You're right! Why has it to be so intricated the way too get that
complete window?
I could remember I ran into that trick many years ago but completely
forgotten it.
Many thanks Christopher
Il 19/09/2018 14.40, Christopher Smith ha scritto:
I know what’s going on.
There are TWO different dial
I know what’s going on.
There are TWO different dialogue boxes called “Chord Suffix Selection”. One has
the edit and create buttons; the other doesn’t. This IS a stupid thing, because
I often want the create buttons when the one that lacks them is open, and I’ve
complained about this for about
Hi to all
I never had the need to modify the chord library I used (Jazzfont or
Handwritten) but now
I would want to group all the suffixes I use mostly one near the other.
Well, the buttons from "edit" to "create" that are mentioned in the User
Manual aren't
there in the Chord Suffix Selectio
A scratch staff is a staff just the same, and perhaps one of the MIDI
channels assigned to 1-4 also is assigned to 5. Make sure 5 has its
own MIDI channel. As for copying, make sure she looks at Items to Copy
and de-select Performance Data. I don't know (because I've never tried
it) but per
I have a friend who has posed me a question that I can't replicate.
Setup:
5 staves:
staff 1: Soprano/Alto - Midi channel 1, Choir Ahs
staff 2: Tenor/Bass - Midi channel 2, Choir Ahs
staff 3: Piano RH - Midi channel 3, piano
staff 4: Piano LH - Midi channel 3, piano
staff 5: scratch staff:
The
Well, not the same setup, but you could try deleting the Finale
Preferences file. I had an issue on my iMac where it couldn't adjust
page margins in Page view (the menu selection), and deleting that file
solved it. I think it is in UserName/Library/Preferences/ and the file
is Finale 2007 Prefe
Hi,
I've got a problem with Finale 2006d & 2007. When I tried to scroll
in scroll view (or mixer) more that a couple of bars at a time,
Finale hangs (beach ball) and I have to force quit. It's to the
point where I can't work, on this file.
I'm on a G5 dual 2.5 with 5 gig or ram and a Dell 2
Is anybody running Finale @ 2560x1600 resolution on Dell
3007WFP or Apple 30 ACD monitor? My Finale 2006 seems sluggish on Dell 3007
with GeForce 7800GTX (Win XP Pro). It feels like Sibelius 1 did on Mac when it
came out. I know this is a lot to ask of a music program (or any program) to
Is anybody running Finale @ 2560x1600 pixel resolution on
Dell 3007WFP or Apple 30 ACD monitor? My Finale 2006 seems sluggish on Dell
3007 with GeForce 7800GTX (Win XP Pro). It feels like Sibelius 1 did on Mac
when it came out. I know this is a lot to ask of a music program (or any
program
Hi Jerry,
You can get Chinese text into Finale text and lyrics. But there are
extra steps involved given Finale's lack of support for Unicode. You
have to set the Finale text/lyrics to be Chinese script, not Western
script. On XP, you probably have to set Chinese in the language bar
when using Fin
On Apr 10, 2006, at 2:38 PM, Jerry Liu wrote:
Hi,
Has anybody successfully enter lyrics in foreign fonts in Finale 2006?
I am
looking for specifically entering Chinese Big5 Unicode characters. I
have
downloaded the 2006 demo but could not enter any Chinese characters
even with
my
Hi,
Has anybody successfully enter lyrics in foreign fonts in Finale 2006? I am
looking for specifically entering Chinese Big5 Unicode characters. I have
downloaded the 2006 demo but could not enter any Chinese characters even with
my TwinBridge Chinese Partner running on XP Pro. Has anyone done
On 6 Apr 2006 at 8:57, Fisher, Allen wrote:
> You need to first activate it as an Administrative user. Then your
> normal user accounts should be able to access it.
>
> Finale only requires Admin rights to register it.
Shouldn't the registration process know this, and activate the RunAs
service
, 2006 4:10 AMTo:
finale@shsu.eduSubject: [Finale] Finale 2006 Win - not possible to
run it withoutadministrator rights?
I installed Finale 2006 on a Win 2000 Pro system using administrator
rights.
I need to run it from a normal user account. I try to run it and I get
"f
On 5 Apr 2006 at 11:10, themark wrote:
> I installed Finale 2006 on a Win 2000 Pro system using administrator
> rights.
>
> I need to run it from a normal user account. I try to run it and I get
> "finale encountered an error. please reinstall Finale".
>
> I
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Daley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale 2006 Win - not possible to run it
withoutadministrator rights?
> At 4/5/2006 05:10 AM, themark wrote:
>
> >I installed F
At 4/5/2006 05:10 AM, themark wrote:
I installed Finale 2006 on a Win 2000 Pro system using administrator rights.
I need to run it from a normal user account. I try to run it and I get
"finale encountered an error. please reinstall Finale".
There are 2 possible problems that I ca
I installed Finale 2006 on a Win 2000 Pro system using administrator
rights.
I need to run it from a normal user account. I try to run it and I get
"finale encountered an error. please reinstall Finale".
I had not yet registered the prog.
Should I register it first with adm
dual G5.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://secretsociety.typepad.com
Brooklyn, NY
On 03 Mar 2006, at 2:23 AM, Brian Williams wrote:
I know this has been discussed before, but how fast does Finale
2006 run on
the new Intel-based MacBooks? Faster or slower than on a top-of-the-
line
Po
I know this has been discussed before, but how fast does Finale 2006 run on
the new Intel-based MacBooks? Faster or slower than on a top-of-the-line
PowerPC-based PowerBook? I thought that Finale was compiled using
CodeWarrior (not XCode) and therefore might have problems.
Brian
> Hold down only the opt key as you click on the target measure.
>
> John
Thanks so much for this info. I've been using Finale (Mac) since version
2.0.1. Old habits are hard to break!
Brian
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu
tiple
monitors.)
> -Original Message-
> From: A-NO-NE Music [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2006 04:52 PM
> To: finale@shsu.edu
> Subject: Re: [Finale] Mass Copy in Finale 2006
>
> Fisher, Allen / 2006/02/01 / 09:17 AM wrote:
>
>
Fisher, Allen / 2006/02/01 / 09:17 AM wrote:
>I always thought shift was used to bypass dialogs, at least in Finale...
Nope.
Example. Create an expression, then hit OK while Cmd is pressed. You
bypass the rest of the dialog boxes. This has been this way since v1.0
which I paid $1,000 for!
--
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of A-NO-NE Music
Sent: Tue 1/31/2006 9:00 AM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Cc:
Subject:Re: [Finale] Mass Copy in Finale 2006
Christopher Smith / 2006/01/31 / 07:08 AM wrote:
John Bell got it right - hold down just the Opt key to skip the
dialogue box. Once
I always thought shift was used to bypass dialogs, at least in Finale...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of A-NO-NE Music
Sent: Tue 1/31/2006 9:00 AM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Cc:
Subject:Re: [Finale] Mass Copy in Finale 2006
Christopher Smith / 2006
On Jan 31, 2006, at 4:08 AM, Christopher Smith wrote:
The only big loss of functionality with the new copy behaviour (for
me on Mac, dunno about PC) is that drag-and-drop between documents
is now disabled,
Christopher,
I just tried this, and it does work. It's a little dicey sometimes
Christopher Smith / 2006/01/31 / 07:08 AM wrote:
>John Bell got it right - hold down just the Opt key to skip the
>dialogue box. Once I got this, things got a LOT faster!
My biggest pleasure with 2006 was this new Mass Mover (still can't
remember the new name for this tool!) improvement, but I h
>
> copy-paste between documents doesn't copy everything,
Are you talking about meas-attached shapes here? Is that what Fin06 doesn't
copy that prior versions did copy? I had hoped MM was gonna restore that in a
maintenance release, but perhaps not, huh?
For me the biggest loss of functionalit
iams wrote:
Dear list,
I just started using Finale 2006 for "real" work and discovered a
disturbing
new loss of functionality. In the mass mover tool, whenever you select
a
region and attempt to copy it to other staves you are greeted in every
instance by an annoying dialog box tha
Brian
Hold down only the opt key as you click on the target measure.
John
On 31 Jan 2006, at 10:28, Brian Williams wrote:
Dear list,
I just started using Finale 2006 for "real" work and discovered a
disturbing
new loss of functionality. In the mass mover tool, whenever you
Dear list,
I just started using Finale 2006 for "real" work and discovered a disturbing
new loss of functionality. In the mass mover tool, whenever you select a
region and attempt to copy it to other staves you are greeted in every
instance by an annoying dialog box that takes the pl
Hey, thanks MakeMusic / Coda!
My biggest wish has been fulfilled. After (only) about ten years of
waiting, EPS windows really works again! I just did some tests, and
it works fine, but ONLY if I include the fonts which results in
bigger files of course, but then, what the heck, it works!!!
I
Friends, I need to know if anyone else has no MP3 capability. I will try a
reload, but I cannot understand why.
Henry Howey
Professor of Music
Sam Houston State University
Box 2208
Huntsville, TX 77341
(936) 294-1364
http://www.shsu.edu/~music/faculty/howey.html
Owner of FINALE Discu
Saw this hadn't been hit on. I don't have the web site handy -- I'd
have to search like you but go to the Garritan site and root around --
that's how I found it.
Jerry
On 30-Oct-05, at 11:20 PM, Frank Fitzpatrick wrote:
I read an aside in a recent post that the probl
I read an aside in a recent post that the problems with Finale 2006
(mine is Mac) and GPO were resolved by an update or bug fix of some
kind from Native Instruments.
I missed any earlier postings there may have been about how to find the
fixes. Can anyone refer me to a URL or elsewhere for more
Aaron, Hans, many thanks.
the fix only works for new documents, but you have to do it manually
in older ones on the older files, but so it's no problem!
Thanks for the quick answers
Kurt
At 20:56 27.10.2005, you wrote:
At 02:21 PM 10/27/2005, Kurt Gnos wrote:
>I have win 2006. When I extrac
At 03:26 PM 10/27/2005, Hans Arktoft wrote:
>if you enter a zero (or no digit at all for that matter) before
>clicking Select, the Shape Selection dialog will open.
Why so it does.
Well, in any event, to answer Kurt's original question, it looks like
you want shape 1. I just took a look at the
Aaron,
if you enter a zero (or no digit at all for that matter) before
clicking Select, the Shape Selection dialog will open.
Regards,
Hans
--
(Incidentally, does anyone know why this button is labeled 'Select'?
It doesn't really let you select anything -- it just lets you edit t
At 02:21 PM 10/27/2005, Kurt Gnos wrote:
>I have win 2006. When I extract parts, instead of rests I get quarter
>Note heads in multimesure rests. I already downloaded the update from
>Coda, but the problem seems to stay.
I'm not sure what those updated default files were meant to fix, but
of cou
Hi,
I have win 2006. When I extract parts, instead of rests I get quarter
Note heads in multimesure rests. I already downloaded the update from
Coda, but the problem seems to stay. Any hints?
Kurt
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lis
Javier Ruiz / 2005/10/19 / 06:49 AM wrote:
>By this time, you are probably aware of the problem: Finale 2006 is
>completely unusable for professional use.
>Let's make things clear: this is not another bug, it is a failure in the
>basic set of features of any program. It is si
If some is interested this what I sent to Makemusic.
Please forgive my convoluted English.
-- Forwarded Message
From: Javier Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:44:37 +0100
To: Finale Sales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Finale 2006 refund request.
Makemusic Inc.
On Behalf
Of Neal Gittleman
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 4:43 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: [Finale] "Finale 2006 DVD Version"/Mac Installation Problems
Greetings...
Being a habitual late adopter, I just received my Finale 2006 packet
(perhaps not quite as habitually late
Darcy:
I couldn't find the Finale pre-installer either but here are the
instructions on how to do it manually:
Thanks, Darcy. If anyone's interested in finding the pre-installer,
a Google search turned up a MakeMusic discussion forum that had this
(still live) link
finalemusic.com
At 05:42 PM 09/21/2005, Neal Gittleman wrote:
>Being a habitual late adopter, I just received my Finale 2006 packet
>(perhaps not quite as habitually late as usual...) What I received
>is "Finale 2006 for Windows® and Macintosh® DVD Version". My
>question, before I insert
I couldn't find the Finale pre-installer either but here are the
instructions on how to do it manually:
IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU INSTALL FINALE 2006 FOR
MACINTOSH!
Dear Finale Macintosh User,
Due to a problem in the Finale installer, IMPORTANT USER FILES MAY
BE DE
Greetings...
Being a habitual late adopter, I just received my Finale 2006 packet
(perhaps not quite as habitually late as usual...) What I received
is "Finale 2006 for Windows® and Macintosh® DVD Version". My
question, before I insert anything into anything, is: Doe
Dear Finale List,
Although SmartMusic SoftSynth Playback works great in Finale 2005 for me, I
can't get it to work in Finale 2006.
I am using an identical template to what works in Fin 2K5. I have made sure
that I have the latest version of the synthgms.sf2 file in my Components
folder, an
On 2 Sep 2005 at 0:19, John Howell wrote:
> At 6:34 PM +0200 9/1/05, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
> >On 18:07 Uhr Brad Beyenhof wrote:
> >> >>Life would be so much easier if only (3/2)12=(2/1)7.
> >>>
> >> Have you heard about the recently discovered Bach tuning,
> >> which is
> hidd
At 6:34 PM +0200 9/1/05, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 18:07 Uhr Brad Beyenhof wrote:
>>Life would be so much easier if only (3/2)12=(2/1)7.
>> Have you heard about the recently discovered Bach tuning, which is
hidden on the title page of the well-tempered manuscript?
This has been much dis
Dear folks,
In Mac, if you move the Finale 2006 folder to another location different to
the Applications one, it looses the Finale GPO feature. But if you move
both, it crashes miserably!
So don´t put those apps in a subfolder like I did...
Off to the beach ;)
Javier Ruiz
Michael Good / 2005/09/01 / 10:06 PM wrote:
>Finale 2006 is still not Unicode, but it is *not* limited to the Western
>European characters in Cp1252 / MacRoman. Finale supports many different
>scripts, including double-byte characters for Japanese and other languages.
Well,
Title,
Finale 2006 is still not Unicode, but it is *not* limited to the Western
European characters in Cp1252 / MacRoman. Finale supports many different
scripts, including double-byte characters for Japanese and other languages.
We've been busy collecting examples of different languages for ou
On 9/1/05, I wrote:
> On 8/31/05, Karen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Are you running any Haxies...anything that uses the APE manager
>> (Application Enhancer per Unsanity??) These can cause many
>> problems. I took them all off of my machine. I run Quicksilver
>> with no problems so I don't th
Hi Brad,
I'd bet that APE is causing the symptoms you were describing. I was
also using ClearDock and had to remove it. So, get rid of Clear Dock
and the APE manager all together and see if things get better.
Here is an alternative you can try$8.00 Sharware/Donationware. I
believ
On 1 Sep 2005 at 23:43, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
> On 23:03 Uhr David W. Fenton wrote:
> > It's clearly not real scholarship, because real scholars don't make
> > claims like:
>
> [snip]
>
> David,
> I don't doubt you are right, yet that doesn't actually say anything
> about the findings, it jus
On 1 Sep 2005 at 23:17, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
> On 18:21 Uhr dc wrote:
> > It is only one of numerous "Bach tunings"! And most specialists in
> > the field of temperament and tuning simply didn't buy it... No-one
> > has even started to prove that the squiggle in question is in Bach's
> > hand (
On 23:03 Uhr David W. Fenton wrote:
It's clearly not real scholarship, because real scholars don't make
claims like:
[snip]
David,
I don't doubt you are right, yet that doesn't actually say anything
about the findings, it just says something about the scholar. His
methods may be questionabl
On 18:21 Uhr dc wrote:
It is only one of numerous "Bach tunings"! And most specialists in
the field of temperament and tuning simply didn't buy it... No-one
has even started to prove that the squiggle in question is in Bach's
hand (no research has been done on the original). And then, there are
On 1 Sep 2005 at 18:34, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
> On 18:07 Uhr Brad Beyenhof wrote:
> > >>Life would be so much easier if only (3/2)12=(2/1)7.
> > >> Have you heard about the recently discovered Bach tuning, which
> > >> is hidden on the title page of the well-tempered manuscript?
> >
> > No... d
I'll give it a try.
Dean
On Sep 1, 2005, at 6:18 AM, Gerald Berg wrote:
This is a 'standard' MAC fix on GPO too. Dump the reverb entirely
and recieive no clicks -- quite a deal.
Jerry
On 31-Aug-05, at 5:01 PM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Hmm, I would have thought that moving the Qualtiy
On 9/1/05, Johannes Gebauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 18:07 Uhr Brad Beyenhof wrote:
Life would be so much easier if only (3/2)^12=(2/1)^7.
>>> Have you heard about the recently discovered Bach tuning, which is
>>> hidden on the title page of the well-tempered manuscript?
>>
>> No...
On 18:07 Uhr Brad Beyenhof wrote:
>>Life would be so much easier if only (3/2)12=(2/1)7.
>
>>
>> Have you heard about the recently discovered Bach tuning, which is
>> hidden on the title page of the well-tempered manuscript?
No... do you have a reference (preferably online) where I can read
On 9/1/05, Johannes Gebauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17:22 Uhr Brad Beyenhof wrote:
>
>> Life would be so much easier if only (3/2)^12=(2/1)^7.
>
> Have you heard about the recently discovered Bach tuning, which is
> hidden on the title page of the well-tempered manuscript?
No... do you ha
On 17:22 Uhr Brad Beyenhof wrote:
Life would be so much easier if only (3/2)12=(2/1)7.
Have you heard about the recently discovered Bach tuning, which is
hidden on the title page of the well-tempered manuscript?
It's arguably the most important Bach research discovery since the
discovery of
On 8/31/05, Karen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you running any Haxies...anything that uses the APE manager
> (Application Enhancer per Unsanity??) These can cause many
> problems. I took them all off of my machine. I run Quicksilver
> with no problems so I don't think that is the cause.
I
This is a 'standard' MAC fix on GPO too. Dump the reverb entirely and
recieive no clicks -- quite a deal.
Jerry
On 31-Aug-05, at 5:01 PM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Hmm, I would have thought that moving the Qualtiy CPU way down, would
have exacerbated the clicks, etc, rather than improving t
At 8/31/2005 01:45 PM, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
>>Really? (Finale has got to be one of the last hold-outs [in an increasingly
>>small group of non-internationalized software producers].) Is Finale
limited
>>to western European languages, then? (ISO-8859-1/ISO-8859-15 or Win-1252
>>encodings?)
>
>Yu
Hi Brad,
Are you running any Haxies...anything that uses the APE manager
(Application Enhancer per Unsanity??) These can cause many
problems. I took them all off of my machine. I run Quicksilver
with no problems so I don't think that is the cause.
Just a thought...
-Karen
I quit
Le 05-08-31 à 07:08, Johannes Gebauer a écrit :
Am I correct that only dotted slurs and similar smart shapes are
affected by this bug? I am not trying to make it look less serious,
it is serious, but I am trying to work out whether it will be a
problem for me...
Johannes
For the moment
Just uncheck the "Ambience reverb" button to disable it.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 31 Aug 2005, at 5:01 PM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Hmm, I would have thought that moving the Qualtiy CPU way down,
would have exacerbated the clicks, etc, rather than improving them.
I
Hmm, I would have thought that moving the Qualtiy CPU way down,
would have exacerbated the clicks, etc, rather than improving them.
I'll have to try that. By absolutely dry, do you mean to set the
room size to zero?
Dean
On Aug 31, 2005, at 9:07 AM, Harold Owen wrote:
Regarding FinMac2
On 31 Aug 2005, at 3:13 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Of course, if it vastly improves the anti-aliasing of small font
sizes, that might make it more compelling as a feature, since Finale
is the kind of program where it's useful to see a lot on the screen
at once (i.e., smaller magnification).
I
On 31 Aug 2005, at 3:16 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Well, it would depend on how that's done. I'd think you would want
those kinds of lines to always be at least 1 onscreen pixel, so I'd
think anti-aliasing wouldn't really help much.
Quartz uses shaded pixels to create the illusion of line thi
On 21:16 Uhr David W. Fenton wrote:
Well, it would depend on how that's done. I'd think you would want
those kinds of lines to always be at least 1 onscreen pixel, so I'd
think anti-aliasing wouldn't really help much.
I posted last week about Adobe Acrobat Reader 5 vs. 7, and the
difference
On 31 Aug 2005 at 21:01, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
> On 20:41 Uhr David W. Fenton wrote:
> > The music on my screen is anti-aliased, because I have anti-aliasing
> > turned on in the OS. The only reason that I can see that Finale
> > wouldn't anti-alias is if you haven't turned on Windows "font
> >
rtz -- is *much* better
> than QuickDraw or Windows ClearType. . . .
Windows ClearType is not the only anti-aliasing that Windows offers.
It is, in fact, designed for LCD monitors (i.e., with square pixels),
though it seems to improve anti-aliasing for some non-LCD monitors.
> . . . Fin
On 20:41 Uhr David W. Fenton wrote:
The music on my screen is anti-aliased, because I have anti-aliasing
turned on in the OS. The only reason that I can see that Finale
wouldn't anti-alias is if you haven't turned on Windows "font
smoothing" (as they call it). Or are you saying that Finale does
. Finale 2006 is the first version
to take advantage of Quartz antialiasing (enabled by drawing the
screen using CoreGraphics instead of QuickDraw).
There is a "before" and "after" comparison on Coda's web site, but
the "before" shot has antialiasing turned off
On 31 Aug 2005 at 19:59, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
> Compared to 2k5 and any XP version you might like the anti-aliased
> screen display on the Mac. Imo a real advantage of the Mac version
> over the Win version.
???
The music on my screen is anti-aliased, because I have anti-aliasing
turned on i
Morris Inouye / 2005/08/31 / 11:54 AM wrote:
>Really? (Finale has got to be one of the last hold-outs [in an increasingly
>small group of non-internationalized software producers].) Is Finale limited
>to western European languages, then? (ISO-8859-1/ISO-8859-15 or Win-1252
>encodings?)
Yup,
On 19:08 Uhr Eric Dannewitz wrote:
I have no clue what it is. I have GPO installed, but generally none
of the scores/sheets are using it. Finale will crash randomly after a
while, when I go to print something.
I assume you have done all the usual maintenance, like checking permissions?
On 18:17 Uhr Brad Beyenhof wrote:
In a blank document it's not too bad (1/4 to 1/2 second), but in a
medium-sized concert band score it's up to a second of delay with
*every* action. Any more suggestions? Has anybody hit this sort of
lag in Tiger? Has anybody *not* hit this sort of lag in Panth
On 17:43 Uhr Morris Inouye wrote:
Although many indicate that it is trustable, there are enough
problems that I think I will probably give Sibelius a try (and maybe
install the 2006 upgrade on my WinXP box).
I see no reason why you shouldn't install Fin2k6 on your Mac and try it
out for you
x27;t play well with other Unicode
apps.
At 8/31/2005 11:54 AM, Morris Inouye wrote:
On 8/31/05, Nomos Alpha
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear all,
Finale 2006 is still not Unicode compliant.
Really? (Finale has got to be one of the last hold-outs [in an increasingly small group of non-intern
I have no clue what it is. I have GPO installed, but generally none of
the scores/sheets are using it. Finale will crash randomly after a
while, when I go to print something.
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Really? I have been using Finale 2k6 heavily over the last few weeks
and it has not cr
On 8/31/05, Harold Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is nice to have EPS working - but since Finale 2004 the only
> choice for preview is PICT, which looks very poor on screen. Printout
> is fine. I will be making a request to Coda (MakeMusic) to allow for
> bitmap preview. That way the screen
t;
>> Dear all,
>> Finale 2006 is still not Unicode compliant.
>
>
> Really? (Finale has got to be one of the last hold-outs [in an increasingly
> small group of non-internationalized software producers].) Is Finale limited
> to western European languages, then? (ISO-
Regarding FinMac2k6:
I'm on a Mac G4, 800 Mhz, with 1 Gig. RAM. When I'm working on a
large score with many instruments, I select SoftSynth in the MIDI
Window to begin with. It's good enough for editing, and it doesn't
slow down operations. Then when everything else is done I switch to
GPO an
On 8/30/05, I wrote:
> My problems with 2k6 occur even when no GPO instruments are loaded,
> though. I've got a memory usage meter (CompactMemory in Konfabulator),
> and I can't remember it ever going above 60% or so, even when the lag
> is worst.
>
> I'll check again tomorrow when I'm in the off
Thanks, everyone, for your feedback!!
Although many indicate that it is trustable, there are enough problems
that I think I will probably give Sibelius a try (and maybe install the
2006 upgrade on my WinXP box).
BTW, OS X *rocks* as a platform. My reasons for feeling this way are
probably quite d
On 8/31/05, Nomos Alpha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear all,Finale 2006 is still not Unicode compliant.
Really? (Finale has got to be one of the last hold-outs [in an
increasingly small group of non-internationalized software producers].)
Is Finale limited to western European languages, then
Dear all,
Finale 2006 is still not Unicode compliant.
Saludos, Javier.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
On Aug 31, 2005, at 3:24 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 2:54 Uhr Eric Dussault wrote:
I you don't need eps (there broken until MM fixes it, but it's
unlikely you will need it if you were on Win XP)) and have a powerful
Mac will at least 1 GB of ram if you need GPO, then it may be ok to
work
Am I correct that only dotted slurs and similar smart shapes are
affected by this bug? I am not trying to make it look less serious, it
is serious, but I am trying to work out whether it will be a problem for
me...
Johannes
Eric Dussault schrieb:
see this thread:
http://forum.makemusic.com/
see this thread:
http://forum.makemusic.com/default.aspx?f=6&m=125732
I've posted on this list a similar topic, but only Simon Troup and
Harold Howen have responded.
Éric Dussault
Le 05-08-31 à 03:24, Johannes Gebauer a écrit :
On 2:54 Uhr Eric Dussault wrote:
I you don't need eps (there
Performance drop maybe, but only if you are using GPO, as far as I can
see. I am not using it, and I am fine.
Johannes
Eric Dannewitz schrieb:
Powerful as in a dual G5? Yeah. For those who were using 2005 with a G4,
and getting stuff done, switching to 2006 results in a huge performance
drop.
Eric Dannewitz schrieb:
Finale 2006 crashes a LOT for me under Tiger. While printing. Totally
recommend you wait until there is a patch or something
Really? I have been using Finale 2k6 heavily over the last few weeks and
it has not crashed at all (perhaps once).
Seems like this
On 2:54 Uhr Eric Dussault wrote:
I you don't need eps (there broken until MM fixes it, but it's
unlikely you will need it if you were on Win XP)) and have a powerful
Mac will at least 1 GB of ram if you need GPO, then it may be ok to
work with the mac version.
What is the exacty problem wit
Brad Beyenhof wrote:
I've had major problems with the slow-as-molasses interface using
FinMac2k6 under Panther (1GHz-G4/1.25GB-DDR/10.3.9). I'm beginning to
think that the problem is more in the OS I'm running (about which I
have no choice at the moment) than in the specs, because most all of
th
1 - 100 of 313 matches
Mail list logo