I've got a Lombard here that is freezing up trying to run or install OS
X on.
It's a 333Mhz model with 2 64 MB DIMMS, (though I've tried a 128 MB
dimm in combination and by itself in this one).
My original though was to just put in a HDD with OS X on it already
(from a dead PB G4...I figured
Same problem here: my 400 MHz Lombard also resists conversion to OSX,
irrespective of what configuration of RAM I try (up to and including
384 MB). From the replies to my post on the list a few weeks ago, I got
the impression that there is a series (apparently more than one?) of
Lombards that
On Feb 19, 2005, at 2:48 PM, Dijkwel wrote:
Same problem here: my 400 MHz Lombard also resists conversion to OSX,
irrespective of what configuration of RAM I try (up to and including
384 MB). From the replies to my post on the list a few weeks ago, I
got the impression that there is a series
On Feb 19, 2005, at 3:48 PM, Dijkwel wrote:
Same problem here: my 400 MHz Lombard also resists conversion to
OSX.
I had to put in new ram (the old Apple ram would NOT let OSX install)
before my Lombard would allow install. Now it runs Jag beautifully!
--
Tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 19/02/05 15:56, Steve Fuller at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 19, 2005, at 2:48 PM, Dijkwel wrote:
Same problem here: my 400 MHz Lombard also resists conversion to OSX,
irrespective of what configuration of RAM I try (up to and including
384 MB). From the replies to my post on the list
On Jan 16, 2005, Dijkwel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rumors go that one should be able to install OS X on a Lombard (400
Mhz). However, in spite of numerous tries with different configurations
of RAM ( from 64 to 384), no success yet. During installation the book
invariable freezes and it does so
Rumors go that one should be able to install OS X on a Lombard (400
Mhz). However, in spite of numerous tries with different configurations
of RAM ( from 64 to 384), no success yet. During installation the book
invariable freezes and it does so irrespective of whether I try to
install 10.0
16, 2005, at 5:35 AM, Dijkwel wrote:
Rumors go that one should be able to install OS X on a Lombard (400
Mhz). However, in spite of numerous tries with different
configurations of RAM ( from 64 to 384), no success yet. During
installation the book invariable freezes and it does so irrespective
:35 AM, Dijkwel wrote:
Rumors go that one should be able to install OS X on a Lombard (400
Mhz). However, in spite of numerous tries with different
configurations of RAM ( from 64 to 384), no success yet. During
installation the book invariable freezes and it does so irrespective
of whether I
OS X on a Lombard (400
Mhz). However, in spite of numerous tries with different
configurations of RAM ( from 64 to 384), no success yet. During
installation the book invariable freezes and it does so irrespective
of whether I try to install 10.0, 10.2 or 10.3.
I've heard X is quite picky about
geschreven:
Rumors go that one should be able to install OS X on a Lombard (400
Mhz). However, in spite of numerous tries with different
configurations
of RAM ( from 64 to 384), no success yet. During installation the book
invariable freezes and it does so irrespective of whether I try to
install 10.0
Rumors go that one should be able to install OS X on a Lombard (400
Mhz). However, in spite of numerous tries with different configurations
of RAM ( from 64 to 384), no success yet. During installation the book
invariable freezes and it does so irrespective of whether I try to
install 10.0, 10.2
on 16/01/05 11:51, Dijkwel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably only the 64 MB of RAM that came with the Lombard originally
are Apple or Apple-like: at least they have allowed me to install
10.0.3. Anything I add (need to add) to get 10.2 or 10.3 installed,
leads to freezes.
Then, you would
If you get a single stick of PC100 sdram at 128mb and put it in the
lower slot 10.3 should load fine.
PC 66 and PC133 are no good it must be 100. I do not know why but that
was the only way i could get panther on my 400 Lombard when i had it.
After the install i just put the ram i had back in
Hi All,
For a few days now I have been trying in vain to install OS X (10.0.3
as well as 10.2) on my daughter's 400 MHz powerbook Lombard with 320 MB
of RAM and a 6 Gig hard drive, that had been running OS 9 without a
glitch essentially for as long as she had it (2 years).
The first try,
hi, i remember reading that the lombard is picky about having more than
256mb ram to install os x. i can't remember if it prefers the 256 in
the lower or upper slot. after the installation of os x, reinstalling
the ram should work fine. hope this helps.
rama.
On Dec 23, 2004, at 2:04 AM,
Ensure your RAM is working correctly -- try removing each of the DIMMs
in turn, and installing. OS X is much more picky about its RAM than OS
9.
Apart from that, try resetting PRAM (Cmd-Opt-P-R at startup, hold until
you hear 3 startup chimes), resetting the PMU (instructions will be in
the
Remove any memory from the upper slot, that should help.
Andrew
On 12/23/04 2:04 AM, Dijkwel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
For a few days now I have been trying in vain to install OS X (10.0.3
as well as 10.2) on my daughter's 400 MHz powerbook Lombard with 320 MB
of RAM and a 6 Gig
Hi:
There has been a lot of info. lately about bad Kingston memory. Check
out MacInTouch.com forums. You may simply have bad RAM (and then again,
you may not!).
... e
On Jan 22, 2004, at 12:49 PM, Dave Bonhoff wrote:
I'm running 256 in both slots right now, but I can't recommend it for
This is my set up, got it from OCW. It s fine. And not expensive from them.
16/1/04 9:58 PM -0800 Adam Thayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Officially, the bottom slot can take a 128 low-profile DIMM and the upper
slot can take a 256. Unofficially, many people have put 256MB low-profile
DIMMs in the
I'm running 256 in both slots right now, but I can't recommend it for
Panther. The installer refused to complete with this configuration.
No amount of zapping pram, open firmware resets, processor card
manipulation, RAM swapping, drive reformatting, etc would work. I was
forced to remove
On Jan 22, 2004, at 12:49 pm, Dave Bonhoff wrote:
I have read in various places that 384MB is now the limit for Lombards
running Panther.
Dave
I have Panther running with 512MB on a Lombard and have not yet
experienced what you described.
Alan
--
G-Books is sponsored by
Tsuki, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I have often heard that for OS X, the more RAM you
have, the better it runs. I want to know how much RAM would be sufficient
to run Panther smoothly on this machine.
There have been some agreement in many circles I frequent that 384 MB is
a magic number for
Greetings:
My wife has a Lombard 333mhz with 384MB RAM and it runs 10.3.2 very
nicely. I have been told by the local Apple tech that 256 MB is the
largest that will fit in each slot.
George
I have a Lombard (333mhz) running OS 9, which I would like to upgrade to
Panther. I have 192megs of
I was thinking about getting a 256 and using it with my 128 for a total
of 384. Think that would be enough?
And I'm sure this problem has been discussed before, but I have
heard often that any more than 256 megs of RAM in a Lombard causes
problems with OS X.
Should this still be a concern,
gf sciacca said at ÒSubject: Re: RAM needed for OS X on LombardÓ.
[19/Jan/2004 01:46]
It runs fine (and by far more stable) under OS X, but not half as fast as
under OS 9.2.2, specially when using many apps at a time as I do. Special
concerns (in my case) are very slow Finder actions,
I was thinking about getting a 256 and using it with my 128 for a total of
384. Think that would be enough?
And I'm sure this problem has been discussed before, but I have heard often
that any more than 256 megs of RAM in a Lombard causes problems with OS X.
Should this still be a concern, or
On Jan 17, 2004, at 8:12 PM, Tsuki Hoshijima wrote:
I was thinking about getting a 256 and using it with my 128 for a
total of
384. Think that would be enough?
And I'm sure this problem has been discussed before, but I have heard
often
that any more than 256 megs of RAM in a Lombard causes
I have a Lombard (333mhz) running OS 9, which I would like to upgrade to
Panther. I have 192megs of physical memory installed, 128 on the top slot
and 64 on the bottom. I have often heard that for OS X, the more RAM you
have, the better it runs. I want to know how much RAM would be sufficient
Officially, the bottom slot can take a 128 low-profile DIMM and the
upper slot can take a 256. Unofficially, many people have put 256MB
low-profile DIMMs in the lower slot for a total of 512MB RAM. OWC seems
to be a good source for this because of the lifetime warranty and
guarantee that they
on 17/01/04 00:44, Tsuki Hoshijima at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a Lombard (333mhz) running OS 9, which I would like to upgrade to
Panther. I have 192megs of physical memory installed, 128 on the top slot
and 64 on the bottom. I have often heard that for OS X, the more RAM you
have,
hi all got jag installed on my lombard finally, i put the original 4 gb
drive back in and it installed with no problems.
now one more question it doesnt recognize the battery i have replaced the
pmu board, and still doesnt see the battery and suggestions?
thanks all
t.
--
G-Books is
versions of OS X on my Lombard without any
problems. But I spent money on my RAM upgrades (I think I'm all
Crucial or Kingston now).
i put a 256 stick og kingston ram in top and then bootom slot and still no
os X ..
t.
--
G-Books is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:23:53PM -0400, Jkr wrote:
:
: on 8/18/03 7:46 PM, Eugene Lee wrote:
:
: I have installed all versions of OS X on my Lombard without any
: problems. But I spent money on my RAM upgrades (I think I'm all
: Crucial or Kingston now).
:
: i put a 256 stick og kingston
OS X to install. I then put the RAM back
in and it worked though I wouldn't recomend putting OS X on a beige G3. It was a tad
sluggish.
-tom
--
From: Eugene Lee
Subject: Re: OS X on Lombard
Do you have anything other non-standard hardware? Maybe some strange
CPU
.
Do you have anything other non-standard hardware? Maybe some strange
CPU upgrade card? Or other external things like USB or SCSI devices,
or PCMCIA cards? Also, try removing one or the other 256 MB modules, or
even returning to your original Apple-supplied RAM (if you still have it).
hi all
once again ive tried to install jag on my lombard after in stalling a 10gb
travelstar it will install but when i get to restart it restarts then just
goes to a blue screen it shows that it is starting ip services and printing
services and so fourth but then just a blue screen ive tried
Hello t.
Not trying to be a smart-ass here, but could you try to use some punctuation
once in a while? Your message was one long sentence, making in hard to read.
In fact, the only time you used a period, was after your name!! :-)
As for the Lombard install, I doubt it would be the new hard
on 8/18/03 2:39 AM, Wiebe Wilbers at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello t.
Not trying to be a smart-ass here, but could you try to use some punctuation
once in a while? Your message was one long sentence, making in hard to read.
In fact, the only time you used a period, was after your name!!
t. is having problems. So am I.
The hell of it is the Lombard (I don't know
about yours) only came with 64 megs - in the
lower slot. So ripping everything else out to
install X is absurd. And even the stock RAM
isn't Apple. Who's to say that some other big
four RAM would be better or worse? I
On 18/08/03 18:11, Tom Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
t. is having problems. So am I.
The hell of it is the Lombard (I don't know
about yours) only came with 64 megs - in the
lower slot. So ripping everything else out to
install X is absurd. And even the stock RAM
isn't Apple. Who's to
on 8/18/03 6:42 PM, Laurent Daudelin at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 18/08/03 18:11, Tom Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
t. is having problems. So am I.
The hell of it is the Lombard (I don't know
about yours) only came with 64 megs - in the
lower slot. So ripping everything else out to
On 8/18/03 7:04, Jkr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 8/18/03 6:42 PM, Laurent Daudelin at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 18/08/03 18:11, Tom Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
t. is having problems. So am I.
The hell of it is the Lombard (I don't know
about yours) only came with 64 megs - in the
On Monday, August 18, 2003, at 06:12 pm, Joe Ellis wrote:
I don't know about the Lombard and where the cut-off is but depending
on
several things you can find on the Apple site, there is an 8 GB
partition
limitation on installing OS X. The Documentation and limits are pretty
clearly outlined
The Lombard uses a shorter lower memory chip. You can't use stock chips.
On Monday, August 18, 2003, at 06:42 PM, Laurent Daudelin wrote:
On 18/08/03 18:11, Tom Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
t. is having problems. So am I.
The hell of it is the Lombard (I don't know
about yours) only came
Apple. Who's to say that some other big
: four RAM would be better or worse? I already
: swapped the top slot to Hynix. No better - no X.
: No wonder t. is steamed. Anyone get a better
: configuration?
I have installed all versions of OS X on my Lombard without any
problems. But I spent money on my
new twist maybe im running rammomiter now to check the ram, all is well its
at 5000 right now.so maybe its not the ram ?
or is it?
--
G-Books is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives |
-- Check our web site for
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 07:12:09PM -0400, Joe Ellis wrote:
:
: I don't know about the Lombard and where the cut-off is but depending on
: several things you can find on the Apple site, there is an 8 GB partition
: limitation on installing OS X. The Documentation and limits are pretty
: clearly
hi all hope you can help me ive been trying to install os x on my lombard
after i just installed a 10 GB drive to no avail it installed no problems on
the original 4 GB
now it will install but when it restarts i just get a blue screen thats it
help plz
t.
--
G-Books is sponsored by http
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 10:49:00AM -0400, Jkr wrote:
:
: hi all hope you can help me ive been trying to install os x on my lombard
: after i just installed a 10 GB drive to no avail it installed no problems on
: the original 4 GB
:
: now it will install but when it restarts i just get a blue
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 08:09:34AM +0100, Tom Burke wrote:
:
: What meant by 'not supported' and 'supported'? I have a Lombard (333)
: on which I have run retail Jaguar and then the 10.2.4 upgrade. I can't
: say that video performance was noticeably a) worse before the 10.2.4
: upgrade or b)
On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 05:11 AM, Richard Smykla wrote:
All,
The Lombard's video card IS supported as of OS X.2.4. Still not very
exciting video, but you don't need the hack any more, and you can
change resolutions without problems. HTH.
Rick
Just hijacking the thread here
52 matches
Mail list logo
