> TGTools has this, in Modify | Special
> Modifications | Alter Smart Shapes.
Yes indeed, and in the TGTools INDEX you will find it listed
under slurs (the "replace" item):
Slurs
* convert measure-attached to note-attached: Modify>Slurs
* convert to ties: Modify>Slurs
* increase slur height
At 04:13 PM 11/02/02, Andrew Stiller wrote:
>On a slightly different subject: it would be valuable (to me at
>least) if there were some way to change an existing slur to a dashed
>slur, and vice-versa. Plugin, anyone?
TGTools has this, in Modify | Special Modifications | Alter Smart Shapes.
Aaron
At 4:13 PM 11/02/02, Andrew Stiller wrote:
[answering Colin Broom]
>>Is there a way of
>>processing the entire staff so that the top note remains in layer 1, while
>>the bottom note shifts to layer 2 (or any other layer for that matter).
>No. I have been asking for this for many years, both from
Title: Re: [Finale] A new revelation re chord
accompaniment
At 5:37 PM -0500 11/02/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message
dated 11/2/2002 12:51:06 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Actually, if
you go into the Instrument List (under the Window menu) and you
click on that lit
At 9:22 PM + 11/02/02, Marcus Girvan wrote:
Since the topic has got round to chord playback can I repeat a query that I
made last week which was greeted with a stunning silence so perhaps noone
knows the answer.
The message read:-
'I find that Finale's chord analysis problematical in the ext
At 3:27 PM -0500 11/02/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found out that when you anchor the chords to a note in a given staff, it
uses the SAME INSTRUMENT for the accompaniment. So the only way to accompany
a flute passage with piano chords (for example) is to have a separate staff
with piano, and an
In a message dated 11/2/2002 12:51:06 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, if you go into the Instrument List (under the Window menu) and you
click on that little triangle in the column: Staff Name, then you can create
a new instrument especially for Chords
I tried that,
Since the topic has got round to chord playback can I repeat a query that I
made last week which was greeted with a stunning silence so perhaps noone
knows the answer.
The message read:-
'I find that Finale's chord analysis problematical in the extreme. It always
seems to find the most obscure co
Is there a way of
processing the entire staff so that the top note remains in layer 1, while
the bottom note shifts to layer 2 (or any other layer for that matter).
Colin Broom.
No. I have been asking for this for many years, both from Coda and
from the plugin developers. Nobody seems to giv
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I found out that when you anchor the chords to a note in a given staff, it
> uses the SAME INSTRUMENT for the accompaniment. So the only way to accompany
> a flute passage with piano chords (for example) is to have a separate staff
> with piano, and anchor the chords
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I found out that when you anchor the chords to a note in a given staff, it
> uses the SAME INSTRUMENT for the accompaniment. So the only way to accompany
> a flute passage with piano chords (for example) is to have a separate staff
> with piano, and anchor the chords to
I found out that when you anchor the chords to a note in a given staff, it
uses the SAME INSTRUMENT for the accompaniment. So the only way to accompany
a flute passage with piano chords (for example) is to have a separate staff
with piano, and anchor the chords to that. Kind of clumsy, but that'
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carl Dershem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes
>Hello, all.
>I just (after many years) got a new printer for use in many areas - an
>Epson 1520. Very nice printer, but ... I printed out a sample part, and
>it was backwards.
>Let me clarify:
>Opened a 2 page part in Page
Finale as of 2003 does not support cross-staving of rests directly,
except through workarounds like the one sugggested so far. Please write
to Coda asking them to include this feature. It seems like it wouldn't
be that hard to add if more people needed and requested it. Let them
know if this would
Colin Broom writes:
OK, I'm sure this has been asked before, but...
Let's say I have a series of 2-note chords on one staff. Is there a way of
processing the entire staff so that the top note remains in layer 1, while
the bottom note shifts to layer 2 (or any other layer for that matter). The
OK, I'm sure this has been asked before, but...
Let's say I have a series of 2-note chords on one staff. Is there a way of
processing the entire staff so that the top note remains in layer 1, while
the bottom note shifts to layer 2 (or any other layer for that matter). The
only way I can think o
Larry,
Hide the rest in the upper staff part. Put rests in the lower staff, hide
those except the last 8th.
-Carl
--On Saturday, November 02, 2002 6:06 AM -0500 "Eden - Lawrence D."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear List,
I wrote a piano part that includes cross staff beaming. This worked f
At 10:55 PM -0500 11/01/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to avoid deleteing the chords whenever possible, since I at some
point would like to put them back into the score. And of course, I don't want
to have go through that process every time I make any changes.
As far as muting the acco
Dear Sir
URGENT BUSINESS REQUEST
I am a Solicitor resident and practicing in Lagos, Nigeria and I am using this
correspondence to urgently seek and request your assistance and cooperation in a
sensitive but highly beneficial financial arrangement.
An important client of mine whose
Dear List,
I wrote a piano part that includes cross staff beaming. This worked fine,
except I need an eighth rest at the end of the measure and FinaleMac
(2000c) insists on placing the rest in the right hand. I want the rest to
appear in the left hand only. What should I do to fix this?
Lar
On Saturday, November 2, 2002, at 04:50 AM, Klaas de Jong wrote:
I presume that when you erase all the note number boxes (for every
suffix, so a little work has to be done), no chord will ever playback
anything, even if playback is activated in whatever dialog box.
Well, you know what they s
Hi,
One option seems to be unspoken of in this very long discussion. When you really never want to use the playback of chords and want to get rid of the somewhere existing midi-information you'll have to erase the playback information for the suffix, which you reach when you manually put in the cho
22 matches
Mail list logo
