--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > on 9/26/05 6:32 PM, jyouells2000 at [EMAIL PROTECTED
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Does the TMO fall under the parameters of the f
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > A friend is working on a TM project and is looking for clergy
> > who ideally practice TM and have something nice to say abo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Turquoi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If J and B are coercing students to have sex, why are the students
> not reporting it? A comprehensive reporting and review system is
> in place.
And, like most such systems, it is a joke if the people
involved know tha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In
> FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tom T writes:
> > It is both, it is either and it is neither all at the same
> > time. Tom
> >
> > Judy wr
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TorquoiseB writes:
> Well, if they wanted to funnel some of the millions
> to me, I'd promise to give much of it away to truly
> worthy organizations. But they can keep the screwing
> married wo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> My only criterion, for instance, is not to
> > > be overshadowed.
>
> Thinking about that thought, paraphrasing, "I just don't want to be
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TorquoiseB writes:
> Anyway, if you were to attend such a party, or
> were just dressing up for Halloween, who/what
> would you be?
>
> Tom T:
> I was invited to a costume party/wedding. Everyon
> > > > Tom T writes:
> > > > No matter how radical that all sounds it is possible to be
able to hold all that in the awake mind.
>
akasha_108 wrote:
> > > Then it must be possible to be able to
> > > hold all that in the unawake mind too. All Possibilities.
Rory wrote:
> > Right; no re
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm wondering what exactly separates a cult from a "regular" religion
> to begin with. The main difference that I can see in most cases is
> simply higher numbers. Beyond that, aren't they all somewhat
> cult-like
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> A friend is working on a TM project and is looking for clergy
> who ideally practice TM and have something nice to say about it.
> Let me know if you know anyone along these lines.
Ah, the rigorous TM scien
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Does the TMO fall under the parameters of the fo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "uns_tressor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does the TMO fall under the parameters of the following
> > definition of a cult?
>
> Sounds a lot like the Army.
>
> There's a te
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > > Hagelin is a figurehead for the university. Indeed, he is
> > BEYOND being a mere professor.
> > >
> > > Why is celebrity a factor for acts between consenting adults?
> >
> >
> > I don't think it should be a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "uns_tressor"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Su
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > Let's say we don't get attached. Let's
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> My only criterion, for instance, is not to
> > be overshadowed.
Thinking about that thought, paraphrasing, "I just don't want to be
oveshadowed" gets funnier and funnier the more it is contemplated and
considered. Its l
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sounds like great fun, unless you're the guy who has to put up
> with
> > all the pomp.
>
>
> ...what about the circumstance?
That depends
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig"
> > > Hagelin is a figurehead for the university. Indeed, he is
> BEYOND being a mere professor.
> >
> > Why is celebrity a factor for acts between consenting adults?
>
>
> I don't think it should be a factor.
>
> And, yes, I agree that anyone 18 years or older is old enough to
> freely ch
Rory wrote:
> > Right; no real difference between ignorance and enlightenment,
or
> > between being "asleep" and being "awake" -- though oddly enough,
as
> > we have seen, only the experientially "awake" appear generally
able
> > to appreciate this to any visceral extent, while the self-
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > on 9/26/05 6:32 PM, jyouells2000 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTE
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting postmodern, feminist / post feminist perspectives.
>
> -
> Open Debate: Sex with the Teacher
>
> Click for a printer friendly version of this article
> E Ruth Klein
>
> E R Klein arg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Let's say we don't get attached. Let's say we've
> > never *been* attached. Let's say human beans have
> > always been realized.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> [Akasha108 wrote:]
> > > > Tom T writes:
> > > > No matter how radical that all sounds it is possible to be
able
> > > > to hold al
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "uns_tressor"
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > on 9/26/05 2:28 AM, anonymousff at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig"
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tom T writes:
> > It is both, it is either and it is neither all at the same
> > time. Tom
> >
> > Judy writes:
> > Or none of the above...
> >
> > Tom T:
> > Which part of all possibilities
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In
> FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tom T writes:
> > It is both, it is either and it is neither all at the same
> > time. Tom
> >
> > Judy wri
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom T writes:
> It is both, it is either and it is neither all at the same
> time. Tom
>
> Judy writes:
> Or none of the above...
>
> Tom T:
> Which part of all possibilities isn't clear?
Huh
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Tom T writes:
> > > No matter how radical that all sounds it is possible to be able
> to hold all that in the awake mind.
> > Then it must be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > on 9/26/05 10:06 AM, Peter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[Akasha108 wrote:]
> > > Tom T writes:
> > > No matter how radical that all sounds it is possible to be able
> > > to hold all that in the awake mind.
> >
> > Then it must be possible to be able to
> > hold all that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> <[E
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > on 9/26/05 10:42 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTE
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > [...]
> > > > So you think that the TM leadership is supp
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > on 9/26/05 10:40 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > on 9/26/05 2:28 AM, anonymousff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >>
> > >> What licentious behavior and why do you care?
> > >
> > > Be
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TorquoiseB writes:
> Anyway, if you were to attend such a party, or
> were just dressing up for Halloween, who/what
> would you be?
>
> Tom T:
> I was invited to a costume party/wedding. Everyon
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "uns_tressor"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Su
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Judy responds:
> >
> > The bottom line being that there is nothing that
> > can be said about Brahman, positive
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > on 9/26/05 10:06 AM, Peter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 9/26/05 6:32 PM, jyouells2000 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> on 9/26/05 1:30 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>>
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 9/26/05 7:12 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> on 9/26/05 2:28 AM, anonymousff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 9/26/05 7:35 PM, akasha_108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Does Haglin still teach courses? I don't know. My impression is he
has
> > his intitute and all and travels and speaks globally, spends a
lot of
> > ti
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 9/26/05 7:35 PM, akasha_108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Does Haglin still teach courses? I don't know. My impression is he has
> > his intitute and all and travels and speaks globally, spends a lot of
> > time
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
"tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Judy responds:
>
> The bottom line being that there is nothing that
> can be said about Brahman, positive or negative,
> of which the opposite is not also the case,
> because Brahman is One withou
Interesting postmodern, feminist / post feminist perspectives.
-
Open Debate: Sex with the Teacher
Click for a printer friendly version of this article
E Ruth Klein
E R Klein argues that no good reason has yet been given for academic
institutions to condemn consensual sex
on 9/26/05 7:35 PM, akasha_108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does Haglin still teach courses? I don't know. My impression is he has
> his intitute and all and travels and speaks globally, spends a lot of
> time in holland, NY and DC -- and is not in FF enought to teach
> regular classes.
I don't
Title: MLive.com's Printer-Friendly Page
Packed crowd hears Filmmaker David Lynch
shares zeal for transcendental meditation
Monday, September 26, 2005
BY JENN MCKEE News Arts Writer
If you
on 9/26/05 7:12 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> on 9/26/05 2:28 AM, anonymousff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What licentious behavior and why do you care?
>>>
>>> Bevan and Hagelin are infamous
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "uns_tressor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "uns_tressor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Suns
on 9/26/05 6:32 PM, jyouells2000 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> on 9/26/05 1:30 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>> ...and it is on this very point that I was intrigued to see that
>>> John had appeared
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm wondering what exactly separates a cult from a "regular" religion
> to begin with. The main difference that I can see in most cases is
> simply higher numbers. Beyond that, aren't they all somewhat
> cult-like
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Judy responds:
>
> The bottom line being that there is nothing that
> can be said about Brahman, positive or negative,
> of which the opposite is not also the case,
> because Brahman is One with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "qntmpkt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --How about Brahman is the Absolute AS the relative?
You'd have to ask Nagarjuna. ;-)
I suspect it would come under "...not both the
relative and the Absolute," though.
> - In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfrie
Judy responds:
The bottom line being that there is nothing that
can be said about Brahman, positive or negative,
of which the opposite is not also the case,
because Brahman is One without a second.
"All possibilities" is one way of putting it, but
it doesn't quite convey how radical the Advaita
p
--How about Brahman is the Absolute AS the relative?
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In
> FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Tom T writes:
> > > It is both, it is either and it i
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
"tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark meredith writes:
> " In a sermon, Samuel Parris, the minister
> in whose house the whole thing started, stated, "We are either saints
> or Devils: the Scripture gives us no medium"
>
> TOm T:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tom T writes:
> > It is both, it is either and it is neither all at the same
> > time. Tom
> >
> > Judy writes:
> > Or none of the above...
> >
> > Tom T:
> > Which part of all possibilities
Mark meredith writes:
" In a sermon, Samuel Parris, the minister
in whose house the whole thing started, stated, "We are either saints
or Devils: the Scripture gives us no medium"
TOm T:
This is plain old Black and white thinking which is a sure sign of the
cult and addictive thinking. Look at Bus
Rick Archer writes:
NPR did a show today on the world's worst jobs - picking up road kill,
inspecting sewers, determining the sex of baby chicks. They commented
that all the people interviewed had cheerful attitudes. The sewer
inspector, who was often waist-deep in muck, was a psychiatrist who
drop
> Tom T writes:
> It is both, it is either and it is neither all at the same
> time. Tom
>
> Judy writes:
> Or none of the above...
>
> Tom T:
> Which part of all possibilities isn't clear?
Judy:
Um, I was invoking Nagarjuna.
TomT:
OK explain please. What has that to do with all possibilities.
If J and B are coercing students to have sex, why are the students not
reporting it? A comprehensive reporting and review system is in place.
http://www.mum.edu/safety/bulletin.html
Ideal Education for Orderly Behavior
Compliance with all national, state, and local laws and ordinances is
a prer
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2294/is_2003_June/ai_103381809
Contrapower sexual harassment: A survey of students and faculty members
Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, June, 2003 by Eros DeSouza, A.
Gigi Fansler
new
Although Congress passed Title IX of the Education Amendments in
http://www.matrixinstitute.com/
Sep 26, 2005, 08:32
Earth Changes
Quake Hits Peru - Third Part of 4-Quake Scenario Fulfilled
A powerful earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 7.0 (updated
9.26.05 to 7.5) hit northern Peru late Sunday, causing power outages
and cutting phone service through
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom T writes:
> It is both, it is either and it is neither all at the same
> time. Tom
>
> Judy writes:
> Or none of the above...
>
> Tom T:
> Which part of all possibilities isn't clear?
Um,
Tom T writes:
It is both, it is either and it is neither all at the same
time. Tom
Judy writes:
Or none of the above...
Tom T:
Which part of all possibilities isn't clear?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups
http://www.yaleherald.com/article.php?Article=2475
Forbidden fruit: student-faculty relationships
How does Yale policy deal with romance in the classroom?
BY KRISTEN VON HOFFMANN
At the University of California, Berkeley, a new controversial policy
forbids "romantic or sexual" relationships betw
Judy writes:
FWIW, National Enquirer has the peculiar
reputation of being sleazy but accurate.
I'd be inclined to give one of its stories
more credibility than anything in Capitol
Hill Blue.
Tom T:
As I have said before. Dry drunk or wet drunk still a drunk. THe
behaviour doesn't change just
> In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But there's coercion and coercion. It doesn't have
> to involve a demand for obedience to be coercive when
> the power relationship is unequal.
In most relationships each party brings different values and
dysfunctions
TorquoiseB writes:
Well, if they wanted to funnel some of the millions
to me, I'd promise to give much of it away to truly
worthy organizations. But they can keep the screwing
married women part. Wouldn't touch it with a ten-
foot...uh...pole.
Tom T:
old joke. What happens when you cross a roost
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TorquoiseB writes:
> I think I picked it up in New York. It always
> seemed to capture the Zen of certain paradoxes
> for me, like the one you cite above. The coex-
> istence of seeming opposit
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > >
> > > While it is certainly boorish behavior and I do not
> > > support it in the least, the ladies can say no.
> >
> > That apply to
http://slate.msn.com/id/2093351
Off Limits
Should students be allowed to hook up with professors?
By Laura Kipnis
Posted Friday, Jan. 2, 2004, at 8:17 AM PT
Illustration by Robert Neubecker
The burning academic question of the day: Should we professors be
permitted to "hook up with" our students
http://chronicle.com/errors.dir/noauthorization.php3?page=/che-data/articles.dir/articles-41.dir/issue-24.dir/24b00101.htm
When Students Make Sexual Advances
By David R. Pichaske
Recent bans on professor-student relationships are founded on two
assumptions: that sex between teachers and students
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Fifteen grand a month, or $500.00/day. How do you make
> > $500.00/day
>
> The C word: C O N S U L T I N G :-)
I read the local business journal on a weekly basis where different
public cos. are featured. Compani
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > on 9/26/05 10:06 AM, Peter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Why would I care? Hmm, let's see...perhaps because
> > >> of the unbeli
How about Father Miller. He runs the Liberal Catholic Church in
Fairfield that is open to all but is mostly Ru's
St Gabriels and all Angels is that correct Someone in FF can give you
the number I am out of town
> Hello all,
>
> A friend is working on a TM project and is looking for clergy wh
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [...]
> > > So you think that the TM leadership is supposed to be better than
> > > everyone else?
> >
> > Wow, is that a long way around, just
Pictures please!
On 9/26/05 8:06 PM, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TorquoiseB writes:
> Anyway, if you were to attend such a party, or
> were just dressing up for Halloween, who/what
> would you be?
>
> Tom T:
> I was invited to a costume party/wedding. Everyon
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TorquoiseB writes:
> Anyway, if you were to attend such a party, or
> were just dressing up for Halloween, who/what
> would you be?
>
> Tom T:
> I was invited to a costume party/wedding. Everyon
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > on 9/26/05 10:40 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > On 9/26/05 10:36 AM, "Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > on 9/26/05 10:42 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >> It's not necessary for me to go over her books in order to see
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 9/26/05 2:28 AM, anonymousff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> What licentious behavior and why do you care?
> >
> > Bevan and Hagelin are infamous womanizers. They have not limited
> > themselves to single wome
TorquoiseB writes:
I think I picked it up in New York. It always
seemed to capture the Zen of certain paradoxes
for me, like the one you cite above. The coex-
istence of seeming opposites, the irresolvability
of the paradox, and all that. It's like how a
Zen master from the Bronx should talk: "D
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > snip
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Do you think that Bevan and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "uns_tressor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > I always thought Bevan was gay.
> > >
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > In a message dated 9/25/05 7:58:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > "We're only half way through this decade, ba
TorquoiseB writes:
Anyway, if you were to attend such a party, or
were just dressing up for Halloween, who/what
would you be?
Tom T:
I was invited to a costume party/wedding. Everyone was invited to come
in costume. I went as Krishna, as the bride? had kind of hinted she
thought I could carry it o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > While it is certainly boorish behavior and I do not
> > support it in the least, the ladies can say no.
>
> That apply to Maharishi as well?
Why would it not?
I know a standard theme revolves around "unquesion
on 9/26/05 3:23 PM, pibssmith at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Rick any idea what they paid for Grants log house or
> must I want until the assessor posts it.
My sister, who lives right next to them, told me, but I forget. I'll ask
her.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 9/26/05 1:30 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > ...and it is on this very point that I was intrigued to see that
> > John had appeared in the "What the *&$#$" movie, as it was produced
> > by a contr
1 - 100 of 235 matches
Mail list logo
