Hello,
here is the transcript of a mail conversation I just have with
a guy at SkyscraperPage.com . After asking to the members of its
site, he agreed to let us use their nice and accurate building
diagrams ( see the thread link below, they are enthusiastic ).
So I made 2 models that are visible
WillyB wrote:
I'm trying to make some buildings for my local airport using Blender-2.25
then
converting them to .ac format via a python sript.
I am still using blender 2.23 with the old python script (on windows).
No problem here.
The models export ok, but when I try to put texture on them
Thanks David
Will have a play and see what I can figure out.
Cheers
Innis
David Megginson writes
Innis Cunningham writes:
The heading bug on the HSI does not seem to work.When you select a
new heading the bug just stays were it is ie: does not grab the
compass card and move with it as
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 23:28, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
WillyB wrote:
I'm trying to make some buildings for my local airport using Blender-2.25
then
converting them to .ac format via a python sript.
I am still using blender 2.23 with the old python script (on windows).
No problem here.
WillyB wrote:
...
and
error time!
I only use the UV editor and it is very practical.
Is that in Blender, or a seperate program?
In blender.
First, split the main window ( right click on the window separator )
then in on window, choose the face icon,
load your .rgb file.
In the 3D
I wrote:
In blender.
First, split the main window ( right click on the window separator )
then in on window, choose the face icon,
load your .rgb file.
The face icon is in the bar that show up when you click on the leftmost icon.
-Fred
___
Alex Perry wrote:
The changes that have appeared since -Done day ago break my build.
Note that the gl.h included is the file that is provided with Utah-GLX.
The error message is pretty self-evident. Let me know any questions.
I was already afraid of that. I fine tuned it down to a much more
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Scenery/w130n30/w123n37
In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv1601/Scenery/w130n30/w123n37
Modified Files:
942066.stg
Added Files:
bofa-sf-fb.ac bofa-sf.rgb transamerica-fb.ac
transamerica-fb.rgb
* Martin Spott -- Wednesday 18 June 2003 12:51:
OBJECT_STATIC transamerica-fb.ac -122.40226 37.79503 29.2525 80
I believe there is no scenery in the base package at this location. At least
I've been flying aroung looking at the position mentioned here (I'm using
the coordinate display in the
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 02:00, Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
WillyB wrote:
...
and
error time!
I only use the UV editor and it is very practical.
Is that in Blender, or a seperate program?
In blender.
First, split the main window ( right click on the window separator )
then
* Melchior FRANZ -- Wednesday 18 June 2003 13:07:
Probably, yes. Works here. Both buildings are at reasonable places in SF.
(not that I've ever been there and checked the coords with a GPS receiver :-)
Try this:
$ fgfs --lon=-122.40 --lat=37.79 --heading=320 --altitude=500 --aircraft=ufo
m.
Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ fgfs --lon=-122.40 --lat=37.79 --heading=320 --altitude=500 --aircraft=ufo
Thanks, this shows the buildings as expected. Now I understand the matter:
The HUD coordinates display degree and minute (the latter with decimals) -
not degrees with decimals
Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will post the model to Erik for inclusion in CVS.
This looks really promising. I have a feature request now: _Before_ people
start modelling the Golden Gate it would be tremendously useful if the empty
space below an object would really remain empty.
Martin Spott wrote:
Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will post the model to Erik for inclusion in CVS.
This looks really promising. I have a feature request now: _Before_ people
start modelling the Golden Gate it would be tremendously useful if the empty
space below an object
Cameron Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tina M. Stahlke) [2003.06.17 23:27]:
Hey Jim:
I was browsing the UMN website and saw your posting about LindowsOS.
snip/
Tina M. Stahlke
Business Development, Lindows.com
This sort of came out of left field, but I wanted
Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Their is another gotcha in the plib ac loader that can not recognize sharp
edge and interpolate normal that makes square look spherical.
Shading is done per object (normals generated on the fly). If you need a
square edge, split the adjacent sides
Frederic BOUVIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I already noted several weeks ago that it is not possible to taxi below the
new KSFO terminal building. It would be a pity if it would not be possible
to fly below The Bridge :-)
I think that this is because the hit test routine looks for the
On Wed 18. June 2003 15:09, you wrote:
Frederic BOUVIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I already noted several weeks ago that it is not possible to taxi below
the new KSFO terminal building. It would be a pity if it would not be
possible to fly below The Bridge :-)
I think that this is
Jim Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's right. You aren't supposed to fly below the bridge anyway. :-)
I can't accept this argument ;-))
BTW, I suppose you all know about the cockpit video of someone flying below
the eiffel tower. I don't know if this video is real, but it looks pretty
I can't accept this argument ;-))
BTW, I suppose you all know about the cockpit video of someone flying below
the eiffel tower. I don't know if this video is real, but it looks pretty
nice
Where is it? Is it on the web somewhere?
One of the best places for flying under a bridge is
Martin Spott wrote :
Jim Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's right. You aren't supposed to fly below the bridge anyway. :-)
I can't accept this argument ;-))
BTW, I suppose you all know about the cockpit video of someone flying below
the eiffel tower. I don't know if this video is
I would not like to think about flying anything larger than a model aircraft along the
Clifton gorge.
http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=clifton+suspension+bridge
Richard
-Original Message-
From: Major A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 June 2003 3:33 pm
To: FlightGear
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:00:22 +0200
Martin Dressler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should be able hide your aircraft in Hangar. If I
remember it. Even new hits routine has some support for this.
Madr
I think Norman may know the answer to this one. However,
JSBSim simply gets a terrain height
One of the best places for flying under a bridge is Bristol (UK),
there's a lot of space beneath the Clifton Suspension Bridge (some
250m long, ~75m above the water). Allegedly, hot-air balloons used to
fly underneath the bridge occasionally, but that must have been before
my time. More
Richard Bytheway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would not like to think about flying anything larger than a model
aircraft along the Clifton gorge.
http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=clifton+suspension+bridge
Didn't you know this is the primary application for a simulator like
FlightGear ? ;-)
Major A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where is it? Is it on the web somewhere?
I just put it on ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Devel/eiffel.qt
It's very short but it looks like it were real
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Oh I am quite happy to crash a simulated aircraft. It is much less painful.
When are we getting 10m DEM data for the UK though?
Richard
-Original Message-
From: Martin Spott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 June 2003 4:24 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel]
I just put it on ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Devel/eiffel.qt
It's very short but it looks like it were real
Looks real, but it stops at the wrong place... in any case, I can
easily imagine someone flying through there, given proper clearance by
ATC etc. Not in an Airbus, but
Alex Perry wrote:
The changes that have appeared since -Done day ago break my build.
Note that the gl.h included is the file that is provided with Utah-GLX.
The error message is pretty self-evident. Let me know any questions.
From: Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was already afraid of
At 6/18/03, Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will post the model to Erik for inclusion in CVS.
This looks really promising. I have a feature request now: _Before_ people
start modelling the Golden Gate it would be tremendously useful
Here's a patch to simgear that implements gl function pointer lookup:
http://homepage.mac.com/walisser/downloads/simgearglprocaddress.diff
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:33:03 -0500,
Michael Selig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 6/18/03, Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will post the model to Erik for inclusion in CVS.
This looks really
The point parameters extensions are unsupported in Apple's GL stack.
The fix I've chosen is
#ifdef GL_SGIS_point_parameters
// do stuff here
#endif
http://homepage.mac.com/walisser/downloads/flightgearpointparams.diff
___
Flightgear-devel mailing
On 18 Jun 2003 15:24:17 GMT,
Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Richard Bytheway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would not like to think about flying anything larger than a model
aircraft along the Clifton gorge.
On 18 Jun 2003 15:24:17 GMT,
Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Richard Bytheway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would not like to think about flying anything larger than a model
aircraft along the Clifton gorge.
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 04:32, Martin Spott wrote:
Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ fgfs --lon=-122.40 --lat=37.79 --heading=320 --altitude=500
--aircraft=ufo
Thanks, this shows the buildings as expected. Now I understand the matter:
The HUD coordinates display degree and
I would love to be able to land on a modeled aircraft carrier :D
I used to do touch and go landings on them when I played one of Jane's sims a
few years ago... I was even the commander of my online squadron!
Re's
Lt. Col. WillyB vmf 214 - commander IC
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 09:33,
Innis
There are a lot of problems with the hsi, the nav does not work
correctly either. I did work on fixing some of this and making a more
correct set-up and put it on the c310-ifr aircraft if you want to try
it. That one is still working in the cvs version. I think if you just
replace
Seems I can't build FG since yesterday either:
Making all in Main
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/build/FlightGear/source/src/Main'
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src/Include -I../.. -I../../src -I/opt/F
Gcvs/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -DPKGLIBDIR=\/opt/FGcvs/lib/FlightGear\ -g -
O2
Richard A Downing FBCS wrote:
Seems I can't build FG since yesterday either:
Ehm, I suppose you all have installed the latest version of SimGear?
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Erik,
with the new GL extension code, MSVC says :
Compiling...
main.cxx
src\Main\main.cxx(778) : error C2065: 'GL_DISTANCE_ATTENUATION_EXT' :
undeclared identifier
src\Main\main.cxx(779) : error C2065: 'GL_POINT_SIZE_MIN_EXT' : undeclared
identifier
I found these defines are in clouds3d/extgl.h
FYI
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike
A. Harris
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Freeglut-developer] contributions and status
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Eric Sandall wrote:
Brian Paul
Jon S Berndt writes:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:00:22 +0200
Martin Dressler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should be able hide your aircraft in Hangar. If I
remember it. Even new hits routine has some support for this.
Madr
I think Norman may know the answer to this one. However,
? GLenum.patch
? sudo-make-install
? simgear/interpreter/.deps
? simgear/interpreter/Makefile
? simgear/interpreter/Makefile.in
cvs server: Updating .
cvs server: Updating simgear
cvs server: Updating simgear/bucket
cvs server: Updating simgear/compatibility
cvs server: Updating simgear/debug
cvs
Michael Selig writes:
Sounds like we need a new property:
detect-building-collisions type=boolfalse/detect-building-collisions
We don't distinguish between buildings and terrain, so this would also
cause the plane to fall throught he surface of the earth when taxiing.
All the best,
Alex Perry writes:
Congratulations, you have joined the ranks of the voluntarily poor
8-)
Poor, but happy.
I was in Manhattan yesterday, then did a midnight flight from Caldwell
NJ back to Ottawa after giving an evening talk in downtown Manhattan.
I left at 11:10 pm, watched the lights of
From: Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ehm, I suppose you all have installed the latest version of SimGear?
Yeah, but I didn't do a make clean. Apparently, that made a difference.
I can now complete build to the binary image of the current CVS tree.
___
At 6/18/03, David Megginson wrote:
Michael Selig writes:
Sounds like we need a new property:
detect-building-collisions type=boolfalse/detect-building-collisions
We don't distinguish between buildings and terrain, so this would also
cause the plane to fall throught he surface of the earth
When I try to build under both MacOS X and Windows, I get the following
errors in screen/extensions.cxx
In file included from extensions.cxx:31:
extensions.hxx: In function `void (* SGLookupFunction(const char*))()':
extensions.hxx:58: `glXGetProcAddressARB' undeclared (first use this
function)
Thanks Paul
It is the HSI2 that I am using.
The thing is If the problem is in the source code then I won't be able to do
anything about it.But if it is in the property application in the instrument
xml then I might have a chance.
Cheers
Innis
paul mccann wrote
There are a lot of problems with
Innis
Oh ok, but I am some what confused now because I updated from cvs last
night after reading your message, and do not get the error your talking
about. You did the following
fgfs --aircraft=c310-ifr , and you still get this? If so are using cvs
version or 9.2?
In either case its in the
What looks odd? That one cannot open directory message just indicates that
you've got a directory in your local copy that was moved or deleted. Just
remove it.
Best,
Jim
Alex Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
? GLenum.patch
? sudo-make-install
? simgear/interpreter/.deps
?
Here's a rough start on the PFD for the Boeing 747-400:
http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/pfd01.png
http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/pfd02.png
As you can see there's quite a bit of detail missing and the roll arrow isn't
animated yet.
I'll be adding a little more detail for our current autopilot
Jim looks great, just like the real thing.
1. they are ptich limit bars or symbol, you will get to stick shaker or
stall if you pitch up to them.
2. On the 737 the dg or compass has 7 modes
1. nav (full)/ looks like hsi but really showing track not heading
and relation to stored route not
54 matches
Mail list logo
