Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-in-band-wildcard-encoding-02

Thanks for the review, Elwyn. Ice, is a new version upcoming? (The telechat is in a moment… just wanted to check that we’ve not forgotten anything, it is of course fine to collect various changes to a draft revision that you’ll post after the call as well.) Jari On 14 Nov 2014, at 20:07, Elwyn

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-manet-ibs-03

FWIW, I have followed this discussion. I have to say that IBS would not necessarily be my first choice of crypto solutions, particularly in a standards track spec. But it is interesting. I do not mind the definition of a new ICV with IBS. But it does have the issues Stephen and and Martin point

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-mldp-nlri-06

thanks for your review! On 27 Oct 2014, at 08:05, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other L

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-manet-ibs-03

Thanks Jari The choice is very much based on the intended characteristics of ad hoc networks. In particular the property that you can add new participants to a network without letting anyone already in the network know you are doing this until they turn up in your neighbourhood discovery, and t

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-mldp-nlri-07

Is there a response to this? It seems important that the ranges are correct. Jari On 24 Nov 2014, at 09:21, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at < > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenAr

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-mpls-deprecate-bgp-entropy-label-01

thanks for your review! authors: was there a response to Ben’s observations? i have balloted no-obj. jari On 03 Nov 2014, at 22:08, Ben Campbell wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis

Thanks for your review, Roni! Jari On 23 Oct 2014, at 15:46, Roni Even wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > . > > Please resolve these comments along with any

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-in-band-wildcard-encoding-02

Hi Jari, Elwyn, I missed Elwyn’s response during my travel the last couple of weeks, sorry about that. I think Elwyn and I are in sync on the error handling. I’ll make a small modification that Elwyn suggest below. There are a few minor updates I like to do, will try to do that by the end of t

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tram-alpn-07

Thanks for your review, Russ! Jari On 20 Nov 2014, at 00:54, Russ Housley wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > . > > Please resolve these comments along with any

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kucherawy-rfc3777bis-03.txt

Thanks for your review, Christer! On 18 Nov 2014, at 01:08, Christer Holmberg wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > > > Document: draft-

Re: [Gen-art] LC review of draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05.txt

Thanks for the review. (Were the comments adopted by the authors? This review is from August, but I cannot see a response…) Jari On 03 Aug 2014, at 21:37, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review: draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength-15

Thank you Robert for the review, and thank you authors for the updates in -15! I have balloted no-obj for this document in today’s IESG telechat. Jari On 21 Nov 2014, at 21:19, Robert Sparks wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-03.txt

Thank you very much Francis and Carlos. Jari On 29 Oct 2014, at 15:52, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) wrote: > Many thanks, Francis, for this review! All nits acknowledged and fixed. > > Thanks, > > Carlos. > >> On Oct 29, 2014, at 9:56 AM, Francis Dupont >> wrote: >> >> I am the assigned G

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mibs-to-ieee80231-01.txt

lve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-mibs-to-ieee80231-01.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 20141104 > IETF LC End Date: 20141106 > IESG Telechat date: 20141125 > > Summary: Ready >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-murdock-nato-nid-02.txt

Thanks, Dan and Barry. Is there a new rev or RFC Editor -notes? On 20 Nov 2014, at 15:13, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: > Hi Barry, > > This looks reasonable, thanks for the timely response and for addressing my > comments. I suggest that the editor also fixes the text in section 7. > > Rega

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART of draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-05

I agree with many of these comments (were they observed?) but I also agree with the part about “ship it” :-) Jari On 01 Nov 2014, at 06:10, Martin Thomson wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-mldp-nlri-07

Jari, Meral, Eric had changed of email address. I have forwarded him the review when it came out. He took note but said he would submit the updated draft few weeks after due to the pre-IETF submission cut-off. I guess it should come out soon. However, I am not sure about the change, but I'll l

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-murdock-nato-nid-02.txt

There will be a revised I-D. Barry On Tuesday, November 25, 2014, Jari Arkko wrote: > Thanks, Dan and Barry. > > Is there a new rev or RFC Editor -notes? > > On 20 Nov 2014, at 15:13, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) > wrote: > > > Hi Barry, > > > > This looks reasonable, thanks for the timely response an

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-mldp-nlri-07

I just posted the -09 version of the draft, which has the requested changes (including most of Meral's suggestions and also including the typos pointed out today by Martin). I changed the start of the mLDP range to 0x43; the choice of 0x41 is also defensible (as Martin has argued), but it is p

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-mldp-nlri-07

Hi, Thank you for the changes, latest version http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-mldp-nlri-08 looks good. Best regards, Meral -Original Message- From: Eric C Rosen [mailto:ero...@juniper.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 11:41 AM To: Martin Vigoureux; Jari Arkko; Mera

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-mldp-nlri-07

Eric, Meral - thanks. jari On 25 Nov 2014, at 22:25, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > Hi, > Thank you for the changes, latest version > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-mldp-nlri-08 looks good. > > Best regards, > Meral > > -Original Message- > From: Eric C Rosen [mailto:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART of draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-05

On 25 November 2014 at 07:59, Jari Arkko wrote: > I agree with many of these comments (were they observed?) but I also agree > with the part about “ship it” :-) I have not seen a response. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART of draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-05

On 25/11/14 22:26, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 25 November 2014 at 07:59, Jari Arkko wrote: >> I agree with many of these comments (were they observed?) but I also agree >> with the part about “ship it” :-) > > I have not seen a response. I asked Viktor to produce one. He's rolling the existin

Re: [Gen-art] LC review of draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05.txt

On 11/25/2014 09:50 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: Thanks for the review. (Were the comments adopted by the authors? This review is from August, but I cannot see a response…) So, just to update the RMCAT crew, this document was approved on today's telechat, pending comment disposition. On the commen