is not specific to this article, it
happens with all of them.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
me, tomorrow or next week is fine.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
to jump back in later on.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
I'm afraid. I've had a long day at a customer and am
traveling back home.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 17:59, Eric Steele wrote:
> Current reviews:
> Craig: 5
> Rob: 5
> Alec: 3
> Elizabeth: 2
> Laurence: 0
> Matthew: 0
> Martijn: 0
> Ross: 0
Though shamefully behind, I did complete 1 review (#9
e how to set up
> their own tests
> 3) Write a separate PLIP for the inclusion of these two packages into
> our KGS (but not for the porting of all existing PTC tests, since
> that'd be a pretty big task)
I'd go with option 3, for the same reason
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Eric Steele wrote:
> I want to introduce two additions to the PLIP process that I'd like us to add
> into the Plone 4.1 process.
Excellent additions, +1 on both of them from me.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Fra
most of you know who I am and since I hate CV
writing, I'll leave it at that. :-)
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
part with 'hg svn+http' and create a DCVS clone so you
can make local changes while offline.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
>> Let's find a restaurant tonight and eat together!
>
> Let's meet at the lobby right now and head out?
We'll meet at Soul Cafe at 20:00:
http://www.soulcafe.hu/
and head out from there.
Map reference: http://bit.ly/
2009/10/28 Martijn Pieters :
> 2009/10/28 Alec Mitchell :
>> I'm in. Any evening or sometime during Friday open space works for me.
>
> Let's find a restaurant tonight and eat together!
Let's meet at the lobby right now and
2009/10/28 Alec Mitchell :
> I'm in. Any evening or sometime during Friday open space works for me.
Let's find a restaurant tonight and eat together!
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.p
but fails to move the egg into the correct location. Or at least I
> assume your egg cache is not "~/.buildout/eggs/tmpiT6PqP" but
> "~/.buildout/eggs/".
That's because the egg is zipped, and gets unzipped in a te
2009/6/19 Ross Patterson :
> One of these days I'm gonna have to disagree with Hanno and Martin just
> cause I always agree with them, but not today. +100 also and seriously,
> for all the exact reasons detailed.
+sys.maxint from me too. Process, not software.
--
M
t; available: Raphael (3), Ross (4), Matt (4)
> unavailable: Andi (3)
I'll have to pass too, if only because then I'll be a member of 3
teams. I am clear out of time for the next 2 months at least.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framewor
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 18:16, Martijn Pieters wrote:
>> 1) Should there be a significant new feature release of Plone this
>> year? What are its most basic goals? Which framework team is in
>> charge?
[..]
> I'd nominate the incumbent 3.x team for this; this team al
Committee? Version numbering is not just technical,
> it's a matter of expectations and perception. The Marketing team may
> be able to give you some feedback on the confusion or perception
> problems that might result from one choice or another. Giv
e, consider this
> proposal changed in this regard.
Having read the discussion on the bus, I can say I concur. +1 on this proposal.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
ussion on the bus, I can say I concur. +1 on this proposal.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 19:50, Matthew Wilkes
wrote:
> I've tried to include all the relevant possible times in this, let me know
> if there's another I should add.
Excellent poll, my info added (and updated after I learned this was to
be a generic week). :-)
--
we can talk at a very high
> level about the roadmap for this release
> * Better documentation for developers and the PLIP process and how it has
> changed
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
1. :-)
> Thanks again for taking the time to look at this, I really appreciate all of
> your notes (and the buildout help!) & I'll try to be as responsive as I
> possibly can.
np! Thanks for your hard work on implementing the PLIP!
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
R enhancements
review; I've had a unexpected long day today and am exhausted.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
just
> did so (for #237) and would like to ask you to fill in the remaining slots
> today.
I've #232 to myself.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
wild; I've got implementations where TTW
locking is disabled altogether for example, by implementing ILockable
as no-op operations.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
alleviate my concerns about the test
failures, I'm giving this PLIP a +0.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
to the develop, eggs and zcml lines and Bob's your
uncle. Alternatively, just set tractor-autoload-zcml to false, which
you did.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
ne sentence to the README to clarify why IIndexer adapters cannot be used
for workflow variables; it was a question I had while reviewing. No further
comments required. :-)
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plo
ving that icky smell is not a prerequisite for
acceptance, just advice to improve what otherwise is an excellent
implementation.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
That lack of progress has me a bit worried.
I suspect the reviewers are looking forward to the weekend. :-)
I'm on my 3rd review atm, at my current tempo I can pick up the
unassigned 2nd reviews.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing li
od in ATContentTypes.
Otherwise this has my +1.
A next step (not necessarily for this PLIP) would be to move that test
in CMFPlone mentioned in r79241 to be moved to ATContentTypes, or both
test and the re-index to be moved to Archetypes, if it is appropriate
there.
ut to me
> i makes a subtle difference if you the code isn't quite ready yet or if
> "only" the notification mail went missing — somehow :). anyway, i'm +1 on
> considering the bundle.
Same sentiment here, +1 from me
(s). A case in
point is the Plone egg, which contains the Products.Plone
module.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
ewer assigned:
#237 "Minor i18n upgrades"
#243 "Replace workflow history viewlet with content history viewlet"
Shall we tackle these ad hoc or will someone take these?
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
hat wichert considered this not worth
>> it?
>
> I thought it was rejected? I might have misremembered. It's trivial enough
> that I can make a quicky implementation of it though.
No, it was indeed rejected. Not sure why Andi included it. ;-)
--
Martijn Pieters
be useful with non-Archetypes
> content as well as AT-based content.
collective.transmogrifier already can load both AT-based content and
non-Archetypes content, but is fully pluggable and only needs
additional components to support more details as well as dumping.
-
1 that supports this (see
http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/DetailedRssFeedPlugin) but dev.plone.org
still runs on 0.10.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
I could be on the list to
> be available as facilitators and errand runners, but without votes.
I'm sure that would be very helpful. However, since I am a nominee I
can't really comment on that since I won't be part of the list. :-)
--
Martijn Pieters
team that have nominated themselves for the next one? My preference
> would be to exclude them from the discussion too, again to facilitate and
> open and frank discussion.
As one of the nominees, I expected to not take part. So, +1 from me there too.
--
Martijn Pieters
_
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 18:29, Steve McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks to me like we're getting a pretty good list of nominations.
>
> Shall we close nominations in a week? I can send deadline
> announcements to the lists and news.
My nomination is in, so +1 ;
, helping develop
the CMF and Zope 3. I have strong opinions about code quality,
testing, and how to make effective use of the component architecture,
and I am the Plone javascript maintainer.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 00:31, Steve McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Got it. How's this?
+1 from me :-)
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
am asking for some
reworking the text a little to also encouraging informal nominations.
I agree that to require someone to officially second or endorse you is
too much overhead.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 22:37, Steve McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Martijn Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd like to see people nominated as well; perhaps candidates need to
>> have someone second them? Not sure wh
well; perhaps candidates need to
have someone second them? Not sure what standing we'd expect from the
nominator.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:45, Raphael Ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 on both of them.
Indeed!
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
velopers as a PLIP
for a future version of Plone:
http://markmail.org/message/el63mapo647dh32a
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
the implementation BTW. That's something
for the next round.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
plone/roadmap/244
+1 from me.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
but I'd appreciate it if you
> could review it.
I can't find this on plone.org; is this still a proposal to consider?
> Enable automatic plugins for Plone with z3c.autoinclude
I am generally +1
--
Martijn Pieters
___
F
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 13:27, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to propose PLIP 243 for Plone 3.3: Replace workflow history
> viewlet with content history viewlet.
+1
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team
o the view should somehow provide this property sheet.
-1, see the discussion on what should be in 3.3 (We can't remove,
change or move major pieces of the UI).
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http:/
1, less code is good.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
>
> The plip is:
> #197: Add FeedParser as external requirement instead of shipping with it
> http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/197
I'll reconfirm my previous +1
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 20:24, Sidnei da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to propose PLIP #187 for Plone 3.3.
+1
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman
entally getting left in a locked state.
I've implemented a non-locking Trough-The-Web locking adapter for
several projects now to circumvent the problem; a rather bigger hammer
than we'd like.
+1 on this proposal.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Fram
is accessed by a direct URL (not just when it appears as a
> link in navigation).
+1
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
s rather than having a global registry of functions.
I've been itching to do this myself already. +1!
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
inly feel this is an exception. +1 on this proposal.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
ar only received positive
> responses from several people.
>
> The full PLIP can be found here:
> http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/228
In view of the recent discussion on consistency in the 3.x series, I
am -1 on this for 3.3.
--
Martijn Pieters
__
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 16:56, Hanno Schlichting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to propose to accept PLIP 237 - Minor i18n upgrades for Plone
> 3.3. The full text is at http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/237.
+1 from me
--
his may be a +0 if there is a
more l logical destination.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
is I am
hardly covering all my current responsibilities.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
global. Site actions is
a set of global actions and moving the link there will lead to a lot
of confusion.
-1 from me therefore.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
ake it to DC and the conference this year due to personal
circumstances. Hope you guys have a great time!
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
econded
> bij Martijn Pieters.
I did not; Jens Klein seconded it, I gave my framework team vote on it
already (a +1).
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 18:38, Martijn Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am staying at the Carlyle Suites Hotel, 1731 New Hampshire Ave NW,
> which makes it Du Pont Circle, I believe.
I completely missed the opportunity to let
Ubiquity<http://labs.mozilla.com/2008/08/intro
.
I am staying at the Carlyle Suites Hotel, 1731 New Hampshire Ave NW,
which makes it Du Pont Circle, I believe.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
e is scheduled to land at Dulles at 15:00.
Means I should be checked in at the hotel and ready for dinner by
19:00-ish, no?
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
me
due to jet-lag, I think..
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
nd will be happy
> to take notes at the meeting.
>
> Can we start by finding out when folks are arriving in and leaving DC?
I'm in DC from monday afternoon through to sunday afternoon (6 - 12 oktober).
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Fr
n of Plone.
In your specific case, that'd be for Plone 3.3. Current Plone trunk
will be version 4.0. I'd keep it on the list and not canvas us
directly though.
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@
own
> and get direct feedback when necessary on things like PLIPs.
Be that as it may, but didn't you reach us all by sending email to
this list? ;-)
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://list
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Tom Lazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>| from | til
> -
> tomster | 6th | 12th
> witsch | 6th | 12th
> wiggy | |
> raphael | |
> danny | |
> martijn | 6th
manager for the whole 3.x cycle, from a continuity and
> stability perspective.
I must say that I agree with that sentiment, especially in light of
what a great job Wichert has done so far. I'm in favour of not
changing a winning formula. ;-)
--
Martijn Pieters
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or when you want the quickinstaller to be aware of your package.
Are we talking about the same thing here? The initialize attribute
isn't needed for the quickinstaller, only the
element, I think.
--
M
actories with Zope (so content types, tools, etc).
The attribute is optional and should be removed when the initialize
method is empty.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
't vote on, and
agreed with the reviewers remarks. I therefor hereby cast my vote to
echo the last reviewer's vote on each PLIP I didn't review myself.
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://li
we going to go
> about this? will we collect explicit votes from andi, martijn and danny?
Seeing as I am one of the co-authors of the plip and code, I'd abstain
in any case. :-)
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-
gt; reviews each, it would be great if you do one more as well (and let us
> know which, too).
I have both 205 and 218 on my laptop already, so I'll tackle those next.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@list
mbs up. Just be aware of
potential problems around the instance home part and the effective
user due to a misconfigured CLIENT_HOME.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
oing reviews since the new
> deadline announcement, but personally I feel left in the dark whether the
> whole
> team is really committed to the February 16 deadline.
I am definitely behind that deadline and am making it.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
209: Add buildout to Unified Installer
then and do them this weekend if possible.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
I will take a look at PLIPs 205 and 218 next, this weekend hopefully.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
I've reviewed Martin's plipathon (184, 200, 203 and 204) as well as
Wichert's Product dependencies PLIP (195) today.
5 down, 5 to go.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.pl
g down
> from a task in a free software project; much better than preventing the
> project from progressing.
Stepping down won't help us make the deadline.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
htt
I am downloading bundles like crazy over leeched Wifi, while standing
outside in a field.. I'll update bundles with notes as connections
become available ;-)
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
On 1. feb.. 2008, at 12.28, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Careful with weeding imports. I recently had to fix a migration issue
for a customer, where a persistent tool had been moved into another
module with an import at the old location. Someone else then ran
pyflakes and removed said import, breaking th
had been moved into another
module with an import at the old location. Someone else then ran
pyflakes and removed said import, breaking the migration.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
*at all*. I moved to an island this weekend, and thanks to a minor
crisis with the landlady, I do not have any network at the moment, nor
any time to do reviewing in next to regular work. I should have had
the house in reasonable order by now, but things went otherwise. :-(
--
hances
> > the UX of the thing.
>
> I hadn't thought of it, and I'm not sure I'll have time, but I'd be
> happy to include it if the team agrees and someone can help me with the
> implementation.
Wouldn't th
ater deadlines for review bundles
> etc are met).
+1
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
On Dec 20, 2007 3:01 PM, Raphael Ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> don't know whether this is even submitted for 3.1
>
>http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/197
It wasn't, but I've voted on it anyway. :-)
+1
the same vein I'd rather see PLIP #217 go directly into the CMF, if
it were not for the fact I'd like to see the CMFPlacefulWorkflow
monkey patch disappear ASAP. Perhaps we should ensure that we port
both PLIPs to the CMF ASAP.
--
Martijn Pieters
__
On Dec 16, 2007 3:31 PM, Martijn Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If it's too late for 3.1, well, too bad. :(
>
> I am okay with including this one for 3.1; it would be a shame if we
> didn't include the work.
I'd like to hear from the other framework
On Dec 19, 2007 9:42 PM, Martijn Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As you can see from the 3.1 release schedule as set by Wichert, the
> framework team has set itself this friday as the deadline for
> selecting the PLIPs for 3.1.
Whoops, I meant to include a URL for the sc
hould have voted on all PLIPs submitted
by the deadline, and perhaps even on some that were submitted late.
Note that we'll only consider accepted PLIPs for inclusion in 3.1,
provided there is a review bundle ready for the 2008-01-19 deadline
for your accepted PLIP.
--
Martijn Pieters
__
l okay about the WebDAV PLIP being included, I
feel I should be lenient here too. I also already voted on more than
half the submissions, so I in that vein an extra PLIP on Monday is
also fine by me.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framewo
esult of my GSoC work.
URL: http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/187
> If it's too late for 3.1, well, too bad. :(
I am okay with including this one for 3.1; it would be a shame if we
didn't include the work.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Fra
On Dec 14, 2007 9:18 PM, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to propose PLIP 220: http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/220
+1 from me.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
