What does it make you wonder, Pete?
73,
Bob, K5KDN
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pete M
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 3:37 PM
To: Jerry Flanders
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] differences between PSK31 demodulators
s, voice keyers, digital
programs, etc? Makes you wonder
Pete WA2ODO
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry Flanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brian Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] differences betwe
On Jul 20, 2008, at 6:35 PM, Bob McGwier wrote:
> What Frank suggests and what Brian suggested before: modify threading
> priorities, has been done for the audio threads in PowerSDR for,
> literally,
> years. All threads in PowerSDR can be run at real time through a
> setting in
> the Setup
slow Hurdle the dead"
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Brickle
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 6:28 PM
To: Brian Lloyd
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] differences between PSK31 demodulators
On Sun, Jul 20, 20
On Jul 20, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Frank Brickle wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> FWIW, my current hypothesis is that there is some high-priority
>> process that is part of Windows that is causing a problem...
>
> The way this problem is addressed un
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Brian Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, my current hypothesis is that there is some high-priority
> process that is part of Windows that is causing a problem...
The way this problem is addressed under Linux is by using the so-called "rt"
version of the ke
On Jul 20, 2008, at 1:29 PM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
> Hmmm. Seems like a recommendation of this sort should have been
> based on engineering considerations, not philosophical ones.
>
> My transmitted RTTY is now 100% garble-free. Is 90-95% good enough
> for everybody else?
I understand Jerry
gt;"Trample the slow Hurdle the dead"
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Brian Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 3:18 PM
>To: Jerry Flanders
>Cc: Bob McGwier; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
>Subject: Re: [Flexradio] differences between PSK31 demodula
e the dead"
-Original Message-
From: Brian Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 3:18 PM
To: Jerry Flanders
Cc: Bob McGwier; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] differences between PSK31 demodulators
On Jul 20, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote
On Jul 20, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
> At 02:28 PM 7/20/2008, Brian Lloyd wrote:
>>
>>
>>> If there ever was a compelling reason to use VAC, I missed it. Given
>>> its faults, why is VAC still being recommended?
>>
>> What else can replace it?
> I bought a lifetime supply of these
At 02:22 PM 7/20/2008, K0VM wrote:
>Jerry,
> I guess that VAC is still recommended , because for many of us,
> the current, paid for,version works reliably!
I wonder if the hiccups don't reveal themselves in ordinary digital
mode use, where the only person listening to the transmitted signal
At 02:28 PM 7/20/2008, Brian Lloyd wrote:
>
>
>>If there ever was a compelling reason to use VAC, I missed it. Given
>>its faults, why is VAC still being recommended?
>
>What else can replace it?
I bought a lifetime supply of these for less than I paid for VAC:
http://www.mpja.com/prodinfo.asp?num
On Jul 20, 2008, at 8:29 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
> After initially buying and trying VAC just because "everybody does
> it", I gave it up and use conventional audio cables now.
I am beginning to think I may have to do just that. Right now I am
using an audio cable to my Mac which is running
On Jul 20, 2008, at 3:56 AM, Bob McGwier wrote:
> There are some not understood faults in the use of VAC, it being
> closed
> source, etc.
>
> The following is a general rule of thumb. Open on the PowerSDR
> side, a VAC
> cable that is a integer divisor of the sample rate in the radio.
That
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dudley Hurry
>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 9:12 PM
>To: Brian Lloyd
>Cc: FlexRadio Reflector
>Subject: Re: [Flexradio] differences between PSK31 demodulators
>
>Brian,
>
>Try DM780 that comes with Ham Radio Deluxe. You have to download
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dudley Hurry
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 9:12 PM
To: Brian Lloyd
Cc: FlexRadio Reflector
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] differences between PSK31 demodulators
Brian,
Try DM780 that comes with Ham Radio Deluxe. You have to download the
entire HRD package, but then y
Brian,
Try DM780 that comes with Ham Radio Deluxe. You have to download the
entire HRD package, but then you can run only DM-780 for the digital.
In the Super Browser, you can have 20 to 30 PSK QSOs going at once,
and it's decode rate is better than MixW I think..
73,
Dudley
WA5QPZ
B
On Jul 19, 2008, at 12:22 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
> Are you using the demo version of VAC?
No. I paid for it. They gave me a link for download. I presume this is
the full version. It isn't asking for a serial number or anything.
> If so, the decode errors are from the embedded voice that says
FlexRadio Reflector
Subject: [Flexradio] differences between PSK31 demodulators
Making progress here. VAC is working and I am trying different digital-
mode applications. It is interesting to see how different the quality
of the copy is. I have my MacBook Pro connected via analog cable to
line out an
Making progress here. VAC is working and I am trying different digital-
mode applications. It is interesting to see how different the quality
of the copy is. I have my MacBook Pro connected via analog cable to
line out and am using CocoaModem to monitor the off-air signal as I
fumble with VA
20 matches
Mail list logo
