[Fink-users] ADV: ´í¹ý´óºÃµÄ½»Ò×Á¼»ú

2002-10-07 Thread dmsr168
Title: ĿǰȫÇò?ÉϽ»Ò×µÄÊÐ?ÈÕ?³ÉÊì ĿǰȫÇòÏßÉϽ»Ò×µÄÊг¡ÈÕÇ÷³ÉÊì¡£ÍøÂ·¹ºÎïÖУ¬¸ß´ï80%µÄÍøÉϽ»Ò×ÊÇͨ¹ýÐÅÓÿ¨¸¶¿î¡£ÍøÉÏÐÅÓÿ¨¸¶¿î·þÎñÒѱä³ÉÍøÉÏÉ̼ҵıØÐèÆ·¡£ ²»Ïë´í¹ý´óºÃµÄ½»Ò×Á¼»úÂð£¿ÂíÉÏÌá¹©ÍøÉÏÐÅÓÿ¨¸¶¿î·þÎñ£¬±£Ö¤ÄúµÄÏúÊÛ¶îÉÏÉý¡£ GinixµÄÍøÉÏÐÅÓÿ¨¸¶¿îϵͳPS2ÊÇÄúµÄ×î¼ÑÑ¡Ôñ£¡ ÎÞ°²

Re: [Fink-users] emac21-21.2-10 build still broken

2002-10-07 Thread Ben Hines
On Monday, October 7, 2002, at 03:37 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: > Viktor Haag wrote: >> I noticed that the emacs21 package had been updated again, so I >> tried to update my install of 2-8 to 2-10. >> I run into the same problem with the build as with 2-9. Here is >> the point at which the buil

Re: [Fink-users] fink install pwlib fails

2002-10-07 Thread Martin Costabel
Joe Izen wrote: > fink install pwlib is failing for me. I've followed the > instructions for installing fink for the first time on Mac OS 10.2.1 > and have successfully build other packages. Here is the message I > encountered when building. [] >> esdaudio.cxx:61:17: esd.h: No such file or

[Fink-users] fink install pwlib fails

2002-10-07 Thread Joe Izen
fink install pwlib is failing for me. I've followed the instructions for installing fink for the first time on Mac OS 10.2.1 and have successfully build other packages. Here is the message I encountered when building. > c++ -Wall -DNO_LONG_DOUBLE -DP_MACOSX -DP_SSL -I/usr/include/include >

Re: [Fink-users] emac21-21.2-10 build still broken

2002-10-07 Thread Martin Costabel
Viktor Haag wrote: > I noticed that the emacs21 package had been updated again, so I > tried to update my install of 2-8 to 2-10. > > I run into the same problem with the build as with 2-9. Here is > the point at which the build craps out: > > > ./emacs -q -batch -f list-load-path-shadows > >

Re: [Fink-users] tcsh initialization

2002-10-07 Thread Joel Hacker
OH! I forgot to mention that if you, like me, want to have the fink environment variables set ONLY in terminal programs launched in Xfree86, then you have to add /usr/X11R6/bin to your path in /usr/share/tcsh/examples/login or ~/.cshrc otherwise you won't be able to run XDarwin properly. If

Re: [Fink-users] tcsh initialization

2002-10-07 Thread Remi Mommsen
Hi again, On Monday, October 7, 2002, at 02:00 PM, Joel Hacker wrote: > > On Monday, October 7, 2002, at 03:32 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: > >> Pay attention: $?TERM_PROGRAM returns either 1 (true) or 0 (false) >> depending if the environment variable $TERM_PROGRAM is defined or >> not. Thus yo

Re: [Fink-users] tcsh initialization

2002-10-07 Thread Remi Mommsen
Hi Joel, On Monday, October 7, 2002, at 01:28 PM, Joel Hacker wrote: > > On Monday, October 7, 2002, at 03:32 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: > >> Thus your proposed correction is evaluated always to false. > > Then why is it that typing "e

Re: [Fink-users] tcsh initialization

2002-10-07 Thread Joel Hacker
On Monday, October 7, 2002, at 03:32 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: > Pay attention: $?TERM_PROGRAM returns either 1 (true) or 0 (false) > depending if the environment variable $TERM_PROGRAM is defined or not. > Thus your proposed correction is evaluated always to false. You could > delete the c

Re: [Fink-users] tcsh initialization

2002-10-07 Thread Joel Hacker
On Monday, October 7, 2002, at 03:32 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: > Thus your proposed correction is evaluated always to false. Then why is it that typing "env" shows that TERM_PROGRAM _IS_ defined and set to Apple_Terminal on my mach

Re: [Fink-users] Re: LilyPond-1.6.0-2 Compile fail

2002-10-07 Thread June Van Dyke
On 10/5/02 8:28 PM, "Ben Hines" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Removing ccache while you compile it wouldn't hurt anything and is > worth a shot. (your cache stays intact in your home folder) > > -Ben After reading the recent problems with ghemical, I followed the same advice their and removed

[Fink-users] emac21-21.2-10 build still broken

2002-10-07 Thread Viktor Haag
I noticed that the emacs21 package had been updated again, so I tried to update my install of 2-8 to 2-10. I run into the same problem with the build as with 2-9. Here is the point at which the build craps out: > ./emacs -q -batch -f list-load-path-shadows > make[1]: *** [emacs] Illegal instr

Re: [Fink-users] tcsh initialization

2002-10-07 Thread Remi Mommsen
Hi, On Monday, October 7, 2002, at 12:10 PM, Joel Hacker wrote: > > Yes. First and foremost, though, fix the typo in > /usr/share/tcsh/examples/aliases or else terminal will behave "buggy". > The line "if ("$TERM_PROGRAM" == "Apple_Terminal") then" SHOULD be > "if ("$?TERM_PROGRAM" == "Ap

Re: [Fink-users] compiling ghemical-0.90-3 failed

2002-10-07 Thread Ben Hines
Yes, i know it breaks some things - pretty much only things that use gcc2. If you get it working with gcc3 it should work fine. octave is another one, it also uses gcc2. I think there might be precompiled headers from gcc3 it is not noticing or something. Until then perhaps you could set the c

Re: [Fink-users] tcsh initialization

2002-10-07 Thread Joel Hacker
On Monday, October 7, 2002, at 11:59 AM, Gaetano Vitale wrote: > Hi, > is it possible to initialize the tcsh in 10.2 with both > /sw/bin/init.csh > and jaguar's /usr/share/tcsh/examples/rc and > /usr/share/tcsh/examples/login or to integrate somehow these files? I > miss the tcsh settings iI

[Fink-users] Re: feedback

2002-10-07 Thread Hal Sadofsky
> From: Michael Loose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > As there is no possibility to sent feedback directly to someone who > feels responsible > for the latest distribution i use this way to let out these things > (adressed to whom ever it may concern). > > After having read all that stuff i a

[Fink-users] tcsh initialization

2002-10-07 Thread Gaetano Vitale
Hi, is it possible to initialize the tcsh in 10.2 with both /sw/bin/init.csh and jaguar's /usr/share/tcsh/examples/rc and /usr/share/tcsh/examples/login or to integrate somehow these files? I miss the tcsh settings iI had in 10.1... Thanks in advance for help gaetano

Re: [Fink-users] compiling ghemical-0.90-3 failed

2002-10-07 Thread Pedro Massobrio
Hi matt, I did like you suggested 'fink remove ccache' and then 'ghemical' updated with no problems. Thanks a lot for the magic...!!! Best regards, Pedro On Monday, October 7, 2002, at 10:05 PM, Matt Stephenson wrote: > Pedro, > > I have just reproduced the same build error after install

Re: [Fink-users] Problems building emacs 21.2-10

2002-10-07 Thread Remi Mommsen
Hi, I found the problem for the strange behaviour of the configure script. Here the solution for the records: For another s/w I tried to build (not fink), I made a softlink ln -s /sw/include /usr/local/include. The preprocessor found out, that it has twice the same directory in the search pat

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all: "compiling libxml2-2.4.25-1failed"

2002-10-07 Thread Alexander Hansen
The problem was apparently do to an error in the .info file. Max put a new one out this morning and I was able to do the update. You should be able to selfupdate-cvs and try again. On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 11:25, Andreas Gschwendtner wrote: > Hi everybody, > > When I tried to do "fink selfupdate-

Re: [Fink-users] Any one ported PVM or MPI yet?

2002-10-07 Thread Derek Homeier
On Monday, October 7, 2002, at 09:51 AM, Brian W. Barrett wrote: > Developing LAM/MPI on OS X here :). Right now, there are some bugs in > the > stable release of LAM/MPI (6.5.6) that can cause issues on OS X. > Namely: > > * Our cleanup script can't remove our temporary directory properly

Re: [Fink-users] feedback

2002-10-07 Thread Don MacQueen
At 11:11 PM +0200 10/6/02, Michael Loose wrote: >As there is no possibility to sent feedback directly to someone who >feels responsible >for the latest distribution i use this way to let out these things >(adressed to whom ever it may concern). > <- snip -> >It simply takes more time to use Fi

[Fink-users] fink update-all: "compiling libxml2-2.4.25-1 failed"

2002-10-07 Thread Andreas Gschwendtner
Hi everybody, When I tried to do "fink selfupdate-cvs" and "fink update-all" today, I ran into an error. The first command completed without errors, the "fink update-all"-command produced the output shown at the end of this mail. I am running 10.2.1 on a PowerBook G4-500. Does anybody have an

Re: [Fink-users] compiling ghemical-0.90-3 failed

2002-10-07 Thread Matt Stephenson
Pedro, I have just reproduced the same build error after installing ccache. So try removing ccache, "fink remove ccache" and then try updating ghemical again, let me know how that goes. Ben - have included you in this email because I thought you might like to know. Matt Pedro Massobrio wro

Re: [Fink-users] Any one ported PVM or MPI yet?

2002-10-07 Thread Brian W. Barrett
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Derek Homeier wrote: > On Friday, October 4, 2002, at 12:51 AM, Stephen Hocking wrote: > > > Inquiring minds and all that - the Xserve's significantly reduced power > > consumption and heat production over P4s is making it rather > > interesting... > > > Using LAM-MPI here, a

Re: [Fink-users] Compile Failure libxml2-2.4.25-1

2002-10-07 Thread Alexander Hansen
At the risk of being a "me-tooer", I'll report that I get the same build failure as Michael. -- Alexander K. Hansen Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center Levitated Dipole Experiment 175 Albany Street, NW17-219 Cambridge, MA 02139-4213

Re: [Fink-users] Xmms

2002-10-07 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 08:47, Jason Cox wrote: > Hello. > > First let me thank the Fink team for everything. I am more than happy > using Fink so far. I'm using OS X 10.2.1 and the latest fink release, > with Blackbox as my Xwindow manager. > > 1) When first loading an mp3 file with xmms, the p

[Fink-users] Compile Failure libxml2-2.4.25-1

2002-10-07 Thread Michael E. Zwick
I observed that libxm2-2.4.25-1 failed to install. My system: OS X 10.2.1, DP 800, 512 MB RMA Fink installation: Package manager version: 0.10.0.cvs Distribution version: 0.4.9.cvs I use the unstable tree. Here is the last text (I have the entire text saved in an .rtf file): gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG

Re: [Fink-users] Odd fink behavior

2002-10-07 Thread Max Horn
At 11:01 Uhr -0600 05.10.2002, Samuel M. Smith wrote: >I did a clean install of fink on OSX 10.2.1 as per the directions >given on http://fink.sourceforge.net/news/jag-bootstrap.php. > >I inadvertently skipped step 4 which is to add unstable/main and >unstable/crypto to the Trees: line in fink.c

Re: [Fink-users] Zope under fink and OS 10.2

2002-10-07 Thread Fernando Pereira
On 10/7/02 4:23 AM, "Tom Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have come to believe that the startup file is "/sw/lib/zope/z2.py" because > it is a script and is commented accordingly (I can find no documentation for > fink's zope anywhere, so maybe someone could point me in the right > directio

Re: [Fink-users] Odd fink behavior

2002-10-07 Thread Alexander Hansen
That does indeed seem strange--I could understand fink only seeing the stable versions if unstable is after stable in fink.conf. On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 14:01, Samuel M.Smith wrote: > I did a clean install of fink on OSX 10.2.1 as per the directions given > on http://fink.sourceforge.net/news/jag-

[Fink-users] Xmms

2002-10-07 Thread Jason Cox
Hello. First let me thank the Fink team for everything. I am more than happy using Fink so far. I'm using OS X 10.2.1 and the latest fink release, with Blackbox as my Xwindow manager. 1) When first loading an mp3 file with xmms, the program hung up. I restarted xwindow to try again, and xmms

[Fink-users] fix-fink questions...

2002-10-07 Thread Justin Wright
I upgraded to 0.4.1 from 0.4.0a this weekend. I am running 10.1, on a TiBook 500. While attempting to diagnose another problem (now fixed), I ran fix-fink (output attached). Now, I have a couple of questions. First, I have uninstalled/reinstalled and rebuilt mysql, and the libmysqlclient.dylib

[Fink-users] Zope under fink and OS 10.2

2002-10-07 Thread Tom Harris
I have struggled for about a week trying to understand how to get zope running under 10.2, but I continue to get the same error message every time I try to start zope. I have come to believe that the startup file is "/sw/lib/zope/z2.py" because it is a script and is commented accordingly (I can f

Re: [Fink-users] openssl-0.9.6g is actually openssl-0.9.6e?

2002-10-07 Thread Nicholas Riley
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 01:35:32AM -0500, Nicholas Riley wrote: > [p8:5008] ~%strings - /usr/lib/libssl/libssl.dylib |grep "0.9.6" Doh, /usr/lib/libssl.dylib is the right place, /usr/lib/libssl is just a directory I created to stop things from linking against it (it didn't help). The base of the