Hi,
> Well, as everyone could have guessed, they talk aboout "fields".
>
>A summary of the RADIUS data format is shown below. The fields
>are transmitted from left to right.
>
>
> They then switch to calling them "attributes", for no good reason.
Nope. They call one part
"Also sprach Anson Rinesmith:"
> If you feel so strongly about changes needing to be made, then why not make
> an official comment to the RFC and try to make things better? An RFC is, by
> the way, a Request For Clarification.
I don't feel at all strongly about it. I feel about as strongly about
"Also sprach Michael Griego:"
> On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 21:16, Peter T. Breuer wrote:
> > No I haven't. I'm sure radius is fine. OTOH I'm quite sure the rfc is
> > probably a load of badly written rubbish, because they normally are.
> > So? Is there something new? Have you read a rfc lately? I certai
On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 21:16, Peter T. Breuer wrote:
> No I haven't. I'm sure radius is fine. OTOH I'm quite sure the rfc is
> probably a load of badly written rubbish, because they normally are.
> So? Is there something new? Have you read a rfc lately? I certainly
> haven't! ;)
Yes, I have. As su
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 9:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to add a field to the reply that contains data from the
request?
"Also sprach Michael Griego:"
> All I have to say is that your attitude normally determines the response
> you get. You came in here tel
"Also sprach Mitchell, Michael:"
> When you're given a gift for FREE do you give it back complaining that
> the shade of red is not quite what you wanted?
Nobody gave me a gift - I was kind enough to evaluate your product. I
didn't have to. It took time to do so. If I were paying you for it I
w
When you're given a gift for FREE do you give it back complaining that
the shade of red is not quite what you wanted?
Perhaps if you're not happy with freeRADIUS you should go PAY for
something you like better. Then you can make demands of the people that
provide the product to "fix" it. Afterall,
"Also sprach Michael Griego:"
> All I have to say is that your attitude normally determines the response
> you get. You came in here telling many people who have worked with
> RADIUS for a long time how the specs are wrong and how you are much
No I haven't. I'm sure radius is fine. OTOH I'm quite
Peter,
All I have to say is that your attitude normally determines the response
you get. You came in here telling many people who have worked with
RADIUS for a long time how the specs are wrong and how you are much
better than they. This is a fatally flawed approach when trying to
learn somethin
"Also sprach Anson Rinesmith:"
>
> >I particularly like this one (at end of 4.3):
>
> > Attributes
>
> > The Attribute field is variable in length, and contains a list
> > of zero or more Attributes.
>
> >!!! Yeah. Are they trying to make a pastiche comedy sketch takeoff of
>
"Also sprach Anson Rinesmith:"
> >Well, as everyone could have guessed, they talk aboout "fields".
>
> > A summary of the RADIUS data format is shown below. The fields
> > are transmitted from left to right.
>
>
> >They then switch to calling them "attributes", for no good reason.
>
>I particularly like this one (at end of 4.3):
> Attributes
> The Attribute field is variable in length, and contains a list
> of zero or more Attributes.
>!!! Yeah. Are they trying to make a pastiche comedy sketch takeoff of
>themselves?
Section 4 is clearly describing PACKE
>Well, as everyone could have guessed, they talk aboout "fields".
> A summary of the RADIUS data format is shown below. The fields
> are transmitted from left to right.
>They then switch to calling them "attributes", for no good reason.
If you were REALLY comprehending the document
"Also sprach Alan DeKok:"
> > Then why is it showing a different reply below?
> >
> > Because it is NOT saying "I sent no response" here! It should.
>
> When you don't get mail, does the post office send you a letter
> saying "you didn't get mail today?"
If I ask them to tell me when I get a r
"Also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED]:"
> Right. Notice however, that there are many different and sometimes
> contracdicting
> conventions. Would you agree that it is perfectly reasonable for a RADIUS
> implementation (and its documentation) to use the conventions that are
> detailed in
> the RADIUS RF
Hi,
> > character, and has no special meaning of "field name".
>
> Oh yes it does. I'm afraid the rest of the universe disagrees with you!
> We use conventions for a reasonm, no?
Right. Notice however, that there are many different and sometimes
contracdicting
conventions. Would you agre
Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not assuming anything, I am _telling_ you that about the only place
> anyone uses - signs in identifiers is in cobol and jcl record field
> names, and other languages which share portions of the same evolutionary
> history.
RADIUS isn't a langua
"Also sprach Alan DeKok:"
> "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Because the other is in capital letters, called PPP, and does not begin
> > with an "x" or contain a "-", all things which would indicate
> > variables. It looks like a constant. PPP. If it is a variable, then it
> > does
"Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because the other is in capital letters, called PPP, and does not begin
> with an "x" or contain a "-", all things which would indicate
> variables. It looks like a constant. PPP. If it is a variable, then it
> does not look like one. It's the name of
"Also sprach David Luyens:"
> Could you share your config with us?
Here is radiusd.conf. I have stripped every line that begins with " *#",
and every empty line.
---
prefix = /usr/home/ptb
exec_prefix = ${prefix}
sysconfdir = ${prefix}/etc
local
"Also sprach David Luyens:"
> Could you share your config with us?
I'm sure I could - but please note that I would be very grateful if you
did NOT quote a 200 line mail of mine (or someone elses) without
commenting on a word of it! What was the point of attaching the stuff
below (apart from brown
Could you share your config with us?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Peter T. Breuer
Verzonden: zaterdag 4 december 2004 4:38
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: How to add a field to the reply that contains data from the
request?
"
"Also sprach Alan DeKok:"
> "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't presently know where all this stuff should go, since I have
> > only been using the server for 30 mins, and am pleased to be able to
> > get it to work and respond! (I tried gnu-radius and gave up in horror).
>
>
"Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't presently know where all this stuff should go, since I have
> only been using the server for 30 mins, and am pleased to be able to
> get it to work and respond! (I tried gnu-radius and gave up in horror).
Any particular reason why?
> >I
"Also sprach Jason Lixfeld:"
> joeuser Login-LAT-Node == FOO
> ARAP-Security-Data = FOO
Well, I think you are right in principle, but it doesn't seem to quite work
for me.
I have
ptb Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == "XX", Login-LAT-Node ==
User-Se
"Also sprach Jason Lixfeld:"
> Pardon my possible stupidity, but in looking at how to solve my own
> problems, I came across this from man 5 users:
Hi.
I don't presently know where all this stuff should go, since I have
only been using the server for 30 mins, and am pleased to be able to
get it
Pardon my possible stupidity, but in looking at how to solve my own
problems, I came across this from man 5 users:
DEFAULT Service-Type == Framed-User, Framed-Protocol == PPP
Service-Type = Framed-User,
Framed-Protocol = PPP,
Fall-Through = Yes
freeradius 1.0.1 on FreeBSD 4.10
I believe I want to add a
ARAP-Security-Data = FOO
field to the reply, where I receive
Login-LAT-Node = FOO
How can I do this?
I believe I want to use the exec echo module, but I see no clear example
of how. I have set
program = "/bin/echo A
28 matches
Mail list logo
