> Wouldn't anybody who could get that far be too busy writing their own
code?
That's what many of us would do, but there are the others that will expend
more energy to not do work (or work that *could not do*), rather than just
doing it.
___
Flashcoder
On 7/19/07, Jon Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 19, 2007, at 8:29 AM, Mark Winterhalder wrote:
> But I wonder, did anybody compare haXe vs AS3 bytecode yet? A
> decompiler is likely to assume AS3 has been used, and maybe haXe
> creates sufficiently different bytecode to confuse it.
Th
"So, maybe half your code in the end will be pretty funked up. That's
still probably more than enough to make use of the decompiled code."
Wouldn't anybody who could get that far be too busy writing their own code?
Jim
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf
On Jul 19, 2007, at 8:29 AM, Mark Winterhalder wrote:
But I wonder, did anybody compare haXe vs AS3 bytecode yet? A
decompiler is likely to assume AS3 has been used, and maybe haXe
creates sufficiently different bytecode to confuse it.
That doesn't really matter. If it's FP9, it's AS3. The by
But I wonder, did anybody compare haXe vs AS3 bytecode yet? A
decompiler is likely to assume AS3 has been used, and maybe haXe
creates sufficiently different bytecode to confuse it.
I don't know about haxe as3 pcode.
BTW, I know that haxe as2 version use some differents structures in
the compil
Another idea...
Would it be possible to add to the SWF some malicious bytecode ?
The process:
user tries to decompile a SWF. When trying to read the bytecode,
decompiler stumbles upon the malicious bytecode which makes, let's
say, windows, go out of reach... ? (overflow, bluescreen ...?)
of
Though, one could just use Haxe instead...
Yeah, I prefer it anyway.
But I wonder, did anybody compare haXe vs AS3 bytecode yet? A
decompiler is likely to assume AS3 has been used, and maybe haXe
creates sufficiently different bytecode to confuse it.
Mark
On 7/19/07, Jon Bradley <[EMAIL PROT
A better link for those interested in obfuscation of AS3 code.
http://www.kirupa.com/forum/showthread.php?t=266992
peace,
jon
On Jul 18, 2007, at 7:32 PM, Latcho wrote:
whats this?
Jon Bradley wrote:
Or, if you're a masochist:
http://www.kirupa.com/forum/showthread.php?t=256400
_
It's basically a macro process for compiling AS classes.
One of the side effects is that it can be to obfuscate SWF files by
using your own re-write rules. Hit up the second page of the thread
to see a bit more information.
Macros are pretty cool stuff. Though the author of the toolset isn'
whats this?
Jon Bradley wrote:
Or, if you're a masochist:
http://www.kirupa.com/forum/showthread.php?t=256400
- Jon
On Jul 18, 2007, at 1:13 PM, Mark Winterhalder wrote:
On 7/18/07, Douglas Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since we're talking about obfuscation/encryption does anyone know
Or, if you're a masochist:
http://www.kirupa.com/forum/showthread.php?t=256400
- Jon
On Jul 18, 2007, at 1:13 PM, Mark Winterhalder wrote:
On 7/18/07, Douglas Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since we're talking about obfuscation/encryption does anyone know
of a tool
that works for AS3 y
On 7/18/07, Douglas Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since we're talking about obfuscation/encryption does anyone know of a tool
that works for AS3 yet?
All the standard tools seem to stop with Flash 8/AS2.
I don't think there are any decompilers for AS3 yet, but I could be
wrong, and it's j
oders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] RE: obfuscation swf !
I agree with JC that it wasn't really necessary to be quite so spiteful
about defeating his code.
I think the problem may have come from a "here's my solution, try and break
it" attitude instead of simply givi
even if it isn't a proper swf file when
it hits the player . . .
. . . I'll be back . . . :~)
jimbo
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] RE: obfuscation swf !
H
but instead of using Blowfish or something heavyweight to decrypt,
just split the source .swf into chunks on the server, load each chunk
seperately, reassemble and loadBytes on the client side.
Great concept, Ian :
"Diviser pour mieux régner"
---
Eric Priou aka erixtekila
Dev notes : http://www.
Hm. Just a side thought on that - again, making it difficult rather
than impossible. Use the same FP9 idea - loading via a binary socket -
but instead of using Blowfish or something heavyweight to decrypt,
just split the source .swf into chunks on the server, load each chunk
seperately, reassemble
On Jul 18, 2007, at 7:24 AM, Jim Berkey wrote:
I found early on that so many people can tear down a wall and
condemn it easily when they see the skeleton, without ever trying
to climb the wall, and that is not a good judge of the
effectiveness of the wall. But if you do not see the skeleto
You are my hero . . . I think I am finished.
jimbo
- Original Message -
From: "Rákos Attila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jim Berkey"
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 9:22 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [Flashcoders] RE: obfuscation swf !
It was even easier than the ye
x27;origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Jim Berkey
Envoyé : July 18, 2007 9:07 AM
ÃÂ : flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Objet : Re: [Flashcoders] RE: obfuscation swf !
Ok, yesterday was 7 minutes of work to capture . . . another try today. Is
the wa
Attila
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From:Jim Berkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Date:Wednesday, July 18, 2007, 3:07:01 PM
Subject: [Flashcoders] RE: obfuscation swf !
--===--
Ok, yesterday was 7 minutes of
Ok, yesterday was 7 minutes of work to capture . . . another try today. Is
the wall higher yet?
http://jimbo.us/Games/jumpPeg/
jimbo
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.f
On 7/18/07, Jim Berkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wonderful folks, don't worry about my feelings because my methods were so
quickly destroyed. I'm a big boy, and have enjoyed the search for the holy
swf-grail for some time now. Thanks to Rákos, I believe I am one brick away
from that wall that i
ichman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] RE: obfuscation swf !
Hi,
I might be wrong but like Bart said, I think SWFEncrypt does all this
already. At least I haven't had any problems with this andits fast too AND
usable from a build file. But I'm sure some of you will
Sunil Jolly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 5:08 AM
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] RE: obfuscation swf !
I agree with JC that it wasn't really necessary to be quite so spiteful
about defeating his code.
I think the problem may have come from a "here's m
MAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hans
Wichman
Sent: 18 July 2007 05:56
To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] RE: obfuscation swf !
Hi,
I might be wrong but like Bart said, I think SWFEncrypt does all this
already. At least I haven't had any problems w
Hi,
I might be wrong but like Bart said, I think SWFEncrypt does all this
already. At least I haven't had any problems with this andits fast too AND
usable from a build file. But I'm sure some of you will be able to crack it.
What I do have problems with is the attitude displayed towards Jimbo by
> 2006/5/7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is there any good way or method for obfuscation a Flash file so that
> swf works fine after obfuscation and also prevent any one to
> understand the code easily . Few common softwares for obfuscation are
> just not that good as swf stops working
27 matches
Mail list logo
