Re: Making license adjustment tools publicly available

On 7 March 2016 at 01:46, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > To close a loop on this: based on the consensus I created a public > version of the tools under: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev/tools/licensing/ > > My attempts of preserving the history weren't successfully since > private and public

Re: Copyright sign offs

On Mar 6, 2016 23:49, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: > > Henri, it seems I'm a bit lost with your terminology. See the question bellow: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > Haven't done this in a while :) > > > > Thought I'd share that the following podlings have not yet signe

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

Alex, Justin, all, Thank you for your comments. With your comments in mind, I will make this statement for the record: Regarding the subject of the Software Grant Agreement, download link: https://github.com/brooklyncentral/brooklyn-cli/archive/b8b39e54ecbb7c12f4828783f07bec978a76b7be.zip SHA1: 5

Re: Update on Apache Toree and LGPL dependency

+1 > On Mar 6, 2016, at 6:58 PM, Gino Bustelo wrote: > > @john The 0mq ecosystem is made up of many projects of different sizes and > maturity. In the case of JeroMQ, the committers are showing an overwhelming > momentum to transition to MPL. I don't see any reason for us to consider any > ot

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Really nice project, happy to see it incubating. -Flavio > On 04 Mar 2016, at 09:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 03/02/2016 04:06 PM, Gangumalla, Uma wrote: >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Regards, >> Uma >> >> On 3/1/16, 4:53 PM, "Andrew Pur

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9alpha-rc1

With the blocking (vestiges of MPL code) jiras fixed and the blessing from legal-discuss on how to proceed re: missing BSD licensing headers: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201603.mbox/%3C9D1AF43C-370B-4E58-B0EF-2E29D242F50B%40jaguNET.com%3E I propose we move ahead

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

On 3/7/16, 6:05 AM, "Richard Downer" wrote: >Alex, Justin, all, > >Thank you for your comments. With your comments in mind, I will make >this statement for the record: > >Regarding the subject of the Software Grant Agreement, download link: >https://github.com/brooklyncentral/brooklyn-cli/archi

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

A software grant can only grant rights that are owned by the grantor. If there was a(n innocent) mistake in the file referenced by the grant, no big deal IMHO. Clearly, bundled dependencies cannot be included in a grant since the grantor has no rights to them. The fact that they were included i

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

Thanks Craig. Richard, I would take Craig's answer as authorization to proceed. -Alex On 3/7/16, 9:43 AM, "Craig Russell" wrote: >A software grant can only grant rights that are owned by the grantor. > >If there was a(n innocent) mistake in the file referenced by the grant, >no big deal IMHO.

[VOTE] Graduation for Apache Johnzon

Hi, We discussed on johnzon@ and the graduation is out next goal (there was several threads but the one triggering this vote is http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-johnzon-dev/201603.mbox/browser ). I'd ilke the IPMC to recommend the resolution to the Board and therefore I'm asking

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.2 (incubating)

Forwarding my +1 from the vote on the dev list. Alan. > On Mar 6, 2016, at 16:18, Madhan Neethiraj wrote: > > Incubator PMC, > > Apologies for yet another location-change of the release artifacts. The > artifacts are moved from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release to > https://dist.apa

Re: [VOTE] Graduation for Apache Johnzon

Usually graduation votes include things like the proposal. It seems like this wasn't particularly discussed on the dev list, and not voted on at the dev list... John On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:55 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi, > > We discussed on johnzon@ and the graduation is out next goal

[DRAFT] - Incubator Board Report March 2016

Hi all, I have some things I'm going to wrap up tonight. But below is the current draft report. I notice that there are still many missing podlings. - Atlas - Htrace - iota (new podling) - Johnzon (just raised a graduation vote) - OpenAz - Ranger - Sirona - Wave I'd like to hear from these pod

LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF

Hi, I’m compiling information for LICENSE file for a binary distribution. We (Trafodion) have a bundled dependency that is Apache-2.0 license, but not part of ASF. Do we need to call these out in the license file, or only call out the things that are non-Apache-2.0? Thanks, --Steve

Re: [VOTE] Graduation for Apache Johnzon

2016-03-07 20:08 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : > Usually graduation votes include things like the proposal. > > It seems like this wasn't particularly discussed on the dev list, and not > voted on at the dev list... > > Was not voted cause everyone agreed, it has been discussed twice and acknowledged

Re: [VOTE] Graduation for Apache Johnzon

Romain, Please review the graduation guide: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html John On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:42 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > 2016-03-07 20:08 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : > > > Usually graduation votes include things like the proposal. > > > > It seems like this

Re: [VOTE] Graduation for Apache Johnzon

I did, the idea was to reuse asf charter (replacing ${PROJECT} by Johnzon), ppmc vote was considered useless since everyone agreed and nobody objected so we were at voting on IPMC step, did I miss something? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator

Hi All, Thanks to all who voted! The vote has passed with the following tallies: +1 Binding (7 total) Henry Saputra James Taylor Andrew Purtell Jean-Baptiste Onofré Alan Gates Julian Hyde Lars Hofhansl +1 Non-binding (4 total) Ramakrishna Vasudevan Terence Yim Andreas Neumann Naresh Agarwal We'

Re: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF

On 3/7/16, 11:21 AM, "Steve Varnau" wrote: >Hi, > > > >I’m compiling information for LICENSE file for a binary distribution. We >(Trafodion) have a bundled dependency that is Apache-2.0 license, but not >part of ASF. Do we need to call these out in the license file, or only >call out the thing

Re: [VOTE] Graduation for Apache Johnzon

Yes, you're missing a proposed charter, the name of the proposed VP, who the initial committers, initial PMC, etc. Please review it carefully and work with your mentors to define all this stuff. John On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:52 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > I did, the idea was to reuse asf ch

Re: [VOTE] Graduation for Apache Johnzon

@John: thks, will do Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber 2016-03-07 21:16 GMT+01:00 John

Re: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF

As I understand it, LICENSE is for licenses. Period. If advertising is required, the NOTICE file is used. If there are third party works included in a distribution that use the same Apache 2.0 license as any Apache components, the license file already contains the appropriate license. Section

Re: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF

On 3/7/16, 12:26 PM, "Craig Russell" wrote: >As I understand it, LICENSE is for licenses. Period. If advertising is >required, the NOTICE file is used. Sorry, I should have been more clear. When I said "consider NOTICE" I meant that any NOTICE for the non-ASF AL dependency may have content th

RE: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF

> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] > Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 1:09 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF > > On 3/7/16, 12:26 PM, "Craig Russell" wrote: > > >As I understand it, LICENSE is for licenses. Period. If advertising is > >require

Re: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF

HI, Current recommendation is not to include it [1] but it’s not an error to do so. Justin 1.http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additio

[RESULT][IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

This is the result thread for the IP Clearance vote started in this thread: https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201602.mbox/%3CCABQFKi1-VxhduAnn0BKewsDihWJP0kcBZ5KerWi%3DVXVjs-%2B5bQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E No explicit binding votes were cast. As this is a lazy consensus vote,

Re: [VOTE] Release taverna-language-0.15.1-incubating-RC5 and taverna-osgi-0.2.1-incubating-RC5

Hi, As the PPMC seem on top of the issue and know what needs to be done changing my vote to: +1 binding Re mentoring sorry but I'm a little too much stretched as it is and can't take on another project to mentor. Thanks, Justin -

RE: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF

> -Original Message- > From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] > Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 2:10 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF > > HI, > > Current recommendation is not to include it [1] but it’s not an error to > do so. >

Re: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF

> On Mar 7, 2016, at 1:43 PM, Steve Varnau wrote: > >> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] >> Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 1:09 PM >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF >> >> On 3/7/16, 12:26 PM, "Craig Russell" wrote: >> >>> As I understand

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non binding) Regards, Uma On 3/3/16, 5:29 PM, "Poorna Chandra" wrote: >Hi All, > >Tephra proposal was sent out for discussion last week. The proposal is >available at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TephraProposal > >Please vote to accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator. The vote will be

Re: Copyright sign offs

Basically http://incubator.apache.org/projects/datafu.html does not include any timestamps for the sections Copyright and Verify Distribution Right. So we don't know if this has happened or not. In fact no dates appear in this particular incubator, so I guess it's just not updated. Some email arch

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - signatures and hashes fine - name contains incubating - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE good - No unexpected binaries - Source file have apache headers (some have extra ones) - Can compile on OS X (but it takes a while) I still think there’s a couple of minor i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.2 (incubating)

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - name include incubating - signature and hashes good - disclaimer exits - LICENSE is OK but missing a couple of licenses - NOTICE has too much info - A couple of files are missing Apache headers, for example [1][5][6]. There may be others. - No unexpected binary files

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.2 (incubating)

Release contents look good, +1 from me. Now about your missing board report... Any comments? John On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 7:18 PM Madhan Neethiraj wrote: > Incubator PMC, > > Apologies for yet another location-change of the release artifacts. The > artifacts are moved from https://dist.apache.

Re: [DRAFT] - Incubator Board Report March 2016

I've moved the podlings that had no report submitted to non-reporting and marked them as monthly. I'm especially concerned about iota and Johnzon, one a brand new podling (maybe they shouldn't have reported this month?) and the other a podling that was trying to graduate. I'll reach out to those

Re: Short form IP clearance

Just to follow up on this thread, were the changes ever completed? On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 2:20 PM William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Marvin Humphrey > > wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 3:41 AM, John D. Ament > >

Re: [DRAFT] - Incubator Board Report March 2016

Hi John, > I've moved the podlings that had no report submitted to non-reporting and > marked them as monthly. I'm especially concerned about iota and Johnzon, > one a brand new podling (maybe they shouldn't have reported this month?) JFYI Iota has been slow to start up I’m not sure they would h

Re: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF

On 3/7/16, 2:38 PM, "Craig Russell" wrote: >>>Agreed. Sebb's recommendation, AIUI, was to simply mention in LICENSE >>> that there is a non-ASF AL bundle without copying the entire LICENSE. > >That’s what I was objecting to. LICENSE is for licenses. If notice is >required, then use NOTICE. Hm