[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-10

Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-09

Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case-15

Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling-10

Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review result: Ready Document: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling-10 Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review Date: 2016-12-10 IETF LC End Date: 2016-12-07 IESG Telechat date: 2016-12-15 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC Note: My review

[Gen-art] IESG Evaluation review of draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-13

before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <​http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-13 Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review Date: 2016-11-01 IETF LC End Date: 2016-10-06 IESG Telechat date: 2016-11-03 S

[Gen-art] IESG Evaluation review of draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-11

information, please see the FAQ at <​http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-11 Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review Date: 2016-11-01 IETF LC End Date: 2016-10-06 IESG Telechat date: 2016-11-03 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Pr

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-stir-certificates-10

at <​http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-stir-certificates-10 Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review Date: 2016-11-01 IETF LC End Date: 2016-11-01 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC. Major issues

[Gen-art] Gen-ART IETF Last Call review for draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-12

at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-12 Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review Date: 2016-10-21 IETF LC End Date: 2016-10-06 IESG Telechat date: 2016-11-03 Summary: Ready for publication as a Proposed Standard I apologize for the late subm

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-pals-rfc4447bis-05.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information,

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-tram-turn-server-discovery-08

RI just completed a quick review of draft-ietf-tram-turn-server-discovery-08. The DNS Service Discovery section is much improved. I have a couple of comments on the revised text: I suggest adding a reference to the IANa "Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry",

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-tram-turn-server-discovery-08

gt; > Hi Ralph, > > Thanks for the review. Please see inline. > >> -----Original Message- >> From: Ralph Droms [mailto:rdroms.i...@gmail.com >> <mailto:rdroms.i...@gmail.com>] >> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 2:58 AM >> To: Review Area gen-ar

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-tram-turn-server-discovery-08

at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-tram-turn-server-discovery-08 Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review Date: 2016-08-09 IETF LC End Date: 2016-08-11 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: This draft is on the right track but has open issues, des

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-holmberg-dispatch-rfc7315-updates

> On Jul 12, 2016, at 7:41 AM 7/12/16, Christer Holmberg > wrote: > > Hi Ralph, > > Thanks for your comments! Please see inline. > > Minor issues: > > > I had some difficulty unraveling the relationship among the text in section > > 3.3.2, 3.3.3, 4 and RFC

[Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-holmberg-dispatch-rfc7315-updates

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General AreaReview Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processedby the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments justlike any other last call comments.For more information, please see the FAQ at.Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>>. Document: draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10 Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review Date: 2016-06-08 IETF LC End Date: ? IESG Telechat date: 2016-06-16 Summary: This draft is ready for

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11

> On May 18, 2016, at 9:29 PM 5/18/16, Jari Arkko wrote: > > Thanks for your review, Ralph! You're welcome. I'm glad to hear you found the review valuable. Responses in line... > > I do think some of the points you raised need to be addressed. Inline: > >> >> #

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11 Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review Date: 2016-04-28 IETF LC End Date: 2016-05-04 IESG Telechat date: 2016-05-19 Summary: This draft is on the right track but has open issues, described in the review. In gene

[Gen-art] Gem-Art review of draft-ietf-lager-specification-11

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>>. Document: draft-ietf-lager-specification-11 Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review Date: 2016-04-19 IETF LC End Date: 2016-04-11 IESG Telechat date: (if known) 2016-04-21 Summary: This dr

[Gen-art] Review of draft-sparks-genarea-mailarch-improvements-02

see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>>. Document: draft-sparks-genarea-mailarch-improvements-02 Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review Date: 2016-03-09 IETF LC End Date: 2016-02-18 IESG Telechat dat

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-08

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>>. Document: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-08 Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review Date: 2016-03-10 IETF LC End Date: 2016-03-10 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This draft is ready for

Re: [Gen-art] Gem-Art review for draft-ietf-httpauth-scram-auth-14

Confirming that rev -15 addresses my Gen-ART review comments... - Ralph > On Dec 16, 2015, at 11:19 AM 12/16/15, Ralph Droms (rdroms) > <rdr...@cisco.com> wrote: > > >> On Dec 16, 2015, at 10:47 AM 12/16/15, Alexey Melnikov >> <alexey.melni...@isode.com>

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-07

> On Dec 7, 2015, at 1:31 PM 12/7/15, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> > wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 01:55:46PM +0000, > Ralph Droms (rdroms) <rdr...@cisco.com> wrote > a message of 128 lines which said: > >> Would you consider adding a

Re: [Gen-art] Gem-Art review for draft-ietf-httpauth-scram-auth-14

mention below appear in rev -15? - Ralph > > On 09/12/2015 20:47, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote: >> Nits/editorial comments: >> >> Nicely written, very clear document. > Thank you. >> idnits reports some lines too long and an unused reference. > I fixed the re

[Gen-art] Gem-Art review for draft-ietf-httpauth-scram-auth-14

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-httpauth-scram-auth-14 Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review Date: 2015-13-9 IETF LC End Date: 2015-12-16 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Experimental RFC. Major issues: None. Minor

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-07

> On Nov 26, 2015, at 7:41 AM 11/26/15, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> > wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 04:22:21PM +0000, > Ralph Droms (rdroms) <rdr...@cisco.com> wrote > a message of 97 lines which said: > >> I am the assigned Gen-ART

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-07

> On Nov 23, 2015, at 9:01 AM 11/23/15, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ralph > > Thanks for the detailed review. Commeinline > > On 11/20/15 11:22 AM, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote: >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for >&g

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-07

cument: draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-07 Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review Date: 2015-11-20 IETF LC End Date: 2015-11-23 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: This draft is on the right track but has open issues, described in the review. Major issues: The document is well-written and easy to unde

[Gen-art] Gem-Art Last Call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-07

cument: draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-07 Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review Date: 2015-11-20 IETF LC End Date: 2015-11-23 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: This draft is on the right track but has open issues, described in the review. Major issues: The document is well-written and easy to unde

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd

Himanshu <hs...@ciena.com> wrote: > > Thanks Andy. > He did re-send the email without MIME and I was able to read and reply. > > Thanks, > Himanshu > > From: Andrew G. Malis [mailto:agma...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 2:08 PM > To: Shah, Himanshu

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd

> > Now with the draft.. > > Thanks, > Himanshu > > > -Original Message- > From: Shah, Himanshu > Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2015 5:52 PM > To: 'Ralph Droms (rdroms)' > Cc: 'A. Jean Mahoney'; 'General Area Review Team'; > 'draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd..

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd

apologies for the inaccuracy. - Ralph > On Oct 22, 2015, at 11:31 AM 10/22/15, Shah, Himanshu <hs...@ciena.com> wrote: > > Aahh! Finally got it with content!!.. > > Let me go through your email.. > > Thanks, > Himanshu > > > -Original Message- > From: Ra

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd

MIME… > > Thanks, > Himanshu > > From: Ralph Droms (rdroms) [mailto:rdr...@cisco.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:20 AM > To: Shah, Himanshu > Cc: A. Jean Mahoney; General Area Review Team; > draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@ietf.org; The IESG > Subject: Re:

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd

e are two implementations of this draft deployed in a > Telco network > in Asia. Noted. > > > Thanks, > Himanshu > > > -Original Message- > From: Ralph Droms (rdroms) [mailto:rdr...@cisco.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 4:02 PM > To: A. Jea

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd

e are two implementations of this draft deployed in a > Telco network > in Asia. Noted. > > > Thanks, > Himanshu > > > -Original Message- > From: Ralph Droms (rdroms) [mailto:rdr...@cisco.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 4:02 PM > To: A. Jea

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd

his draft deployed in a > Telco network > in Asia. Noted. > > > Thanks, > Himanshu > > > -Original Message- > From: Ralph Droms (rdroms) [mailto:rdr...@cisco.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 4:02 PM > To: A. Jean Mahoney; General Area Review

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-02, "MAC Address Withdrawal over Static Pseudowire" Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review Date: 2015-10-14 IETF LC End Date: 2015-10-19 IESG Telechat date: (if known) N/A Summary: This draft is on the rig

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-02, "MAC Address Withdrawal over Static Pseudowire" Reviewer: Ralph Droms Review Date: 2015-10-14 IETF LC End Date: 2015-10-19 IESG Telechat date: (if known) N/A Summary: This draft is on the rig

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-6man-multicast-scopes-05.txt

Francis, Jari - thanks for your reviews. I will address those editorial issues in the next revision of the draft. - Ralph On Jun 10, 2014, at 3:37 AM 6/10/14, Jari Arkko jari.ar...@ericsson.com wrote: Thanks for your review. I have also reviewed the document. Jari On 02 Jun 2014, at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-solmaxrt-update-03

Dan - thanks for your review. Responses in line; edits will appear in the -04 rev. - Ralph On Aug 25, 2013, at 7:29 AM 8/25/13, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) droma...@avaya.com wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-solmaxrt-update-03

Dan - thanks for your review. On Aug 25, 2013, at 7:29 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) droma...@avaya.com wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-arkko-townsley-coexistence-04.txt

Thanks, Brian. - Ralph On Sep 17, 2010, at 6:09 AM 9/17/10, Brian E Carpenter wrote: draft-arkko-townsley-coexistence-04-carpenter.txt ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-ntp-autokey-06.txt

Russ - I've added the RFC Editor comments. I expect we'll need another rev before publication, which should incorporate those comments. - Ralph On Aug 19, 2009, at 4:58 PM 8/19/09, Russ Housley wrote: Ralph: Russ - would you be willing to clear your DISCUSS and capture Joel's new issues

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-ntp-autokey-06.txt

Russ - would you be willing to clear your DISCUSS and capture Joel's new issues in a COMMENT? - Ralph On Jul 27, 2009, at 4:56 AM 7/27/09, Joel M. Halpern wrote: This document is nearly ready for publication as an Informational RFC. While my comments have been resolved, some minor issues

Re: [Gen-art] [dhcwg] [mif] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-container-00

Ralph Droms rdr...@cisco.com wrote: For example, would a host process information received from a Starbucks network over its 802.11 interface differently from information received a home network over the 802.11 interface? It's even more fun than that. How do we reliably know that we

Re: [Gen-art] [dhcwg] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-container-00

Ted - I think it's just as likely for the RG to get different information from different interfaces (or different administrative domains) as it is for a host to get get different information directly. Traffic from the host, which is then forwarded by the RG to one of more than one

Re: [Gen-art] [dhcwg] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-container-00

s...@employees.org: Excerpts from Ralph Droms on Fri, Apr 10, 2009 03:25:49PM -0400: Scott raises an interesting point about identifying the source of options when delivered to clients. BTW, Scott - what is DHS? Sorry, DHCP server The usual case - almost the only case today

Re: [Gen-art] [dhcwg] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-container-00

in, but does this or could this interact with the options specified in RFC3046 in an unexpected way? At 01:41 PM 4/11/2009, Ralph Droms wrote: Scott - even knowing which interface which DHCP information came from may not be enough for a device with multiple interfaces. Can policies for merging

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-container-00

- or does the device need to differentiate between Verizon Wireless and Starbucks if I'm away from home? Or differentiate between my ATT femtocell and my home WiFi network? - Ralph On Apr 11, 2009, at 6:00 AM 4/11/09, Scott Brim wrote: Excerpts from Ralph Droms on Fri, Apr 10, 2009 03:25:49PM

Re: [Gen-art] Re: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt

Yeah. I have to agree with James and Brian: in retrospect, the M/O bits are useless and further discussion at this point is even more useless. - Ralph On 11/29/06 4:58 AM, Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The MO bits were defined long before we had DHCPv6 in place. And they

[Gen-art] Re: GEN-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-radext-delegated-prefix-01.txt

Spencer - thanks for your review and helpful comments. You've correctly understood the Length and Prefix-Length fields; I'll update those definitions. Regarding Reserved - Always set to zero: I'll check the definition of the Framed-IPv6-Prefix in RFC 3162 to understand the common practice (if

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-pxe-options-02.txt

Spencer - It turns out this draft has a *very* long history. It is intended to document the use of some optinos that date back to a time when IANA handed out options codes for DHCP options *before* the defining RFC was published. The current process for assigning option codes is defined in RFC