---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I believe the concept of extraordinary claims requiring extraordinary proof
helps a bit. I believe it is also important to resist the tendency to fill in
gaps. It is perfectly reasonable to say that you saw an object in the sky you
could not iden
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I am glad to hear it was offered to you and that it was your choice. I don't
blame you for not wanting it. I also appreciate your information about the
security issues. That pretty much destroys any chance of being protected if
someone goes after
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Yes, I would like to thank Rick too for starting this forum and allowing me to
be part of it after these years. Good luck in your future endeavors and we'll
be watching your BATGAP presentations. Come back and visit us anytime.
JR
M
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Which one of RD's did you read Curtis?
Me:
The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution is the book I am
referring to. It is my favorite of his.
S:
I often recommend his stuff on here because he is such a clear communicator and
it's obvio
"It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no god.
It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." Thomas Jefferson
I loves me some Thomas Jefferson. But this quote is incomplete in itself. I
don't know if he corrected it in context. He lived under (and helped create
I recommend Richard Dawkins' book on evolution if anyone wants to get a better
handle on what it actually is than we can remember from biology class. When I
read it I found that I had some odd perspectives that needed adjusting. We are
by nature drawn to teleological perspectives (ones that pres
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Well, Curtis, you've managed to nudge this discussion farther and farther away
from the actual issue, which was your erroneous claims that Barry's mistake
(lie?) about who started the Subud discussion was an insignificant detail, and
that I had mi
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
P.S.: This may be unpleasant and embarrassing for you, Curtis, but in the
interests of adjusting your perspective in the direction of reality, you might
want to keep an eye on Barry's FFL2 posts yourself, noting how many of them
have been about mo
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Doug (not "Buck") said he hadn't heard Maharishi say anything about Subud.
(Barry made fun of him for that, but then t3rinity chimed in that he had
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Doug (not "Buck") said he hadn't heard Maharishi say anything about Subud.
(Barry made fun of him for that, but then t3rinity chimed in that he hadn't
heard anything either. Another Oooopsie! for Barry.)
As I said, what Doug wrote seems to
Me: Touche
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
(snip)
All I know is that Barry's spirit has possessed some people here fer real real.
First he forced them to click on his posts when he was on FFL and to read
whatever he wrote that o
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Of course it was Mike Dixon who brought it up
Me: This Judy nitpick is such a classic. It reveals both humor impairment as
well as an ability to comple
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Save them for what? But here is my point, anyone can find you, even
techno-dolts if they go google your handle here. It doesn't take a technical
genius which neither you or I, apparently, are. Now go nurse those fingers so
you can continue to ber
Thanks for the heads up.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Be aware that he who shall not be invoked by name subscribed to FFL2 last
night. So far, he's behaving himself, and everyone else is completely ignoring
him.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Thanks for
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Me:
Protecting people who post from asshole trolls with bad intentions, and letting
adults express themselves the way they want. I hope it is back at the original
FFL site because of the legacy of a
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I'm not sure I see the point of these "Barry bulletins." Why don't you post
them on FFL2? Barry is no longer on this forum, and I doubt whether anyone here
wants to read about him. He was booted off for very good reasons, so why keep
raising his gh
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Of course it was Mike Dixon who brought it up
Me: This Judy nitpick is such a classic. It reveals both humor impairment as
well as an ability to completely miss the point of the writer. It is
fascinating to see it in action on someone else where it
Thanks for the suggestion Alex. I appreciate your taking precautions against
people who wish to do real harm while we are trying to enjoy some open
conversations. I think your idea makes it much clearer when someone crosses the
line. If I knew then what I know now before starting on FF...
--
Me:
Protecting people who post from asshole trolls with bad intentions, and letting
adults express themselves the way they want. I hope it is back at the original
FFL site because of the legacy of all we have put into this place.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
It's funny becaus
Me: Well you got this right and I do appreciate that:
Judy:
(BTW, it's "manner," not "manor." A manner is a way of doing something; a manor
is a very big house.)
Me: Unfortunately for you that correcton proved my point.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Curtis, this is about as
The proper context of my comment is in the paragraph below. If Judy was a
professional editor of people's words I would have to call her on a completely
dishonest presentation of my meaning in the paragraph I wrote.
Since she cannot be held to such a high standard, perhaps her presenting what I
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
It's quite amazing that both salyavin and Curtis, intelligent as they are, are
still complaining loudly ab
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
It's quite amazing that both salyavin and Curtis, intelligent as they are, are
still complaining loudly about the imaginary notion that Doug is out to ban
people who express negative opinions of TM. It doesn't matter how many people
tell them what
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
No, not conflating what was evident that some people posting here were
exploitatively seeking to inflict methodical and personal emotional hurt on
people using a Yahoo-group [FFL]. For a touch on an energetic component of this
abuse see the post ov
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Curtis, I actually read this message from Doug rather differently. The section
below seems to be referring to younger TMers at the university who are pointing
out to older TM-movement types that some of the language they use contains
these "micro-
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Yes, as some are affirming here the Yahoo-groups guidelines are a lot about
civility and how things are said. Yes it is about civility and facilitating
communal well-being for individuals in [safe] collaborative communal
organization. With this it
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
OK, I have to step in to this fantasyland with a dose of reality.
Me: Perfect Judy entrance, lead with breaking rapport...
MJ was canned for voicing an opinion about Doug, insulting him by calling him
"a hypocrite and full of crap."
Me: And Buc
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Doug is right here, and I think calling this new group Free Speech is a
misnomer, as Doug implies. It's more a question of civility than free speech.
Me: I'll bet our idea of civility would be a pretty close match. But it is a
subjective evaluatio
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
As someone pointed out down at Paradiso Cafe in Fairfield, Iowa this morning
about the creation of FFL2 for the FFL-banished, these fox may not have fun for
long by themselves without also having hens to pick on. Making straw-men may
suffice for s
Given the tools you had, your perspective on your role here, and your
explanation about anonymity, I can understand your position better Alex.
Since you are now dealing with the level of computer sophistication and crazy
that was aimed at F'ing me, and my own explanation of my perspective on it
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
If you're so concerned about your search engine rankings, why did you choose
to make them vulnerable to being messed with by directly tying your business
identity to FFL?
Me: My concerns developed long after I had chosen a name which was purpos
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Hah! I'd intended my praise for Sal! (He seems particularly downcast by
today's developments.)
Me: That is hilarious since I re-read your post and now can understand why I
thought it was for me. I guess I was paranoid since I had just posted a
cr
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Me: Thanks for pointing that out to me.
Apologies to Buck for misunderstanding his intention for that word choice. I
mistook it for his usual old timey fey word choice so it seemed normal.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
--In Fa
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
My experience sitting in the full lotus for an extended period (30 minutes or
so), was that it had a remarkable effect on my physiology.
But I happened to get a little frostbite on my heel late in the game, and it
made sitting in that posture un
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Blimey! I hope you're not leaving us - or about to get the order of the boot.
I've praised your writing style twice in recent weeks so I won't repeat myself.
I've found your contributions some of the most thought-provoking on FFL.
Heretics are
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I have long appreciated a lot of the content of what these recently fallen
Me:
"Fallen?" Condescending much? You got the power to slip them the mickey and you
did it. Nobody "fell" anywhere you just took advantage of the situation to suit
you
I used to promote a high tech company on search engines Alex. I brought them to
number one in their category. Recent postings of a name pumps up the relevancy
in searches. At the time I was complaining about my name being used repeatedly,
I could track how it was affecting the search engines.
T
Sal if you get canned, this place has officially jumped the shark. I couldn't
stand the place without dissenting voices like yours. You have made huge
intellectual contributions to the place, and the idea that you are now in a
laser sight from such a tiny mind's perspective makes me sick.
-
Hi Share. Comments below.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
salyavin, Jai Guru You! I love how you keep saying bye but remain. Yay!
Me: Maharishi would have been appalled by this hijacking of his way to honor
his master. He was completely against this even when it was directed to
Just as Maharishi said, "the movement belongs to those who move" (slave labor
of course) FFL belongs to those who post. Today I see two valuable
contributors, Michael and Xeno have been canned following Barry's "first shoe
dropped."
I want to weigh in that I oppose the way content is being e
It reminds me of the old porta-foams for flying. I forget who created those in
FF but they were great when I was busy trying to compress my spine twice a day!
They had straps for your legs and you could "fly" anywhere.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
That is almost enough to ma
Me: It may have been after this that he disappeared for a while before finally
accepting the position.
The way Maharishi tells this story is that when they did all the pujas for him
to be Shankaracharia, he said "Are you done, now go." From his perspective it
wasn't that he was tricked into it
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
As long as he had a dry cave to sleep in, why would he worry about his
housing,
Me: Throw pillows. If you look at the pictures it is all about the color
coordinated throw pillows.
M: given the fact that he had that bag was it, the one that GD c
Re "Why did Swa. Brahmananda abandon this realization-practice to engage in a
role-playing position as a kingly Shankaracharya. This is never addressed by
the biographies but is glossed over with pious platitudes.":
Me:
Many Homeless people accept help to live inside when they reach the age whe
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Just to
clarify (as Curtis seems unable to comprehend a particular point here)
Me: Bit of unnecessary condescension. I can comprehend points just fine, I j
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
The other part of Ann's post was that Rick told her he had been bombarded with
complaints (presumably from more than one person) about the unpleasantness on
FFL.
Me: I wonder who these complaints were directed toward?
Judy: Curtis, I wouldn't
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Just to clarify
(as Curtis seems unable to comprehend a particular point here)
Me: Bit of unnecessary condescension. I can comprehend points just fine, I just
had not seen your post.
A: Rick approached Buck to see if he was interested in the job as m
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Thanks for your feedback.
Curtis, I think I get where you are coming from.
I think most of us do.
As I recall, Doug did provide some explanation, but perhaps you felt it was
just weak cover to get rid of someone who was a perceived enem
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
(snip)
So far Doug has stonewalled us on his reasons for banning Barry. So some are
making up their own to cover this glaring gap.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I'm rushing a bit. Sorry about that.
I can see your point about Richard and Barry. Yes, two different situations.
Me: Thanks for saying that.
Seve:Barry stated on many occasions that nothing would keep him from his
mission to demonstra
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
excuse me for interrupting here, Curtis, but this is quite a distortion.
Your issue is primarily with Judy, so come on, is this a martyr play of some
sort?
Me: My issue is with our new moderator. Judy is just a way to keep the
discussion livel
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Yeah, pretty hard to manufacture a convincing counterargument, ain't it?
Me: Keep digging Ms Doubledown...You are extending my joy.
The *fact* is that what Doug wrote isn't explicit either way.
Me: Says the person who professionally edits. K
Lumping together R and Barry is not accurate Steve. R didn't get bounced for
being a troll, he violated a much more serious rule, was banned for it once and
then came back and did it again, and then continued it on the Peak. He was much
more than a guy who starts arguments on the Internet. If
Et tu Edg?
So if he culls one from the herd unfairly, but you don't like the guy anyway it
is OK?
Say it is not true my brother, say it is not true.
It is only when he comes for you that you will get a sense of conscience? Right
now, bouncing me would be more trouble than it would be worth, b
Me: You just saved me some typing time. Excellent, thank you.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
But the spirit of FFL was far more interesting than this drivel, and in 10
years Yahoo never made any attempt to change or alter what happened on FFL,
Yahoo really does not care wha
I can't even comment on this right away. I just want it to sink in for the
readers. Take it in, let it wallow in your mind. Take a moment, perhaps with a
cup of tea, open the windows, hear the birds, breath in the the fresh air of
Summer and enjoy something special, nay, something beautiful. In
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
You're a little confused. See my third paragraph below. All three of 'em are
doing it.
(I'm not talking about *sexual* harassment, BTW, just co
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Although I'm posting more, because the two trolls are gone, I gotta mention
that it seems almost everyone here is still dissin' on each other for various
infractions. This includes my beloved sacred hero, Curtishee hee.not
that he's wr
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
You're a little confused. See my third paragraph below. All three of 'em are
doing it.
(I'm not talking about *sexual* harassment, BTW, just continued annoying dumb
attacks, typically gratuitous.)
Me: There are no "attacks" and no one was bein
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
My first send hasn't shown up. Maybe Doug has decided to hold my posts for
approval. Let's see if this second try makes it...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Sure. Your accusati
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Sure. Your accusation today that it was dishonest of me to post the last
paragraph of Barry's post in which he declares he's going to ignore Doug
completely. That was harassment, for the reasons I've already stated.
C: I said it was slippery. Whic
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I do not say this. But sometimes it's obvious what state of mind a poster is
in.
salyavin was just demanding that Ann quit what he called her "dumb harassment
of Xeno." How about you quit your dumb harassment of me and other TM supporters?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Oh, blow it out your I/O port, Curtis.
Me: Buck please deal with this violation of the "kindness" yahoo guideline.
Judy:
I note that you don't mention the context of *my* post, because it's
embarrassing to one of your compatriots in trying to ma
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Curtis, have you spoken to Rick over the phone about this?
You took a lot of effort to bring me back into the forum.
You certainly can bring Barry back to the forum.
Where is Dr. Pete when we need him?
Me: Hey Jason,
I don't have any power
There is something slippery going on here. Judy, who is the first to make a
stink about the context of a quote when it serves her own purposes has clipped
out this paragraph of Barry's from the thread context, dishonestly making it
look like Barry said this in a vacuum.
The context was Buck
You are really on to something.
FFL #1 "Barrry is bad and keeps me from having interesting discussions here."
FFL #2 "OK Barry is gone now, what do you want to say?"
FFL #1 "That Barry is bad."
FFL#2 "Feel better now?"
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@ya
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I ask ya, cuz, when I first got up off the floor, I was pretty fixated on
anti-spirituality -- more than I could really justify. Truth be told, you seem
to be in a similar fix -- just can't cut spirituality a break, and with a
massive intellect to
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
quite an exaggeration, I'd say.
we know negativity, and we know what an edge is. everyone likes edge, no one
lines trolling.
it sounds Cur
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Curtis, we've done this dance before, and my toes still hurt!
Please believe me when I say I had to read Nisargadatta's "I Am That" three
times before my intellect felt like he was logically consistent. Each page
seems to say the same thing ag
That was fascinating, thanks for the heads up Alex.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Actually, just this morning, Doug did his first exertion of editorial control
by deleting Ravi's "Barry - here's the gameplan" thread. Granted, I can
understand why he deleted it, but a deleti
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Here's my take, and please correct me if I'm wrong.
Ravi posted, and no one probably thought much about it.
However, you reminded the denizens that Ravi had been banned, and so, it would
follow, that if someone had been banned, and posted
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
quite an exaggeration, I'd say.
we know negativity, and we know what an edge is. everyone likes edge, no one
lines trolling.
it sounds Curtis, like you have a fervent wish for Doug to turn into the
tyrant, he shows no sign of turning into.
I'll take a crack...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
If all the buzzings of a brain are 100% obedient to the laws of chemistry and
physics, where's the free will?
Old question. Still bothers me. If it's all determined, then it's moot to
suss out individuality. We're all "
Thanks for keeping the thread alive Michael. We have a fascinating power
dynamic in play here that students of cult bullshittery like us can have some
fun dissecting.
Buck/Doug felt abused by the TM group when they yanked his badge for not
following their rules about seeing other "saints." T
I thought it was pretty hilarious but thanks for letting me know how it
happened.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
As Ravi demonstrates, another aspect of the whole banning people thing is that
by having originally configured the group for anonymous posting, there's really
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Curtis - you really need to stop this malice and deception please. I don't
have the time or energy or the inclination to post here and re-hash old issues
from 4 years back. The fact of the matter is Ravi didn't cause you any personal
harm nor did
Edg,
I was not in Barry's crosshairs and you were. I never viewed you through his
eyes. You and I became friends on our own as we sized each other up as good
people. So I am not judging you for your opinion of him nor him for his opinion
of you. That is between you two guys and is none of my
OK I've done my homework Doug. You have not been dealing straight with us and
it is time for you to man up and explain why YOU decided on your own to ban
Barry and what the reason was.
Seriously dude, you have been naughty and you owe us an explanation.
I get it that many people who post here d
Interspersed comments.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Why not give it a go, Curtis.
Me: I am giving it my version of a "go" by commenting on issues I find relevant
here. This new change is interesting, so I am writing about it. That is my
"go." If you mean why don't I change
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Nice to hear from folks again and see folks returning and some joining FFL
again. Feels like watching the migration flyways where waterfowl in traveling
drop in out of the sky to rest and feed along the way.
Me:Other than a brief drop-in by a Pe
Crystal clear, thanks for posting this.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
This is still a complete lack of transparency (except for the case of 'R').
This explains nothing about precisely why Turq was dropped. It's not about
coloured cards. It is about certain specific posts that
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On one Yahoo page Guidelines for Comments on Yahoo, the following appeared at
the end of their so-called guidelines:
'Yahoo is not responsible or liable in any way for comments posted by its
users'
That rather undoes any responsibility on Ya
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Thanks for all your concern for the community here. The yahoo-guidelines are
really quite simple. Folks will be quite fine on FFL as they write well within
the wide margins of tolerance that are the Yahoo-groups guidelines.
Me:
S, we sho
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Declaring one is going to ignore the authority figure, of course, adds up to
far more than simply talking back to the authority figure. And it has nothing
to do with the Yahoo Guidelines per se; it has to do with the authority figures
themselves.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Regardless of how folks feel about Turq, moderation should be carried out
transparently, and not in a secret, undefined manner.
Me: Exactly Alex. No one can follow the lines if they are not painted clearly.
When people hide the criteria they are
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Curtis deliberately misrepresents what I said in an effort to switch the
context his way. Again, standard.
My conclusion about why Turq got bounced was that he declared he was going to
ignore anything Doug posted. Kind of like a football player
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
(snip)
But your support for him has eliminated you from the FFL dead pool so in the
end your choice my be the wise one here if you still care to post.
I resent the implication. Standard Curt
I am not a member so I cannot post this there but I know he reads FFL sometimes.
Richard is now posting every instance of when I used my real name in the past
on your site.
The issue is that recent postings of my real name, personal or professional get
picked up by search engines as more relev
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
What on earth is the difficulty understanding the obvious here? Turq got
thrown out because he declared he was not subject to Doug's moderation. There's
no need to have Doug explain it to us when we have the evidence of the post in
which he exp
Feste, I forgot to thank you for saying something very nice about my
participation here. Back at you and thanks. We will see if I can stay this side
of the undefined invisible line that has drawn as I try to find out where
exactly it is.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I wou
My comments below:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
This post is almost entirely irrelevant to the current situation on FFL.
Moreover, it has quite a few inaccuracies.
There is no reason that anyone's equanimity should be deliberately tested by
trying to upset them. It may hap
I agree with the need to know. If we are expected to follow your
interpretation of the vague yahoo guidelines, it is only fair for us to find
out what POV we need to align ourselves to until all dissenting voices are
inevitably quelled here.
So far it is a perfect reflection of the movement s
FFL reflected Rick's open mindedness and respect for adults voicing their
opinion in dramatic contrast to the group that most of us were involved with. I
consider this latest change to be a version of FFL suicide by appointing
Buck/Doug to kill off all opposing views. Once freedom of expression
Just added to my Dead Pool list for oppositional opinion:
4. Xeno
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
It would appear a dark, medieval consciousness is beginning to take over
Fairfield Life, in the likeness of the Transcendental Meditation Organisation's
tyrannical manner.
Med
Thanks for posting this Alex. Perhaps Buck/Doug will share the rational here
so we can understand which of his interpretation of the previously never
enforced vague Yahoo guidelines Barry violated.
In the spirit of Barry's sense of humor here I think the only appropriate thing
to do now is to
I found this to be a revealing post about how Doug and I differ concerning
information and contrasting POV's here on FFL
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Dear 4U, I appreciate your taking the time to post this here. There are a
number of contributors here who often cut off discu
I object to this overreach of moderator power into content censorship by a
blatant misread of the explicit intention of this guidline. The guideline
applies to members of the list, and David lynch is not a member, he is a public
figure. He is not being "degraded" because he will never read this
Hey Barry,
I don't know what Doug's role in this was except it was after the fact of me
emailing Rick.
Funny troll graphic with non English speaker spelling.
Thanks for understanding the need to be careful not to stir what must be kept
in the ground.
The Doug as CEO (his term) of FFL seems t
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
We do too.
Willytex is one of the very few few people here I won't miss because he really
did just come here to stir trouble. What he got out of it is anyone's guess.
I've been calling for Rick and Alex to set him free for ages because there
Here is how it went down. R was phishing for my professional name. I told him
that I keep my names separate on social media to prevent casual searches from
combining my business and personal life. He responded by posting my personal
Facebook page to out my real name AGAIN.
While this was going
1 - 100 of 493 matches
Mail list logo