[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mr.Obama has been under a national and international microscope for > over two years... What microscope? I wish. He still refuses to show: Occidental College records Columbia College records Columbia Thesis paper Harvard

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

(snip) Sarah was in the kitchen multi-tasking slicing, > (emasculating code?) skinning, and stuffing hot dogs for dinner. Try > that without a teleprompter, Barack. Have you ever seen a politician > give an interview in such an informal setting? Probably not. > (snip) Mr.Obama has been under a na

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" > wrote: > > [quoting Camille Paglia in Salon.com:] > > > > Liberal Democrats are going to wake up from their > > sadomasochistic, anti-Palin orgy with a very big

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (snip) > Actually, one would have to go back only a few > months to find the very same evil genie released > to assail Hillary. Once she was done for, it > barely had time to catch its breath before > ripping into Pali

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [quoting Camille Paglia in Salon.com:] > > Liberal Democrats are going to wake up from their > sadomasochistic, anti-Palin orgy with a very big hangover. > The evil genie released during this sorry episode will > not so

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

(snip) No, Sarah Palin should stick to her > governorship and just hit the rubber-chicken circuit, as Richard Nixon > did in his long haul back from political limbo following his California > gubernatorial defeat in 1962. Step by step, the mainstream media will > come around, wipe its own mud o

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > curtisdeltablues@ wrote: > > > > > I'm referring (as I suspect you're well aware) to > > > crap like calling her a "bimbo" and worse, and > > > pretending she

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

http://www.amazon.com/Terminatrix-Editors-Wasilla-Iron-Gazette/dp/0061778729/ref=pd_sim_b_1 On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 11, 2008, at 2:25 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote: > > > It sounds to me like someone needs a Sarah Palin inflatable love doll! > It'

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

> Her entertainment value has a proven track > record for me! > TurquoiseB wrote: > No accounting for taste. Some people actually find > beauty contests and the contestants fascinating, > too. > "Why on earth would you want to be VP when you could be a TV rock star making 10 million a year, o

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

On Nov 11, 2008, at 3:21 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:I'm beginning to understand what Curtis meansby "entertainment value." OK, I'll bite.  :-)The thing is, I've heard that Sarah Palin hatesthis sex doll of her more than she hates Obama.The reason is that not only is it better in bedthan she is, it gives

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > It sounds to me like someone needs a Sarah Palin inflatable love doll! > > It's sure to take those blues away! Come on! It's time to cross those > > party lines! > > > > http://www.thefrisky.com/s

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Nov 11, 2008, at 2:25 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote: > > >> They *want* us to keep talking about them, but > >> why should we? Because some people can't stop > >> obsessing on them? That's their problem, not > >> mine. > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

> > It sounds to me like someone needs a Sarah Palin inflatable love doll! > It's sure to take those blues away! Come on! It's time to cross those > party lines! > > http://www.thefrisky.com/site/post/246-sarah-palin-sex-doll-now-on-sale/ > The comments are hilarious! Of course I am not

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

On Nov 11, 2008, at 2:25 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote: >> They *want* us to keep talking about them, but >> why should we? Because some people can't stop >> obsessing on them? That's their problem, not >> mine. > > Dude, if this is an intervention then I'm gunna need a few weeks of > Methadone befo

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 > > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > They *want* us to keep talking about them, but > > why should we? Because some people can't stop > > obsessing on them? That's their problem, not > > mine. > > Dude, if this is an intervention then I'm gunna

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

> They *want* us to keep talking about them, but > why should we? Because some people can't stop > obsessing on them? That's their problem, not > mine. Dude, if this is an intervention then I'm gunna need a few weeks of Methadone before I go cold turkey on her. If anything she is much more fasci

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But damn, that was a close one. You betcha! > > Way to close, brother, way too close. So why is anyone still talking about her? Is anyone still talking about McCain? The reason is that Sarah Palin is an occultist, an

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

John Updike described Sarah as a "bird-brain," which seems about right, although perhaps a little unfair to some birds. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > wrote: > > > > Judy, > > > > > I'

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "boo_lives" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > there's absolutely no friggin way she's talking about > birth control and sex education - she will never ever > ever never say those words She already has, and on the record. I posted the quotes awhile back from the L.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

> > That is true, but not in her case. She has been clear on > > where her beliefs on this come from. > > Would you be more inclined to tolerate the view (as > opposed to not agreeing with it) if someone believed > it for nonreligious reasons? I give more credit to "this is my personal, reasoned

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Judy: > > > Did you hear her say that pro-life and pro-choice > > people should be able to work together to reduce > > (as opposed to "deny") abortions by promoting > > preventive measures? She means birth cont

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 > > wrote: > > > to call the democrats' actions unwarranted and inexcusable, > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Judy: > > > Did you hear her say that pro-life and pro-choice > > people should be able to work together to reduce > > (as opposed to "deny") abortions by promoting > > preventive measures? She means birth con

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > -snip- > > > I still wouldn't vote for her, and there's no > > > question t

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- On Tue, 11/11/08, curtisdeltablues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: huge snip > > But damn, that was a close one. You betcha! Way to close, brother, way too close. I'd like to say to McCain,"What the hell were you thinking?" I'm sure he'd say, "I know, I know, sorry." There's a huge back st

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

Judy: > Did you hear her say that pro-life and pro-choice > people should be able to work together to reduce > (as opposed to "deny") abortions by promoting > preventive measures? She means birth control and > sex education, not banning abortion, obviously > (since pro-choice people wouldn't stan

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Judy, > > > I'm referring (as I suspect you're well aware) to > > crap like calling her a "bimbo" and worse, and > > pretending she's stupid, and ccusing her of being > > a "thief" because of the clothing purc

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

Judy, > I'm referring (as I suspect you're well aware) to > crap like calling her a "bimbo" and worse, and > pretending she's stupid, and ccusing her of being > a "thief" because of the clothing purchases, and a > "religious fanatic," when she's obviously none of > the above. "stupid" may not be

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

I just saw the first part of Gretta Van Facelift's (why do people think this makes them look better?) with "Again"(more on that later) Sarah Palin. I am enjoying a more relaxed ability to listen to her since our country is safe from her for at least 4 years (dodged a bullet on that one!) Somehow

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > -snip- > > I still wouldn't vote for her, and there's no > > question that she isn't presidential material. > > But the sheer meanness with which sh

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -snip- > I still wouldn't vote for her, and there's no > question that she isn't presidential material. > But the sheer meanness with which she's been > attacked is unwarranted and inexcusable. > politics is a dirty busi

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > , Peter > wrote: > > > > "I'm like, OK, God, if there is > > an open door for me somewhere, this is what I always pray, I'm like,

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter wrote: > > > > "I'm like, OK, God, if there is > > an open door for me somewhere, this is what I always pray, > > I'm like, don't let me miss the open door... And if there

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "I'm like, OK, God, if there is > an open door for me somewhere, this is what I always pray, I'm like, > don't let me miss the open door... And if there is an open door in > (20)12 or

[FairfieldLife] Re: Palin Again

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "I'm like, OK, God, if there is > an open door for me somewhere, this is what I always pray, I'm like, > don't let me miss the open door... And if there is an open door in > (20)12 or four years later, and if it is something