Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Service API and nbackup

2008-04-20 Thread Roman Rokytskyy
Is there a way to specify for Backup service to use nbackup and make incremental backup? No. AFAIK nbackup isn't available thru Service API. Nether I can find any link to api for nbackup..hope you know more! This is a bad news...back to batch file...or process ! AFAIK, nbackup can be

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Possible issue in

2007-11-02 Thread Roman Rokytskyy
P.S. BTW, I'm pretty sure when you have correct unicode database and specify correct non-unicode charset when connecting in IBExpert or ODBC driver, you will get your characters back. This depends on characters. If you have UTF8 column and there's a japanese character in row, then using

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Possible issue in

2007-11-02 Thread Roman Rokytskyy
1] put back encoding of UNICODE_FSS to UTF-8 and find replacements for DB client and ODBC driver. Currently I use IBExpert and ODBC Firebird/Interbase Driver by IBPhoenix. 2] keep the changed version and possibly have invalid unicode characters in my DB when using other ODBC driver

[Firebird-net-provider] Firebird Embedded and .NET Provider used in o2 Connection Manager

2007-10-04 Thread Roman Rokytskyy
Hi, Some time ago I have upgraded my phone contract to include also mobile internet (5GB/month) and as a normal user read the instructions on the o2 website, which suggested to install the o2 Connection Manager software. I installed it, but then got some device driver problems with another

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird Embedded and .NET Provider used in o2 Connection Manager

2007-10-04 Thread Roman Rokytskyy
I think O2 should buy some beer to Carlos and core development team and maybe whole FB project team. :) I did some more checks, it turns out that o2 Connection Manager is developed by WebToGo Mobiles Internet GmbH, a Germany-based software company. Their references also include E-Plus,

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] New releases

2007-07-05 Thread Roman Rokytskyy
Oleg Deribas wrote: Hello, Mercea Paul said the following on 02.07.2007 21:08: Could Fb.Net Provider have release number specific to Firebird server? If Current provider support all facilities for FB 2.1 Beta 1, could have same release number as fb server (2.1)? It's more easy to know

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] New releases

2007-07-05 Thread Roman Rokytskyy
I agree with you, but in software everythink has a solution. Solution for this could be like firebird versions. For FB Version 2.X we could have FB .Net provider 2.X.Y where Y is udate version for X release of FB 2 server. In my opinion a solution would be an installation package Firebird

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] FbCommand: CommandTimeout no effect and Cancel() not supported?

2007-05-10 Thread Roman Rokytskyy
we are using Firebird 1.5.3 with .NET Provider 2.0. Under this versions FbCommand.CommandTimeout seems to have no effect and FbCommand.Cancel() is not supported. Are these features supported in newer versions or do you plan to support them in future versions? These features are not

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] New protocol implementation: Internal namespace changes

2007-05-04 Thread Roman Rokytskyy
What is version 10 ? Maby Version_1, Version_2, ets... ? It's the version of FB Protocol. AFAIK. It's impossible. Newest Interbase server has version 8 and protocol didn't change in each version, so protocol version can't be greater than server version. So i think that version 10 sounds

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] New GDS ( first thoughts )

2007-05-01 Thread Roman Rokytskyy
Carlos, We are going to need to implement the version 11 of the Firebird Protocol and review the buffer handling code to make better checks on buffer lengths and server resposnses. Now the Firebird server supports batching of messages ( not available for all of them ), so we can send

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Some minor improvement in provider's

2007-04-26 Thread Roman Rokytskyy
Jiri Cincura wrote: Carlos Guzmán Álvarez wrote: That is why we need to check the changes in firebird 2.1, check how they affect the provider, create a new GDS implementation and add a new Server Type. I agree. joke Carlos, Jiri, it looks like it was bad idea to use Jaybird as a