TurquoiseB wrote:
Bingo. What you focus on, you become.
From: Judy Stein
Subject: Re: Good bye
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental
Date: 2003-11-07 07:00:34 PST
http://tinyurl.com/ynv9bn
Barry sent this post to me via email to make sure I
wouldn't miss it. I responded briefly and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TurquoiseB wrote:
Bingo. What you focus on, you become.
From: Judy Stein
Subject: Re: Good bye
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental
Date: 2003-11-07 07:00:34 PST
http://tinyurl.com/ynv9bn
Barry
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
willytex@ wrote:
TurquoiseB wrote:
Bingo. What you focus on, you become.
From: Judy Stein
Subject: Re: Good bye
Newsgroups:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I posted your message in FFL a few days ago. Here are
some responses:
Thanks so much, Rick, for forwarding to your
two FF correspondents a post in which Curtis
and Barry have a jolly good time bashing me
by name.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 12:18 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Somewhere in the Akash
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 12:18 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Somewhere in the Akash
Curtis and Barry have a jolly good time bashing me by name.
Bashing you huh? So much for your own wonderfully
finely honed sense of ethics.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
snip
I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Edg, great stuff.
I agree. Edg had me singing I fought the doubt
for some time last night. :-)
The only doubt that in my mind is whether to credit
the original melody to Sonny Curtis of the Crickets
or to Bobby
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy: Fine. But my point was that Curtis didn't
address the plausibility of the scenario.
Instead, he bashed the guy for purportedly
attacking Rick on the basis of no evidence,
after having decided--on the basis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Curtis, excellent analysis and I agree with you that the
'discussion' itself is a good thing.
I mean, it seems like such a unique relationship -- the
guru/disciple one -- and more peculiar yet, the guru/former-
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, boo_lives [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with talking with these people [the two guys
Rick has posted excerpts from recently] is that they define
bashing as saying anything that contradicts their view of
MMY...
Bingo. That is one of the aspects of
On May 25, 2007, at 1:28 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Edg, great stuff.
I agree. Edg had me singing I fought the doubt
And the doubt won?
for some time last night. :-)
On May 25, 2007, at 12:14 AM, Kenny H wrote:
Well, I know I will get bashed for this, but this whole discussion is
a clearcut example of a stupid discussion, a seriously stupid
discussion.
But you gotta love the subject heading.
Sal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Kenny H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I know I will get bashed for this, but this whole discussion is
a clearcut example of a stupid discussion, a seriously stupid
discussion.
I can't disagree. Sometimes this is easier to spot from outside. It
was a
ME: The fact that any discussion is going on at all seems like a good
thing to me. I certainly am enjoying it. The quality of the his post
is just above the you are a poopy pants level, but perhaps we can
collectively raise the bar here. I don't think anyone here wants this
person to stop doing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ME: The fact that any discussion is going on at all seems like a
good
thing to me. I certainly am enjoying it. The quality of the his
post
is just above the you are a poopy pants level, but perhaps we can
OK, he is speculating in his personal attack instead of dealing with
the issues themselves. Since it is just a speculation does that make
it any better in your eyes? Not in mine. His sincerity about his
speculation is irrelevant to my criticism of his approach. I am not
criticizing his
Rick,
I gotta tip my hat to you for keeping whatever it is you got going
that folks like The Purusha Guy trust enough to, you know, actually
deign to communicate with you (us.) Even though this guy probably
cannot be reached by any reasoning or experimental
results-to-the-contrary-of-TM-dogma,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was from the friend (whom you call The Purusha Guy but who is
actually married) with whom I've been having that discussion.
Evidently he
shared our discussion with a mutual friend, whose identity I'm not
told, as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, he is speculating in his personal attack instead of dealing
with the issues themselves. Since it is just a speculation does
that make it any better in your eyes? Not in mine. His sincerity
about his
Many thanks, Rick! It's been fun to explore these energies. A few
thoughts interspersed below...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was from the friend (whom you call The Purusha Guy but who is
actually married) with whom I've been having that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was from the friend (whom you call The Purusha Guy but who is
actually married) with whom I've been having that discussion.
Evidently he
shared our discussion with a mutual friend, whose identity I'm not
told, as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
But, I don't know anybody who got there by bashing
their previous master and
trying to get others to join them.
Oh, you haven't read your spiritual literature too
carefully now. Saul loved slow baking Christians
Quick comment below:
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ME: The fact that any discussion is going on at all seems like a good
thing to me. I certainly am enjoying it. The quality of the his post
is just above the you are a poopy pants level,
Comment below:
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
**snip**
Try this as an exercise: Assume for the sake of
argument that he *is* sincere that he is just
speculating, and that he's saying *if* it's the
case that Rick's disappointment and doubt
Edg, great stuff. I'm totally in love with you.
And totally agree about Rick.
Thanks.
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick,
I gotta tip my hat to you for keeping whatever it is you got going
that folks like The Purusha Guy trust enough to, you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comment below:
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
**snip**
Try this as an exercise: Assume for the sake of
argument that he *is* sincere that he is just
speculating,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip This is equally true of the POV-3 Eclectic and the POV-2
Fundamentalist. The only difference is, the POV-3 Eclectic is no
longer denying these qualities, so they are much less toxic
and damaging to the nervous
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
snip This is equally true of the POV-3 Eclectic and the POV-2
Fundamentalist. The only difference is, the POV-3 Eclectic is no
longer denying
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
snip This is equally true of the POV-3 Eclectic and the POV-2
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Slathering everything with maya nays I see! Rory-ji! Sri Sri Sri
Nama Rori-ji! :-)
Slathering back on my self, I see Rory again and again.
lurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Slathering everything with maya nays I see! Rory-ji! Sri Sri Sri
Nama Rori-ji! :-)
Too many puns! Ahh well, soemtime I'll ketchup, and in the meantime
I'll relax, pick a lily, and relish yours :-)
Judy: Fine. But my point was that Curtis didn't
address the plausibility of the scenario.
Instead, he bashed the guy for purportedly
attacking Rick on the basis of no evidence,
after having decided--on the basis of no
evidence--that the guy wasn't telling the
truth when he said he was just
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
Slathering everything with maya nays I see! Rory-ji! Sri Sri Sri
Nama Rori-ji! :-)
Slathering back on my self, I see Rory again and
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of curtisdeltablues
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 11:06 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Somewhere in the Akash
I'll let Rick respond if he chooses to your parting shot. But I will
say
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy: Fine. But my point was that Curtis didn't
address the plausibility of the scenario.
Instead, he bashed the guy for purportedly
attacking Rick on the basis of no evidence,
after having decided--on the basis
Well, I know I will get bashed for this, but this whole discussion is
a clearcut example of a stupid discussion, a seriously stupid discussion.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@
37 matches
Mail list logo
