On Wednesday 04 June 2003 11:49 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> I just tagged the 0.9.2 release in CVS so I guess that's it. Any
> further changes will have to go into the next release.
>
> John, feel free to bundle up the corresponding base package any time.
>
> Thanks everyone!
>
> Curt.
Roger tha
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
I am using Blender to model an Airbus A320 and I would like to
make the windows transparent. I added alpha to my texture but
the problem is that there is a backface culling so I don't
see the interior of the plane through the window but what is
behind the plane. Should I ha
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I just tagged the 0.9.2 release in CVS so I guess that's it. Any
further changes will have to go into the next release.
Although I'm not too excited about some last minute changes, especially
in the base package, I'm quite satisfied with that we have right now. I
expect th
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I just tagged the 0.9.2 release in CVS so I guess that's it.
So, now it's time for everybody to post a link to their favorite screen
shots of the latest version of FlightGear. Curtis can then hand select
some of them for the front page of the website ...
Erik
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 11:49 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> I just tagged the 0.9.2 release in CVS so I guess that's it. Any
> further changes will have to go into the next release.
>
> John, feel free to bundle up the corresponding base package any time.
>
> Thanks everyone!
>
> Curt.
I'm havin
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Textures/Terrain
> In directory seneca:/tmp/cvs-serv1077/Textures/Terrain
> Modified Files:
> cropgrass.rgb drycrop.rgb
> Log Message:
> Back out the changes to cropgrass.rgb and drycrop.rgb for the 0.9.2
Hi,
Someone has been doing some pretty useless stuff here:
http://www.stavatti.com/
Erik
(Or didn't he?)
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Curtis L. Olson writes:
> I just tagged the 0.9.2 release in CVS so I guess that's it. Any
> further changes will have to go into the next release.
Congrats. So it's OK to make major changes now?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
_
Frederic Bouvier writes:
> I am using Blender to model an Airbus A320 and I would like to
> make the windows transparent. I added alpha to my texture but
> the problem is that there is a backface culling so I don't
> see the interior of the plane through the window but what is
> behind the p
Martin Spott writes:
> Hmmm, I've been following the texture changes for quite some time and to my
> knowledge these textures have been the most sophisticated ones for this sort
> of land coverage that FlightGear has ever seen.
>
> This is why I simply don't understand why they had to go. Wo
Frederic Bouvier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I am using Blender to model an Airbus A320 and I would like to
> make the windows transparent. I added alpha to my texture but
> the problem is that there is a backface culling so I don't
> see the interior of the plane through the window but what is
>
David Megginson wrote:
Curtis L. Olson writes:
> I just tagged the 0.9.2 release in CVS so I guess that's it. Any
> further changes will have to go into the next release.
Congrats. So it's OK to make major changes now?
That's the spirit.
Erik
___
F
Michael Selig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I think Lee did an amazing job w/ the model.
He sure did. It is excellent work.
> I think he used several
> "tricks" (read that - things learned the hard way through experience), but
> one I'm aware of are the logos and labels on the struts and gear.
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 19:59, Jim Wilson wrote:
> Michael Selig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > I think Lee did an amazing job w/ the model.
>
> He sure did. It is excellent work.
>
Always amazing work from Lee. Wonder how quick it is for him to throw a
plane together?
> > I think he used sev
Matthew Johnson writes:
> On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 19:59, Jim Wilson wrote:
> > Michael Selig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > > I think Lee did an amazing job w/ the model.
> >
> > He sure did. It is excellent work.
> >
>
> Always amazing work from Lee. Wonder how quick it is for him to throw
> We should also point out that the p51d is no slouch either. Jim has
> done a *lot* of work on the 3d interior as well.
>
Very very true, trying to build a plane with ac3D and its a *lot* of
work. The p51D exudes power and performance in FlightGear and that is
not easy to accomplish.
You're r
At 6/5/03, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> We should also point out that the p51d is no slouch either. Jim has
> done a *lot* of work on the 3d interior as well.
>
Very very true, trying to build a plane with ac3D and its a *lot* of
work. The p51D exudes power and performance in FlightGear and that is
n
At 6/5/03, Michael Selig wrote:
At 6/5/03, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> We should also point out that the p51d is no slouch either. Jim has
> done a *lot* of work on the 3d interior as well.
>
Very very true, trying to build a plane with ac3D and its a *lot* of
work. The p51D exudes power and perform
David Culp wrote:
>
> > I am trying to animate the rudder but it seems that the property
> > /surface-positions/rudder-pos-norm stay at 0.
>
> My mistake. The FCS didn't have an aerosurface-scale for the rudder. In
> fact, none of my models have it, so I'll have to add it to them all
(thanks
> fo
Back to an old thread:
At 3/30/03, Tony Peden wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 21:16, Michael Selig wrote:
> At 3/30/03, you wrote:
> >On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 20:05, Michael Selig wrote:
> > > At 3/30/03, you wrote:
> > > >Michael Selig writes:
> > > >
... snip ...
> > > [2] In preferences.xml, I have c
Hi,
Just flying the B52 with all engines running, manually took her up to
10,000 feet, engaged autopilot to take her down to 1000 feet and to plot
a course back to KSF0.
Of course, minds do wander, so I messed with the cloud settings and
tried to make everything clear. Unfortunately I ended up
Having built the cvs version of FG under cygwin. I cannot see the terminal
at KSFO.
All the correct files (.stg and .ac)seem to be in the scenery folder.
If it is a Plib problem why would Plib handle the aircraft .ac files and not
the scenery .ac files.
The aircraft work fine.
Also is there any o
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 23:46, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just flying the B52 with all engines running, manually took her up to
> 10,000 feet, engaged autopilot to take her down to 1000 feet and to plot
> a course back to KSF0.
>
> Of course, minds do wander, so I messed with the cloud sett
* Jim Wilson -- Wednesday 04 June 2003 15:40:
> Sigh... can't we just leave this the way it was for now and tell people that
> we recommend a 3 axis stick??? :-/ If not we need time to check the joystick
> configs (and I don't have time to do the two I have today). I'd much rather
> see this pat
Jim Wilson writes:
> Sigh... can't we just leave this the way it was for now and tell people that
> we recommend a 3 axis stick??? :-/ If not we need time to check the joystick
> configs (and I don't have time to do the two I have today). I'd much rather
> see this patch added right after releas
Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > Right, but changing this affects other bindings negatively on my system (trim
> > and view offset/camera panning).
>
> It may "break" some of the bindings -- these have to be adjusted now, for the
> first time independent of the CPU clock. That's
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Erik, can we back this out for the release? Let's put it back in
immediately afterwards so we have time to sort out the consequences
(if any.)
Done.
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear
* Jim Wilson -- Wednesday 04 June 2003 15:50:
> Unless some things can be smoother or better with a faster CPU, like panning
> the view or spinning the trim wheels. This is a hackish fix taking away that
> potential benefit. Trust me, you do not want to increase the trim wheel
> interval!
Huh? T
Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Jim Wilson -- Wednesday 04 June 2003 15:50:
> > Unless some things can be smoother or better with a faster CPU, like panning
> > the view or spinning the trim wheels. This is a hackish fix taking away that
> > potential benefit. Trust me, you do not w
Jim Wilson writes:
> This isn't an OS and IMHO it isn't a pointless arguement. I really
> like the fact that the trim wheel control is more repsonsive on my
> faster computer.
Try trimming with the mouse wheel -- it's much easier.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED
* Jim Wilson -- Wednesday 04 June 2003 16:08:
> This isn't an OS and IMHO it isn't a pointless arguement. I really like the
> fact that the trim wheel control is more repsonsive on my faster computer.
OK. That's what personal config files are for. But if we offer different
configuration files for
Jim Wilson writes:
> Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > * Jim Wilson -- Wednesday 04 June 2003 15:50:
> > > Unless some things can be smoother or better with a faster CPU, like panning
> > > the view or spinning the trim wheels. This is a hackish fix taking away that
> > > potential b
* Curtis L. Olson -- Wednesday 04 June 2003 16:43:
> It would be nice to have the same deg/sec response so that faster
> computers would do it in smaller/smoother step sizes. I think this is
> what Jim is saying.
Yes, meanwhile I got it. :-)
So, basically, if we make the update frequency higher
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Jim Wilson writes:
>
> > This isn't an OS and IMHO it isn't a pointless arguement. I really
> > like the fact that the trim wheel control is more repsonsive on my
> > faster computer.
>
> Try trimming with the mouse wheel -- it's much easier.
I've
Could someone with CVS write access set the binary flag to C-GPTR-003.rgb.
It is corrupt for us, Windows users.
Thanks,
-Fred
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Curtis L. Olson writes:
>
> Norman Vine writes:
> > David Megginson writes:
> > >
> > > Norman Vine writes:
> > >
> > > > This should work fine, the only thing I am worried about is that it
> > > > seems as if every sub component of FGFS is passing a double dt in
> > > > both the initialization
Norman Vine writes:
> > Are you sure that's true?
>
> Yes !
>
> > The event queue still needs to check every
> > event every iteration to see if anything is ready to run ...
>
> Not if the event queue is ordered by next run time !
>
> All you have todo is process those items whose time stamp
>
> If someone wants to contribute a flight model, go ahead.
It will be easy to convert the 737 model to an A320. I'll send you one.
Dave Culp
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-dev
> It will be easy to convert the 737 model to an A320. I'll send you one.
What about fly-by-wire ? How can it be taken into account ?
--
Jorge Van Hemelryck
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listin
Hi,
Has anyone come out the right solution for Property Manager memory leak? If
there is, please tell me!
Thanks!
Chengbi
-Original Message-
From: Richard Kiš [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 3:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Property manager
On Wed, 04 Jun 2003 14:23:20 +0200,
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Jun 2003 11:31:38 +0200,
> > Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> >>I've set it to 20 times a second.
> >
> > ..this is configurable
On Wed, 04 Jun 2003 14:09:51 +0200,
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > * Jim Wilson -- Wednesday 04 June 2003 13:22:
> >
> >>Wow, great work everyone! I crash landed it once after stalling in
> >a>turn...not sure what I did. Other
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 20:40:42 +0200
Jorge Van Hemelryck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It will be easy to convert the 737 model to an A320.
I'll send you one.
What about fly-by-wire ? How can it be taken into account
?
Since David is making a JSBSim version of the A-310, you
can use the JSBSim flight
> What about fly-by-wire ? How can it be taken into account ?
I'll try to work up an alpha limiter and bank limiter using JSBSim's FCS.
Dave Culp
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear
At 6/4/03, Jim Wilson wrote:
Wow, great work everyone! I crash landed it once after stalling in a
turn...not sure what I did. Otherwise a successful flight. It really
works :-)
Is there a 3D cockpit in the works? This one would be very cool flown from a
virtual cockpit.
The stall in the tur
At 6/4/03, Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
Could someone with CVS write access set the binary flag to C-GPTR-003.rgb.
It is corrupt for us, Windows users.
If it has not already been done, I'd be happy to do this. Can someone tell
me the cvs command?
Regards,
Michael
_
At 6/4/03, Jim Wilson wrote:
Wow, great work everyone! I crash landed it once after stalling in a
turn...not sure what I did. Otherwise a successful flight. It really
works :-)
Is there a 3D cockpit in the works? This one would be very cool flown from a
virtual cockpit.
One other thought, it'
> Has anyone come out the right solution for Property Manager memory =
> leak? If there is, please tell me!
As I mentioned, it's already in there:
SGPropertyNode_ptr::~SGPropertyNode_ptr()
{
if (_ptr && _ptr->decrementRef() == 0)
delete _ptr;
}
When property node smart pointer
Michael Selig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> So far, nothing is going on w/ a 3D cockpit. But if someone wants to do
> this, I have photos of the actual cockpit.
Great. Can you send them? Not sure how much I'll get done when, but I can
give it a start.
Best,
Jim
__
Michael Selig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> At 6/4/03, Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
> >Could someone with CVS write access set the binary flag to C-GPTR-003.rgb.
> >It is corrupt for us, Windows users.
>
> If it has not already been done, I'd be happy to do this. Can someone tell
> me the cvs command?
Frederic Bouvier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> You could have made it binary at the first place by doing :
>
> cvs add -kb
>
> instead of :
>
> cvs add
>
Yes that's right. I think that John might have had a wrapper set up. I've
made the same mistake myself a couple of time.
Best,
Jim
_
> just a note to say that I am in the process of modelling an
> Airbus A320 :
> http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fb-fgsd.png
Beautiful model Fred! Here are some files that will get it into the air. The
aero model uses A320-200 metrics with 737-300 aerodynamics and flight control
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 17:29:09 +0200,
Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 04 Jun 2003 14:23:20 +0200,
> Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > > On Wed, 04 Jun 2003 11:31:38 +0200,
> > >
It seems as though this model is nearly impossible to fly without a few pieces
of information. So I finally got around to making up a doc to go with the
p51d-yasim flight model. It is in Aircraft-yasim/README.p51d.
For those who have been flying the p51d, note that I just made the booster
defau
Thank you Dave. I now have to begin the animation stuff.
I will try all these files as soon as I can.
-Fred
David Culp wrote:
> just a note to say that I am in the process of modelling an
> Airbus A320 :
> http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fb-fgsd.png
Beautiful model Fred! Here a
Hello,
I normally configure FlightGear using "--without-logging" unless I
have problems. Today, after a LARGE CVS update preparing for the
release, I am getting much verbose output in spite of this. Is that
option broken, or did someone leave some debug flags enabled amongst
the flood of file
[the -kb problem]
* Jim Wilson -- Wednesday 04 June 2003 23:01:
> I think that John might have had a wrapper set up. I've
> made the same mistake myself a couple of time.
So, let's install a wrapper, too. I've copied the one from
KDE, removed some irrelevant and added (hopefully) all
fgfs-relate
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 7:04 pm, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> [the -kb problem]
>
> * Jim Wilson -- Wednesday 04 June 2003 23:01:
> > I think that John might have had a wrapper set up. I've
> > made the same mistake myself a couple of time.
>
> So, let's install a wrapper, too. I've copied the one fr
At 6/4/03, Jim Wilson wrote:
Oops... make that.
cvs admin -kb
Sorry about that...
Michael Selig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> At 6/4/03, Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
> >Could someone with CVS write access set the binary flag to C-GPTR-003.rgb.
> >It is corrupt for us, Windows users.
>
> If it has not
You guys all work really hard on this sim, and it shows!
Keep up the excellant work :))
Congratulations on the new release!
Best Re's
WillyB
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-deve
On Wed, 04 Jun 2003 12:33:30 -0500
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Norman Vine writes:
> > > Are you sure that's true?
> >
> > Yes !
> >
> > > The event queue still needs to check every
> > > event every iteration to see if anything is ready to run ...
> >
> > Not if the event qu
* John Check -- Thursday 05 June 2003 02:48:
> IIRC the wrappers file is case sensitive, so it's a good idea to cover upper
> and lowercase for each extension.
Yes. I considered this for most files that might come from Micros~1
systems. So there's e.g. both MDL and mdl, while you'll never run int
Michael Selig wrote:
> >cvs admin -kb
> >
> >Then run a cvs update to sync the flag on your local copy.
>
> Done. Thanks. And I think it all worked.
Thanks Michael, I can see the 3D model now.
While you're at it, you have add a dos file into CVS from a Linux
machine. This file is named flap.dat
I am using Blender to model an Airbus A320 and I would like to
make the windows transparent. I added alpha to my texture but
the problem is that there is a backface culling so I don't
see the interior of the plane through the window but what is
behind the plane. Should I have to add an object in t
64 matches
Mail list logo
