Working on a piece with 4 flugelhorns (a nice ballad/samba) and found
upon listening to playback that when "Flugelhorn" is selected, the patch
used is "French Horn."
It's actually kind of funny, in its own bizarre way.
cd
___
Finale mailing list
[EMA
On 1 Mar 2004 at 13:14, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
> On Monday, March 1, 2004, at 12:08 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
>
> > The only thing that may help to avoid such dilemmas in the future is
> > to include a reply to address in list messages. I think this has
> > been asked for many times (and all oth
The heartiest of congratulations to you, Dennis!! When the applause is
deafening, remember us "little people" on the ole Finale list(:>)
Richard Huggins
> From: Dennis Bathory-Kitsz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 22:39:26 -0500
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Finale] It's of
...as of this afternoon, so I can announce it.
I'm very pleased to tell my Finale friends that I have received the annual
commission from the Vermont Symphony Orchestra. The new work will be
premiered on September 22, and played ten times during the orchestra's
statewide tour from September 22 to
It sounds to me as if the keyboard maybe stuck and is giving out a midi
message, if as you mention:
3. Instead of receiving notes from the piano, it is just entering notes
from the computer keyboard whenever I try to choose the note value to accept
from the piano.
Try 'all notes off' and panic
Crystal,
Have you checked "MIDI thru" in the MIDI menu? I can't remember if
mine was just a playback or an input problem, but when I had trouble
getting MIDI to work I finally discovered buried deeply-- no make that
*obscurely*-- in the OLD that I needed MIDI thru checked to make my
system wo
On Monday, March 1, 2004, at 01:33 PM, d. collins wrote:
Brad Beyenhof écrit:
But this, IMO, would be worse. If the Reply-to were set to the list,
the whitelist "request" would have been sent *to the list*, for
*every* post. What's more, all of those replies would get archived
and uselessly
On Monday, March 1, 2004, at 12:08 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 01.03.2004 20:16 Uhr, Henry Howey wrote
I did not see the Whitemail notices to the list as they were sent by
a listmember. I will check with IT folks here to see if another
filter is possible. I currently monitor only the DIGEST s
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> So how do I make the ENTIRE chord big enough to read? I want the chords to be
> uniformly large enough throughout the whole score, and keep them from
> overlapping each other also.
You can make them any size or font you want. To change the chord symbol
font, and or siz
Make sure this kind of stuff gets to Macsupport. The more customers we
hear about this kind of thing from, the better. Remember that I'm not
officially monitoring the list...
(and for the record, I'm not strictly a PC guy--I actually have more
Macs in my cage than PC's :-P)
-Original Message-
Hi,
You can change the symbol font size (and more), via options/document
options/fonts/chord.
Hope this helps.
Klaas.
Op 28-feb-04 om 3:31 heeft [EMAIL PROTECTED] het volgende geschreven:
When preparing a lead sheet, the musicians say the chord font size is
way too small. However, upon examining
On 01.03.2004 20:16 Uhr, Henry Howey wrote
> I did not see the Whitemail notices to the list as they were sent by
> a listmember. I will check with IT folks here to see if another
> filter is possible. I currently monitor only the DIGEST so I seem to
> have escaped the blizzard;-)
>
> If anyone h
Hi Allen,
Finale 2004's performance is, unfortunately, bad all around. Finale
redraws are very slow and getting slower, especially on OS X. What's
more, it suffers greatly by comparison to the Distinguished
Competition. Sibelius 3.x has effectively eliminated lag and redraws
by using OpenGL
I am seeing a tendency that the smart shapes are slow to drag around when
there are many things on the page. The redraw slows down a bit just like
before in earlier versions. But the smart shapes slowing down is new. This
is in page view that I'm talking about.
But, I have noticed that the smart s
At 02:15 PM 3/1/2004, Mr. Liudas Motekaitis wrote:
>It's not just Mac and it's not just OSX. I'm on Windows, and as I stated
>earlier my computer is fast. The smart shapes lag behind on my system, too.
>Now working on a score about 240 pages of large wind ensemble. Have inputed
>about half. The fur
Thus Saith Darcy:
>Yes. Write to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and tell them speed should be
>their #1 priority for MacFin2005. Remind them that Sibelius is now
>*much, much* faster than Finale, with virtually no redraws, and they'd
>better catch up.
When you do, please be sure to list *specific* step
At 02:11 PM 3/1/2004, Lee Actor wrote:
>> a large orchestral piece, and am about 60 measures into it (the
>> file is now
>> at about 135mb).
>
>Though I'm on a PC, something is seriously amiss with a file size of 135 MB,
>which is undoubtedly what is slowing you down.
I read that and assumed he m
I did not see the Whitemail notices to the list as they were sent by
a listmember. I will check with IT folks here to see if another
filter is possible. I currently monitor only the DIGEST so I seem to
have escaped the blizzard;-)
If anyone has a suggested filter I could propose to IT, please n
> I recently learned (sort of) how to use percussion maps myself with
> FinMac2k4. I was trying to convert regular percussion staves to
> mapped ones and came up with a process that works more or less.
> Luckily, you can start from scratch. Finale's choices for the
> positions I believe are based
> Another MIDI question. What is the best workaround for the playback
> problem, in a string section, of having the whole section go back
> and forth
> from pizz to arco when only one of the sections changes? When
> the celli or
> basses, for example, have pizz, the whole string section sounds li
It's not just Mac and it's not just OSX. I'm on Windows, and as I stated
earlier my computer is fast. The smart shapes lag behind on my system, too.
Now working on a score about 240 pages of large wind ensemble. Have inputed
about half. The further I go, the more I see hairpins lagging behind, smar
To accomplish your midi effect, you need to have each string part
defined as its own instrument (violin 1, violin 2, etc.) and channel.
They can share the same patch but if each instrument is separate then
patch changes will only affect that particular part, not the entire
string section.
Davi
On 01 Mar 2004, at 01:55 PM, David Froom wrote:
And a comment about speed: for me the thing that is HORRIBLY slow now
is
smart shapes. When I click on a slur or hairpin to move it, it takes
a full
3 seconds for the thing to be selected. Then there is a couple of
seconds
delay after I use my
Thanks to those who responded to the MIDI percussion mapping question.
Another MIDI question. What is the best workaround for the playback
problem, in a string section, of having the whole section go back and forth
from pizz to arco when only one of the sections changes? When the celli or
basses
Lyrics can slow down a piece with SmartHyphens and Smart Word Extensions
set to Update automatically in program options. Deleting the lyrics is
unnecessary, simply go to Program Options, click View, and Set Smart
Hyphens and Word Extensions to update Manually.
-Original Message-
From: [EMA
Thanks to Allen Fisher. Somehow the presence of lyrics in my score slowed
down the speedy entry
process. Once the lyrics were deleted, the speedy entry went back to normal.
Thanks as always for the help, but I wonder if anyone knows why the
presence of lyrics might
slow down speedy entry?
Thanks
Crystal,
It sounds to me as if the keyboard maybe stuck and is giving out a midi
message, if as you mention:
3. Instead of receiving notes from the piano, it is just entering notes
from the computer keyboard whenever I try to choose the note value to accept
from the piano.
Try 'all notes off
At 2/28/2004 09:33 AM, gj.berg wrote:
>Course I omitted the classic full rim shot and rapping up the flat stick
>with the slap shtick. Which cannot be accomplished with the
>aforementioned 'stripper' rim shots - nor in reverse for the stripper
>rim shot open rolls. So, to me, they are different
Please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] They can help you get the lab set
up properly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Stephen Cronin
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 3:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Finale] Lab setup problems FinMac 2k4
Hello
Do you have lyrics in the document?
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 6:21 PM
Subject: [Finale] Finale 2004: Speedy entry suddenly slow
> Dear Finale list:
>
> My speedy entry in Finale 2004 has suddenly slowed to a snai
I can't duplicate the bug now, unfortunately. It could have happened
on one of the several scores that the Mac version crashes on when
playing back, so it might have to do with something else. However,
one doesn't need to change patches back, since going to channel 10
automatically kicks in t
Hello Folks,
I have lurked on this list for many years and greatly value the
combined knowledge the participants hold and share. Thanks to you all!
I teach an introductory Finale class and an advanced music engraving
class and, of course, use the program for my own work.
Currently we have a di
Thanx for the reply Phil.
Course I omitted the classic full rim shot and rapping up the flat stick
with the slap shtick. Which cannot be accomplished with the
aforementioned 'stripper' rim shots - nor in reverse for the stripper
rim shot open rolls. So, to me, they are different beasts also.
When preparing a lead sheet, the musicians say the chord font size is way too small. However, upon examining the chord menu, it says "Change chord SUFFIX size."
This seems rather absurd. Why not change the size of the WHOLE chord? Why would someone want a large suffix when the root designator
I have noticed a slow Speedy behaviour myself. I have fast computer with a
few GHz processor, enough ram, a very good motherboard, etc.
But in Finale 2004 Speedy is not speedy in switching Layers. Not quite
enough to slow down my work, but just slow enough to get me thinking, to get
me, well, just
Dear Finale list:
My speedy entry in Finale 2004 has suddenly slowed to a snails pace.
I've performed various dianostics to optimize my hard drive etc., but that
has not fixed the problem.
I do have a very old machine (Gateway P5-100) and am using Windows 98.
It's been perfectly tolerable up to
On 01.03.2004 6:45 Uhr, Mark D Lew wrote
>> Actually, based on the response on this list (and my own personal
>> reaction), I think it's fair to say that people don't like spam
>> whitelists, PERIOD. I received *12* junk emails from your
>> "spamslammer" telling me I needed to fill out a form to
From: Aaron Sherber
Take the note position tool from the special tools and drag the 32nd rests
to the right in order to achieve the length of the 32nd beam which you want.
For precision's sake select them all first and then figure out what you need
to set your N
38 matches
Mail list logo
