C++ has become a very obscure language, that is generally not used very often
anymore.
Objective C is much bigger then C++ now.
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "Steve Nickolas"
Aan: "Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers."
Verzonden: Dinsdag 26 mei 2015 17:25:54
On
defrag requires a VGA screen to use the user interface
There is an option to run it from the command line
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "Mateusz Viste"
Aan: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Verzonden: Zondag 24 mei 2015 11:29:32
Onderwerp: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS (ODIN) and 8086 com
no, it is not
However there are some multithreading kernels that run on it, like:
http://www.erickengelke.com/ertos/
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "jo van montfort1"
Aan: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Verzonden: Dinsdag 12 mei 2015 15:51:06
Onderwerp: [Freedos-devel] mult
No that would actually be a superb idea. I am not going to go into the details
of why running mono on FreeDOS is pure genious.
I started work on it years ago, but not going to start that again.
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "Steve Nickolas"
Aan: "Technical discussion and questions for
I was just installing my new computer with ASUS motherboard and I came across
the following page:
http://www.manualslib.com/manual/806097/Asus-B85-Pro-Gamer.html?page=40#manual
.
Unless I am reading this correctly, the FreeDOS is on the USB flash drive
(which you have to obtain seperately) an
I wonder if it's even physically possible to sue FreeDOS because it doesn't
exist as a legal organization.
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "Teddy T."
Aan: "Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers."
Verzonden: Donderdag 26 maart 2015 07:08:15
Onderwerp: Re: [Fre
It's either technically broken or bad marketing. The provided function clearly
does not work.
It's up to Asus to make sure such an option, if they provide it, works. And if
they want to technically incorporate FreeDOS then they have to make sure it
works around the limitations of what they are
I mean if they sell you a computer and they choose to use FreeDOS for this,
it's there concern to make sure it runs correctly. If they build a product
around FreeDOS, they have to make sure the FreeDOS runs correctly.
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "imre leber"
FreeDOS is open source, if Asus wants to do something with FreeDOS, they can do
so regardless.
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "Teddy T."
Aan: "Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers."
Verzonden: Zondag 22 maart 2015 21:53:51
Onderwerp: Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeD
- Doorgestuurd bericht -
Van: "imre leber"
Aan: "Roberto Perotti"
Verzonden: Donderdag 5 februari 2015 20:46:48
Onderwerp: Re: [Freedos-devel] 16 bit fat 32 chkdsk and defrag!
There are significant different ways of defragmenting.
In the old days if fat12/16 de
- defrag does FAT32 (you have to select the right defragmentation method
from the menu)
- chkdsk does not do FAT32, you have to use DOSFSCK for FAT32. There is
not enough memory in 16 bit to check the disk in a reasonable amout of time
sparky4 schreef op 15/01/2015 om 17:24:
> I noticed they do
Well, you could be notified when lunch break is over.
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "Michael Brutman"
Aan: "Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers."
Verzonden: Vrijdag 30 januari 2015 06:24:01
Onderwerp: Re: [Freedos-devel] Clock
Let's think about this critic
Ok, this is starting to sound like a real archeology project.
But QuickBASIC always produced .exe files.
Also, some of the earliest computer like sinclair QL really only had BASIC.
There used to be a BASIC compiler in the PC/XT called ROM-BASIC, which would do
BASIC.
And of course the very fir
https://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~horie/intx.bas
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU"
Aan: "Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers."
Verzonden: Vrijdag 23 januari 2015 12:01:02
Onderwerp: [Freedos-devel] Multi user system
Unfortunately,to my dismay,
But emails keep people interested long enough for code to be written.
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "Tom Ehlert"
Aan: "Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers."
Verzonden: Dinsdag 6 januari 2015 18:40:43
Onderwerp: Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 and 2.0 roadmap disc
And then why not emphasize the real benefits of DOS since like for ever?
Direct access to hardware and real time behaviour (linux is not real time)
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "imre leber"
Aan: "Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers."
Just to put in my own two cents.
The lastest happening thing is all about open source hardware. Open source
operating systems are so 2000.
Intel has recently released a number of x86 based boards. With a simple
operating system like DOS you could do all sorts of hardware things directly,
wit
Not that I all of a sudden want to jump the bandwagon, but is he planning on
hiring current/past FreeDOS developers at least?
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "Jim Hall"
Aan: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Verzonden: Woensdag 31 december 2014 17:12:57
Onderwerp: [Freedos-devel]
chkdsk fully supports long file names. It even has checks to ensure the long
file names are correct.
It does not however support FAT32.
- Originele e-mail -
Van: "Rugxulo"
Aan: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Verzonden: Zondag 8 januari 2012 20:21:53 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlijn
I think you need to define what exactly you mean with the project. Do you mean
only the kernel and command.com, or including all the utilities.
I think moving to openwatcom is a noble goal, but it would be a huge
undertaking, I think.
- Original Message -
From: Pat Villani
To: fr
iblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/chkdsk/ckdsk092.zip
>
> Regards,
> Aitor
>
> 2009/5/14 Imre Leber :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am hereby releasing a new version of chkdsk. This version fixes bug:
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid
dos/defrag/dfrag132.zip
Regards,
Aitor
2009/5/16 Imre Leber :
> Fixed
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Jim Michaels
> To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 6:26 AM
> Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.3.2
> I tried
You are right,
But we do have a long history of using this list for pointing out DOS
related software.
- Original Message -
From: "Pat Villani"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] New RxDOS memory subsystem source code
> Actually, replying here woul
I think more people might be interested ;)
Imre
- Original Message -
From: "Imre Leber"
To: "Eric Auer"
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: chkdsk checked
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Eric Auer"
> To: &
:)
- Original Message -
From: "dos386"
To: ;
;
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:49 AM
Subject: [Freedos-devel] test
> as Eric suggested :-D
>
> --
> Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
> Check out
Fixed
- Original Message -
From: Jim Michaels
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 6:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.3.2
I tried it twice. this file appears to be corrupted. please fix.
Jim Michaels
>From: I
Hi,
I am hereby releasing a new version of defrag. This version fixes bug:
http://www.freedos.org/bugzilla/cgi-bin/show_bug.cgi?id=1964
You can download it from:
http://users.telenet.be/imre/FreeDOS/dfrag132.zip
Imre
-
Hi,
I am hereby releasing a new version of chkdsk. This version fixes bug:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2462084&group_id=5109&atid=105109
You can download it from:
http://users.telenet.be/imre/FreeDOS/ckdsk092.zip
Imre
I am hereby releasing a new version of chkdsk. This version fixes bug
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2462084&group_id=5109&atid=105109--
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances!
I am hereby releasing a new version of chkdsk. This version fixes bug
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2462084&group_id=5109&atid=105109--
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances!
> whatever 'this' technique is - DeskView was stable multi tasking for
> DOS. So this is at least possible.
>
Yes the rumored to once have existed deskview/X. Was that not the reason for
the bankrupcy of quarterdeck?
Anyway windows 95 was stable too.
Point remaining is that tridos tries to inte
> AFAIR this has been done; this is called 'linux' ;)
yup
>
> Tom
--
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Well I think it is cool to have an open source PC.
Now just waiting for it to become printable, maybe powered by an open source
magnetic motor? ;)
Imre
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Riebisch"
To:
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:11 PM
Subject: [Freedos-devel] Zet PC platform
> Zeus' website incorrectly lists FreeDOS version 1.1 as released. ;-)
Is't that the one on the knoppix live cd?
Imre
>
> Robert Riebisch
> --
> BTTR Software
> http://www.bttr-software.de/
>
> --
>
- Original Message -
> - tridos (multitasking, not a freedos packet but interesting, licence
> unclear (free?),
> http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a0503736/php/drdoswiki/index.php?n=Main.TripleDOS)
The license for this is GNU GPL.
Anyway i wouldn't put my time in this one. I don't think mu
Well, I think that a seperate partition with a compressed file system and a
block driver would be the best option.
At the time doublespace/stacker were released, people were not intended to have
many partitions on there drive.
But with linux requiring a multiple of partitions, it is proven that
> but more about efficient handling of long
>file names.
Your joking, right?
Stored in reverse order, with the short file name after the long one, yeah
that's realy got to make speed.
Imre
-
Check out the new SourceFo
Actually the sources seem to already contain zlib.
So I assume we almost have a working doublespace already. But somebody ought to
have a look at it to make it complete/fix the bugs.
Imre
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Imre Leber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: vrijd
e compressed if needed.
>>
>> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>> Marco A. Achury
>> Tel: +58-(212)-6158777
>> Cel: +58-(414)-3142282
>> Fax: +58-(212)-2410828
>> Skype: marcoachury
>> www.geocities.com/marcoachury
>>
>>
>>
>> Imre Leber escrib
But then again,
Do you realy need a file system if it is read only. You could just as well use
a table in the front that lists file names with path, and copy all data after
it. No need to have anything remotely like FAT and the like.
Just:
\temp\file1 start at 0
\temp\file2 start at 1000
0:
You did however make the very valid point that implementing a compressed file
system is not so easy as one might think.
There is indeed a problem with random access in a stream. That is not very
trivial to solve. But it shouldn't be overly difficult either.
Imre
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht
No what I mean with this is that if it is a linux driver it means that it is
inherently linked to the internals of linux. I wouldn't think that this would
be very easy to port to anything. At least not unless you would implement the
entire virtual file system layer of linux first.
What I did no
life (and world of
warcraft). People online talk much more direct, but people might not always
apreciate it.
Anyway if anybody would like to build a virtual presence for FreeDOS in second
life. That would be so cool.
Imre
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Imre Leber [ma
Does the fact that all this runs on linux slip your mind (like in no way
interesting for the stated purpose).
Seriously, how is any of that supposed to be running in DOS? It's mainly not
even embedded (like a set of operating system services you can embed in a
microcontroller application).
Im
methods (OT)
>
>Interesting...
>
>What information is tored in the "FAT refered table" it needs 32 bits?
>
>Alain
>
>Imre Leber escreveu:
>> Here are the numbers for the data structures used by defrag, when calculated
>> for FAT32.
>>
>> Cluster
Here are the numbers for the data structures used by defrag, when calculated
for FAT32.
Cluster movable map: 32 MB (fat size * 1 bit)
FAT refered map: 32MB (fat size * 1 bit)
FAT refered table: 1024MB (fat size * 4 byte)
Dir refered table (take 10 files): (# files * 6 bytes) 0,5 MB
total: 10
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Eric Auer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: dinsdag, maart 18, 2008 10:22 PM
>Aan: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Onderwerp: Re: [Freedos-devel] Fwd: freedos defrag methods (OT)
>
>
>Hi!
>
>> For this it is very sad that FreeDOS does not use the
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Aitor Santamar?a [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: woensdag, maart 19, 2008 01:45 AM
>Aan: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Onderwerp: Re: [Freedos-devel] compressed FAT filesystems (was: defrag methods)
>
>One more thing: the big deal about Double
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Eric Auer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: dinsdag, maart 18, 2008 10:38 PM
>Aan: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Onderwerp: [Freedos-devel] compressed FAT filesystems (was: defrag methods)
>
>
>Hi!
>
>> Maybe with adding compression it could mak
Maybe with adding compression it could make a replacement for doublespace?
(running it through the network redirector obviously)
Imre
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Imre Leber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: dinsdag, maart 18, 2008 07:10 PM
>Aan: f
cht -
>Van: Imre Leber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: dinsdag, maart 18, 2008 07:10 PM
>Aan: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Onderwerp: Re: [Freedos-devel] Fwd: freedos defrag methods
>
>
>>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>>Van: Eric Auer [mai
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Eric Auer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: dinsdag, maart 18, 2008 01:54 PM
>Aan: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Onderwerp: Re: [Freedos-devel] Fwd: freedos defrag methods
>
>
>Hi!
>
>> I tried to defragment my 10Gb fat32 hdd. I choose quick tr
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Eric Auer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: maandag, maart 17, 2008 01:56 PM
Aan: 'Imre Leber'
Onderwerp: Re: freedos defrag methods
Hi!
> Well the old methods from MSDOS are still
> supported for historical reasons.
I think for smaller partitions (
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Ladislav Lacina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: zondag, maart 16, 2008 07:31 PM
>Aan: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Onderwerp: Re: [Freedos-devel] How to create alternative shell
>
>> Well, I wouldn't say that it would never be done. I actuall
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Ladislav Lacina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: zondag, maart 16, 2008 07:31 PM
>Aan: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Onderwerp: Re: [Freedos-devel] How to create alternative shell
>
>> Well, I wouldn't say that it would never be done. I actuall
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>What programming language you use is entirely up to you - though I doubt that
>Java or C# are available on any current or previous MS/PC/DR-DOS clone, and I
>doubt that anyone will provide them for it either.
Well, I wouldn't say that it would never be done
Strange,
Anybody else noticed that knoppix comes with FreeDOS 1.2?
Wonder where they got that from.
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Aitor Santamar?a [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: zondag, december 30, 2007 09:46 PM
>Aan: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Onderwerp: [Freedos-devel] Help: TLINK commandline getting too long
>
>Hello,
>
>I'm trying to link a project with TLINK, w
Hi,
I am hereby releasing a new version of diskcopy, beta 0.95. This includes the
changes by rugxulo in order to add status information (very sorry it took so
long (/me having been sick and all ;-)).
You can find the new version at:
http://users.telenet.be/imre/FreeDOS/DSKCP095.ZIP
Happy new
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: John Elliott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: dinsdag, oktober 2, 2007 08:30 PM
>Aan: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Onderwerp: Re: [Freedos-devel] lfn in freecom?
>
>>
>> Ok, thanks, that's good news. I'm used to such feature in UNIX, and
>> m
Hi,
I am hereby releasing a new version of more. Version 4.3.
The major change is that it now support long file names. This has been tested
under FreeDOS with the doslfn tsr.
You can find the new version at:
http://users.pandora.be/imre/FreeDOS/more43.zip
Imre
PS. this does not look at the s
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Tom Ehlert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: maandag, oktober 1, 2007 01:32 PM
>Aan: 'Imre Leber'
>CC: 'Jim Hall'
>Onderwerp: Re: [Freedos-devel] New version of more with lfn support
>
>> I extended more
Hi,
I extended more with lfn support. You can find the new version at:
http://users.pandora.be/imre/FreeDOS/mores-lfn.zip
I have mailed the maintainer, Tom, in private but he has not find it useful to
answer me regarding this issue.
Therefor I am putting this on the mailing list. In case there
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Blair Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: dinsdag, september 18, 2007 11:18 PM
>Aan: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Onderwerp: Re: [Freedos-devel] lfn in freecom?
>
>Use dir /lfn to get long filename directory listings. Also, dir.c
>shoul
>> I have been working with 0.84 pre 2 for well over a year now, and I have not
>> found a problem with external commands not being executed.
>
>I have encountered it once or twice but it is more or less as
>difficult to get as the context out of memory error (also in previous
>versions). Perhap
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Eric Auer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: maandag, september 17, 2007 09:03 PM
>Aan: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Onderwerp: Re: [Freedos-devel] lfn in freecom?
>
>
>Hi Imre,
>
>> Does anybody know what the status is of long file name support
Hi,
Does anybody know what the status is of long file name support in freecom.
There is absolutely a compile time option you can use, but does it work (well)?
Imre
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all
Hi,
I am hereby releasing a new version of defrag version 1.3.1.
This is a minor update whereby it is now possible to abort defragmentation
using the "quick try" and "complete quick try" methods using the F3 key.
You can find it here:
http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/free-defrag/DF
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: vrijdag, augustus 24, 2007 03:35 PM
>Aan: 'freedos-devel'
>Onderwerp: [Freedos-devel] Porting the FAT filesystem (18)
>
>Hi guys,
>
>here I'm back on track.
>
>I've been pretty busy in the past two m
Well this probably isn't very interesting but I also updated the savannah
project for defrag.
For those that still remember it, it is at:
http://www.nongnu.org/free-defrag/
and
http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/free-defrag
Imre
Hi,
I am hereby releasing a new version of defrag, 1.3.
7 years in the making defrag now features 8 defragmentation methods.
Two new methods are now implemented especially for better FAT32 functionality:
- Quick try:
goes through the directory tree once and moves every fragmented file to a
c
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Bernd Blaauw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: woensdag, augustus 15, 2007 11:14 PM
>Aan: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Onderwerp: Re: [Freedos-devel] Another bug in DOSFSCK
>
>Imre Leber schreef:
>> fs_open(path=&
Hi,
this time I do realy have a problem with dosfsck in qemu.
I have a harddisk image of an 800MB hard disk as drive d:
When I try to do
dosfsck d:
I get:
fs_open(path='d:', rw=0) =open d::No such file or directory (ENOENT)
With chkdsk I have no problem, including with any files that would
7;ll use this one as my home page.
Imre
>-jh
>
>
>On 8/15/07, Robert Riebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Imre Leber wrote:
>>
>> > Is the FreeDOS website always down or do I have spyware on my computer?
>>
>> It's down for me too. (from Germa
at out.
Altough totally useless, reactos in nowhere stable enough for me :-(
Imre
>
>
>----- Original Message
>From: Imre Leber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 2:25:22 AM
>Subject: [Freedos-devel] websi
Hi,
Is the FreeDOS website always down or do I have spyware on my computer?
Imre
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configur
Hi,
I was just testing some stuff and then I came upon a surprise.
It seems that when testing FAT's for equality, DOSFSCK checks the complete
sectors containing the FAT's.
In actuality it should only check the equality of the labels in the fat (is
number of clusters in the volume). This is not
I don't know. It seems a lot like ems40.sys.
We have left this phase behind years ago.
Imre
>-Original Message-
>From: Ladislav Lacina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2006 07:57 PM
>To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: [Freedos-devel] EMSmagic
>
>Today I
And if you are planning on including chkdsk. Please take the 0.9.1 version.
But then again dosfsck is probably a better choice.
Imre
>-Original Message-
>From: Eric Auer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 08:52 PM
>To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject
The many bug fixes refers mostly to the fact that I am not fully aware of
everything that was fixed. And how bug fixes relate to chkdsk.
But I took the latest code from defrag which has lots of bug fixes that were
not until now in chkdsk.
With the new code the program now seems to find the sam
I hereby release a new version of chkdsk, version 0.9.1
In this version the latest source is combined. So a lot of bugs should be fixed.
Most notably the file sizes that were way to big should be fixed.
You can find it at:
http://users.telenet.be/imre/FreeDOS/CKDSK091.ZIP
Imre
-
Hi,
I tested chkdsk again. Seems that there were some issues.
I upgraded to the latest version of the "fat transformation engine" fat
manipulation library and now all works ok.
I will make a new release soon, when i can use my arm again.
Imre
>-Original Message-
>From: Alain M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, October 2, 2006 07:05 PM
>To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] djgpp
>
>> Isn't there a stdio95.lib or something that's GPL and provides the LFN
>> stuff?
>
>What would really help
>-Original Message-
>From: Johnson Lam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, October 1, 2006 11:35 AM
>To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Cc: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] djgpp
>
>On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:48:35 +, you wrote:
>
>Hi Imre,
>
>>A
>-Original Message-
>From: Lyrical Nanoha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, October 1, 2006 02:28 PM
>To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] djgpp
>
>On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Johnson Lam wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:48:35 +, you wrote:
>>
>> Hi Im
ld just run on FreeDOS/32 anyway they are compiled.
Imre
>-T
>
>--- Original Message -
>From: "Lyrical Nanoha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To:
>Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 7:03 PM
>Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] djgpp
>
>
>> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006
> My reply to that is
>that FreeDOS itself is not used by anybody except hobbyists.
If you mean hobyists with a 8086 computer, then I'd have to say:
"Have you spent time on planet earth lately?"
Everybody, and I mean everybody, is talking about us right now (I have even
seen it come up in for
>-Original Message-
>From: tom ehlert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 03:03 PM
>To: 'Imre Leber'
>Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] djgpp
>
>>>> And Jim said
>>>> repeatetly that he wants us to move into
>-Original Message-
>From: tom ehlert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 02:25 PM
>To: 'Imre Leber'
>Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] djgpp
>
>Hello Imre,
>
>> After having an extensive private chat with Eric. I was wonde
After having an extensive private chat with Eric. I was wondering what the
overall interest of the project would be to move the FreeDOS utilities to a
DJGPP based platform.
This would give us full LFN support for free. And Jim said repeatetly that he
wants us to move into 32 and 64 bit program
Cool,
If you want it to be included in FreeDOS, you have to do the anounce-thing and
send an LSM to Jim.
Imre
>-Original Message-
>From: Japheth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:34 AM
>To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: [Freedos-devel] DEBUG
In two weeks from now I need to do an operation.
Because of this i am in a lot of pain.
Therefore I might have said some things to certain people that I should not
have said.
I think it is best for me to stay away from the list until I can again function
in a normal fashion.
Imre
-
>-Original Message-
>From: Arkady V.Belousov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 04:18 PM
>To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] int 25/26
>
>Hi!
>
>19-Сен-2006 13:08 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Imre Leb
I just thought about something.
These days when people run DOS there is a 90% change that they will be running
FreeDOS.
For this reason it might be interesting to no longer support MS-DOS and to no
longer use int25/int26 in FreeDOS utilities (like defrag).
Imre
-
Hi,
If the latest version of defrag gives an "out of memory" this is kind of
normal, since it is logging way too much data.
Imre
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done q
>-Original Message-
>From: Japheth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 01:47 PM
>To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] This week
>
>
>I did a quick test with some FAT32 drives.
>
>The "undefined problem" error has disappeared, but in
Hi,
This week's version of defrag features the following menu:
* I have enabled the OS checking, so it can only be run in plain FreeDOS and
not in windows, DOSemu, ...
* I have enabled the logging so that if things go wrong there will be a log
file in c:\defrag.log containing an error trace.
What doesn't stop to amaze me is that this project is so completely oposed to
anything 32bit. But when it comes down to it you all complain that things don't
work on GIGA disks which are so incredibely over spec of anything DOS was ever
designed to do.
Imre
>-Original Message-
>From:
>-Original Message-
>From: Eric Auer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 01:41 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: 32bit stuff
>
>
>hi, novell is by no means the only linux company,
Then I am a little reluctant/biased given the history of that company.
>and i do n
>-Original Message-
>From: Alain M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 07:45 PM
>To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] 32 bit
>
>
>
>Imre Leber escreveu:
>> Well I for one think that FreeDOS shoul
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
