Well, I'm hoping that better education is associated with lower poverty and
crime. But I suppose that my friends and I will be deceased or oblivious
by the time today's preschoolers are old enough to be criminals.
Frank
Frank Wimberly
Phone (505) 670-9918
On Apr 27, 2017 4:21 PM, "Marcus
Frank writes:
"I don't care about the tax or how much sugar I consume but everyone will
benefit from wider access to pre-K.
Speaking of elitist, most of my friends are my age peers and have no young
children in their lives currently."
Everyone except your friends.
Marcus
lf Of Marcus Daniels
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 3:55 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Santa Fe's Sugar Tax
Joe writes:
"It is Elitist to be in favor of something that promotes general health?"
It is elitist to burden your neighbors'
Perhaps it is elitist to even be questioning any of this?
If you have the time/energy/resources to worry about the impact of
sugary drinks on the general population, that might be elitist, no
matter how you land/vote on the topic?
Here is an interesting article on the question of elitism
Joe writes:
"It is Elitist to be in favor of something that promotes general health?"
It is elitist to burden your neighbors' pocketbook by pushing for law to
promote general health AND is it is elitist to not care about your neighbors'
health! Damned elitists!
Marcus
No. It's a common refrain amongst those who oppose taxes like this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sin_tax#Opposition
On 04/26/2017 02:14 PM, Owen Densmore wrote:
> Am I the only one who smells Elitist? After all, it won't impact US!
--
☣ glen
Am I the only one who smells Elitist? After all, it won't impact US!
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Got it. You have to buy the chemical, not the sweetener.
I think there's plenty for all of us to groom, plenty.
T.
Tom Johnson
Institute for Analytic Journalism -- Santa Fe, NM USA
505.577.6482(c)
Steve:
Have you looked into Stevia?
http://www.webmd.com/diet/stevia-sugar-substitutes#1-2
TJ
Tom Johnson
Institute for Analytic Journalism -- Santa Fe, NM USA
505.577.6482(c)505.473.9646(h)
Society of
Group <friam@redfish.com>
Cc: Sherry Kelsey <kel...@edc.pitt.edu>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Santa Fe's Sugar Tax
I'm wondering this morning, if the nation seems to have accepted the fact that
the federal government can regulate vehicle mileage, require seat belt
installation, testing of drug
I think Sugar is the new Tobacco on many fronts... it WILL fall
(somewhat), albeit slowly. And we will be able to get it without the
tax on the Reservation from a drive-through window?
Meanwhile I need to start a fresh batch of Kombucha and if the *only*
reliable source of sugar is (as
I'm wondering this morning, if the nation seems to have accepted the fact
that the federal government can regulate vehicle mileage, require seat
belt installation, testing of drugs for public consumption, etc., how come
it can't regulate sugar (and sodium?) in food and drink? Could it be the
Much as I agree with Tom's analysis and wish for a better process for
public policy decision making (hey that was my career at Carnegie Mellon!),
the issue here for our own voting is whether we better off if this
initiative passes. I vote yes. Indeed I have already voted yes.
Also I cannot
We have a lot of data on whether sin taxes do or don't work. And that data is
colored/interpreted by everyone who sees it, like all data.
And that brings me to my problem with Tom's argument. We can focus on this
part:
"Voting on the measure is also a vote for or against good social
Me, too, Joe.
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Joe Spinden wrote:
> I do not disagree with the analysis, but I think the tax would result in a
> lower consumption. I think this is good from a general health POV, despite
> the fact that the bill is not well-researched nor
Joe that assumes:
-Martinez finishes her term.
-The next govenor and their cheifs even bother to revist it.
-The bill even passes.
Like I said yesterday part of my concern is it's so vague it can be
purposly smartalcly interperted--because! As I (tried to) point out with
silly examples of fruits
I do not disagree with the analysis, but I think the tax would result in
a lower consumption. I think this is good from a general health POV,
despite the fact that the bill is not well-researched nor well-written.
This is probably the only shot SF has to get something like this
through. So,
On 4/26/17 10:00 AM, Owen Densmore wrote:
Could we get back to Tom's OP? I for one am a "no" vote for exactly
Tom's reasons.
I can't help you with the vote. While I'm a county resident, I am not a
city resident for just such reasons. If I did have a dog in this
particular fight, I would
Could we get back to Tom's OP? I for one am a "no" vote for exactly Tom's
reasons.
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe
Merle -
I appreciate your open-ness about this... I would not have expected you
to have voted for his Orangeness, but I was not surprised that you had
trouble with HIllary. Absence of Evidence vs Evidence of Absence?
I'm surprised you refer to Trump's behaviour as "transparent"... he
< This is, I think, different from the "best of all possible world"... It's
more like a rejection of a stable landscape. >
I'm sure they'd like that hypothesis once it was explained to them by a leader
with a 4th grade vocabulary. (And someone explained it to him.)
For people that can't pay
When it came time to cast my vote for President, I was very worried about
the absence of transparency coming out of the Clinton campaign. Hillary
had obviously been guilty of many breaches of protocol during her time in
the government. I didn't have the data I needed to refute the obvious
I think one of the useful arguments in this vein is the one often lobbed
against the concept of a free market. There is no such thing; and there
will/can never be such a thing. So, your question seems to assume there is a
"true" economy by comparison to the "false" economies (or an upside
Steve wrote: "...And as much as I like my year round bounty of fresh
fruits and veggies imported from around the world (with gawd knows how
much inefficiency and product waste/spoilage)"
George Duncan and I were in Sri Lanka in January. We stopped at a
highway produce stand in the interior
I fully agree adding junk to food is a foods is a issue.
I am just concerned their might be (hopefuly) better ways to bring
desperatly needed funds to NM.
I just wonder if there's a better way to go about fixing that problem, and
try to encourage people to enjoy a healthyER life style.
I am
Steve wrote: "...And as much as I like my year round bounty of fresh fruits
and veggies imported from around the world (with gawd knows how much
inefficiency and product waste/spoilage)"
George Duncan and I were in Sri Lanka in January. We stopped at a highway
produce stand in the interior part
Gil-
For what it is worth, I recommend that you buy local honey from a local
beekeeper, probably off the books, not subject to sugar (or any other
kind of) tax. It will be much healthier for you (the local pollens help
with allergies, etc.) and will support a local economy well beyond the
The issue is refined sugars added into products, Gil. I'm sure your grapes
and strawberries are safe.
T.
Tom Johnson
Institute for Analytic Journalism -- Santa Fe, NM USA
505.577.6482(c)505.473.9646(h)
As someone that's currently...Financially Challenged. All this crap adds
up, and as you note it's to easy to interpert how you want.
For example: I am (famously?) a tea lover. I love all kinds of tea,
medically helpful, just fun etc. Why do I mention that? How likely would
they decide my 2-3buck
For the FRIAMers in Santa Fe who might be interested in the sugar-tax
vote
There's an interesting issue coming up on a May 2nd city ballot here in
Santa Fe: Whether the city can tax drinks with sugar. I may have a short
letter running in The New Mexican this week, but here is the link to
30 matches
Mail list logo