[Finale] Re: FinMac2004c A Few Bugs

2004-07-16 Thread shirling & neueweise
can anyone confirm these? i am using the OS9 version, but perhaps they happen in the OSX version also? ARTICULATION TOOL: periodically following group-drag articulation metatool assignment, redraw is necessary to be able to apply new articulations (because all handles have disappeared). LAYOU

[Finale] Re: FinMac2004c A Few Bugs

2004-07-16 Thread shirling & neueweise
forgot one: when i open a document, it fills only half my screen, even if i just saved prefs before closing it and reopening it. anyone else? jef -- shirling & neueweise \/ new music notation specialists mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :.../ http://newmusicnotation.com

[Finale] Re: FinMac2004c A Few Bugs

2004-07-16 Thread shirling & neueweise
F2004c, OS9. From: Jonathan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Page setup is now lost in extracted part files and is coming out as a default US letter size. my part page format (9.5 x 12.5") was retained in extraction. The Hide/Show message bar option under preferences doesn't work, it defaults back to sh

[Finale] FinMac2004c A Few Bugs

2004-07-16 Thread Jonathan Smith
Thanks Tobias, but I'm on about the page setup from the file menu. Whatever was set here (and saved) would be the same in the extacted parts, but this seems to have gone adrift in 2004. Maybe I could use an apple script to batch process all the files once extracted? This is going to be a pain a

[Finale] FinMac2004c A Few Bugs

2004-07-16 Thread Jonathan Smith
Thanks Jari, that has certainly helped but now of course we must all remember to keep updating the exts and hyphens. Seems that the trade off of automation has been speedrather pointless. Jonathan Smith Have you turned OFF the new automatic lyric update stuff? I think that could resolve many

Re: [Finale] paage setup default in 2004

2004-07-16 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 16.07.2004 4:12 Uhr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote > This has changed since 2003. The new behavior is that every document defaults > to the printer page set up contained in the default file. I have learned to > work with this, but I don't think it's a particularly elegant decision. I haven't check

Re: [Finale] 2/10 time signature

2004-07-16 Thread dhbailey
Owain Sutton wrote: Without wanting to disrupt the talk of modes, scales and all elsebut should I take it that a 2/10 signature isn't possible in Finale? I thought we had answered that a long time ago -- You are correct, the easy use of a 2/10 time signature is NOT possible in Finale. Workar

[Finale] Re: OS 9 vs OS X

2004-07-16 Thread shirling & neueweise
although it is significant, i'm not sure that the time saved with the new expression tool features is greater than time lost to the programme's overall response (in OS9). From: Johannes Gebauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 08.07.2004 20:46 Uhr, Randolph Peters wrote > If you have the option, I would

Re: [Finale] Re: OS 9 vs OS X

2004-07-16 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 16.07.2004 16:21 Uhr, shirling & neueweise wrote > although it is significant, i'm not sure that the time saved with the > new expression tool features is greater than time lost to the > programme's overall response (in OS9). I haven't tried the OS 9 version, but the general consensus seems to

Re: [Finale] 2/10 time signature

2004-07-16 Thread Andrew Stiller
there are few, if any, possible successions of diatonic chords that can fail to find a functional definition. More to the point is the relationship of a given function to a real repertoire or tradition. For example, it is a commonplace in music theory that a "classical" repertoire work using on

Re: [Finale] 2/10 time signature

2004-07-16 Thread Christopher BJ Smith
At 11:09 AM -0400 7/16/04, Andrew Stiller wrote: The most obvious and prominent repertoire featuring the V-IV retrogression is the blues, where it is fact mandatory at the beginning of the tenth of twelve bars. But is this functional? Is it even proper to assign the numbers I, V, and IV to the t

Re: [Finale] 2/10 time signature

2004-07-16 Thread Harold Owen
OK, folks, Debussy (in pieces like "Maid with the Flaxon Hair") uses a cadence that would be F/G (F major in the right hand, G in the bass) to the tonic in C Major. Is that plagal or authentic? Is the F/G chord a V11? How would Schenkerian scholars view it? I love the falling fourth ("Hey, Jude

Re: [Finale] F/G - plagal or authentic?

2004-07-16 Thread musicminister
> Debussy (in pieces like "Maid with the Flaxon Hair") uses a cadence > that would be F/G (F major in the right hand, G in the bass) to the > tonic in C Major. Is that plagal or authentic? Is the F/G chord a > V11? How would Schenkerian scholars view it? > > Hal Hey, Hal, I'm not a Schen

RE: [Finale] (ot) printer & computer

2004-07-16 Thread masao iikura
Hello, Bob I have two laser printers that cannot be used with OSX, old HP & OKI. Fortunatele my G4 is TCP/IP-connected to PC with centronics via ADSL router. So I download GhostScript for windows which is shareware and allows Mac to acc ess the PC as if it were a postscript prin

[Finale] {Spam} celesta

2004-07-16 Thread Lidia Lynch
Fernando Gordon,@ The _cable_filter will all0w you to receive all the channels that you 0rder with your remote contr0l,+ want pay_perviews,XXX-movies,sp0rt events,special-events,` http://mtjsmec.fortherest.info/amite/cable/ penna ,snakeroot ,thereon ,condescend . stoke ,comparative ,ibm ,so

Re: [Finale] 2/10 time signature

2004-07-16 Thread Andrew Stiller
Christopher: is a plagal cadence in a situation like this [the blues] tonal? If you end with a seventh chord it's neither plagal (except in the same very broad sense by wh. a ii-I cadence could also be so called) nor tonal. Or do you absolutely require a functioning leading tone to be able to

Re: [Finale] 2/10 time signature

2004-07-16 Thread Christopher BJ Smith
At 11:50 AM -0700 7/16/04, Harold Owen wrote: OK, folks, Debussy (in pieces like "Maid with the Flaxon Hair") uses a cadence that would be F/G (F major in the right hand, G in the bass) to the tonic in C Major. Is that plagal or authentic? Is the F/G chord a V11? How would Schenkerian scholars v

Re: [Finale] 2/10 time signature

2004-07-16 Thread Christopher BJ Smith
At 4:56 PM -0400 7/16/04, Andrew Stiller wrote: Christopher: is a plagal cadence in a situation like this [the blues] tonal? If you end with a seventh chord it's neither plagal (except in the same very broad sense by wh. a ii-I cadence could also be so called) nor tonal. OK, I guess we're runn

Re: [Finale] Rests or blank?

2004-07-16 Thread John Howell
At 7:04 PM -0500 7/15/04, Richard Huggins wrote: I have a certain 5-measure choral section that involves the choir singing from one stave one time and another stave on the repeat. Because there is a 1st and 2nd ending, that means some measures have nothing in them. Use rests. But from bitter exper

Re: [Finale] 2/10 time signature

2004-07-16 Thread Owain Sutton
dhbailey wrote: Owain Sutton wrote: Without wanting to disrupt the talk of modes, scales and all elsebut should I take it that a 2/10 signature isn't possible in Finale? I thought we had answered that a long time ago -- You are correct, the easy use of a 2/10 time signature is NOT possible

Re: [Finale] Rests or blank?

2004-07-16 Thread Darcy James Argue
HI Richard, I absolutely agree with John. I read your explanation (w/diagram) and still couldn't make head nor tail of it. I can't imagine this section going well in rehearsal if you leave it as you describe. Just write it out for everyone, without the repeat. - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Finale] 2/10 time signature

2004-07-16 Thread Noel Stoutenburg
Owain Sutton wrote: It really isn't a workaround when every bar is a measure change, two thirds of them being x/10 or x/12. I can't claim to understand the intricacies of how Finale works, but I'm sure it can't be too difficult for me to replace one symbol for another, Well, if it were me, I'd