I have just add an ASW 20 to the CVS. Not only does it include the
flight dynamics model, but also there's an external model from Roland
Stuck! He has granted permission for us to use and release these with
FlightGear under the GNU GPL.
Taken together, this is one really neat airplane in FGFS.
At 11/9/02, John Check wrote:
On Friday 08 November 2002 9:43 pm, Michael Selig wrote:
> I have just updated the Airwave Xtreme 150 hang glider on the fgfs cvs to
> include the external model from Captain Slug! He has granted permission
> for us to use and release these with FlightGear under the
On Friday 08 November 2002 9:43 pm, Michael Selig wrote:
> I have just updated the Airwave Xtreme 150 hang glider on the fgfs cvs to
> include the external model from Captain Slug! He has granted permission
> for us to use and release these with FlightGear under the GNU GPL.
>
> Regards,
> Michael
It's looking really good!
On the aero side, I have few tweaks that I want to make before it's
"announced" in whatever fashion. It should not take me too much longer to
get to that.
As for the elevator animation, I have use +-20 deg deflection on my model,
but from pictures it looks like more
The lights look great!
The rear facing white light on the rudder is switched on with
the red and green wing tip lights as the nav lights. Is there a
RearNavLightOn and RearNav LightOFF object name?
- Dave P
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PRO
I have just updated the Airwave Xtreme 150 hang glider on the fgfs cvs to
include the external model from Captain Slug! He has granted permission
for us to use and release these with FlightGear under the GNU GPL.
Regards,
Michael
___
Flightgear-dev
It's looking good! (I look forward to flying or crashing it as the case
may be).
Chris
On Sat, 2002-11-09 at 01:41, Jim Wilson wrote:
> Progress has been slow, mostly because of real work getting in the way, but
> the Wright Flyer is getting much closer to completion.
>
> Most of the detail a
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I've committed CVS changes to begin an XML-configurable GUI. It's far
> from ready for end-users, but I need early implementors to start
> playing with what's there so far and to try making their own, simple
> dialogs using XML markup.
This is great! I
Progress has been slow, mostly because of real work getting in the way, but
the Wright Flyer is getting much closer to completion.
Most of the detail and animation is done. Here's a shot from the front with
the elevator mechanism tilted up for initial ascent.:
http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/wr
Boslough, Mark B writes:
> 1) fdm=csv replays a flight from a csv file, running forward or backwards in
> time while controlling the rate.
> 2) fdm=skyhook, which lets you fly around as if hanging from a crane (sorta
> like magic carpet, but you can go backward).
>
> I have no clue how to c
Norman Vine writes:
> If we could build a version of the "property viewer"
> that would attach property nodes into the 'builder's'
> callback slots
>
> It might just 'come alive' :-)
I'd love for FlightGear to be runtime configurable through a GUI --
just drag and drop a property
O.K. I've got a couple of new FDMs.
1) fdm=csv replays a flight from a csv file, running forward or backwards in
time while controlling the rate.
2) fdm=skyhook, which lets you fly around as if hanging from a crane (sorta
like magic carpet, but you can go backward).
I have no clue how to check th
David Megginson writes:
> Norman Vine writes:
> >
> > you have seen $PLIB / demos / p-guide
> > esp. LoadSave.cxx
>
> Is that the GUI builder?
Yes
I was thinking that
If we could build a version of the "property viewer"
that would attach property nodes into the 'builder's'
callbac
Andy Ross wrote:
[about making the panel hot spots visible]
Try the attached patch, which predicates the boxes on the
/sim/panel-hotspots property.
That is excellent! So simple, and in conjunction with David's recent
zoom in/out/normal (+/-/=) bindings, it immediately makes clear what's
goin
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> Too bad they aren't using FlightGear for their software component, but
> it still looks like a lot of fun ...
They're intending linking to this:
http://www.vatsim.net/
So they have virtual ATC as they fly.
Is it possible to feed out flight data in t
Martin Spott writes:
> make[2]: *** No rule to make target `new_gui.cxx', needed by `new_gui.o'. Stop.
Somethings not rebuilding properly. Make sure you have a fresh CVS
checkout, then touch src/GUI/Makefile.am and do a new make. If that
doesn't work, try sh autogen.sh from the root first, th
Hello, am I the only one seeing this with the recent CVS checkout:
Making all in GUI
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/FlightGear/src/GUI'
source='apt_dlg.cxx' object='apt_dlg.o' libtool=no \
depfile='.deps/apt_dlg.Po' tmpdepfile='.deps/apt_dlg.TPo' \
depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh ../../depcomp \
This looks like it might be the one:
http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief2.asp?ev_id=20010921X01977&ntsbno=CHI01LA318&akey=1
The problem was that he had only seconds to pick a landing site and
set up a final approach once he broke out of IMC, and given those
constraints, it's quite impressive that he
David Megginson writes:
> > My impression was that it looked like a "routine" forced landing in
> > a corn field due to engine failure. Thus I was surprised by the
> > amount of damage to the aircraft and the severity of the injuries.
> > In my head I thought, if things were that bad, why
Curtis L. Olson writes:
> My impression was that it looked like a "routine" forced landing in
> a corn field due to engine failure. Thus I was surprised by the
> amount of damage to the aircraft and the severity of the injuries.
> In my head I thought, if things were that bad, why didn't they
Curtis L. Olson writes:
> So I'm probably miss reading something in the diagram. I assume you
> have a similar C172 manual ... perhaps you could find where the
> navigation lights are powered from on your model and we could work
> from that.
In the 1981 C172P, there is a circuit breaker off
Hello,
Forgot to mention the Nav. light breaker is fed directly from the
primary bus, second item from bottom of page.
--
Bill Earnest wde3@ptd-dot-net Linux Powered Allentown, PA, USA
Computers, like air conditioners, work poorly with Windows open.
Bill,
Is there anything in theh electrical diagram that shows how they are
fed (i.e. from what bus)
Curt.
William Earnest writes:
> Curtis L. Olson wrote:
>
> > David,
> >
> > I'm not disagreeing with you, but in the electrical system diagram in
> > the "C172S Information Manual" I can't find
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
David,
I'm not disagreeing with you, but in the electrical system diagram in
the "C172S Information Manual" I can't find any mention of where the
navigation lights are fed. Perhaps I'm misreading something?
The manual does describe the navigation lights as part of the ex
Disclaimer,
I only saw the 14 second blurb on the news; so the following is based
on an event filtered through some TV news reporter who's aviation
experience probably ended with the in flight magazine, then filtered
through my own head, and now we are talking about the fading distant
memories of
David,
I'm not disagreeing with you, but in the electrical system diagram in
the "C172S Information Manual" I can't find any mention of where the
navigation lights are fed. Perhaps I'm misreading something?
The manual does describe the navigation lights as part of the exterior
lighting system co
Curtis L. Olson writes:
> The opposite is also a problem ... pilots not pulling the chute
> because they think they can save the plane or successfully land it and
> then getting themselves hurt. I recall some time back a Cirrus pilot
> being critically injured and totalling his plane when he
Curtis L. Olson writes:
> I don't know where the navigation lights are powered from in real
> life. I'm guessing maybe this is the same thing as the beacon (?)
> I don't see a specific reference to navigation lights power in the
> C172 electrical diagram.
Here's a quick overview of the exter
Norman Vine writes:
> > I've just added the ability to modify property values: we can now
> > construct very simple dialog boxes that actually control FlightGear
> > (the demo can control roll, pitch, and heading). More interesting
> > stuff like pick lists, value constraints, etc. will follo
David Megginson wrote:
>
> Julian Foad writes:
>
> > No - we have that in some places, but I was thinking recently that it's
> > not the right way to go. I think the only practical purpose is to
> > reduce clutter in the browser; but the property browser could and should
> > do this for u
>
> Moving sidewards (e.g. due to wind) is possible and the direction and
> amount is calculated, but I don't know the correct API calls to convert
> the linear movement to a change in lat/lon.
During my balloon flight I noticed that the controls were much more complex that just
a burner.
This p
31 matches
Mail list logo