Howdy,
I would not want it. But, it is a pretty nice machine in some ways.
You say it has no leak issue, but these machines seem to develop that
over time. If you want to use it for several more years, you should
monitor that cooler.
I know I am on the lookout for an inexpensive G5 tower
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 17:14 -0400, John Martz wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Tomtba...@nmia.com wrote:
... OWC has always been
a reliable company, so I just up and ordered up two of these 1-TB ones
from them: http://tinyurl.com/dec2kl. There is a cheaper version of
the same drive
On Sep 7, 2009, at 11:13 PM, Ernest L. Gunerius wrote:
At 7:43 PM -0400 9/7/2009, Len Gerstel wrote:
On Sep 7, 2009, at 7:09 PM, dorayme wrote:
How do you find out on Google, if you don't have inside
knowledge,
why some models were called smurfs?
This is a good example of what we
I got a GeForce 7800 GS for $50 (from the popular auction site) and
flashed it for my G5, it is one of the best AGP cards available.
Before that I had a Geforce 6200/256MB AGP card which was also very
good, they are pretty easy to find in the $50 range.
On Sep 7, 2:01 pm, Ron Romine
Thanks Ralph. That article is heavy going for a non-techie like me,
but what I seem to get out of it is that these enterprise drives
such as the two I bought are built to a higher standard than regular
drives, able to run reliably non-stop 24/7 even while enduring higher
operating temperatures.
On Sep 7, 2009, at 9:26 AM, Stephen Conrad wrote:
From my email
I am using Mac OS X 10.4.11 and Fiefox 3.5.2
In Safari it let me set my Display Style (I chose the pic of the
Crab Nebula)
Sorry, missed that. If you're using a supported browser, then bug them
about it, they're the ones
On Sep 7, 2009, at 12:45 PM, Mac User #330250 wrote:
It may have an intuitive way - like Mac OS X has - but
what it does in the background (in the directories where all the
music files
are) is not very transparent.
This is one commonly made argument that baffles me.
What it does in the
On Sep 7, 2009, at 12:45 PM, Mac User #330250 wrote:
A web shop (with out proprietary Flash) would be a wiser way to reach
the masses.
No it wouldn't. There aren't many 'masses' that the ITMS is missing ,
and it's the largest music retailer on the web and one of the largest
in the
On Sep 7, 2009, at 7:14 PM, Stephen Conrad wrote:
Now, it will take a 5V DC power cord and then I can switch it from
bus-powered to self-powered. However, the folks at Rat Shack (Radio
Shack) said it can run off the USB bus and I can use it with 4 thumb
drives.
Well, this is what you get
On Sep 7, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Mark wrote:
Can I sort my iTunes library by times burnt ?
Everything you can sort by is in the View Options menu, and no 'times
burned' is not one of them. That wouldn't be in song metadata anyway,
since it's playlists that get burned not the songs.
You can
--- On Mon, 9/7/09, Dana Collins dlcatft...@verizon.net wrote:
The second would be to add an audio interface card, a
little harder with
PCI-X, but can be found (regular PCI there are many
options, like an M-Audio
2496 PCI audio card)-anticipate a bit more $$ for PCI-X
since everyone has
Stephen Conrad wrote:
So, I plugged in (via USB) my USB Hub and I plugged in 2 USB Thumb
Drives (a 2 GB and a 247 MB one (according to the Get Info command)
but when I tried to plug in a 3rd (512 MB drive) it gave me a Low
Power Warning.
Now, it will take a 5V DC power cord and then I can
Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Sep 7, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Mark wrote:
Can I sort my iTunes library by times burnt ?
Everything you can sort by is in the View Options menu, and no 'times
burned' is not one of them. That wouldn't be in song metadata anyway,
since it's playlists that get
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: iTunes shuffle question
Date:Dienstag, 8. September 2009N
From:Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
On Sep 7, 2009, at 12:45 PM, Mac User #330250 wrote:
A web shop (with out proprietary
In essence, I am wondering how you can use multiple older ppc computers to make
things happen faster?
I have occasion to run unix based programs via X11 at work. I am not a
knowledgeable unix person but actually OSX is educating me in that direction.
It's possible for me to use ssh to connect
Title: Interesting short-term file sharing service -
s4ve.as
hum. Seems interesting. Works well for 24-hr file
shares.
http://s4ve.as/
It purports to be owned by some of the Napster boiz.
A 5 MB example, good for 24 hrs:
http://bit.ly/15wAY1
- Dan.
--
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: iTunes shuffle question
Date:Dienstag, 8. September 2009N
From:Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
On Sep 7, 2009, at 12:45 PM, Mac User #330250 wrote:
It may have an intuitive way - like
Good call! There's that x-grid thing built into (and addable
seperately) later versions of OS X, but the main machine needs to be
running the server version of the os, and it only works with certain
apps (like final cut) from what I understand.
Would be nice though to hook my old iMacs up
-- Original message --
Subject: Distributed processing.
Date:Dienstag, 8. September 2009N
From:John Niven sense...@yahoo.com
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
In essence, I am wondering how you can use multiple older ppc computers to
make things happen faster?
I
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Distributed processing.
Date:Dienstag, 8. September 2009N
From:Mike mike.dogho...@googlemail.com
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
...
Would be nice though to hook my old iMacs up through FireWire for a
On Sep 7, 2009, at 11:13 PM, Ernest L. Gunerius wrote:
At 7:43 PM -0400 9/7/2009, Len Gerstel wrote:
On Sep 7, 2009, at 7:09 PM, dorayme wrote:
How do you find out on Google, if you don't have inside knowledge,
why some models were called smurfs?
This is a good example of what we need
Just besides, that would cost more power consumption than to run all
that on a
newer machine that has the appropriate power anyway.
In other words: it wouldn't be economic to use old computers to run
processor
intensive applications on them, and display all of it on even
another
On Sep 8, 2009, at 11:14 AM, John Niven wrote:
In essence, I am wondering how you can use multiple older ppc
computers to make things happen faster?
I have occasion to run unix based programs via X11 at work. I am not
a knowledgeable unix person but actually OSX is educating me in
The smurfs (pitufos in Spanish) were very popular in the early 1980s Spain.
When the PowerMac G3 BW appeared, it was quickly nicknamed pitufo as both
were blue and white.
The original iMac G3 was popularly known as cabezon (Big headed), while the
fancy iMac G4 was known as Lamparita (desk
On Sep 8, 2009, at 1:31 PM, Mac User #330250 wrote:
I don't want my directories to be messed with. Some ancient mp3
files have
horribly wrong metadata, and I don't want them to be all over the
place.
You can change the metadata formats within iTunes. You highlight the
track, tracks,
My sister has a dual 1ghz Quicksilver and would like to upgrade the
processor. I have a Sonnet 1.4ghz card that will fit but am wondering
if it would really be any faster (if not slower) than the current dual
processor she has. Any thoughts?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: iTunes shuffle question
Date:Dienstag, 8. September 2009N
From:Kris Tilford ktilfo...@cox.net
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
On Sep 8, 2009, at 1:31 PM, Mac User #330250 wrote:
I don't want my directories to be messed with.
On Sep 8, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Falstaff46 wrote:
My sister has a dual 1ghz Quicksilver and would like to upgrade the
processor. I have a Sonnet 1.4ghz card that will fit but am wondering
if it would really be any faster (if not slower) than the current dual
processor she has. Any thoughts?
On Sep 8, 2009, at 5:05 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Sep 8, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Falstaff46 wrote:
My sister has a dual 1ghz Quicksilver and would like to upgrade the
processor. I have a Sonnet 1.4ghz card that will fit but am wondering
if it would really be any faster (if not slower) than
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Which is a faster option?
Date:Dienstag, 8. September 2009N
From:Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
On Sep 8, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Falstaff46 wrote:
My sister has a dual 1ghz Quicksilver and
On Sep 8, 2009, at 4:41 PM, Falstaff46 wrote:
My sister has a dual 1ghz Quicksilver and would like to upgrade the
processor. I have a Sonnet 1.4ghz card that will fit but am wondering
if it would really be any faster (if not slower) than the current dual
processor she has. Any thoughts?
Date: Tues, Sep 8 2009 4:52 am
From: Len Gerstel
...
Only one of those links even comes close to the explanation of Smurf,
and that is the lowendmac that includes a picture of smurfs with no
label saying that this is a smurf on the page. Others just say
something to the effect of
On one page that came up on a reasonable search request,
there were some smurfs with red in them! I think red hats or boots, I
forget!
That was an one off smurf,chief of the group! There were also black smurfs,
born from standard stock smurfs.
FWIW,
Gorka
Enviado desde mi BlackBerry® de
--- On Tue, 9/8/09, Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu wrote:
You could run multiple Apple Remote Desktop sessions to
each of the
other computers, but frankly, that won't work all that well
either.
Actually I already have that and it works quit well for controlling your other
NOTE: They say the Old Interface is Unsupported
Hi,
You are using the New Interface and the old Style sheets are only
available for the old interface at the moment.
You can switch to the old interface by choosing old web interface
from the Web interface drop down menu in the Options-Account
35 matches
Mail list logo
