Missed this earlier...
He didn't say his enlightenment was a delusion. He said enlightenment per se,
although very real and genuine, is a delusion. You've been told this now five
or six times between Ann and me, so now when you say it, it's a lie, because
you know otherwise.
You are atta
No, go look up the fallacy of appeal to authority. You don't know what you're
talking about, no surprise.
You are wrong not because Ann is an authority, but because, duh, you got it
wrong, and the evidence is on the record in the posts in this exchange plus
Robin's post from December 2012. N
She is in the know. On this point, as it happens, so am I. Of course neither of
us is going to tell you anything about Robin's private life that he didn't
divulge here; what are you, nuts?
Ironically, though, as I told you before, he'd already written a number of
times about his friend who "
Ah, now this is Anne we've come to know. No worries. Anne, read Robin's post.
Read the various comments I have made about it. Now, what I am gathering is
that you think I am mistaken! Yes, I managed to pick that up.!
Now, I've told you why I came to the conclusions I've come to. And yo
Anne, you are saying, "Trust me, because I know what is going on. I'm not
going to tell you anything about it, but I'm in the know"
Well, I don't operate that way, and I don't know many who do. So as they say,
and I don't mean this in an impolite way, but put up, or shut up. There is
rea
One wonders about the current leadership of Iran. He appears to be intent on
intimidating the US military forces. But they don't have the firepower to
shoot it out with the US. Or, it could be just a bluff.
http://news.yahoo.com/iran-says-warships-sailing-towards-u-agency-214302042--fina
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Anne, both you and Judy think that I totally missed the mark in my
recollection of Robin's post from several years ago. I don't think I did miss
the mark, at least by much.
Steve, as I said, I don't really care one way or another but you d
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Anne,
This post was over a year old. In the body of the post at some point by one
of the participants is mentioned "Starbucks". Now if you wish to fault me over
this detail, or any other detail, no problem. But I stand by the my overall
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Well, Fairfield seems to generally have a lot of currency experts like these.
They kind of occupied the Ron Paul campaign. At a point it seemed Ron Paul did
not really know what hit him. Nothing like friends. Always has been a lot of
lectur
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
By the way Ann, re your recent photo upload: that's a splendid hound you have.
I'm jealous. I am more of a cat lover myself but all domestic animals are
endlessly fascinating. Much more enjoyable and rewarding than a colour TV!
Those who do TM
Now you are making me laugh. Yes Judy, yes. That many holes at least. And
you have called me on each of them. Thank God!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Wow, has it been that many holes you've dug for yourself and then couldn't get
out of?
<< How many times have you said
Judy, draw whatever conclusions you wish to draw. It is fine with me. If you
feel I missed the point completely, I am okay with that.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Nowhere near, Stevie baby. Here's what you claimed:
"And then we have his daily confessional with his friend
Anne,
This post was over a year old. In the body of the post at some point by one
of the participants is mentioned "Starbucks". Now if you wish to fault me over
this detail, or any other detail, no problem. But I stand by the my overall
point that Robin had a friend that appeared to call
Dear MJ, you seem jealous of the Maharishi in publishing this time-line of
yours and the color commentary in it. The guy (Maharishi) evidently was
incredibly successful in his life. At the least in leading and creating large
changes in culture in a lot of ways the Maharishi was also quite eviden
God bless you Judy. God bless you.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Think you can get a little more morally smelly, Stevie-boy? Are you in some
kind of competition with Share?
<< Anne, both you and Judy think that I totally missed the mark in my
recollection of Robin's post
Wow, has it been that many holes you've dug for yourself and then couldn't get
out of?
<< How many times have you said such over the past 17 years? I'd say over a
thousand. >>
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Translation: He can't figure out how to dig himself out of this h
Well, Fairfield seems to generally have a lot of currency experts like these.
They kind of occupied the Ron Paul campaign. At a point it seemed Ron Paul did
not really know what hit him. Nothing like friends. Always has been a lot of
lectures and seminars on money/currencies in Fairfield.
Think you can get a little more morally smelly, Stevie-boy? Are you in some
kind of competition with Share?
<< Anne, both you and Judy think that I totally missed the mark in my
recollection of Robin's post from several years ago. I don't think I did miss
the mark, at least by much.
Bu
you're boring Judy. no one can beat you in this game of yours. and no
sensible person would want to.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Stevie-poops, you aren't doing yourself any good with this crap. You aren't
clever enough to patronize anybody; you just make yourself look incr
How many times have you said such over the past 17 years? I'd say over a
thousand.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Translation: He can't figure out how to dig himself out of this hole he's dug
for himself. Standard Stevie.
<< Anne, for the moment, I am content to let my com
Anne, both you and Judy think that I totally missed the mark in my recollection
of Robin's post from several years ago. I don't think I did miss the mark, at
least by much.
But what is wrong with my feeling that Judy had some attachment to Robin? I
mean she said as much, (and I am not goi
He's been well trained by Barry. What do you expect?
Is this where things start to gravitate below the belt? And if so, why Steve?
Is it not possible to engage in a discussion without getting personal and
far-fetched in your unfounded theories?
Judy, you will just have to live with another unfulfilled desire.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Nope, as I said, Stevie-poo (and Ann has said as well), nowhere near. You got
it wrong, that's obvious. Acknowledge it (or not), and move on.
Judy, I don't want to throw cold w
Stevie-poops, you aren't doing yourself any good with this crap. You aren't
clever enough to patronize anybody; you just make yourself look increasingly
foolish, especially when the mistake was yours in the first place.
<< Judy, best to just let your perceptions and fantasies go unimpeded. (a
By the way Ann, re your recent photo upload: that's a splendid hound you have.
I'm jealous. I am more of a cat lover myself but all domestic animals are
endlessly fascinating. Much more enjoyable and rewarding than a colour TV!
Those who do TM are supposed to keep pets out of the room when they
Judy, best to just let your perceptions and fantasies go unimpeded. (as though
there's a choice in the matter). But you must realize, that for you, things
are always going wrong in the minds of people who disagree with you. I mean
that is your calling card, and that's not going to change. But
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Re "I would hate for anyone to call me "right wing":
A European "right-wing" conservative would have views far closer to a typical
American Democrat than to a Republican. Eg, the right for a woman to be able to
opt for an abortion is almost uni
Hey Thanks 7thRay. This is always something I appreciate about FFL and keeps me
coming back, that folks pop up, folks “who were there” and can give an insight
of recollection.
-Buck
7thRay27 wrote:
Hey Mike,
Since I know you like this kind of thing, I'll relate a few stories fr
Re "I would hate for anyone to call me "right wing":
A European "right-wing" conservative would have views far closer to a typical
American Democrat than to a Republican. Eg, the right for a woman to be able to
opt for an abortion is almost universally accepted over here.
But I would never lab
Translation: He can't figure out how to dig himself out of this hole he's dug
for himself. Standard Stevie.
<< Anne, for the moment, I am content to let my comment, and Robin's post
stand on their own without any additional commentary from me. >>
And although I am not a big fan of the Ol
Nope, as I said, Stevie-poo (and Ann has said as well), nowhere near. You got
it wrong, that's obvious. Acknowledge it (or not), and move on.
Judy, I don't want to throw cold water on any of your fantasies. (hey, that
came out just the way I wanted), so create any scenario you want. My
rec
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Anne, for the moment, I am content to let my comment, and Robin's post stand
on their own without any additional commentary from me.
I don't blame you since the quoted post doesn't exactly back up your point.
But, that's okay with me. It is
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
and yikes II, this is pretty revealing. I didn't realize how deep the
attachment went. Do you think it may have run mostly in one direction, though?
Is this where things start to gravitate below the belt? And if so, why Steve?
Is it not
Thank you emptybill for clarifying the Christian and Orthodox views on union
between God and human. It was disconcerting to think that there was such a
seperative divide between Eastern and Western religions on this most essential
of religious concepts.
On Saturday, February 8, 2014 5:20 PM
Ann knows how it began. Remember her response to your original comment?
Take her advice and go research the topic on your own rather than continuing
to flounder around here without knowing what you're talking about, any more
than you had any idea what my religious beliefs are.
<< Ann, I
Stevie, honest, it doesn't hurt me when you make a big fuss about something and
get it badly wrong.
I'm sure there are lots of people who know things about Robin that I don't.
But you aren't one of them.
<< sounds like this one hurt Judy. kinda has your ire up for some reason.
and yike
I don't think it has anything to do with spiritual illumination.
I scored 64% and I don't know nothing about rhythm. Though I can applaud with
two hands clapping.
-Buck
http://tonometric.com/rhythmdeaf/ http://tonometric.com/rhythmdeaf/
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Ann, actually I think this is where you and Judy go off track! Judy once told
Seraph that she was raised Presbyterian. Judy has mentioned reading the
ecclesiastical novels of Susan Howatch. In light of the current topic of God
human union, I wa
I'm not going to discuss my friendship with Robin, sorry, other than to say it
was mutual.
Boy, between you and Share, the stench in here is getting overpowering. No
doubt Barry will fly in here overnight and deposit a bunch more piles of
doodoo. Such spiritual people.
and yikes II, this
Anne, for the moment, I am content to let my comment, and Robin's post stand on
their own without any additional commentary from me.
And although I am not a big fan of the Olympics, I am enjoying watching them
with my wife and daughter and cracking jokes as we go along.
---In FairfieldLife
Judy, I don't want to throw cold water on any of your fantasies. (hey, that
came out just the way I wanted), so create any scenario you want. My
recollection was close enough I think. But, I realize I am treading on your
sacred ground here, so I'm going to try to tip toe away, so you can wor
No, that is most definitely not what I told Seraphita. I told her my family
heritage was Presbyterian but that I did not have a religious upbringing. I
also told her I was not a believer. So I'm wondering where you got the
impression that I was a "devout Christian."
I remember another time w
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Ann, I suggest you go back to how this topic began. Judy threw out the phrases
enlightened days and genuine enlightenment with reference to Robin. I said I
thought those phrases were inaccurate given that Robin himself called his
enlightenment
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Um, I think it's close enough Judy. But to someone who as a matter of course
cannot see the forest for the trees, it probably has no semblance. Kinda,
sorta seems like you had your eggs in the "e-mails with me basket" sorry about
that.
Nowhere near, Stevie baby. Here's what you claimed:
"And then we have his daily confessional with his friend at Starbucks."
And:
"My recollection is that he did, indeed say that he has a friend he meets with
most everyday, at Starbucks, (I believe), in whom he confides thoughts,
feel
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Re "I'm pretty right wing when it comes to this stuff, I admit it.":
It's funny how people feel the need to apologise for being right wing. I
regard both "wings" as equally deluded. (My heroes are maverick outsiders - but
paradoxically a soc
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/328672
Interesting to read this again, I don't ever go back and search and re-read
stuff here. But I don't see anything about any confessionals at Starbucks.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogr
It's true, Judy, my intention is not to analyze what Robin wrote. My intention
is to say that I think your phrases enlightened days and genuine enlightenment
with regards to Robin are inaccurate given that he said his enlightenment was a
delusion. I don't think it is attacking of someone to refe
Ann, I suggest you go back to how this topic began. Judy threw out the phrases
enlightened days and genuine enlightenment with reference to Robin. I said I
thought those phrases were inaccurate given that Robin himself called his
enlightenment a delusion. That is how this discussion began.
BTW
and yikes II, this is pretty revealing. I didn't realize how deep the
attachment went. Do you think it may have run mostly in one direction, though?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
My memory is excellent, and I followed Robin's posts more closely than anyone
here. The two o
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@ wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> > On 02/07/2014 10:01 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >
> > > ---
Ann, actually I think this is where you and Judy go off track! Judy once told
Seraph that she was raised Presbyterian. Judy has mentioned reading the
ecclesiastical novels of Susan Howatch. In light of the current topic of God
human union, I wanted to know what Judy thought as well as what she t
sounds like this one hurt Judy. kinda has your ire up for some reason. and
yikes, I guess I pushed the mother of all buttons, claiming I knew something
about Robin you didn't.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
My memory is excellent, and I followed Robin's posts more closely t
Um, I think it's close enough Judy. But to someone who as a matter of course
cannot see the forest for the trees, it probably has no semblance. Kinda,
sorta seems like you had your eggs in the "e-mails with me basket" sorry about
that.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Oh, hi
When mankind first left the African birthplace of our race millennia ago where
did they head to first? Fair England has that honour. This green and pleasant
land was an irresistible draw to our common ancestors.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-26025763
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/
Oh, hilarious. Of course, this doesn't say at all what you claimed, does it,
now?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/328672
Judy, I don't know what the point of arguing about it is. If he said it, it
will be there in the record. Without being too boastful, my memory is
My memory is excellent, and I followed Robin's posts more closely than anyone
here. The two of us were good friends and had extensive email correspondence.
You repeatedly get things wrong that have happened in the past. I never saw
him say anything like what you imagine. You made the claim, y
Re "I'm pretty right wing when it comes to this stuff, I admit it.":
It's funny how people feel the need to apologise for being right wing. I
regard both "wings" as equally deluded. (My heroes are maverick outsiders - but
paradoxically a society of radical individualists would be a healthier
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/328672
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Judy, I don't know what the point of arguing about it is. If he said it, it
will be there in the record. Without being too boastful, my memory is pretty
good. My impression is that he
Judy, I don't know what the point of arguing about it is. If he said it, it
will be there in the record. Without being too boastful, my memory is pretty
good. My impression is that he had nothing to do with e-mails, and seemed to
predate his participation here.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogro
I luv seeing andy's face again. He was a continuous joy to be around. Always
working material everywhere and anywhere.
Now I am remembering the Orono one month course the summer after Maharishi
stopped doing the one month summer courses. Charlie Donahue hosting the course
talent show,
You've got something screwy here, Stevie. He may have been talking about email,
in which case he probably meant with me. But there was no "daily confessional."
My recollection is that he did, indeed say that he has a friend he meets with
most everyday, at Starbucks, (I believe), in whom he co
My recollection is that he did, indeed say that he has a friend he meets with
most everyday, at Starbucks, (I believe), in whom he confides thoughts,
feelings.
I would say this was a couple months before he stopped posting.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
emptybill doesn't k
emptybill doesn't know what he's talking about with regard to Robin, his reams
of quotes notwithstanding.
"Daily confessional with his friend at Starbuck's"?? Robin never said anything
remotely like that.
Both Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox theologies have clearly explicated
the nat
You missed the word "ontological."
Quoting me:
“Let me put it this way: He believes all forms of enlightenment, etc., that
entail the experience of union with God are delusionary. His viewpoint is
strictly Judeo-Christian in that regard: God is wholly, immutably Other; there
can be no ontol
Fairfield Life Post Counter
===
Start Date (UTC): 02/08/14 00:00:00
End Date (UTC): 02/15/14 00:00:00
100 messages as of (UTC) 02/09/14 00:13:14
19 authfriend
16 awoelflebater
12 Share Long
11 steve.sundur
8 salyavin808
8 TurquoiseB
6 Pundit Sir
4 nablusoss1
Ha!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@ wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> > On 02/07/2014 10:01 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >
> > > -
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Both Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox theologies have clearly explicated
the nature of union with God – at least as far as that is possible for humans.
However, he never appeared interested in learning more - whether about
Catholic/Ortho
Okay, thank you for feedback.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
I am sorry that I did not make it more clear that I've only known Robin from
the period that he was posting here. I left FF and MIU shortly before he made
his big
(Snipped)
How Ann See "Bawwy"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4SdkYo2pTk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4SdkYo2pTk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@ wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> > On 02/07/2014 10:01 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> > > >
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ELvH98lix8&list=PLqEG-7-U8GbXnckJGVk-cOvLpFS0Qb4bD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ELvH98lix8&list=PLqEG-7-U8GbXnckJGVk-cOvLpFS0Qb4bD
Whoa! Thot it was the other way round:
How well can you distinguish subtle differences in rhythm?
This test will play a series of two rhythmical phrases and ask you if they are
the same or different. Unlike the similar tonedeaf test, however, the
differences between the phrases are only
http://tonometric.com/adaptivepitch/ http://tonometric.com/adaptivepitch/
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Judy, if Robin thinks that his experience of union with God was a delusion,
then there is no validity to his saying that enlightenment defined as union
with God is wrong because he did not have it! How could he know if it is right
or wrong?
Sh
Again, Share, your question is incoherent. Robin never said "enlightenment
defined as union with God is wrong," for example. You made that up. I'm telling
you, this whole topic is over your head. Your intention is not to understand
what Robin wrote but rather to find yet another way to beat up o
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Judy, what your beliefs have to do with this discussion is that you're the
person with whom I'm having the discussion!
Here is where Barry and you go off track. Just because Judy is trying to
explain how ROBIN felt and what he believes it does
Judy, if Robin thinks that his experience of union with God was a delusion,
then there is no validity to his saying that enlightenment defined as union
with God is wrong because he did not have it! How could he know if it is right
or wrong?
On Saturday, February 8, 2014 1:34 PM, "authfri...
We've had this discussion before, Share. Yes, it's inaccurate. Search your
memory. And my beliefs, such as they may be, have nothing whatsoever to do with
this discussion, so just drop that angle of attack, please.
<< Judy, what your beliefs have to do with this discussion is that you're the
Judy, what your beliefs have to do with this discussion is that you're the
person with whom I'm having the discussion! And I've gotten the impression that
you're a devout Christian. Is that inaccurate?
What does it mean that Robin said his union with God was a delusion? Is this
where the evil f
Yes, that's what it means. Me, I haven't a clue. (What do my beliefs have to do
with this?) Yes, Robin's experience was of union with God. He believes it was a
delusion.
<< Judy, does ontological union mean: due to their respective natures, there
can be no union between God and human? And do
Judy, does ontological union mean: due to their respective natures, there can
be no union between God and human? And do you also believe that there can be no
ontological union between God and human?
Another question: was Robin saying that he experienced union with God?
On Saturday, Februar
Let me put it this way: He believes all forms of enlightenment, etc., that
entail the experience of union with God are delusionary. His viewpoint is
strictly Judeo-Christian in that regard: God is wholly, immutably Other; there
can be no ontological union between human beings and God.
<< Jud
Again we see Barry's perennial confusion between "So-and-so said" and "What
So-and-so said is true." No matter how many times it's explained to him, he
simply cannot grasp the distinction, so he makes the same stpid mistake
over and over.
I believe Robin was sincere in what he said.
I can't say as I'm surprised, but no, you aren't getting it, Share. I think
you're determined not to get it because of your personal animus against Robin,
which shows up so clearly in your last paragraph.
Here's where your "logic is off": the words "rather than." As far as Robin is
concerned
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Judy and Ann, ok, let me try this and tell me if my logic is off and if so,
where it is off:
Robin said he was enlightened.
Robin also said that enlightenment is a delusion.
Therefore Robin was saying that he was actually deluded rather than enli
Judy, do you think Robin thinks ALL forms of realization, awakening,
enlightenment, etc. in ALL traditions are a delusion?
On Saturday, February 8, 2014 11:28 AM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Absolutely correct. He was insistent that enlightenment is a real state of
consciousness, and
Absolutely correct. He was insistent that enlightenment is a real state of
consciousness, and that he was in this state for 10-plus years. What he says he
came to realize is that the state itself is delusional--the experience of being
one with God, the identification with Self rather than self,
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoecultist wrote:
>
> ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@ wrote:
> >
> > Judy, Robin himself called his alleged enlightenment a delusion. So I think
> > it's inaccurate to use the phrase "en
Judy and Ann, ok, let me try this and tell me if my logic is off and if so,
where it is off:
Robin said he was enlightened.
Robin also said that enlightenment is a delusion.
Therefore Robin was saying that he was actually deluded rather than enlightened.
I also want to add that I recognize that I
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Judy, Robin himself called that experience a delusion. Thus I think it's
inaccurate to refer to it as "genuine enlightenment."
See my later post about this to you. And I am not saying I agree with Robin
only that his experience was his exper
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
I wonder how many more times Barry will need to get shot down in flames before
it dawns on him that he appears a screeching, babbling idiot.
Let's sincerely hope never. I speak only for myself but I find reading Bawwy
to be one of the most h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoecultist wrote:
>
> ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@ wrote:
> >
> > Judy, Robin himself called his alleged enlightenment a delusion. So
I think it's inaccurate to use the phrase "enlightened days."
>
> Here is the important point Share:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Oh nice, I know Hebden bridge, went for a day out there from Skelmersdale when
I was hanging with the movement. Proper nice country town with loads of great
walks in every direction. You can't go wrong. Unless you get lost on the
moors
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
I am sorry that I did not make it more clear that I've only known Robin from
the period that he was posting here. I left FF and MIU shortly before he made
his big splash there.
I did know one lady with whom I had a bit of a crush, Judy G, w
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
You misunderstood him, Share (even as many times as he explained it). He
called enlightenment per se a delusion--his, Maharishi's, anybody's. He did not
say he was deluded to believe he was enlightened.
OK, just read this now after posting m
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Judy, Robin himself called his alleged enlightenment a delusion. So I think
it's inaccurate to use the phrase "enlightened days."
Here is the important point Share: Robin believes "true enlightenment" to be a
delusion, an illusion. It is not
A new study says that educated people marrying each other has increased
inequality by 25 percent:
"Okay, it probably isn't fair to blame Billy Crystal and Meg Ryan for our
widening income gap. But it is fair to say that When Harry Met Sally tells
us something about why the rich have been getting s
I wonder how many more times Barry will need to get shot down in flames before
it dawns on him that he appears a screeching, babbling idiot.
No one was. There *were* no "enlightened days." There was only Narcissistic
Personality Disorder acting itself out.
Hee, hee, says Bawwy who was ove
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
