> On Apr 22, 2015, at 23:38, Giacomo Petrini wrote:
>
> Il 22.04.2015 19:50, Jack Howarth ha scritto:
>>It is very likely that you have upgraded from Mavericks to Yosemite
>> without reinstalling Xquartz, The OS installation removes the
>> /usr/X11R6 and /usr/X11 symlinks preventing many fin
Il 22.04.2015 19:50, Jack Howarth ha scritto:
> It is very likely that you have upgraded from Mavericks to Yosemite
> without reinstalling Xquartz, The OS installation removes the
> /usr/X11R6 and /usr/X11 symlinks preventing many fink builds from
> finding the X11 headers.
Hello,
given that t
Hi all,
I have problems using "fink update-all“. Also the selfupdate do not resolve the
problem. Can you please help me find out where the problem is?
Best Regards,
Reinhold
libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../include -I/sw/include
-I/usr/X11R6/include -O3 -DTARGET_HOST_POSI
Yes that´s right, I have upgraded from Mavericks to Yosemite without
reinstalling Xquartz.
I will try to install Xquartz again and check afterwards also if the
symlinks are present again.
Many thanks for the hint.
Best Regards,
Reinhold
Am 22.04.15 um 19:50 schrieb Jack Howarth:
>It is very
It is very likely that you have upgraded from Mavericks to Yosemite
without reinstalling Xquartz, The OS installation removes the
/usr/X11R6 and /usr/X11 symlinks preventing many fink builds from
finding the X11 headers.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Reinhold Ludwig
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I
Hi Alexander,
removing gcc46 manually and installing the latest version cleared the way for a
complete fink update-all.
Thanks a lot. Your contributions to 'fink' are outstanding.
Gerfried
Dr. Gerfried Kumbartzki
Department of Physics Rutgers University
voice: 732 445 5500 ext.8498
fax: 732
Hi Alexander,
This seems to have done the trick, thanks!
Cheers,
Attila
On May 15, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 5/15/12 12:25 AM, Attila Krasznahorkay wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I've updated my laptop to MacOS X 10.7.4 yesterday. Since then, when I do:
>>
>> fink se
On 5/15/12 7:06 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> What it's about is that Fink needs to be told where your Xcode
>> application actually is:
>>
>> sudo xcode-select -switch /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer
>>
>> (this also tells xcodebuild where it is)
>>
>> We stopped hardcoding the path to Xc
On 5/15/12 2:24 PM, Gerfried Kumbartzki wrote:
> I operate two Mac systems an iMAc and a MacBook Pro, both have the same
> system and should be up to date. Both systems have fink installed. The iMac
> (Xcode 4.1) finished the fink selfupdate
> and fink update all nicely:
> tulip:~ fink --version
I operate two Mac systems an iMAc and a MacBook Pro, both have the same system
and should be up to date. Both systems have fink installed. The iMac (Xcode
4.1) finished the fink selfupdate
and fink update all nicely:
tulip:~ fink --version
Package manager version: 0.32.6
Distribution version: se
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:40:14AM -0700, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 5/15/12 12:25 AM, Attila Krasznahorkay wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I've updated my laptop to MacOS X 10.7.4 yesterday. Since then, when I do:
> >
> > fink selfupdate
> > fink update-all
> >
> > I get the following answer (af
On 5/15/12 12:25 AM, Attila Krasznahorkay wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I've updated my laptop to MacOS X 10.7.4 yesterday. Since then, when I do:
>
> fink selfupdate
> fink update-all
>
> I get the following answer (after the second call, the first one goes through
> okay):
>
> Information about 475
Dear All,
I've updated my laptop to MacOS X 10.7.4 yesterday. Since then, when I do:
fink selfupdate
fink update-all
I get the following answer (after the second call, the first one goes through
okay):
Information about 4756 packages read in 1 seconds.
Can't resolve dependency "xcode (>= 3.1.2
Thanks Robert,
It works now!
thanks again,
kopinjol
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Robert Wyatt wrote:
> Kopinjol Baishya wrote:
>
>>
>> Can't resolve dependency "xcode (>= 3.1.2)"
>>
>
> That would most likely be because you don't have Xcode 3.1.2 installed.
> Since gcc44 requires that versi
Kopinjol Baishya wrote:
>
> Can't resolve dependency "xcode (>= 3.1.2)"
That would most likely be because you don't have Xcode 3.1.2 installed.
Since gcc44 requires that version of Xcode to build, you'll have to
download and install that. (From the Apple developer site which has free
registratio
Hi,
When I do "fink update-all" on my macbook running OSX 10.5.8 this is what I
get:
Can't resolve dependency "xcode (>= 3.1.2)" for package "gcc44-4.4.2-1000"
(no matching
packages/versions found)
Exiting with failure.
Also I tried opening xcode and it crashes.
I am not too worried about xcode
Kingston Mail Server wrote:
> While updating fink, I received this error:
>
> Failed: phase compiling: gcc44-4.4.1-1000 failed
>
>
That's not actually the error; that's a symptom of the error. Literally
every possible failure mode during the compile phase will produce this.
Your error is noted
While updating fink, I received this error:
Failed: phase compiling: gcc44-4.4.1-1000 failed
Before reporting any errors, please run "fink selfupdate" and
try again. If you continue to have issues, please check to see if the
FAQ on fink's website solves the problem. If not, ask on the fink-user
On Jan 12, 2009, at 9:54 PM, Chris Beamis wrote:
Thanks Martin, I got a little bit further. Now it's trying to load
an HTML package that doesn't appear to exist anywhere..
curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
### execution of curl failed, exit code 22
Downloading the file "HTML-
Thanks Martin, I got a little bit further. Now it's trying to load
an HTML package that doesn't appear to exist anywhere..
curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
### execution of curl failed, exit code 22
Downloading the file "HTML-Tagset-3.03.tar.gz" failed.
(1) Give up
(2)
Chris Beamis wrote:
>
> I'm having an issue which may or may not be related to the rsync
> error on the list
I don't think so.
> (I haven't updated fink for quite a while):
This could be more to the point...
> Sat Jan 3 19:58:20 PST 2009
> bea...@wormwood:~ >fink selfupdate
> rsync -az -q
I'm having an issue which may or may not be related to the rsync
error on the list (I haven't updated fink for quite a while):
Sat Jan 3 19:58:20 PST 2009
bea...@wormwood:~ >fink selfupdate
rsync -az -q rsync://msn.wi.us.finkmirrors.net/finkinfo//TIMESTAMP /
sw/fink/TIMESTAMP.tmp
I will now
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 16:26:54 Felix Frolow wrote:
> This time it is not working
> I updated Fink to the latest version and get :
>
> gcc -L/sw/lib -L/usr/local/lib -force_flat_namespace -o miniperl \
> miniperlmain.o opmini.o libperl.a -ldl -lm -lutil -lc
> ld: warning in /usr/local/li
Felix Frolow wrote:
> I use MacBookPro Intel with Leopard
>
> Issuing fink update-all I get following:
>
> [green233-5:~] mbfrolow% fink update-all
> Information about 7116 packages read in 1 seconds.
> Can't resolve dependency "perl586-core" for package "xml-sax-
> pm586-0.16-1" (no
> matching pa
I use MacBookPro Intel with Leopard
Issuing fink update-all I get following:
[green233-5:~] mbfrolow% fink update-all
Information about 7116 packages read in 1 seconds.
Can't resolve dependency "perl586-core" for package "xml-sax-
pm586-0.16-1" (no
matching packages/versions found)
Exiting with
Jürgen Lorenz Simon wrote:
[]
> ../../../gcc-4.2.3/libjava/boehm.cc: In function 'void
> _Jv_RegisterLibForGc(const void*)':
> ../../../gcc-4.2.3/libjava/boehm.cc:670: error: 'Dl_info' was not
> declared in this scope
Look if you have a file /usr/local/include/dlfcn.h. If yes, remove it.
--
Hello,
my latest attempts at fink update-all have failed with the following
error in the
compilation of gcc-4.2.3
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc42-4.2.3-1000/darwin_objdir/./gcc/xgcc -shared-
libgcc -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc42-4.2.3-1000/darwin_objdir/./gcc -
nostdinc++ -L/sw/src/fink.build/gcc42-4.2.
I have tried many times on my intel imac to compile flac from source.
It stll fails for me. It appers that the code has some code stucture
format errors.
Richard E. Miles
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 21, 2008, at 7:19 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 February 2008 06:34:10 am M
On Wednesday 20 February 2008 06:34:10 am Martin Costabel wrote:
> Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> []
>
> > Further I find myself with
> > *i* flac-shlibs 1.1.1-1013 Free lossless audio codec -
> > shared libs
> > I seems a conflicts with flac-shlibs was forgotten, or a
> > correspondin
Jean-François Mertens wrote:
[]
> Further I find myself with
> *i* flac-shlibs 1.1.1-1013 Free lossless audio codec -
> shared libs
> I seems a conflicts with flac-shlibs was forgotten, or a
> corresponding info
> file should have stayed.
The latter, I think. There are still 6 pac
On 20 Feb 2008, at 01:11, Richard E.Miles wrote:
> I am using intel imac 10.2.5 leopard. I did a update to finkcomander.
> Then did fink selfupdate-sync and then update-all. When it had go to
> linsndfile1-1,0.17-2 it failed. Here is output:
>
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I/sw/include -g -
I am using intel imac 10.2.5 leopard. I did a update to finkcomander.
Then did fink selfupdate-sync and then update-all. When it had go to
linsndfile1-1,0.17-2 it failed. Here is output:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I/sw/include -g -O2 -std=gnu99 -W -
Wall -Wdeclaration-after-statement -
Benjamin Melançon wrote:
> Thanks. By the way, what I'm trying to update is SVN (so that https
> works).
>
> This is where it all starts:
> fink update-all
>
> fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual
> dependency. The
> candidates:
> (1)python: Interpreted, object-oriente
Thanks. By the way, what I'm trying to update is SVN (so that https works).
This is where it all starts:
fink update-all
fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. The
candidates:
(1) python: Interpreted, object-oriented language
(2) python-nox: Interpreted,
Benjamin Melançon wrote:
> Hello helpful fink-users,
>
> Running self-update seems to work, but when I go to the next step of
> getting my packages back up to speed, fink update-all, it eventually
> breaks down here with warnings like the last few here and then the
> error. I've been looking aroun
Hello helpful fink-users,
Running self-update seems to work, but when I go to the next step of
getting my packages back up to speed, fink update-all, it eventually
breaks down here with warnings like the last few here and then the
error. I've been looking around but not finding a cure, any
recomm
Le 27 sept. 2006 à 00:51, Daniel Macks a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 12:35:56AM +0200, Jean-David Maillefer wrote:
If I run update-all with unstable enabled, all the stable packages
having greater unstable version will upgrade to the unstable one.
If I run update-all with unstable disable
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 12:35:56AM +0200, Jean-David Maillefer wrote:
>
> If I run update-all with unstable enabled, all the stable packages
> having greater unstable version will upgrade to the unstable one.
> If I run update-all with unstable disable, only the stable packages
> are updated.
Hi,
Is there a way to run a fink update-all which preserves the stable/
unstable tree structure ?
I explain:
- most of the packages I use are stable
- some other package are unstable
If I run update-all with unstable enabled, all the stable packages
having greater unstable version will upgr
Duncan Galloway wrote:
[]
install: xfig.1.html: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [install.man] Error 71
make[1]: *** [install.doc] Error 2
make: *** [install.all] Error 2
### execution of make failed, exit code 2
Removing build lock...
/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-xfig-3.2.4-4
(R
Hi,
I ran fink selfupdate and then tried to run fink update-all recently and had
a problem with compiling xfig:
.
.
.
+ /usr/bin/install -c -m 0444 xfig.1.html
/sw/src/fink.build/root-xfig-3.2.4-4/s
w/share/doc/xfig/html/xfig.1.html
install: xfig.1.html: No such fil
I was away for the weekend, and after your messages tried again. I
somehow found the correct incantation of fink
build/rebuild/update-all/self-update and so was able to update my
system.
Thanks to all; apologies for not replying earlier (time/place/platform
problem...)
Chris
p.s. and OT: will I
Martin Costabel wrote:
Chris wrote:
[]
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] [...]
Python/mactoolboxglue.c: In function 'CFURLRefObj_Convert':
Python/mactoolboxglue.c:480: warning: return makes integer from
pointer without a cast
Python/mactoolboxglue.c:480: warning: return makes integer from
point
Chris wrote:
[]
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
[...]
Python/mactoolboxglue.c: In function 'CFURLRefObj_Convert':
Python/mactoolboxglue.c:480: warning: return makes integer from pointer
without a cast
Python/mactoolboxglue.c:480: warning: return makes integer from pointer
without a cast
Python
Hello,
Currently trapped in a fink selfupdate/fink update all cycle. First of all
my setup:
# Fink configuration, initially created by bootstrap.pl
Trees: local/main stable/main stable/crypto unstable/main unstable/crypto
Distribution: 10.4-transitional
noa:~ christopher$ fink --version
Pack
Didn't receive any response to this the first time I posted it, so
I'm posting it again.
Hope someone can help.
After updating to fink 0.24.6
then running fink selfupdate, then fink update-all, I get the
following error on doxygen
File '/sw/src/root-doxygen-1.4.2-1/sw/share/doc/doxygen/sr
After updating to fink 0.24.6
then running fink selfupdate, then fink update-all, I get the
following error on doxygen
File '/sw/src/root-doxygen-1.4.2-1/sw/share/doc/doxygen/src/
translator.h' not found!
make[1]: *** [language.doc] Error 1
make: *** [install_docs] Error 2
### execution of m
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 08:38:27AM -0600, Dave Price wrote:
> Is there a good way to invoke fink update-all to capture my log in a file?
Check out the script utility, included (with manpage) as part of OS X.
Richard
---
SF email is sponsored b
On 21 Apr 2005, at 17:25, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
On 21 Apr 2005, at 16:19, David R. Morrison wrote:
That really can't be it, since putting in that dependency would
force libgda into the crypto tree.
Sorry, the output below is just for libgda-ldap.so .
JF
# otool -L /sw/lib/libgda/provide
On 21 Apr 2005, at 16:19, David R. Morrison wrote:
That really can't be it, since putting in that dependency would
force libgda into the crypto tree.
# otool -L /sw/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-ldap.so /sw/lib/libgda/
providers/libgda-xml.so/sw/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-ldap.so:
/sw/li
On Apr 21, 2005, at 10:38 AM, Dave Price wrote:
Is there a good way to invoke fink update-all to capture my log in
a file?
aloha,
dave
If I'm using the OS X Terminal application, I typically just set the
Preferences for infinite scrollback and then save the output as a
quick and dirty way.
Is there a good way to invoke fink update-all to capture my log in a file?
aloha,
dave
On 4/21/05, David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That really can't be it, since putting in that dependency would force
> libgda into the crypto tree.
>
> I think we need to see more lines from your l
That really can't be it, since putting in that dependency would force
libgda into the crypto tree.
I think we need to see more lines from your log, to find out the source
of this.
-- Dave
On Apr 21, 2005, at 9:44 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On Apr 21, 2005, at 12:44 AM, Dave Price wrote:
I
On Apr 21, 2005, at 12:44 AM, Dave Price wrote:
I am trying to update my fink and fail here:
grep: /sw/lib/libsasl2.la: No such file or directory
sed: /sw/lib/libsasl2.la: No such file or directory
libtool: link: `/sw/lib/libsasl2.la' is not a valid libtool archive
make[2]: *** [libgda-ldap.la] Err
I am trying to update my fink and fail here:
grep: /sw/lib/libsasl2.la: No such file or directory
sed: /sw/lib/libsasl2.la: No such file or directory
libtool: link: `/sw/lib/libsasl2.la' is not a valid libtool archive
make[2]: *** [libgda-ldap.la] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make:
Ah--totally forgot (hate it when that happens)! These are the -dev
and -shlibs for GNOME 1.4 control-center, which are needed by
something else (maybe).
You might try removing control-center-dev and control-center-shlibs.
If nothing complains, then you may not need them for anything and then
On Apr 5, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
On 5 avr. 05, at 11:45, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On Apr 5, 2005, at 2:36 PM, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
What version of OSX do you have? and What version of fink do you
have ("fink --version")?
If you're on Panther (as is suggested by the -17 revis
On 5 avr. 05, at 11:45, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On Apr 5, 2005, at 2:36 PM, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
What version of OSX do you have? and What version of fink do you
have ("fink --version")?
If you're on Panther (as is suggested by the -17 revision) I'm very
surprised that you can't get a late
On Apr 5, 2005, at 2:36 PM, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
What version of OSX do you have? and What version of fink do you
have ("fink --version")?
If you're on Panther (as is suggested by the -17 revision) I'm very
surprised that you can't get a later version:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package
On 5 avr. 05, at 11:21, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On Apr 5, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
I have been trying to finish an update-all now for several days. And
now I've got to the point where update-all fails on control-center,
as I understand (see below).
I have tried simply fink remov
On Apr 5, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
I have been trying to finish an update-all now for several days. And
now I've got to the point where update-all fails on control-center, as
I understand (see below).
I have tried simply fink remove (and purge) control-center in the
hopes that by
I have been trying to finish an update-all now for several days. And
now I've got to the point where update-all fails on control-center, as
I understand (see below).
I have tried simply fink remove (and purge) control-center in the hopes
that by doing that update-all will finish without it. (not
On 03 Apr, 2005, at 18:28, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On Apr 3, 2005, at 1:53 PM, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
I have been trying to finish an update-all now for several days. And
now I've got to the point where update-all fails on control-center,
as I understand (see below).
I have tried simply fink re
Try rebuilding control-center by itself. Then once it has successfully
built, continue on with the update-all. Repeat each time a package
borks itself. Took me 6 tries last time, but control-center was not one
of the problems.
Good luck,
Brian
On Apr 3, 2005, at 7:28 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wro
I have been trying to finish an update-all now for several days. And
now I've got to the point where update-all fails on control-center, as
I understand (see below).
I have tried simply fink remove (and purge) control-center in the hopes
that by doing that update-all will finish without it. (not
On Apr 3, 2005, at 1:53 PM, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
I have been trying to finish an update-all now for several days. And
now I've got to the point where update-all fails on control-center, as
I understand (see below).
I have tried simply fink remove (and purge) control-center in the
hopes that by
Did you try the suggestion from:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/comp-general.php?phpLang=en#node-exists
?
On Apr 30, 2004, at 12:08 PM, lj Palmer wrote:
Error:
$> fink update-all
/usr/bin/sudo /sw/bin/fink update-all
Information about 3088 packages read in 3 seconds.
Failed: Internal error: n
Hi,
On Apr 30, 2004, at 9:08 AM, lj Palmer wrote:
Error:
$> fink update-all
/usr/bin/sudo /sw/bin/fink update-all
Information about 3088 packages read in 3 seconds.
Failed: Internal error: node for db42-ssl-shlibs already exists
Using Fink unstable tree
$> fink --version
Package manager version:
Error:
$> fink update-all
/usr/bin/sudo /sw/bin/fink update-all
Information about 3088 packages read in 3 seconds.
Failed: Internal error: node for db42-ssl-shlibs already exists
Using Fink unstable tree
$> fink --version
Package manager version: 0.20.1
Distribution version: 0.7.0.cvs
Mac OSX: 10.
Many thanks.
best regards,
Mihalis.
On Apr 14, 2004, at 17:26, Martin Costabel wrote:
Seems the sourceforge site is coming back to life again...
Mihalis Tsoukalos wrote:
Dear list,
I am having the following situation:
Same situation, same answer as on the fink-beginners list.
---
SUPPORT Mac OS
Seems the sourceforge site is coming back to life again...
Mihalis Tsoukalos wrote:
Dear list,
I am having the following situation:
Same situation, same answer as on the fink-beginners list.
--
Martin
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IB
Dear list,
I am having the following situation:
racoon:~ $ fink update-all
/usr/bin/sudo /sw/bin/fink update-all
Information about 1501 packages read in 1 seconds.
The following 6 packages will be installed or updated:
findutils freetype2 freetype2-shlibs lcms-shlibs libpcap-shlibs
openssl097-sh
On Apr 5, 2004, at 8:50 AM, Klaus Hereth wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After updating fink to the latest version (0. ), I ran fink update
all, which terminates with the following lines:
dpkg -i
/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/x11-system/xfree86_4.
3.99.16-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After updating fink to the latest version (0. ), I ran fink update
all, which terminates with the following lines:
dpkg -i
/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/x11-system/xfree86_4.
3.99.16-2_darwin-powerpc.deb
/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/bi
The problem was apparently do to an error in the .info file. Max put a
new one out this morning and I was able to do the update. You should be
able to selfupdate-cvs and try again.
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 11:25, Andreas Gschwendtner wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> When I tried to do "fink selfupdate-
Hi everybody,
When I tried to do "fink selfupdate-cvs" and "fink update-all" today, I
ran into an error. The first command completed without errors, the
"fink update-all"-command produced the output shown at the end of this
mail. I am running 10.2.1 on a PowerBook G4-500.
Does anybody have an
I find that I encounter problems when I give the command `fink
update-all', each of which aborts the update:
curl -f -L -s -S -O
http://dev.scriptics.com/download/tcl/tcl8_3/tk8.3.3.tar.gz
curl: (6) Couldn't resolve host 'ftp.tcl.tk'
### execution of curl failed, exit code 6
Downloading the fi
On Sunday, August 11, 2002, at 08:28 PM, Brandon Potter wrote:
> Hey all,
> I've noticed I keep getting a lot of duplicate libs after I run fink
> update-all. Last time I removed 8 and the time before a whopping 32.
> I'm detecting the dup entries by running fink scanpackages.
What do you mea
Hey all,
I've noticed I keep getting a lot of duplicate libs after I run fink
update-all. Last time I removed 8 and the time before a whopping 32. I'm
detecting the dup entries by running fink scanpackages.
Is there any chance we can get fink to remove the dup entries itself? Or
do I have mine
> I think the problem comes from upgrading from binary distro (old-style
> gnome-libs package, not split off) to the new source distro that has the
> splitoff gnome-libs package. (gnome-libs-shlibs)
This seems unlikely, as I have never installed fink binary
distributions. I started right
On Tuesday, July 16, 2002, at 02:59 PM, Mike O'Brien wrote:
>>
>
> Sure enough, this fixed the problem. What IS the problem,
> anyway? Is it a circular dependency? Inquiring minds want to know,
> so they can better understand what happened...and fix it themselves
> the next time!
>
I t
> Someone else just had the same problem.
Might have been me. I reported this yesterday, and re-reported
today mentioning the suggested fixes that didn't work.
> The fix is:
> dpkg -r --force-depends gnome-libs
> fink update-all
Sure enough, this fixed the problem. What IS the
Someone else just had the same problem. The fix is:
dpkg -r --force-depends gnome-libs
fink update-all
-Ben
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing
real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build
I added the -unstable/main and -unstable/crypto branches so that I
could build KDE. KDE itself is running fairly well, but I can't do a
'fink update-all' any more. The attachments show my fink.conf file and
the results of 'fink update-all'.
To forestall the easy answers:
> Last night I did a fink selfupdate (from CVS), followed by a fink
> update-all, and received a number of packages to update,
> including lesstif and lesstif-shlibs.
> Sweet Josephine, doens't lesstif take a very long time to build
> (or is it the shlibs that take a long time to build?). Anyway,
Last night I did a fink selfupdate (from CVS), followed by a fink
update-all, and received a number of packages to update,
including lesstif and lesstif-shlibs.
Sweet Josephine, doens't lesstif take a very long time to build
(or is it the shlibs that take a long time to build?). Anyway,
the buil
changes are in store for OS X.2.
Jeff
> --
> From: Martin Costabel
> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 7:14 AM
> To: Finlay Dobbie
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: [Fink-users] Fink update-all with new gcc
>
> (Cut down on
At 9:43 AM -0500 4/15/02, Hester, Jeffrey W. wrote:
>Thanks for the info Martin. (I can't e-mail to you either from work for
>some reason. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is my personal address.)
>
>I also tried to file a bug report (bugreport.apple.com) as suggested to
>request Apple include f77/g77 in the n
At 19:48 Uhr +0100 14.04.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
>On Sunday, April 14, 2002, at 01:14 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>
>>My interpretation of the few cryptic remarks I saw is the following (I
>>may be wrong, of course):
>>
>>Apple's forthcoming release will be based on the "nervous weasel" branch
>
On Sunday, April 14, 2002, at 01:14 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> My interpretation of the few cryptic remarks I saw is the following (I
> may be wrong, of course):
>
> Apple's forthcoming release will be based on the "nervous weasel" branch
> of their cvs tree, not on the trunk. In the trunk, th
(Cut down on CC list; otherwise we'll start a a duplicate list; and Jeff
Hester's address isn't working for me anyway)
Finlay Dobbie wrote:
> Actually, they're merging in upstream GCC quite frequently, or at least
> were, and GCC 3.1 is set to go final RSN (tomorrow according to
> http://gcc.gn
On Thursday, April 11, 2002, at 05:47 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>> Note the experimental... From what i read on the lists, Apple's GCC
>
> The "experimental" here is an attribute of the gcc version on which
> Apple's version is based and it will probably stay there for a while. I
> would bet th
Ben Hines wrote:
>
> At 10:14 AM -0500 4/11/02, Hester, Jeffrey W. wrote:
> >
> > > then it starts building correctly. This is with
> >> Apple Computer, Inc. GCC version 1025, based on gcc version 3.1 20020105
> > > (experimental)
> > >
>
> Note the experimental... From what i read on the li
At 10:14 AM -0500 4/11/02, Hester, Jeffrey W. wrote:
>
> > then it starts building correctly. This is with
>> Apple Computer, Inc. GCC version 1025, based on gcc version 3.1 20020105
> > (experimental)
> >
Note the experimental... From what i read on the lists, Apple's GCC
3.1 might have di
*** [all-recursive] Error 1
### make failed, exit code 2
Failed: compiling ddd-3.3.1-2 failed
Thanks.
Jeff
> --
> From: Martin Costabel
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:09 PM
> To: Hester, Jeffrey W.; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject:
Martin Costabel wrote:
>
> "Hester, Jeffrey W." wrote:
>
> > checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler cannot
> > create executables
>
> Standard answer to questions about configure failure: What does the
> config.log file say at the end?
After looking at this myse
"Hester, Jeffrey W." wrote:
> checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler cannot
> create executables
Standard answer to questions about configure failure: What does the
config.log file say at the end?
--
Martin
___
Fink-u
Hello all,
I'm doing a fink update-all. This is my version:
Package manager version: 0.9.9a
Distribution version: 0.3.2a.cvs
I recently went through the steps to successfully download and install gcc
3.1 from Apple's CVS server (it was release 1039.) Unfortunately, the
-no-cpp-precomp switch
Patrick berry writes:
> You can run `fink configure` and answer 'N' to "Allow passive ftp
> transfers."
I could, but the problem is that wouldn't help me in my current
position. Our firewall policies preclude me from doing anything
but passive ftp transfers. What I really need is for
ftp.gnupg
You can run `fink configure` and answer 'N' to "Allow passive ftp
transfers."
Pat
On Tuesday, March 26, 2002, at 01:38 PM, Viktor Haag wrote:
>
> I run 'fink update-all' and it tells me that it wants to
> install/update a number of new packages, including gnupg-1.0.6.
>
> Very good, I tell it
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
