* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011213 22:17] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 03:23:28PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
There are many effects that could cause this, for instance if FreeBSD
manages to align things differently in relation to the CPU cache you
:That's not the point, you're proposing a static configuration
:which i honestly don't like. What makes more sense is to
:teach the dynamic linker to look for archetecture specific
:subdirectories in order to dynamically link in a shared object
:more suited to the running CPU, not the CPU it was
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 02:26:51AM -0600, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
This could easily be hung off CPUTYPE like we do for the asm code in
OpenSSL, right?
That's not the point, you're proposing a static configuration
which i honestly don't like. What makes more sense is to
teach the
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011214 02:46] wrote:
Yes, well, we already compile the *entire tree* with static
(compile-time) optimizations when CPUTYPE is set, so one more (bzero)
is no difference except that it gives an extra performance benefit.
Wait, you go to each and every
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 02:55:33 -0600
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011214 02:46] wrote:
Yes, well, we already compile the *entire tree* with static
(compile-time) optimizations when CPUTYPE is set, so one more (bzero)
is no difference except
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 08:35:08PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
Well, eCos is free-as-in-beer.
From a quick glance at the license it looks to be a lot more like
the GPL than a BSD license but I'll dig deeper.
'Any Modification which You create or to which You contribute must
be
Hello,
I'm running PostgreSQL and it uses SysV shared mem for alot of its functions.
How can verify that the shared mem is wired and not pageable?
sysctl settings:
kern.ipc.shmmax: 128004097
kern.ipc.shmmin: 1
kern.ipc.shmmni: 512
kern.ipc.shmseg: 1024
kern.ipc.shmall: 31251
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Since JFS has come up again... Are there any papers that explain how
to integrate a new filesystem into FreeBSD? The relevant chapter in
the FreeBSD Developers' Handbook (16) is a bit terse :-).
Specifically, I'm looking at being able to read/write 2BSD filesystems
on
Title: Untitled Document
now cross-posting
maybe someone can give me a hint at least
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 11:22:55AM +0100, Sven Huster wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Josh Paetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Sven Huster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FBSD-Q [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 December, 2001 21:41
Subject:
Hi,
You claim the 3Coms are no good choice for FBSD. I have always been very
satisfied
with 3Com905B devices.
And a quick search did not reveal any major problems with the 3com cards.
Pls, can you explain the problem in more detail or direct me to more detailed
information (how to avoid
In a message dated 12/14/01 10:09:20 AM Eastern Standard Time, CB1001 writes:
Hi,
You claim the 3Coms are no good choice for FBSD. I have always been very
satisfied
with 3Com905B devices.
And a quick search did not reveal any major problems with the 3com cards.
A quick search of
Hi FreeBSD lovers :-)
First af all I would like to thank the FreeBSD developers for making such a great
system! Half a year ago, I had to choose an OS for my server and the first decision
was between Windows and Unix, ofcourse it didn't take much research to determine that
Unix were the
Rafter Man wrote:
1. Is there a way to hide a user from other users? Fx programs
like w, who, users, netstat, top, ps all show what other users
are doing.
The most common approach to this is to run the exterior services
in a jail (see: man jail). When the user logs into the jail,
they do not
Rafter Man [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. I hope that in the furture the FreeBSD developers will rewrite the system in C++.
I think you're alone on that one.
Best regards,
Mike Barcroft
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
* GB Clark II [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011214 06:28] wrote:
Hello,
I'm running PostgreSQL and it uses SysV shared mem for alot of its functions.
How can verify that the shared mem is wired and not pageable?
sysctl settings:
kern.ipc.shmmax: 128004097
kern.ipc.shmmin: 1
kern.ipc.shmmni: 512
Rafter Man [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. I hope that in the furture the FreeBSD developers will rewrite
the system in C++.
You need to have your head examined.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in
Can't address many of these, but will address one.
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Rafter Man wrote:
Hi FreeBSD lovers :-)
First af all I would like to thank the FreeBSD developers for making
such a great system! Half a year ago, I had to choose an OS for my
server and the first decision was between
On 14-Dec-01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/14/01 10:09:20 AM Eastern Standard Time, CB1001 writes:
Hi,
You claim the 3Coms are no good choice for FBSD. I have always been very
satisfied
with 3Com905B devices.
And a quick search did not reveal any major problems
First af all I would like to thank the FreeBSD developers for making
such a great system! Half a year ago, I had to choose an OS for my
server and the first decision was between Windows and Unix, ofcourse
it didn't take much research to determine that Unix were the better
choice. But now I
1. Is there a way to hide a user from other users? Fx programs like w, who, u
As Terry has already pointed out, jails are probably your best bet.
ps: 1. I hope that in the future FreeBSD will remain a servers only OS.
As Terry also said, volunteers work on things they like to work on,
but
Reports are due tonight to be included in the November, 2001 monthly
development report. The turnout is pretty low so far -- given activity in
the tree, I know a lot more has been happening. :-) For example, I'd
really like to get a report on the SMPng work, and hardware driver work,
etc.
with 3Com905B devices.
And a quick search did not reveal any major problems with the 3com cards.
A quick search of what? Get some perspective. The hackers are only
interested in cards that they use, and they all use intel for high end
stuff.
Bill paul is too busy writing drivers for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Try to front end your machine with a switch...the 5 cards is most likely your
problem. With each device you increase your bus contention (ie worsen the
worst case bus master scenario)...either that or get a 4 port card that is
more efficient than 5 individual
FYI, this is another [EMAIL PROTECTED] clone.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with 3Com905B devices.
And a quick search did not reveal any major problems with the 3com cards.
A quick search of what? Get some perspective. The hackers are only
interested in cards that they use, and they
FYI: This is another [EMAIL PROTECTED] clone.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
You claim the 3Coms are no good choice for FBSD. I have always been very
satisfied
with 3Com905B devices.
And a quick search did not reveal any major problems with the 3com cards.
Pls, can you explain the
On Friday, 14 December 2001 at 6:16:27 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Since JFS has come up again... Are there any papers that explain how
to integrate a new filesystem into FreeBSD? The relevant chapter in
the FreeBSD Developers' Handbook (16) is a bit terse :-).
On Friday 14 December 2001 3:03 pm, Rafter Man wrote:
Hi FreeBSD lovers :-)
snip/
1. Is there a way to hide a user from other users? Fx programs like
w, who, users, netstat, top, ps all show what other users are
doing. It would fx be a good idea to hide root or the admin's
activities from
Hi,
I am playing with a driver for the Broadcom 5700/5701.
It recognizes the 5700 in my 3Com cards OK, but seems to screw up the
TCP checksum.
Switching off hardware checksum capability fixes it.
Does anyone know the details of which stepping this stuff worked on?
--
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL
Brooks Davis wrote:
There was a commit to current a few hours ago disabling hardware
checksums on recieve due to corruption problems. It will be MFC'd in
three days though it's a two line fix so you could apply it your self:
30 matches
Mail list logo
