Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-25 Thread Paul Hayden
Steve Parker wrote: "And a third [hard drive] to back up the second because reinstalling it all [sample libraries] from DVDs is a PITA." That's a good point, Steve. I have backups of my system drive but not the samples drive. That _would_ be a PITA to reinstall from DVDs. Steve also wrote: "I

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-24 Thread Steve Parker
On 24 Apr 2012, at 21:29, Nick Raspa wrote: > It sounds like I should take a close look at DP before investing in Logic. DP is one of those pieces of software that you'd have to prise from my cold, dead (virtual) fingers.. I'm still waiting for the same emotional attachment to Finale! > It ha

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-24 Thread Nick Raspa
Hi Paul & Steve, It sounds like I should take a close look at DP before investing in Logic.  It has become obvious to me, from all the responses, that a second drive is necessary if for no other reason than to house the libraries. Nick Raspa NJR Music Enterprises On Apr 24, 2012, at 02:32 PM,

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-24 Thread Steve Parker
Hi Paul, I use DP too.. I may be alone in the UK in that..! I prefer it to Logic by far. Your setup is not far from mine. I also rarely use convolution reverb because it gains me nothing over my favourite Wave Arts reverb which can be instantiated dozens of times with little processing hit. I

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-24 Thread Paul Hayden
Hi Nick & Steve, I have an old Mac Pro ("1,1", 2 dual-core Xeon, 2.66 GHz) with a second internal hard drive just for sample libraries. I don't do any sequencing in Finale as I don't want to pay for mental health counseling. Sequencing is in Digital Performer using East West Quantum Leap Sympho

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-23 Thread Nick Raspa
I'm not sure at the moment.  I've been using Garritan and probably will continue to use it, however, I know there are some other good sound libraries out there, so I will have to investigate them and see what will work best for me.  It sounds like the issue lies more with space and that a second

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-23 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
On Mon, April 23, 2012 9:10 am, Nick Raspa wrote: > My concern right now is with virtual instruments rather than live recording. >  I just want to ensure that whatever hardware I get, it will handle a full > orchestra of virtual instruments without hiccups due to lack of speed or > space. Right no

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-23 Thread Steve Parker
Any idea which virtual orchestra? As has been said, Finale with Garritan runs very lightly. I run easy west symphonic orchestra gold and that runs best from an external FireWire. EWSI Platinum is best run from at least four separate drives for brass, wind, strings and percussion as it uses mult

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-23 Thread Nick Raspa
My concern right now is with virtual instruments rather than live recording.  I just want to ensure that whatever hardware I get, it will handle a full orchestra of virtual instruments without hiccups due to lack of speed or space. Nick Raspa NJR Music Enterprises On Apr 23, 2012, at 05:31 AM, S

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-23 Thread Steve Parker
How many tracks are you likely to record at once? My internal 4200rpm (as slow as they come) will record 16 tracks of 24/44 reliably. I also use the MacBooks internal drive as my live rig playing rhodes, wurli, piano, hammond, strings, brass.. all run as AUs inside Mainstage or DP. So.. the in

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Richard Yates
finale@shsu.edu > Subject: Re: [Finale] suggestions sought > > Flash drives are way fast enough for recording, they just don't have a lot of space > > Sent from my iSomething > -- > > > On Apr 22, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Christopher Smith > wrote: > > > A

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Flash drives are way fast enough for recording, they just don't have a lot of space Sent from my iSomething -- On Apr 22, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Christopher Smith wrote: > A separate partition on the same drive won't help you, as the mechanism is > the same. You need a separate PHYSICAL drive on a

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Christopher Smith
A separate partition on the same drive won't help you, as the mechanism is the same. You need a separate PHYSICAL drive on a different bus, and I understand that you need certain minimum rotation speeds and search speeds. I may be wrong here, but I think flash drives are not quick enough for aud

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Nick Raspa
So the OS is on my computer hard drive and the imputed data is going to a separate drive that doesn't impact the main computer (such as in flash drive) similar to hard drive partition except that the second drive (partition) is external? Nick Raspa NJR Music Enterprises On Apr 22, 2012, at 04:3

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Steve Parker
Not really hard drive space. More throughput. Recording to a different drive to the one running the OS. Steve P. On 22 Apr 2012, at 22:06, Nick Raspa wrote: > hard drive space is more the concern. Is my understanding correct? ___ Finale mailing lis

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Nick Raspa
I originally used Finale only for note setting and Opcode Vision for sequencing but Vision went the way of the dinosaur.  So I have been using Finale for both purposes (unfortunately).  My use of audio is generally for demos - virtual tracks with no live recording (at least not now).  Since I no

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Eric Dannewitz
I just replaced a 2006 iMac that I was using in my studio. It could record fine at 44.1khz. Never more than 20 tracks. However, if you start throwing plugins into the mix, things started going south fast. Add say an instance of Aliverbor a waves compressor...then the track count on the machine

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread SN jef chippewa
when i moved from desktop to portable, for questions of transportability and price i got the faster (2.53 GHz) of the two macbook pro 13" available at the time rather than 15" or 17" and put the saved money into a 24" monitor that stays home when i travel. the 13" is much lighter and takes up

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Steve Parker
This is conventional wisdom and very good advice.. but still depends on how much you need to do at once. My ageing MacBook has no problem recording 16 tracks or 24/44 to the internal 4200rpm drive. External drives are so cheap though... Steve P. On 22 Apr 2012, at 18:53, Eric Dannewitz wrot

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Logic for doing what? Recording? Virtual instruments? Any Mac can do it, but if you are going to record audio or use a lot of sample libraries, you'll want to tracks/record using a different hard drive like a FireWire/usb2/thunderbolt drive. Using just one drive for everything will drop your perfo

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Christopher Smith
Finale will run on minimal specs. It's very light, even with Garritan playback. I would concentrate on what is needed to run Pro Logic, which unfortunately I can't advise you on. Christopher On Sun Apr 22, at SundayApr 22 11:02 AM, Nick Raspa wrote: > Hello, > > I am preparing to purchase a

Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Steve Parker
Depends what you want to do. I have one of the first intel MacBooks and that will run Finale with no probs and record 24+ (probably very +) tracks of 24/44.1 audio and run a ton of large sample libraries. Unless you specifically need to do something more than this then anything you can curren