Re: [Flightgear-devel] Generic Protocol (generic.cxx etc) - Binary Mode

2006-04-25 Thread Hugo Vincent
Any one had a chance to look over the patch yet?What needs to be changed/fixed/rewritten/redesigned(!) before it can be applied to the main CVS version?Hugo.On 4/25/06, Hugo Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks Erik,Here is the patch. Let me know what needs to be changed, fixed, orrefactored

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A SenecaII for FlightGear: first version available

2006-04-25 Thread Torsten Dreyer
> Looks great, flies good. I managed some pretty landings after I got a > feel for it. Is it supposed to pitch down so violently when the flaps > deploy, though? No, that has to be improved > > The instrument panel is outstanding, does (will) the white dial on the > airspeed indicator move to giv

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Me262

2006-04-25 Thread Julien Pierru
it even made it to airliners.net http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1036465/M/ Julien

[Flightgear-devel] GUI front-end for MacFlightGear

2006-04-25 Thread ppmweb
Hello. I'm Japanese FlightGear user. I've developed GUI front-end for MacFlightGear, called "FlightGear Alternative", and put that on: http://www.geocities.jp/ppmweb/download/FlightGearAlternative.zip There is no English instruction yet. But maybe you don't need that really. It's c

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Me262

2006-04-25 Thread Dave Culp
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 03:11 pm, Lee Elliott wrote: > This is the second Me262 to be built by the Me262 Project and it > was first flown by Wolfgang Czaia on August 15th, 2005 from > Seattle, where it was built. These new-build Me262s are > convertible to tandem two-seaters and the first one to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] SoC

2006-04-25 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 00:48, Alex Perry wrote: > http://code.google.com/soc/ > Is anybody here an eligible student? > Would anyone like to offer to mentor? Why aren't we on the list? :P Ampere --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to s

[Flightgear-devel] Heads up for Curt.

2006-04-25 Thread Lee Elliott
Hi Curt, I've sent you a few e-mails over the last month re updates and queries but haven't heard anything from you - are my e-mails getting through? LeeE --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stu

[Flightgear-devel] menu not working

2006-04-25 Thread Lee Elliott
Hello all, back at the beginning of April I reported a problem where the top menu and any open dialogue windows stop responding to mouse clicks. The problem is intermittent in that some times it happens immediately and sometimes it doesn't happen at all. I get nothing from setting --log-leve

[Flightgear-devel] Re: [PATCH] simgear patch that fixes my whole last no sound fix

2006-04-25 Thread Pigeon
> Finally applied. > Appears to work for me. > Please tell me if you experience any problems with that. Thanks! Just a BIG note here, this fix needs the simgear patch, or some sounds will be effectively broken. :) Pigeon. --- Using

[Flightgear-devel] Re: FlightGear RPMs (was Re: FC2 .rpm)

2006-04-25 Thread Melchior FRANZ
This should work: diff -u -p -r1.13 fg_os_sdl.cxx --- fg_os_sdl.cxx 16 Feb 2006 21:02:09 - 1.13 +++ fg_os_sdl.cxx 25 Apr 2006 20:38:03 - @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ static int CurrentMouseX = 0; static int CurrentMouseY = 0; static int CurrentMouseCursor = MOUSE_CURSOR_POINTER;

[Flightgear-devel] Re: FlightGear RPMs (was Re: FC2 .rpm)

2006-04-25 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 25 April 2006 22:31: > +if (SDL_VERSION_ATLEAST(1, 2, 10)) { Whoops. This wouldn't compile on older versions. Needs to be a preprocessor instruction.:-/ m. --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to s

[Flightgear-devel] Re: FlightGear RPMs (was Re: FC2 .rpm)

2006-04-25 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 25 April 2006 20:03: > [...] if we want a more usable fullscreen with SDL, then we can have > it. It's just a setup question in fgfs. Here's a solution for SDL>= 1.2.10. It doesn't simply use SDL's fullscreen (which the user didn't ask for -- he asked for FlightGear's),

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Me262

2006-04-25 Thread Lee Elliott
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 20:28, Georg Vollnhals wrote: > ng. > > > What the subject said is apparently correct: > > > > "today the First Flight in Manching / Germany" > > > > I guess "today" rellay means "today" ! > > That is very right, it is the "First Flight" of one of the > rebuild planes "in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Me262

2006-04-25 Thread Georg Vollnhals
ng. > > What the subject said is apparently correct: > > "today the First Flight in Manching / Germany" > > I guess "today" rellay means "today" ! > That is very right, it is the "First Flight" of one of the rebuild planes "in Manching/Germany". But it is *NOT* the first flight of this American

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] simgear patch that fixes my whole last no sound fix

2006-04-25 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 01:12, Pigeon wrote: > > In simgear/sound/soundmgr_openal.cxx, "working" is never set to true > > for openal/alut version >= 1 if it worked. > > This should fix my last fix. > > And please make sure to reapply the fix in FGFX::play_message before > testing/commi

[Flightgear-devel] Re: FlightGear RPMs (was Re: FC2 .rpm)

2006-04-25 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Curtis L. Olson -- Tuesday 25 April 2006 19:55: > And I have to disagree, when SDL locks out other displays/head when you > go "fullscreen", that is definitely a feature of SDL, not a feature of > flightgear. Sure. But if we want a more usable fullscreen with SDL, then we can have it. It's jus

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: FlightGear RPMs (was Re: FC2 .rpm)

2006-04-25 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Melchior FRANZ wrote: But, of course, you can make an SDL window "fullscreen" without locking anything, which is what I do: $ fgfs --geometry=1152x864 Then I just let my window manager suppress the window decoration. There's even an SDL flag to do that automatically: SDL_VideoMode(SDL_NOFRAME

[Flightgear-devel] Re: FlightGear RPMs (was Re: FC2 .rpm)

2006-04-25 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Curtis L. Olson -- Tuesday 25 April 2006 19:38: > - SDL locks out all other displays when you go full screen. Ok for > 99.9% of our users, but for the 0.1% that needs to run "fullscreen" but > in a multiheaded environment, SDL is not an option. But, of course, you can make an SDL window "full

Re: FlightGear RPMs (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] FC2 .rpm)

2006-04-25 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Martin Spott wrote: Does this mean that you generally recommend using SDL for FlightGear instead of GLUT on any platform if possible ? Is there any comparison of SDL vs. GLUT with FlightGear ? On FreeBSD 'configure' currently does not detect libSDL, but if the mentioned is really your recommenda

Re: FlightGear RPMs (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] FC2 .rpm)

2006-04-25 Thread Martin Spott
"Curtis L. Olson" wrote: > My vote is to build it with sdl. For 99.9% of the people out there, sdl > will work just fine and they won't be able to tell the difference, and > for the other 0.1%, freeglut won't work anyways because they never > actually implimented glut's game mode. Does this m

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Me262

2006-04-25 Thread Dave Culp
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 10:48 am, Steve Hosgood wrote: > Those photos could have been taken yesterday if it wasn't for the fact > that there - are --- no --- ME262's -- still -- flying. There was a group of people in Ft. Worth who were building five Me-262's, full scale, using J-85 engines.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Me262

2006-04-25 Thread Michal Fabik
> Amazing isn't it? You forget just how good Agfacolor > was, even in the > 1940's. I take it the photos must have been color > corrected or something > because there's no scratches or fading or anything. > > Those photos could have been taken yesterday if it > wasn't for the fact > that there

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Me262

2006-04-25 Thread Martin Spott
Steve Hosgood wrote: > Those photos could have been taken yesterday if it wasn't for the fact > that there - are --- no --- ME262's -- still -- flying. What the subject said is apparently correct: "today the First Flight in Manching / Germany" I guess "today" rellay means "today" ! The

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Me262

2006-04-25 Thread Steve Hosgood
Martin Spott wrote: I just recieved these photographs from a collague at Eurocopter. Subject of his EMail was: "today the First Flight in Manching / Germany" http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/bitmap/FGFS/Me_20262-1.jpg http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/bitmap/FGFS/Me_20262-2.jpg http://d

Re: FlightGear RPMs (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] FC2 .rpm)

2006-04-25 Thread Steve Hosgood
Curtis L. Olson wrote: My vote is to build it with sdl. For 99.9% of the people out there, sdl will work just fine and they won't be able to tell the difference, and for the other 0.1%, freeglut won't work anyways because they never actually implimented glut's game mode. Curt. SDL is indee

[Flightgear-devel] Me262

2006-04-25 Thread Martin Spott
I just recieved these photographs from a collague at Eurocopter. Subject of his EMail was: "today the First Flight in Manching / Germany" http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/bitmap/FGFS/Me_20262-1.jpg http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/bitmap/FGFS/Me_20262-2.jpg http://document.ihg.uni-duis

Re: FlightGear RPMs (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] FC2 .rpm)

2006-04-25 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Steve Hosgood wrote: Folks: There is a 0.9.10 version of FlightGear and SimGear in RPM form suitable for Fedora Core 2,3,4 on: ftp://tallyho.bc.nu/pub/steve/flightgear/ Would the main FlightGear site maintainers (and mirror-site managers) please grab these and throw them in the existing "R

FlightGear RPMs (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] FC2 .rpm)

2006-04-25 Thread Steve Hosgood
Folks: There is a 0.9.10 version of FlightGear and SimGear in RPM form suitable for Fedora Core 2,3,4 on: ftp://tallyho.bc.nu/pub/steve/flightgear/ Would the main FlightGear site maintainers (and mirror-site managers) please grab these and throw them in the existing "RPMs for Fedora Core" di

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A SenecaII for FlightGear: first version available

2006-04-25 Thread Ron Jensen
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 22:38 +0200, Torsten Dreyer wrote: > Hi all, > > it's been a while, since I announced the model for a Seneca. It is a *LOT* > more work, than I expected it to be so it took a lot longer than I thought. > But I think I can show you what I have so far: > > http://www.t3r.de/