While I really don't understand why you would want to do things this
way, but...
I tested this code below, with several clips on the stage:
sq_1, sq_12, sq_122, sq_1222a, sq_1212_1212, sq_6dad_12, sq_6d_6d
it worked fine and outputed the obvious results:
sq_1
sq_12
sq_122
sq_1212_1212
sq_6dad_1
Ah, I was trying to do it without public methods or variables, just passing
things around through custom events.
_ _ _
Erik Mattheis
Senior Web Developer
Minneapolis
T 952 346 6610
C 612 377 2272
Weber Shandwick
Advocacy starts here.
PRWeek Global Agency Report Card 2009 - Gold Medal Winner
Th
The view would have public methods the controller calls. The views retain
their encapsulation/loose coupling as does the model. The controller however,
is tied into calling specific methods on views - so it's tightly coupled.
There are patterns to break this down further (i.e. Cairngorm uses
I've been thinking about the below message from Jason and tried rearranging a
simple project into a MVC for a while this afternoon, but couldn't figure out
how to do it without breaking encapsulation.
I think I'm not getting the MVC advantage because I don't understand one of two
things - or ma
Hello Paul,
> [...] how can I get the right angle to point it to?
very easy:
http://code.google.com/p/bezier/source/browse/trunk/bezier/src/flash/geom/Bezier.as
getTangentAngle method.
time parameter is 0 for start and 1 for end of bezier.
good luck!
--
iv
http://www.bezier.ru
http://bezier.
Hello,
i would like some help, because I am confused.
If have a Movieclip that holds several sprites some of them have
instance names like so
frame_ where n is a number.
I then loop through every child of the MovieClip and test the instance
name using regExp.
var childs:int = clip.numChild
Hi Glen,
Thanks for the suggestion. Coffee shops are cool, and I love Pizza.
Thanks,
Anthony
On 3/18/2010 1:33 PM, Glen Pike wrote:
Anthony Pace wrote:
Apparently, according to what I have been reading, I have lately been
designing everything using a command pattern / composition mix, as it
Anthony Pace wrote:
Apparently, according to what I have been reading, I have lately been
designing everything using a command pattern / composition mix, as it
seems to come most naturally, and deviating where necessary, without
knowing the names of any of the patterns I stumble upon; thus, you
Apparently, according to what I have been reading, I have lately been
designing everything using a command pattern / composition mix, as it
seems to come most naturally, and deviating where necessary, without
knowing the names of any of the patterns I stumble upon; thus, you can
obviously tell
Oops. Just noticed how atrocious the writing was.
On 3/18/2010 11:25 AM, Anthony Pace wrote:
Hi Pual,
I just noticed that I had already written something, but it didn't get
sent to the list before the question got answered.
Oh well...anyways:
To find the angle, you have to find the slope o
Me either, I was just wanting a quick response and got all this.
Thank you though Ashim and everyone else and Steve.
I am sorry this took up so much of everyones time.
I understand now why I was getting the results I was getting.
Thank you,
Karl
This thread can end here.
(you can sigh the sigh o
Hi Pual,
I just noticed that I had already written something, but it didn't get
sent to the list before the question got answered.
Oh well...anyways:
To find the angle, you have to find the slope of the tangent at that
point of the curve; however, this is really easy because with bezier
cur
Sorry if this is an annoying question to ask this list, but I asked
the Teddy Bear and he just shrugged and went back to pulling cotton
from the hole in his seam.
I'm guessing there are people on this list hitting FATC, does anyone
know why there are two prices for the Workshops, and what the
"sta
Well, that's OK and you don't even have to get fancy yet - just write a
class that has references to all the display objects, and listens to
your custom events. It also has the handlers in it to respond to the
events. This in effect, is a "controller" class.
Jason Merrill
Bank of America Gl
Yes, I suspected I've been touching on MVC. I'm not that sophisticated in my
design pattern usage yet. I will get there though. Thanks for the follow up
responses Jason. I really appreciate the feedback.
- Michael M.
>> In my project, this EventDispatcher managing all the Sprites. Is
the
>> In my project, this EventDispatcher managing all the Sprites. Is
there a better way of managing all the displayObjects from one class,
other than having instructions come from an EventDispatcher?
See the example I posted - you just have to extend on it. If you choose
MVC as a pattern like I l
Thanks for the responses everyone!
> Yes, and what I am saying is, that architecture is wrong. You don't create
> instances of EventDispatcher and then put Display object inside of them.
OK, it seems I've violated a golden rule about bubbling. My EventDispatcher
obviously isn't on the display
Is there any difference between Test Movie and Publish in terms of the
swf compilation? It seems Publish compiles a tad faster on the Mac
though I've had issues before where a published swf had issues and the
test movie version didn't.
David Benman
Interactive Developer
d...@dbenman.com
htt
Thanks. I think something is messed up with that specific font, but
I'll try what you suggested too.
On Mar 13, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Meinte van't Kruis wrote:
odd, never seen anything like it. I always refrain from using static
text
fields though. Mixing dynamic and static
fields which share
thanks!
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Paul Andrews
[p...@ipauland.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 3:10 AM
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Recurisve Functions
I really can't believe this reply chain has lasted this long.
450 is 15% of 3000.
0.5% of 3000 is 15.
% simply means out of 100.
15/100 * 3000 = 450;
0.5/100 * 3000 = 15;
The equations through most of these emails have been right. Nobody seems to
actually be reading them.
Jonathan said:
sum/to
sarcasm doesn't make it better.
Am 18.03.2010 04:12, schrieb Steven Sacks:
I sincerely apologize for my sarcastic remark regarding the current
state of the public educational system in America, and for any
emotional trauma it may have caused to those whose proficiency at
arithmetic is equivale
22 matches
Mail list logo
