El 03/04/2012 0:50, Ariel Constenla-Haile escribió:
Si quieres una mano para pasar la etapa de ./configure al menos, podemos
arreglar un horario para guiarte por el canal de irc.
Muchas gracias, ya he conseguido pasar ese punto (todos los errores se
debían a que me faltaba un \ en la primer
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate the Apache Jena podling from Apache
Incubator to be a top level project.
+1, binding, mentor
cheers!
- Leo (doing a little celebration dance)
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Paolo Castagna
castagna.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
here is a vote on a release for Apache Jena LARQ module:
jena-larq-1.0.0-incubating.
...
Proposed files and structure to merge with existing dist/ area:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate the Apache Jena podling from Apache
Incubator to be a top level project.
[x] +1 Recommend to the ASF Board that Apache Jena Proposal
is ready to graduate to being a top level
+1. Congrats
-Original Message-
From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:andy.seaborne.apa...@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of Andy Seaborne
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 5:11 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [IMPC] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Jena as a Top Level Project
This is a call for vote to
(dropped infra@)
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm exceedingly sorry here that the IPMC as a whole let you down by
not turning into these issues and dealing with them at the outset.
Me too.
Personally, I have no objection to including mutant
Looking into ManifoldCF a bit, I think what you need is
* buildable source release that contains all the source for ManifoldCF
* source release that contains all the custom patches for the
dependencies that need patches
Our mentor(s) are pushing strongly for a source release (which
contains the
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Our mentor(s) are pushing strongly for a source release (which
contains the upstream patches), plus a lib release, which is to be
overlaid on the source release to allow it to build.
I wouldn't call it strongly, rather
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Our mentor(s) are pushing strongly for a source release (which
contains the upstream patches), plus a lib release, which is to be
overlaid on
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:33 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Our mentor(s) are pushing strongly for a source release (which
contains
Hello,
You will find here [1] an ip clearance for importing Redback project
sources in the Apache Archiva project.
As ip clearance is based on lazy consensus, if no objections sources
will be imported in 72H.
Thanks,
--
Olivier Lamy
Talend: http://coders.talend.com
http://twitter.com/olamy |
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:33 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
It sounds like I wasn't clear enough.
The proposal is for the following release artifacts:
(1) A source-only tar
(2) A source+binary dependencies convenience tar
(3) A binary tar
This is instead of:
(1) A source-only tar
(2) A binary dependencies convenience tar
(3) A binary tar
Hope that
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
It sounds like I wasn't clear enough.
The proposal is for the following release artifacts:
(1) A source-only tar
(2) A source+binary dependencies convenience tar
(3) A binary tar
This is instead of:
(1) A source-only
I don't remember seeing anything about a CloudStack project, is there
something I missed?
http://www.citrix.com/English/NE/news/news.asp?newsID=2323072
-Brian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
On 03/04/2012 16:46, Brian McCallister wrote:
I don't remember seeing anything about a CloudStack project, is there
something I missed?
http://www.citrix.com/English/NE/news/news.asp?newsID=2323072
I was just about to ask the same thing...
p
--
[key:62590808]
signature.asc
See Jim's email (subject CloudStack) of an hour ago.
N
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote:
I don't remember seeing anything about a CloudStack project, is there
something I missed?
http://www.citrix.com/English/NE/news/news.asp?newsID=2323072
-Brian
Quoting: ...will become the first cloud platform in the industry to be
submitted to the Apache Software Foundation http://www.apache.org/,...
They mentioned that it is to be submitted The title is misleading, I am
not sure if that is a problem ?
Is it ?
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Nóirín
On 03/04/2012 16:47, Nóirín Plunkett wrote:
See Jim's email (subject CloudStack) of an hour ago.
Which list did that go to? I don't see it in my Incubator mail.
p
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote:
I don't remember seeing anything about a CloudStack
Hi All, thanks for the interest in CloudStack. I'm working on the wiki page at
this moment. I'll send out a proposal notice later today.
-kevin
-Original Message-
From: Nóirín Plunkett [mailto:noi...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 8:48 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Kevin Kluge kevin.kl...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi All, thanks for the interest in CloudStack. I'm working on the wiki
page at this moment. I'll send out a proposal notice later today.
Then hurry up, cause we are looking forward to it ;)
-kevin
-Original
From the article: CloudStack brings to Apache more than 30,000
community members, thousands of certified apps, and hundreds of
production clouds.
And to think, people were worried about OpenOffice...
Don
-
To unsubscribe,
Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Quoting: ...will become the first cloud platform in the industry to be
submitted to the Apache Software Foundation http://www.apache.org/,...
They mentioned that it is to be submitted The title is misleading, I am
not sure if that is a problem ?
It's also
All,
Please review:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CloudStackProposal
The info that this was on its way kinda leaked out before all was
ready, but in the grand-scheme of things, with so many moving parts
and players, I think it went well.
Needless to say, it also proves, once again,
Hope that helps... The question is, will Roy (or anyone else) be
unwilling to vote for the first option?
Having been one of the people that commented and started the thread, I feel
like I was wearing loose clothing while operating machinery, per Roy's guidance
on the source being the thing
Hi All,
We would like to propose CloudStack to be an Apache Incubator project.
CloudStack provides control plane software that can be used to create an IaaS
cloud. It includes an HTTP-based API for user and administrator functions and a
web UI for user and administrator access. Administrators
Also, making sure the other comments on NOTICEs are addressed as well.
I have gotten extremely confusing advice in this area in the past, and
the available documentation does not help. I believe I am adhering to
Roy's principles, but before we spin another release candidate, I'd
like it very
On 3/31/2012 8:43 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.comwrote:
There isn't (to my knowledge), I can imagine an increasing number of
projects wanting such a thing though. Unless someone tells me I'm
wrong and we already have one would
+1
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:43 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 3/31/2012 8:43 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.comwrote:
There isn't (to my knowledge), I can imagine an increasing number of
On 03.04.2012 19:09, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Now let's see who complains and says we're fragmenting the
cloud community or whatever... Where's Simon? :)
Please, as far as I know the community situation regarding CloudStack
seems to be very different from the one concerning LibreOffice and
It was a joke. Let it go...
On Apr 3, 2012 1:57 PM, Andreas Kuckartz a.kucka...@ping.de wrote:
On 03.04.2012 19:09, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Now let's see who complains and says we're fragmenting the
cloud community or whatever... Where's Simon? :)
Please, as far as I know the community
-Original Message-
From: Karl Wright [mailto:daddy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 1:24 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about downloading binaries
Also, making sure the other comments on NOTICEs are addressed as well.
I have gotten extremely
Regarding the section Source and Intellectual Property Submission
Plan...What do the patents cover/restrict? Is a patent even
compatible with ALv2?
Don
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
On Apr 3, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
On 03.04.2012 19:09, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Now let's see who complains and says we're fragmenting the
cloud community or whatever... Where's Simon? :)
Please, as far as I know the community situation regarding CloudStack
seems to be very
Are there still requirements for the source tree in SVN, as far as
having applicable LICENSE and NOTICE files there? My understanding is
then that the source LICENSE and NOTICE files must reside at the root
level in the SVN tree - which implies that the binary tar/zip build
CANNOT be built from
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Plan...What do the patents cover/restrict? Is a patent even
compatible with ALv2?
Speaking only for myself, Section 3 of ALv2 seems to address patents
held by contributors. Or am I misunderstanding the concern around
On 03.04.2012 20:10, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Oh come on... 1st of all, it's a joke.
One I do not find funny at all.
And 2ndly, people could complain that we should
refuse the donation and force them to
put all their code/energies into OpenStack...
CloudStack and OpenStack seem to be
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:06 PM, David Nalley da...@cloudstack.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Plan...What do the patents cover/restrict? Is a patent even
compatible with ALv2?
Speaking only for myself, Section 3 of ALv2 seems to address
Ok, you can now browse each different build artifact's license,
notice, and readme file at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/trunk/[README.txt,NOTICE.txt,LICENSE.txt]
- source
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/trunk/lib-license/[README.txt,NOTICE.txt,LICENSE.txt]
- lib
Patent law isn't the same as Copyright law- the idea
that you can do anything you want with patents covered
by Apache Licensed code will only wind up getting you
sued someday (IANAL).
Do consult a lawyer if you need advice on how any particular
patent may be implemented outside of code received
I'll note the request to move over websites. There are three to discuss.
- cloudstack.org - This site has a login. There may be the impact of supporting
a set of user registrations. How many users? Are user registrations important?
- docs.cloudbase.org - This site uses MindTouch TCS[1] Is this
On Apr 3, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
On 03.04.2012 20:10, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Oh come on... 1st of all, it's a joke.
One I do not find funny at all.
You should have. It was funny. Maybe you need a
funny bone transplant?
And 2ndly, people could complain that we should
Scott McNealy did his keynote on a Mac running an old version
of OOo. He complained in his talk that OOo was abandoned (obv
not aware of the recent history of LO and AOOo) after a slide
he was trying to present didn't render right. Out of the audience
I said that we were giving love to OOo and
Minor nit:
In economic terms, Apache OpenOffice and LibreOffice are not complementary.
- Dennis
In computing, an example of complements are hardware and software. Software
vendors want the hardware to be free (more for us!) and hardware vendors want
the software to be free (more for us!).
Hi Kevin,
On 04/04/2012, at 3:17 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
Hi All,
We would like to propose CloudStack to be an Apache Incubator project.
CloudStack provides control plane software that can be used to create an IaaS
cloud. It includes an HTTP-based API for user and administrator functions
Thanks, Brett. We appreciate your help.
-kevin
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@porterclan.net] On Behalf Of Brett Porter
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 5:28 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL][RFC] CloudStack for the Apache Incubator
Hi Kevin,
Inline reply
Please don't take my answers as binding, just trying to provide a bit
more information.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
I'll note the request to move over websites. There are three to discuss.
- cloudstack.org - This site has a login. There
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:06 PM, David Nalley da...@cloudstack.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Plan...What do the patents cover/restrict? Is a patent even
compatible
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Kevin Kluge kevin.kl...@citrix.com wrote:
Thanks, Brett. We appreciate your help.
-kevin
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@porterclan.net] On Behalf Of Brett Porter
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 5:28 PM
To:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.orgwrote:
Minor nit:
In economic terms, Apache OpenOffice and LibreOffice are not complementary.
- Dennis
In computing, an example of complements are hardware and software.
Software vendors want the hardware to be
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 21:37, David Nalley da...@cloudstack.org wrote:
...
For
better or worse I don't perceive ASF having the desire to or currently
the ability to deal with filing for patents, or even if they would be
entitled to in this situation.
I'm not sure that we have a *specific*
This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.9.0-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12316360
*** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending].
Note that we are voting upon
Citrix is pursuing patents based on prior CloudStack work and expects to
continue to do so in the future. Citrix is getting these patents to protect
the CloudStack user community. Consider the case where some other entity
states that the use of CloudStack is infringing on their patents.
53 matches
Mail list logo
