urceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse as shipped
> withganglia
>
> On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 10:16 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > I can see about packaging the latest libconfuse for Fedora. However,
> > without a special exception, it won
developers] apr, expat, confuse as shipped with
ganglia
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 10:16 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> I can see about packaging the latest libconfuse for Fedora. However,
> without a special exception, it won't be built for FC4, as FC4 has
> entered 'mainten
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 10:16 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> I can see about packaging the latest libconfuse for Fedora. However,
> without a special exception, it won't be built for FC4, as FC4 has
> entered 'maintenance mode' (meaning generally nothing new gets built,
> only fixes for existing packag
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 08:34 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> --- Jarod Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Seems we are safe for "expat", need to check "apr" and are kind of
> > > lost for "libconfuse".
> >
> > I can see about packaging the latest libconfuse for Fedora. However,
> > without a
--- Jarod Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 06:13 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > Hi Bernard,
> >
> > as I said, if nobody is hurt :-)
> >
> > Being curious I did a quick check on my favourite distribution
> (FC4,
> > yum-uptodate):
> >
> > - apr/apr-devel is
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 06:13 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> Hi Bernard,
>
> as I said, if nobody is hurt :-)
>
> Being curious I did a quick check on my favourite distribution (FC4,
> yum-uptodate):
>
> - apr/apr-devel is 0.9.6-3.5, which is older that what we ship (0.9.7)
> - expat/expa
On 2006-08-16 06:13:16 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> as I said, if nobody is hurt :-)
>
> Being curious I did a quick check on my favourite distribution (FC4,
> yum-uptodate):
>
> - apr/apr-devel is 0.9.6-3.5, which is older that what we ship (0.9.7)
> - expat/expat-devel is 1.95.8-6, w
gt; -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of
> Jarod Wilson
> Sent: Mon 14/08/2006 10:42
> To: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse as shipped with
> ganglia
>
> On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 15:41
lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse as shipped with
> ganglia
>
> On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 15:41 -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> > Hi all:
> >
> > In discussion with Marcus Rueckert (SUSE Linux packager), he
> suggested
> &g
14/08/2006 10:42
To: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse as shipped with ganglia
On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 15:41 -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> In discussion with Marcus Rueckert (SUSE Linux packager), he suggested
>
On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 15:41 -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> In discussion with Marcus Rueckert (SUSE Linux packager), he suggested
> a solution which the subversion folks are doing in their latest 1.4.0
> RC - to ship dependencies in a separate tarball. This way, for Linux
> packagers, we
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 03:41:01PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> In discussion with Marcus Rueckert (SUSE Linux packager), he suggested
> a solution which the subversion folks are doing in their latest 1.4.0
> RC - to ship dependencies in a separate tarball. This way, for Linux
> packa
gt;
>
> From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Fri 21/07/2006 02:21
> To: Bernard Li; Stu Teasdale; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse as shipped with ganglia
>
>
&
_
>
> From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Fri 21/07/2006 02:21
> To: Bernard Li; Stu Teasdale; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse as shipped with ganglia
>
>
>
> Hi Bernard,
>
nt: Fri 21/07/2006 02:21
To: Bernard Li; Stu Teasdale; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse as shipped with ganglia
Hi Bernard,
sorry for note commenting earlier. If we were only talking about
Linux, I would say we should just throw aw
issues so perhaps we can make the official change in the
> code repository?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bernard
>
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Stu
> Teasdale
> Sent: Thu 23/02/2006 08:53
> To: ganglia-developers@lists.source
itory?
Thanks,
Bernard
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Stu Teasdale
Sent: Thu 23/02/2006 08:53
To: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse as shipped with ganglia
On 23 Feb 2006, at 01:07, Martin Knob
Alex Balk wrote:
Ole,
That's an interesting setup you have there. Sounds quite similar to what
I've put together, except for the DB backend. I avoided that as I didn't
want System personnel to have to deal with a DB. I especially like your
idea on generating gmond.conf files... I assume you ac
Ole,
That's an interesting setup you have there. Sounds quite similar to what
I've put together, except for the DB backend. I avoided that as I didn't
want System personnel to have to deal with a DB. I especially like your
idea on generating gmond.conf files... I assume you account for "DB
offlin
Ole,
Thanks for this level of information. I think I also share concerns
about load scripts on the hosts and have a slightly more complex
structure but close enough so it is good to hear that other people are
having good success in this type of deployment.
If you are ever allowed, I would welcom
Chris, all,
I'm in the same legal position as Alex (In addition I'm not allowed to use my
work email address and rely on my ISP email service is only up intermittently -
but webmail is blocked while I'm at work).
However I'd like to share my experience.
Our hierarchy (by geography) is as foll
--- Alex Balk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Martin Knoblauch wrote:
>
>
> [snip]
>
>
> >
> >> We wouldn't have to have a release out the door without properly
> >> testing it under most OS/archs.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > We did last time :-) And it works pretty well. Doing a 3.0.3 with
Martin Knoblauch wrote:
[snip]
>
>> We wouldn't have to have a release out the door without properly
>> testing it under most OS/archs.
>>
>>
>
> We did last time :-) And it works pretty well. Doing a 3.0.3 with
> apr-0.9.7 does not sound a big risk to me.
>
>
Not to nitpick, but
Alex,
Thanks for the great information. I'll check out the Jan email thread
and then follow up with more questions.
BTW, the script statement did come across rather badly, sorry about that
(and after all that PC training I was required to take!)
Thanks
Chris
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 10:36, Alex B
Chris Croswhite wrote:
> Alex,
>
> Yeah, I already have a ton of questions and need some pointers in large
> scale deploys (best practices, do's, dont's, etc,).
>
>
Till I get the legal issues out of the way, I can't share the scripts...
What I can do, however, is share the ideas I've impleme
On Feb 22, 2006, at 5:46 PM, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
I believe apr was modified to include multicast functionality, I'm
not sure about
the rest.
Hi Brooks,
good point. Now I remember the same. Time for a session with "diff"
:-)
Martin
Matt,
"diff" does not make me happy. It seems our v
Alex,
Yeah, I already have a ton of questions and need some pointers in large
scale deploys (best practices, do's, dont's, etc,).
I would love to get my hands on your shell scripts to figure out what
you are doing (the unicast idea is pretty good).
Chris
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 09:35, Alex Balk
--- Alex Balk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Martin Knoblauch wrote:
>
> >>> I believe apr was modified to include multicast functionality,
> I'm
> >>> not sure about
> >>> the rest.
> >>>
> >> Hi Brooks,
> >>
> >> good point. Now I remem
Chris,
Cool! Thanks!
If you need any pointers on large-scale deployments, beyond the
excellent thread that was discussed here last month, drop us a line. I'm
managing Ganglia on a cluster of about the same size as yours, spanning
multiple sites.
I've developed a framework for automating the de
--- Stu Teasdale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 08:04:23AM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > do you remember where you implemented the multicast stuff? It
> seems
> > that apr-1.2.2 now has MC support built in. Maybe we can drop it
> from
> > our source.
> >
> > Question
Hi Chris,
great :-)
- HP-UX is highly needed (HPPA and IA64)
- I can do Solaris 8 with gcc, but 7/9/10 would be great. Especially
with the Sun compiler
- Solaris 10 on AMD-64 is needed
- I can do AIX 5.3 with xlc and with you we have two other victims
- Linux is not a big deal
Thanks
> This raises another issue, which I believe is significant to the
> development process of Ganglia. At the moment we don't seem to have
> (correct me if I'm wrong) official testers for various platforms.
> Maybe we could have some people volunteer to be official beta testers?
> We wouldn't have to
On 23 Feb 2006, at 01:07, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
Hi Matt,
you may have seen the recent report about problems in apr code which
are solved in later versions. This opens the question how to handle
this for Ganglia.
Are the versions of apr, expat and confuse shipped with the current
code just
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 08:04:23AM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> do you remember where you implemented the multicast stuff? It seems
> that apr-1.2.2 now has MC support built in. Maybe we can drop it from
> our source.
>
> Questions to others: what version of apr is nowadays shipped with
> di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Knoblauch wrote:
>>> I believe apr was modified to include multicast functionality, I'm
>>> not sure about
>>> the rest.
>>>
>> Hi Brooks,
>>
>> good point. Now I remember the same. Time for a session with "diff"
>> :-)
>>
>> Martin
>>
> Mat
--- Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 05:07:08PM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > you may have seen the recent report about problems in apr code
> which
> > are solved in later versions. This opens the question how to handle
> > this for Gangli
--- Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 05:07:08PM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > you may have seen the recent report about problems in apr code
> which
> > are solved in later versions. This opens the question how to handle
> > this for Gangli
> >
> > I believe apr was modified to include multicast functionality, I'm
> > not sure about
> > the rest.
> >
> Hi Brooks,
>
> good point. Now I remember the same. Time for a session with "diff"
> :-)
>
> Martin
>
Matt,
"diff" does not make me happy. It seems our version of apr-0.9.5 was
--- Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 05:07:08PM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > you may have seen the recent report about problems in apr code
> which
> > are solved in later versions. This opens the question how to handle
> > this for Gangli
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 05:07:08PM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> you may have seen the recent report about problems in apr code which
> are solved in later versions. This opens the question how to handle
> this for Ganglia.
>
> Are the versions of apr, expat and confuse shipped
Hi Matt,
you may have seen the recent report about problems in apr code which
are solved in later versions. This opens the question how to handle
this for Ganglia.
Are the versions of apr, expat and confuse shipped with the current
code just unmodified copies of the stuff, or are there ganglia
41 matches
Mail list logo
