Hi FlightGear folks,
(I am only temporarily posting to the dev list. I'll remove myself following
this interchange about ProFlightSimulator).
I'm posting because I was so infuriated as a consumer about the
ProFlightSimulator that I bought on Nov. 23rd for $50. It was not what I
expected at all
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>>>
>>> You can post a comment in the tracker
>>>
>>
>> Link? The only bug tracker I know of
> (http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/) stops at #187.
>
> The link was in my original post. It's the fgrun tracker
Ah, ok. Thanks!
g.
--
Proud owne
>>
>> You can post a comment in the tracker
>>
>
>Link? The only bug tracker I know of
(http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/) stops at #187.
The link was in my original post. It's the fgrun tracker
Regards,
-Fred
---
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
- "Gene Buckle" a écrit :
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> By the way, look what I received in my inbox :
>
>> Support Requests item #3117965, was opened at 2010-11-24 20:24
[snip]
>>
>> Initial Comment:
>> The proflightsimulato
lightGear developers discussions"
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 8:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] ProFlightSimulator "The Most Realistic
> Hi Stuart,
>
> I made a few tweaks and posted a copy of this here:
>
>http://www.flightgear.org/flightprosim.
- "Gene Buckle" a écrit :
> On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>
> > By the way, look what I received in my inbox :
> >
> >> Support Requests item #3117965, was opened at 2010-11-24 20:24
> [snip]
> >>
> >> Initial Comment:
> >> The proflightsimulator launch control does not launc
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> By the way, look what I received in my inbox :
>
>> Support Requests item #3117965, was opened at 2010-11-24 20:24
[snip]
>>
>> Initial Comment:
>> The proflightsimulator launch control does not launch pro flight
>
*facepalm* I really, really, really
What a marketing opportunity!
Tim
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> By the way, look what I received in my inbox :
>
> > Support Requests item #3117965, was opened at 2010-11-24 20:24
> > Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by gwself
> > You can res
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 09:47 +0100, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> By the way, look what I received in my inbox :
>
> > Support Requests item #3117965, was opened at 2010-11-24 20:24
> > Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by gwself
> > You can respond by visiting:
> > https://so
By the way, look what I received in my inbox :
> Support Requests item #3117965, was opened at 2010-11-24 20:24
> Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by gwself
> You can respond by visiting:
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=510694&aid=3117965&group_id=653
By the way, look what I received in my inbox :
> Support Requests item #3117965, was opened at 2010-11-24 20:24
> Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by gwself
> You can respond by visiting:
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=510694&aid=3117965&group_id=653
> Curtis Olson wrote:
>
> I made a few tweaks and posted a copy of this here:
>
>http://www.flightgear.org/flightprosim.html
The wiki article has been updated to reflect the official statement. It is
being linked to by a growing number
of websites/forums, including some major ones like SimF
Am 24.11.10 21:42, schrieb James Turner:
>
> On 24 Nov 2010, at 20:32, Curtis Olson wrote:
>
>> What's the actual link (I can't read the full url from your image). We can
>> block specific ads if we need to, but easynewstore.com is clearly a proxy
>> for multiple software packages.
>
> I would o
On 24 Nov 2010, at 20:32, Curtis Olson wrote:
> What's the actual link (I can't read the full url from your image). We can
> block specific ads if we need to, but easynewstore.com is clearly a proxy for
> multiple software packages.
I would once again plead for the ads to be removed from flig
Curtis Olson wrote:
> What's the actual link (I can't read the full url from your image). We can
> block specific ads if we need to, but easynewstore.com is clearly a proxy
> for multiple software packages.
Yup, and it's done pretty cleverly: The URL which is being shown when
you move the mouse
Betreff: Re: [Flightgear-devel] ProFlightSimulator "The Most Realistic
An: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: Mittwoch, 24. November, 2010 21:27 Uhr
Curtis Olson wrote:
> I made a few tweaks and posted a copy of this here:
>
> http://www.flightgear.org/flightprosim.htm
What's the actual link (I can't read the full url from your image). We can
block specific ads if we need to, but easynewstore.com is clearly a proxy
for multiple software packages.
Thanks,
Curt.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
> Curtis Olson wrote:
>
> > I made a few twea
Curtis Olson wrote:
> I made a few tweaks and posted a copy of this here:
>
>http://www.flightgear.org/flightprosim.html
Just looked at this page, noticed one of these obnoxious Google ads on
the right - guess to where this leads when you click onto the ad
http://foxtrot.mgras.net/st
Hi Stuart,
I made a few tweaks and posted a copy of this here:
http://www.flightgear.org/flightprosim.html
Thanks for putting this all together!
Curt.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> > Ok, Stuart and Martin
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:06:42 +0100, Torsten wrote in message
<201011171906.43001.tors...@t3r.de>:
> > Ok, Stuart and Martin make a fair point. Lets move forward with
> > putting something onto the main FlightGear page. Stuart, you
> > mentioned a faq you had drafted?
>
> I think it's all here:
Hi all
> Stuart wrote:
> There is a version on the wiki, but it has since been modified by
> various people to something more emotional and prejorative,
> which nicely illustrates the point Martin and I were making :)
The emotional sentences you are refereing to were written before we decided o
> Ok, Stuart and Martin make a fair point. Lets move forward with putting
> something onto the main FlightGear page. Stuart, you mentioned a faq you
> had drafted?
I think it's all here:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=206864.11472...@web26005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com
Torsten
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> Ok, Stuart and Martin make a fair point. Lets move forward with putting
> something onto the main FlightGear page. Stuart, you mentioned a faq you
> had drafted?
> Thanks,
> Curt.
Hi Curt,
The latest version of the FAQ (v1.4) is below. This
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Curtis Olson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Martin Spott wrote:
>
>> Curtis Olson wrote:
>>
>>> The wiki is a good place to put something like this I think were it can
>>> easily be updated as the landscape changes.
>>
>> The Wiki is hosting, among a lot of serious
Hm, some need to read
http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg29013.html
again.
> Gijs wrote (a lot more, but this is an important passage):
"Of course we don't want some of our important pages (main page, download etc.)
to be edited by just anyone
with a wiki ac
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Martin Spott wrote:
> Curtis Olson wrote:
>
> > The wiki is a good place to put something like this I think were it can
> > easily be updated as the landscape changes.
>
> The Wiki is hosting, among a lot of serious content, a huge pile of -
> to put it mildly - '
Curtis Olson wrote:
> The wiki is a good place to put something like this I think were it can
> easily be updated as the landscape changes.
The Wiki is hosting, among a lot of serious content, a huge pile of -
to put it mildly - 'disputable' stuff, simply because _everyone_ can
edit there, no mat
Curtis Olson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
>> I drafted an FAQ on this subject last time it came around, which was
>> discussed
>> in detail, but never published on our website. Perhaps we should look at
>> that
>> again? It would certainly help to have a official
On 17 Nov 2010, at 15:36, James Turner wrote:
> The wiki has an official statement, it would be good to improve that, and
> then make it official.
Err, that sentence is silly, apologies. What I mean is, it would be good to
promote the wiki statement widely, eg, the newsletter, other flight si
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> Hi Curt,
>
> Not entirely sure whether you are being sarcastic or not, but I was able to
> get hold of the source code (without buying it I might add). It's not
> particularly
> easy to get hold off, or indeed to un-tar (various semi-corrup
On 17 Nov 2010, at 13:32, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> As Martin and others have pointed out numerous times, what we have is
> basically
> a marketing failure on our part. If people had put as much effort into
> marketing
> and evangelizing FG instead of griping about an unlikely GPL violation, we
Curtis Olson wrote:
> Out of curiosity, has anyone been able to obtain a copy of their source
> code? Could this be posted in a known location? Or is there a known link
> for downloading their code? It might be useful for us to maintain a
> reference copy ourselves somewhere. It should be no pr
t: Wed, 17 November, 2010 12:57:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] ProFlightSimulator "The Most Realistic Flight
Sim Ever"
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:25:06 -0800 (PST), Chris wrote in message
<86015.90161...@web56902.mail.re3.yahoo.com>:
> > From: Mally
> > Sent: Wed, 17
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:25:06 -0800 (PST), Chris wrote in message
<86015.90161...@web56902.mail.re3.yahoo.com>:
> > From: Mally
> > Sent: Wed, 17 November,
> > 2010 11:43:05 AM Subject: [Flightgear-devel] ProFlightSimulator
> > "The Most Realistic Flight
Sent: Wed, 17 November, 2010 12:47:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] ProFlightSimulator "The Most Realistic
> Flight Sim Ever"
>
> Out of curiosity, has anyone been able to obtain a copy of their source
> code? Could this be posted in a known location? Or is there a k
, YBBN/BNE.
From: Curtis Olson
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Sent: Wed, 17 November, 2010 12:47:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] ProFlightSimulator "The Most Realistic Flight
Sim Ever"
Out of curiosity, has anyone been able to obtain a copy
Out of curiosity, has anyone been able to obtain a copy of their source
code? Could this be posted in a known location? Or is there a known link
for downloading their code? It might be useful for us to maintain a
reference copy ourselves somewhere. It should be no problem to get a copy
of their
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Mally wrote:
> ?Looks familiar?
> http://www.proflightsimulator.com/index3.html
>
> Not to be confused with FlightProSim (obviously).
>
I'm curious about the claimed SimConnect & FSUIPC compatibility. :D
Which one of you lurking geniuses submitted THAT patch, hrm? *laughs*
g
t: Wed, 17 November, 2010 11:43:05 AM
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] ProFlightSimulator "The Most Realistic Flight Sim
Ever"
?Looks familiar?
http://www.proflightsimulator.com/index3.html
Not to be confused with FlightProSim (obviously).
Mally
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked
?Looks familiar?
http://www.proflightsimulator.com/index3.html
Not to be confused with FlightProSim (obviously).
Mally
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3259 - Release Date: 11/15/10
---
40 matches
Mail list logo
