On 2023-06-02 02:58, Steve Litt via fpc-other wrote:
HSN via fpc-other said on Wed, 31 May 2023 21:50:20 +
I will continue to maintain a high quality place to discuss fpc for
those who need it.
.
.
Everyone else: If you want a non stressful, non judgmental venue in
which to get quick a
On 2023-05-30 02:24, HSN via fpc-other wrote:
Tomas I’m curious if you have ever been to irc at all? If so can you
elaborate on your experiences there?
.
.
No, I will not elaborate on my experiences, because it's completely
unrelated to my arguments (similarly to the remainder of your messag
On 2023-05-29 04:55, HSN via fpc-other wrote:
Hi, I’d like to say, just because a bunch of people follow a trend
doesn’t mean that’s a good idea. History is full of stories about
foolish people following trends and bad ideas which lead to their
demise.
.
.
I don't tell anybody to follow th
On 2023-05-27 14:05, HSN via fpc-other wrote:
Joanna,
.
.
One of the ways that they can do this is by helping other users in
real-time chat. I suspect that many people who use fpc/Lazarus are
either unaware of irc real-time chat, have been chased away by people
sabotaging it or have been dis
On 2023-05-26 05:31, HSN via fpc-other wrote:
Hello,
All other large projects and enterprises have reliable real time chat
support, but not us!
The obvious difference between FPC and "enterprises" is that FPC is an
open-source hobby project, whereas enterprises having some sort of chat
usu
Hello everybody,
Please, note that this thread (already very long) will become moderated now and
no further posts will be let through unless I or some other list moderator
believe that there"s a very good reason for it.
Thanks for your understanding
Tomas
(one of FPC mailing list moderators)
On 28 April 2023 23:31:02 +0200, Jacob Kroon via fpc-other
wrote:
>On 4/28/23 23:20, Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-other wrote:
>> On 4/28/23 23:48, Jacob Kroon wrote:
>>> After reading this email that I am replying to here, and revisiting the
>>> #fpc logs, the only conclusion I can make is that Niko
On 2023-04-26 16:58, HSN via fpc-other wrote:
.
.
https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,63036.msg477096.html#msg477096
It’s easy to judge a person you don’t know doing a job you don’t
want in a place you have never been to from propaganda of crusading
strangers who showed up re
On 2023-04-24 01:56, Alexander Stohr via fpc-other wrote:
Am 2023-04-22 um 19:55 schrieb HSN via fpc-other:
Hello Alexander,
.
.
See you in irc or forums I’m done with this mailing list. Thank
you for reading and have a nice day :)
Have fun wherever you want to go now.
.
.
Please not
On 23 April 2023 04:16:41 +0200, Steve Litt via fpc-other
wrote:
Hi wrote,
.
.
>I said nothing about Joanna on #irc or #pascal, so she's basing it on
>what I said on fpc-other. You guys have read what I said. Did that
>sound like slander and harassment to you? To me it sounded like an
>hone
On 22 April 2023 01:52:26 +0200, Steve Litt via fpc-other
wrote:
Hi Steve,
.
.
>This is a step in the right direction. Thank you Joanna.
>
>Tomas (Hajny), I beg you, please step in and take temporary control of
>#fpc until the project itself can take control. If #fpc is le
On 2023-04-20 01:20, Steve Litt via fpc-other wrote:
Tomas Hajny via fpc-other said on Thu, 20 Apr 2023 00:33:41 +0200
I can mention
##fpc-alt as well if necessary - what's the associated irc:// URN of
this channel?
I don't know anything about irc:// urns. What would I use t
On 2023-04-19 23:33, Steve Litt via fpc-other wrote:
Tomas Hajny via fpc-other said on Wed, 19 Apr 2023 23:15:41 +0200
Hello everybody,
As promised, I raised the topic of the #fpc irc channel in the FPC
core team. The conclusion is that since the FPC core team has no
control over this channel
Hello everybody,
As promised, I raised the topic of the #fpc irc channel in the FPC core
team. The conclusion is that since the FPC core team has no control over
this channel and we don't want to be associated with the moderation
style there, we will change the information about this IRC chann
On 18 April 2023 18:12:49 +0200, James Richters via fpc-other
wrote:
>I can understand keeping bots off the channel, but it seems like there should
>be some easy way to test if you are a bot without annoying real humans.
>Why doesn’t she just send them an email or a text message if their
>conv
On 14 April 2023 18:45:42 +0200, Steve Litt via fpc-other
wrote:
Hi Steve,
>I'm here because of what's going on with the #fpc IRC channel.
Welcome! :-) Just FYI - I'll discuss with other members of the core team
whether we should keep the reference to #fpc IRC channel on our website - if we
On 2020-08-10 12:58, Mgr. Janusz Chmiel via fpc-other wrote:
Hello,
I would like to kindly ask you if you would try to consider adding
information about Pandroid for Linux and about Pandroid for WIndows
package
to The official Lazarus wiki page?
There are info about various project, but this
On 2019-06-17 02:05, wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
On 6/16/19 4:41 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
Am 16.06.2019 um 17:43 schrieb wkitt...@windstream.net:
Switching to fpc-other, since this is certainly not on-topic on
fpc-devel...
if gmail can determine that a message coming in from
On Thu, August 16, 2018 21:26, Maciej Izak wrote:
Hello Maciej,
Moving the part of discussion not directly related to FPC development to
fpc-other...
.
.
> I need to inform that I am not allowed (this is not my decision) to use
> fpc-devel / fpc-pascal anymore to inform about progress/announc
On Tue, June 5, 2018 22:53, edi...@blaisepascal.eu wrote:
Hello Detlef,
As suggested within the digest e-mails, it's better to edit the Subject
when replying to such an e-mail and thus provide information about the
real subject of your response rather than just information that you are
subscribe
On Thu, July 20, 2017 12:00, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Graeme,
> Not strictly FPC related, but I know here are some OS/2 software
> developers around - and I have no idea where else to ask.
>
> I'm working on supporting OS/2 in fpGUI Toolkit and creating OS/2
> themes. Looking at some of the
On Wed, May 24, 2017 16:51, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 2017-05-24 15:30, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>> I have my doubts about availability of the GUI component for OS/2, but
>> you're welcome to prove me wrong. ;-)
>
> I haven't personally tried Git under OS/2, but I ha
On Wed, May 24, 2017 16:03, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 2017-05-24 14:38, Luca Olivetti wrote:
>> $ LC_ALL=C git gui
>> git: 'gui' is not a git command. See 'git --help'.
>
> I guess you can blame your Linux distro's rubbish package management
> requirement policies for that. They probably split
On Wed, May 24, 2017 15:54, Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR) wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2017, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
>
>> > I'm positive that some of you are just clever A.I. bots posing as
>> > humans.. that's where your super powers come from. You're not actually
>> > humans..
>> Hahaha, you got that rig
On Tue, May 23, 2017 11:23, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 2017-05-22 23:11, nore...@z505.com wrote:
Hi Graeme,
.
.
> As with any new applications or technologies, there is always some
> learning curve (big or small). There are tons of bad habits ingrained in
> SVN users. Those do not translate
On Sun, October 30, 2016 19:11, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 2016-10-30 17:24, Sven Barth wrote:
Responding to fpc-other, because it's off-topic.
>> Same here...
I don't miss any messages, i.e. it isn't a general problem (which
obviously doesn't imply that there is no problem).
> First Laza
forged apparently). In any case,
you should better ignore it.
Thanks for your understanding
Tomas Hajny, one of the fpc-other mailing list moderators
___
fpc-other maillist - fpc-other@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-other
On Sat, February 27, 2016 22:36, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Bo Berglund wrote:
>> I hope this might be acceptable to ask here even if it is FPC and
>> Lazarus off topic
No problem on this list.
.
.
>> VMWare virtual adapter for vnet8 on main PC:
>> IP=192.168.80.1 Mask=255.255.255.0
>>
On Fri, April 3, 2015 13:05, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 2015-04-03 10:39, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Moving the discussion about advantages out of fpc-pascal elsewhere to
avoid bothering others... :/
>> you just change one option -Fu/GUI/LCL to 2: -Fu/GUI -NLCL
>> I don't see much added value
On Mon, March 23, 2015 02:06, John H. Lindsay wrote:
Hi John,
> I'm looking for any help getting Free Pascal into usable shape on OS/2
> and eCS; I'm running eCS v. 2.2 B2. The basic problems are that I can't
> get a big enough command-line window to show the fp character-mode
> IDE window to
On Thu, December 18, 2014 23:09, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Noting somebody's earlier comment about the lack of DLL support being
> due to a linker limitation, I think this is unfortunate since when OS/2
> came out the fact that the binary formats were well-documented and
> supported by at least t
On Thu, December 18, 2014 21:54, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> On Thu, December 18, 2014 19:49, Ralf Quint wrote:
>> On 12/17/2014 2:56 PM, mark diener wrote:
>>> Ralf, I am not goint to tell you to do anything, but gently suggest
>>> that you chill out.
>> Well, how abou
On Wed, August 13, 2014 11:35, duilio foschi wrote:
.
.
> In a room, only the few people who wear the magic glasses can see
> data inside a box.
>
> The rest (who have no magic glasses) only see the box.
>
> Brought to IT, only applications that use product X will "see" disk Y
> (and be able to
On Mon, December 16, 2013 09:20, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Tomas Hajny wrote:
>> .
>> .
>> Sorry, but I believe that you should indeed check the respective RFCs
>> first (and possibly also search some information about what mail servers
>> may do when receivin
On Mon, December 16, 2013 00:38, waldo kitty wrote:
> On 12/15/2013 3:06 PM, Johannes W. Dietrich wrote:
.
.
>> Apple Mail doesn't seem to be the only software that doesn't know what
>> to do
>> with this type of encoded data. The problem seem to affect the list
>> processor,
>> too. See
>> http:
On Mon, September 23, 2013 15:06, Guillermo Martínez wrote:
>
> From: "Tomas Hajny"
Switching to fpc-other, since this is really off-topic in fpc-pascal...
>> That should not be an issue by itself. The more likely reason is
>> probably use of 8-bit message (utf-8)
On Thu, July 11, 2013 23:44, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 2013-07-11 20:20, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>>
>> Is it so hard to google "fpc jvm language limitations" ?
>
>
> Yes, especially if your internet has been down for 3/4 of the day [2
> days in a row].
Admittedly, finding stuff on wiki is diff
On Thu, July 11, 2013 13:23, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
> On 10/07/2013 13:38, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi *,
Moving here (from fpc-pascal), since this discussion became off-topic.
.
.
>> And is so since Win95. Just amazing that Windows Console is so far
>> behind other platforms - it's rather ridic
On Fri, March 8, 2013 17:04, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>
>> Also, there as no specific person I targeted in
>> fpc-devel. Almost all posts lately contain about 95% quoted text! How
>> does a moderator fail to see this?
>
> I really don't want to prolong this and perhaps up
On Fri, February 15, 2013 08:32, Alexander Stohr wrote:
> Am 2013-02-14 18:42, schrieb Sven Barth:
>> Maybe we can try it once m68k support is good enough again and Mac OS
>> support has been revived and implemented for m68k ;)
> i think a port to the MS/IBM/Intel-PC platform would have been done
>
On Wed, January 2, 2013 10:59, Peter-Jan Roes wrote:
Hi Peter-Jan,
> I would like to file a few bug reports possibly along with some
> patches. Just to be sure that I understand the correct procedure to
> file a bug:
>
> * Should I file a report at http://bugs.freepascal.org/signup_page.php?
> *
On 6 Oct 12, at 17:12, Giuliano Colla wrote:
> Cephas Atheos ha scritto:
> [..]
> >
> > I knew that I wasn't going to convince anyone who wasn't willing to give
> > new technology a fair go! But we do need to at least be fair with our
> > evaluation of technology, not just go with what we know and
Hi Pete,
Alright, here we go. Sorry, you'll realize soon that I can write
longer e-mails than you although or maybe because English is not my
native language... ;-) Note that all comments below (listed in
completely random order) express my purely personal view (including
my own impressions fr
On Mon, September 6, 2010 19:14, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 6 September 2010 17:58, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>>
>> Neither Lazarus IDE nor MSEide are available under OS/2 and I don't
>> expect
>> that to change any time soon. So if I use an IDE (rather than a
>>
On Mon, September 6, 2010 17:20, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 6 September 2010 15:36, Marco van de Voort wrote:
.
.
>> I assume the inf stuff is easily fixable if sb could be bothered, but
>> the
>> problem is also a bit that the whole helpsystem is too simplistic.
>
> Like I said, I don't mind
On Thu, August 26, 2010 19:09, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 26 August 2010 18:47, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>> Any idea why is your Win32 binary 100 kB (12%) larger than the one I
>> compiled two days ago from your fpGui7.0 sources available in
>> SourceForge?
>> I assume y
On Thu, August 26, 2010 17:55, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Graeme,
> I am pleased to announce that fpGUI's DocView is available for download in
> a convenient binary executable from fpGUI's SourceForge project page. See
> the URL below.
.
.
Thanks!
Any idea why is your Win32 binary 100 kB (1
On 3 Apr 10, at 14:24, Kendall Sears wrote:
> What it the proper procedure for providing typo and misspelling fixes
> for the rtl documents and such?
There is a dedicated category for documentation in the FPC bug
tracker at http://bugs.freepascal.org - you can report typos there,
or even attach
On Tue, September 8, 2009 20:19, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Vincent Snijders said:
>> Marco van de Voort schreef:
>> > In our previous episode, Tomas Hajny said:
Replying via fpc-other, because it became rather off-topic in fpc-pascal now.
>> &g
On Wed, April 8, 2009 16:22, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Florian Klaempfl
> wrote:
.
.
> platforms as well. So far they are going a great job. BTW: I
> understand FPC was Windows only in the beginning. ;-)
.
.
No, DOS. ;-)
Tomas
__
On Wed, April 8, 2009 12:33, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
.
.
>> I wouldn't be able to contribute any longer, because no (usable) Git
>> client for OS/2 / eCS exists at the moment as far as I know.
>
> Ignoring
On Wed, April 8, 2009 11:58, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>>>
>>
>> In this context, any editor which doesn't use LF by default (e.g. for
>> new
>> files) is not an option unless you require Unix users to
On Wed, April 8, 2009 12:07, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>>
>> I certainly don't want to discuss usefulness of git to individual users
>> or
>> projects, but it doesn't seem to be very fit to widely multi-pl
On Tue, April 7, 2009 19:55, ik wrote:
.
.
> And there are even more features, but the question is if it good for all
> projects. I don't know the answer, I only know that I moved to git in my
> last new projects, and it helped me a lot when I was in a need to figure
> out
> when I destroy someth
On Wed, April 8, 2009 10:30, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Florian Klaempfl
> wrote:
>>
>> I know, but I don't want some crappy algorithm to guess if linefeed
>> conversion is needed or not, this feels so cvs like *g*
>
> In that case, all you would need is an editor t
On Thu, December 11, 2008 10:37, Michael Fuchs wrote:
> Mark J. Wood schrieb:
>> It would be good if there was a version of
>> an ObjectPascal that was packaged to meet that need, as you say. I often
>> teach in TP, but it's such a dinosaur. It would be good to have a
>> bridging step.
>
> But if y
On Wed, April 16, 2008 20:00, Alain Michaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
>here is a simple stupid question for experienced programmers:
>
> When using the inline assembler instructions (asm), one can chose the
> "intel" or "ATT" syntax. Which one is the best, more convenient?
Trying to focus on objective fa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm newbie in freepascal lists and in Freepascal Unix, and if this
> question
> doesn't make sense for this list, please ignore!
I believe that fpc-pascal would be the best choice (this one is for
discussions only partly related to FPC).
> I downloaded files fpc.zip
58 matches
Mail list logo
