google name. The archiving feature works great, and the service has never had a hicc

RE: Postini Quarantine

You must, too-at least to some degree, since you're writing from a Gmail address. :) From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 2:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Postini Quarantine "And, frankly, we trusted the Google name.&quo

Re: Postini Quarantine

lor.k12.fl.us > > > > > > > > *From:* Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 21, 2009 2:43 PM > > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Postini Quarantine > > > > MX Logic. Now, they do have their good and b

Re: Postini Quarantine

ohn Hornbuckle >> >> MIS Department >> >> Taylor County School District >> >> 318 North Clark Street >> >> Perry, FL 32347 >> >> >> >> www.taylor.k12.fl.us >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>

RE: Postini Quarantine

es Subject: Re: Postini Quarantine You'll probably want to Blackhole obvious spam, and this will prevent 70% or more from even hitting the remaining filters. Roger Wright ___ Sent from Tampa, FL, United States On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:52 PM, John Hornbuckle mailto:john.hornbuc...@t

Re: Postini Quarantine

m] > Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 2:57 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Postini Quarantine > > "And, frankly, we trusted the Google name." > > U, what? Really? Wow... > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:52 AM, John Hornbuckle > mailto:joh

RE: Postini Quarantine

Trust Google?.. Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, a data marketing company.. Trust? Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, That's a good one. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 12:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Po

Re: Postini Quarantine

27;s a good one. > > -Original Message- > From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 12:55 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Postini Quarantine > > I subscribe to lists like these with my gmail and that is it.  No, I

Re: Postini Quarantine

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Don Guyer wrote: > MX Logic. Now, they do have their good and > bad moments, but nothing like we experienced > with Postini. We're actually unhappy with MX Logic because of the opposite problem: *Everything* gets silently discarded, almost nothing shows up in qu

Re: Postini Quarantine

Ninja. It just works. On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Ben Scott wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Don Guyer > wrote: > > MX Logic. Now, they do have their good and > > bad moments, but nothing like we experienced > > with Postini. > > We're actually unhappy with MX Logic because of

RE: Postini Quarantine

ompany to route all of our e-mail through, we wanted to go with a company like that rather than a smaller organization. John -Original Message- From: Matt Moore [mailto:mattmoore...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 7:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Postini Qu

Re: Postini Quarantine

Is someone hosting it, though? On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Sherry Abercrombie wrote: > Ninja. It just works. > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Ben Scott wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Don Guyer >> wrote: >> > MX Logic. Now, they do have their good and >> > bad moments,

Re: Postini Quarantine

No, it's installed on my Exchange server. It quarantines what I tell it to quarantine, deletes what I tell it to delete, and I have ~ 2% (guesstimate) of spam actually getting to mailboxes. Plus, it has the user level spam control in the mailboxes. I installed it several months ago, since then I

RE: Postini Quarantine

Got to +1 that also. It just works. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 9:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Postini Quarantine No, it's installed on my Exchange server. It quarantines what I tell it to quarantine, de

Re: Postini Quarantine

It just works. > > > > *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, October 22, 2009 9:08 AM > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Postini Quarantine > > > > No, it's installed on my Exchange server. It quarantines what

Re: Postini Quarantine

Oct 22, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Eldridge, Dave wrote: > >> Got to +1 that also. >> >> It just works. >> >> >> >> *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, October 22, 2009 9:08 AM >> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues >

RE: Postini Quarantine

We use Katharion. Worked really well until we just got the news they were bought out by GFI - not sure what to think now. Jay -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 9:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Postini

Re: RE: Postini

Postini servers passes the 220 request back to configured company internal servers. They take your exchange server answers and pass it same way to asking server. Everything else you should be able do it from Postini CP and your mail servers internally Best Ocd On May 11, 2011 1:55 PM, "Matt Moore

RE: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank

Are you getting an NDR from Postini? From: Wulff Jr, Ronald J. [mailto:rwu...@reedsmith.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 9:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank Recently we have run into an issue with

RE: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 10:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank Are you getting an NDR from Postini? From: Wulff Jr, Ron

RE: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank

:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank Nope, we get nothing back. In fact, we didn't even know there was an issue until one of the recipients called our user because they never received the message Ronald Wulff Jr 412.288.360

RE: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank

ell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 10:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank Then Postini is accepting the emails, and then dropping them. Ask them if they can give you one of

RE: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank

You could try asking for the log entry and see if they send you the headers. From: Wulff Jr, Ronald J. [mailto:rwu...@reedsmith.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being

RE: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank

: RE: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank You could try asking for the log entry and see if they send you the headers. From: Wulff Jr, Ronald J. [mailto:rwu...@reedsmith.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin

RE: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank

mith.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 10:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank LOL, that may be worth a try Ronald Wulff Jr 412.288.3601 rwu...@reedsmith.com Reed Smith LLP 20 Stanwix St Suite 1200 Pittsburgh, PA

Re: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Wulff Jr, Ronald J. wrote: > That was blanking out the return path on the messages, and just > leaving the from field populated. Normally, a null reverse-path is used only for DSNs, but spammers sometimes set a null reverse-path on their spam. Postini's system wa

Re: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank

ge- > From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 3:13 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Wulff Jr, Ronald J. > wrote: > > Tha

RE: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank

: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Wulff Jr, Ronald J. wrote: > That was blanking out the return path on the messages,

RE: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank

Hmm, does that mean that postini won't accept server generated rejections (i.e. with null return path)? From: Wulff Jr, Ronald J. [mailto:rwu...@reedsmith.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 11:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Postini blo

RE: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank

ssages are usually non-delivery reports (NDRs). From: Wulff Jr, Ronald J. [mailto:rwu...@reedsmith.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 1:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank Oddly enough, we seem to have figured this out.

Re: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Wulff Jr, Ronald J. wrote: > Yeah, that makes sense, I'm just not sure why Postini just started acting up > with > these messages, but who really knows what goes one there Assuming it's not a recent configuration change done by the receiving system's mail admins

RE: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank

:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Postini blocking based on ENV sender field being blank On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Wulff Jr, Ronald J. wrote: > Yeah, that makes sense, I'm just not sure why Postini just started acting up > with > these messages, but who really k