Doug Barton pisze:
I can't speak for portupgrade but the vast majority of time with
portmaster is actually spent building the port. The updating of
/var/db/pkg is trivial in comparison. What portmaster does that
bsd.port.mk by itself does not is allow you to update dependencies in
place
Hi FreeBSD community
We are Tomahawk Desktop, trying to make a working desktop OS based on
FreeBSD!
We use FreeBSD 7.2 on i386.
We earlier discussed two crucial issues regarding a desktop OS:
1.http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2009-July/051231.html
Compiling the kernel gives me:
cc -c -O -pipe -std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -nostdinc -I.
-I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/altq -D_KERNEL
Promotional gift with YOUR OWN LOGO HUB302 USD1.10 1Kpcs (usb1.1)
(
http://rs-tr.com//t.aspx/subid/7648016/camid/26753/www.worldcrown.net/product_info.asp?id=529
) (
http://rs-tr.com//t.aspx/subid/7648016/camid/26753/worldcrown.net/product_info.asp?id=539
) (
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:27+0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
With a 6.4 of last night
Michael Butler contributed a patch where ch-max_iosize was changed
twice to atadev-max_iosize on line 454 in src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c.
Either re-cvsup and hope for the best or apply the patch manually.
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
With a 6.4 of last night
So I guess 6.4 - 7.2 needs to go via 7.0 ??
It is already fixed.
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/195987
--
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
With a 6.4 of last night
So I guess 6.4 - 7.2 needs to go via 7.0 ??
It is already fixed.
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/195987
cvsupped last night at 1:00 +1
So the apha-particle strikes again. ;)
I'll update, and rerun.
In message 4a72b8e4.6060...@withagen.nl,
Willem Jan Withagen (w...@withagen.nl) wrote:
Compiling the kernel gives me:
cc -c -O -pipe -std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual -Wundef
and in 7.2-STABLE (built July 27) cvsuped today and failed with
max_iosize error
.
JeffD
_
M 0427565791
jeff.dows...@mac.com
On 31/07/2009, at 7:27 PM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Compiling the kernel gives me:
cc -c -O -pipe -std=c99 -g -Wall
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:41+0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:27+0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
So I guess 6.4 - 7.2 needs to go via 7.0 ??
I'd do a binary upgrade to 7.2-R. gcc doesn't understand the
-Wpointer-sign flag used when compiling RELENG_7_0_0_RELEASE using
Cezary Morga wrote:
Alson van der Meulen pisze:
* Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org [2009-07-29 22:10]:
I'm planning to remove the -u option altogether. It actually does very
little now, and certainly does not do what most users expect it should
do.
If I may chip in here on a similar note.
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
With a 6.4 of last night
So I guess 6.4 - 7.2 needs to go via 7.0 ??
It is already fixed.
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/195987
cvsupped last night at 1:00 +1
So the apha-particle strikes again. ;)
Miroslav Lachman pisze:
If I may chip in here on a similar note.
I'm currently looking for a port management tool that might replace good
ol' portinstall/portupgrade tools in my toolbox. Portmaster looks
promising but I noticed that it doesn't seem to take BATCH=yes in my
/etc/make.conf into
On Pén, Július 31, 2009 2:06 pm, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
With a 6.4 of last night
So I guess 6.4 - 7.2 needs to go via 7.0 ??
It is already fixed.
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/195987
Hi. I guess I'll play Tinderbox. With RELENG_7 sources from a few
minutes ago, I get:
cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -march=athlon64 -std=c99 -Wall
-Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef
Boris Kochergin wrote:
Hi. I guess I'll play Tinderbox. With RELENG_7 sources from a few
minutes ago, I get:
cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -march=athlon64 -std=c99 -Wall
-Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual
Willem,
Willem Jan Withagen wrote on Friday, July 31, 2009 2:07 PM:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
With a 6.4 of last night
So I guess 6.4 - 7.2 needs to go via 7.0 ??
It is already fixed.
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/195987
helge.old...@atosorigin.com wrote:
Willem,
Willem Jan Withagen wrote on Friday, July 31, 2009 2:07 PM:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
With a 6.4 of last night
So I guess 6.4 - 7.2 needs to go via 7.0 ??
It is already fixed.
On Jul 31, 2009, at 9:43 AM, helge.old...@atosorigin.com helge.old...@atosorigin.com
wrote:
Are you sure the kernel does not install? I have recently source-
upgraded a bunch of systems straight from 6-STABLE to 7-STABLE,
constantly observed this error, but kernel and modules did install
Gót András wrote:
On Pén, Július 31, 2009 2:06 pm, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
With a 6.4 of last night
So I guess 6.4 - 7.2 needs to go via 7.0 ??
It is already fixed.
On Pén, Július 31, 2009 4:44 pm, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
helge.old...@atosorigin.com wrote:
Willem,
Willem Jan Withagen wrote on Friday, July 31, 2009 2:07 PM:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
With a 6.4 of last night
So I guess
Cezary Morga wrote:
Doug Barton pisze:
I can't speak for portupgrade but the vast majority of time with
portmaster is actually spent building the port. The updating of
/var/db/pkg is trivial in comparison. What portmaster does that
bsd.port.mk by itself does not is allow you to update
Cezary Morga wrote:
Alson van der Meulen pisze:
* Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org [2009-07-29 22:10]:
I'm planning to remove the -u option altogether. It actually does very
little now, and certainly does not do what most users expect it should
do.
If I may chip in here on a similar note.
This week I updated my laptop (Dell Latitude C610) to 8.0-BETA2 from
7.2-RELEASE from source. Apart from the fact that building world stopped
in usbconfig (see PR bin/137180, I patched usbconfig's Makefile to link
to the newly built libusb), the update went smoothly.
So far I have not found
Quoth Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org:
How about this? When the user has -[rf] but not -R, and there are flag
files present, ask if they should be cleared before beginning to do
anything. Otherwise (no -[rf]) ignore them. Sound good?
Since my machine has spent the last 48hrs or so rebuilding
25 matches
Mail list logo