here my response to Endre's mail
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200801.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
about Pluto V 1.x:
Due to the JCP process guidelines at that time you could not have early
public drafts and thus you are correct that the RI got to Apache very
late.
On Jan 31, 2008 3:44 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1.
How does the license of erlang (Erlang Public License, which is a Mozilla PL
derivative) affect this project?
If we don't bundle Erlang itself (and I presume that we will not),
then not at all. After all, we have plenty
Stefan
Thank you for you insights and response.
Maybe the interesting question is whether you think - based on your
experience - if is is really appropriate to try to create a JCP RI as
an Apache incubator project?
Paul
On Feb 1, 2008 11:11 AM, Stefan Hepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here my
On Jan 31, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
The original source for this proposal can be found at
http://www.couchdbwiki.com/index.php?title=Apache_Incubator_Proposal
and a current snapshot is attached below. Once we have established
that there is interest, my plan is to move this
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Incubator PMC,
Please vote on accepting the PDFBox project for incubation. The full
PDFBox proposal is available at the end of this message and as a wiki
page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PDFBoxProposal. We ask the
Incubator PMC to sponsor the PDFBox podling, with
+1
On Feb 1, 2008 3:48 PM, Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me, obviously.
On 01.02.2008 15:18:51 Jukka Zitting wrote:
Incubator PMC,
Please vote on accepting the PDFBox project for incubation. The full
PDFBox proposal is available at the end of this message and as a
+1 from me, obviously.
On 01.02.2008 15:18:51 Jukka Zitting wrote:
Incubator PMC,
Please vote on accepting the PDFBox project for incubation. The full
PDFBox proposal is available at the end of this message and as a wiki
page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PDFBoxProposal. We ask the
Jukka
Seems like a clear proposal with all the right thinking behind it. +1.
Paul
On Feb 1, 2008 2:18 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incubator PMC,
Please vote on accepting the PDFBox project for incubation. The full
PDFBox proposal is available at the end of this message and as
On Jan 31, 2008 12:15 AM, Erik Abele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30.01.2008, at 21:29, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
snip
An overview page linking to all the previous reports (ok, autoindex
works too but isn't as nice)...?
the scripts that generate the sitemap for the infrastructure site will
On Feb 1, 2008 3:18 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote on accepting the PDFBox project for incubation
+1, I'm glad to see this coming here!
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
+1
Niall
On Feb 1, 2008 2:18 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incubator PMC,
Please vote on accepting the PDFBox project for incubation. The full
PDFBox proposal is available at the end of this message and as a wiki
page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PDFBoxProposal. We ask
On Jan 31, 2008 12:15 AM, Erik Abele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30.01.2008, at 21:29, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
you probably have noticed a number of emailed audit reports (see
below). i've been doing some testing (apologies for the SPAM) but
think that everything's working ok now.
Incubator PMC,
Please vote on accepting the PDFBox project for incubation. The full
PDFBox proposal is available at the end of this message and as a wiki
page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PDFBoxProposal. We ask the
Incubator PMC to sponsor the PDFBox podling, with myself, Jeremias
Maerki,
On Jan 30, 2008 10:37 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
3. web page: too concise? too verbose?
Please include checksums or signatures of the release packages. That
way we'll have easier time tracking things if the release artifacts
change for one reason or another.
the raw
Stefan Hepper wrote:
It is not true that after the JSR was final everything stopped. In fact
once we had finished 1.0 there was still work done to get to a more
stable 1.0.1 release. After that the pluto community re-structed the
code which led to the pluto 1.1 stream, so you can see that it
Hi
The Tuscany project is now ready to distribute its Java SCA Release
1.1-incubating. Following up from Robert's recent post to the Tuscany dev
list [1] I am posting here before proceeding to copy the artifacts up to
www.apache.org/dist/incubator.
The proposal it to use a similar release
[X] +1 Accept PDFBox as a new podling
A must have !
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
+1
On 2/1/08, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incubator PMC,
Please vote on accepting the PDFBox project for incubation. The full
PDFBox proposal is available at the end of this message and as a wiki
page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PDFBoxProposal. We ask the
Incubator PMC
Jukka Zitting schrieb:
Incubator PMC,
Please vote on accepting the PDFBox project for incubation. The full
PDFBox proposal is available at the end of this message and as a wiki
+1
Christian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Jan 30, 2008, at 5:55 AM, Upayavira wrote:
As you can see from other proposals, I think you'll find it work
better
with a single committer pool. As others have said, I personally have
never seen a problem with this approach - people steer away from code
that they are unfamiliar with, or
Neng Geng Huang wrote:
Currently I cannot find any sponsors for this project, so if anyone
reading this message would like to get on board, it will be really
appreciated.
I am not a sponsor/mentor, but I would be interested in participating.
I ran into this issue before, when working on this
A big +1, I like the approach a lot. I can serve as a mentor if
needed, even if I expect a fast incubation process for the project. I
have been following it via Sam, and I have run the subversion code and
got impressed on how simple the API is yet how powerful the concepts
are.
Regards
Santiago
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Yahoo Folks,
Hang in there and keep us updated...
- -- dims
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFHo2vigNg6eWEDv1kRAlt4AJ9vuZQqbR9x8j23yPHl2tOJIj1ZyACfQTVb
hRtLR+n0f2e15Ay423ihKsY=
=Cv/t
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
On Feb 1, 2008 10:04 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Fremantle wrote:
Kelvin, NoNameProposers
Maybe no-one has responded yet because no-one wants to ask the hard
questions! So here I go:
Perhaps you can explain why this effort isn't being rolled into the
Tuscany
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 12:37 -0800, Matthieu Riou wrote:
On Feb 1, 2008 10:04 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Fremantle wrote:
Kelvin, NoNameProposers
Maybe no-one has responded yet because no-one wants to ask the hard
questions! So here I go:
Perhaps you
On Feb 1, 2008 1:15 PM, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 12:37 -0800, Matthieu Riou wrote:
On Feb 1, 2008 10:04 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Fremantle wrote:
Kelvin, NoNameProposers
Maybe no-one has responded yet because no-one
Following up on what David sent out yesterday, I think we're all on
board with having a single committers pool based upon mutual trust and
respect.
However, dropping parts of the code feels counterproductive to me, as I
think it might put up a perceived barrier to collaboration with the
Thrift
On Feb 1, 2008 2:32 PM, Mark Slee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following up on what David sent out yesterday, I think we're all on
board with having a single committers pool based upon mutual trust and
respect.
However, dropping parts of the code feels counterproductive to me, as I
think it
J Aaron Farr wrote:
git could be an issue.
Can you explain what the issue is with Git? We have at least seven
contributors (three at Facebook, four external) using git-svn right now, and I
know that at least a few of us would really like to use native Git as the main
repository for Thrift.
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 16:20 -0800, David Reiss wrote:
J Aaron Farr wrote:
git could be an issue.
Can you explain what the issue is with Git? We have at least seven
contributors (three at Facebook, four external) using git-svn right now, and
I
know that at least a few of us would
On Feb 1, 2008 4:48 PM, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 16:20 -0800, David Reiss wrote:
J Aaron Farr wrote:
git could be an issue.
Can you explain what the issue is with Git? We have at least seven
contributors (three at Facebook, four external) using
Hello, Ahmad:
Thank you for your interesting in i18n4data.
i18n4data is an alternative to resource bundles. If one wants to shift from
resource bundles to i18n4data then he might need to move the messages from
resource bundles to a database table. At present my project is only focus on
On Jan 31, 2008 9:24 PM, Neng Geng Huang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Dear incubators:
I am Huang Neng Geng. I would like to post my proposal about i18n4data, an
i18n tool for java web application, that I would like to be incubated.
Currently I cannot find any sponsors for this project, so
Thanks for the explanations. Maybe it is too early for me to start
evangelizing, but let me know if either of these factors makes a difference.
1/ I don't think we would be putting any load on the Apache infrastructure
team. As Matthieu said, it would take about five minutes for one of us to
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 17:21 -0800, David Reiss wrote:
Thanks for the explanations. Maybe it is too early for me to start
evangelizing, but let me know if either of these factors makes a difference.
1/ I don't think we would be putting any load on the Apache infrastructure
team. As
Dear Eelco:
Thank you very much that you will spend time on my proposal.
I will be really appreciated if you could be a sponsor.
Best regards
Huang
On 2/2/08, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 9:24 PM, Neng Geng Huang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Dear
Hi,
In OFBiz we have taken another but similar approach using XML as repository
(and not a real database), please see :
http://www.nabble.com/XML-properties-files---brainstorm-td13955196.html#a13955196
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1442
There is currently an effort to migrate
37 matches
Mail list logo
