On 12.07.2003 21:42 Uhr, Patsy Moore wrote
> Ah, that sounds as if having a 2-line expression is now already a
> regular option. I'm still using FinWin 2000c. Perhaps we should be
> beginning to think _seriously_ about updating...
No, this is not a feature of 2k3.
Johannes
--
http://www.musikma
Not only line breaks, but other text manipulation as in text blocks,
especially justification (which is not necessary with a single line).
Along those lines, I wonder why it is not possible to manipulate
character positioning in lyrics. I've often had situations where it
would be nice...time t
On Saturday, July 12, 2003, at 05:06 PM, Lee Actor wrote:
However, as I like to think of myself as
a frugal individual, if a switch can be set so that these are ignored
in
some places, but not in others, then one can get by with one
expression
instead of two.
Yes, but at the expense of an unfru
On 12 Jul 2003 at 15:15, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
> Darcy James Argue wrote, with respect to having optional CR-LF's::
>
> > I don't understand the desire for
> > *optional* line breaks, when it's so easy to change from one to the
> > other (duplicate one and turn it into the other). Seems like a
> Well, first and foremost I'd like to see the capability of linebreaks; if
> the mechanism were introduced it's certainly feasible to create two
> expressions, one without embedded CR-LF's, and the other one with, and use
> the appropriate one at each point. However, as I like to think
> of mysel
Darcy wrote, in part, enquiring:
> Do you mean that you would allow line breaks on some staves and not
> others?
I hadn't thought about that bit. I was thinking more about a lengty text
expression that occurs several times in the same score, where in a couple
places it needs to be compressed by
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Harold Owen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Noel Stoutenburg:
>
>> > > If not implemented in FIN 2k4, one thing I would like to see in 2k5 is
>> > > the ability to embed non-printing, optional carriage return / linefeed
>> > > sequences (hereinafter, CR-LFs) in text e
Of course. And, you're right about text blocks. (duh, that wasn't too
bright of me.) But I suppose I misunderstood NS's original post, which he
later clarified. I was further confused by your use of the term "linefeed",
which to me has a specific technical meaning.
I agree with NS and Darcy that w
On Saturday, July 12, 2003, at 04:15 PM, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
I don't understand the desire for
*optional* line breaks, when it's so easy to change from one to the
other (duplicate one and turn it into the other). Seems like a awful
amount of extra programming work for a cumbersome, non-intui
Darcy James Argue wrote, with respect to having optional CR-LF's::
> I don't understand the desire for
> *optional* line breaks, when it's so easy to change from one to the
> other (duplicate one and turn it into the other). Seems like a awful
> amount of extra programming work for a cumbersome
Bruce K H Kau writes:
> FWIW The interpretation of CR and LF is different between Macs and PCs.
>
> [...]
>
> Not sure how Finale would deal with all these differences.
There shouldn't be a technical issue regarding line breaks here. Finale
already deals with line breaks in text blocks (which
On Saturday, July 12, 2003, at 09:26 AM, Bruce K H Kau wrote:
FWIW The interpretation of CR and LF is different between Macs and PCs.
On a PC, a CR-LF combination is necessary to end a line. The CR only
brings
the "cursor" to the beginning of the current line, and the LF advances
to
the next l
Noel Stoutenburg:
> > > > If not implemented in FIN 2k4, one thing I would like
> to see in 2k5 is
> > > > the ability to embed non-printing, optional carriage
> return / linefeed
> > > > sequences (hereinafter, CR-LFs) in text expressions.
Jari Williamsson:
> > > Why would the line feed h
FWIW The interpretation of CR and LF is different between Macs and PCs.
On a PC, a CR-LF combination is necessary to end a line. The CR only brings
the "cursor" to the beginning of the current line, and the LF advances to
the next line. As I understand, on a Mac, a CR performs both functions. And,
Noel Stoutenburg:
> > If not implemented in FIN 2k4, one thing I would like to see in 2k5 is
> > the ability to embed non-printing, optional carriage return / linefeed
> > sequences (hereinafter, CR-LFs) in text expressions.
Jari Williamsson:
> Why would the line feed has to be optional? Soun
Jari Williamsson wrote:
> Noel Stoutenburg writes:
>
> > If not implemented in FIN 2k4, one thing I would like to see in 2k5 is
> > the ability to embed non-printing, optional carriage return / linefeed
> > sequences (hereinafter, CR-LFs) in text expressions.
>
> Why would the line feed has to be
Noel Stoutenburg writes:
> If not implemented in FIN 2k4, one thing I would like to see in 2k5 is
> the ability to embed non-printing, optional carriage return / linefeed
> sequences (hereinafter, CR-LFs) in text expressions.
Why would the line feed has to be optional? Sounds to me like if you ne
17 matches
Mail list logo
