On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
I find it unfortunate that the PMC chair nominations got turned into a
debate about the future of the Incubator, especially when the original
reason to consider a new chair were fairly minor issues in timely
handling
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/04/2012 09:15 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
We both care about this stuff, which is why we keep replying. I'm happy
to continue to reply, so long as you are when I feel it's warranted. I've
ignored a few of them
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 8:22 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 2/5/2012 10:20 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
No. With all respect for Noel - we have discussed this multiple times
now. There is a need for a change because some administrative stuff
was delayed
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 9:04 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 2/5/2012 1:40 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Just to set the record straight and get out of the way, *my* position
is that I do not feel particularly qualified to lead the charge in
presiding over the disassembly
Hello Raymond,
i forwarded your request to the ipmc private list. Currently there is
much discussion going on on various topics so your question might be
overseen here.
Besides that, you are right, as a Member you can join on request and
yes, you need to join the IPMC to mentor a project. It is
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
One way to make the load lighter is to try to make one decision at a
time. Entirely selfishly, I suggest looking at the chair election
first.
+1
Too many loose ends - we need to get something done now. I have
We have discussed many things the past days, I think we need to get
towards some results. Imho it was enough time to propose new incubator
chair candidates. So far we have nominations for Noel, Benson and
Chris M.
Should we do the vote now? How is the process for voting a chair when
having
have one.
+1
From: Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2012 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: Time to vote the chair?
On Feb 2, 2012, at 4:52 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
We have discussed many things
We have already 2 good nominations for the IPMC chair role, Noel and Benson.
I would like add a new name and nominate Chris Mattman as the IPMC
chair. He does care deeply on the incubator and expresses my feelings
in many ways. In addition he is a damn nice guy with many ideas.
Cheers
Christian
are not possible
at one time.
On Feb 1, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
We have already 2 good nominations for the IPMC chair role, Noel and Benson.
I would like add a new name and nominate Chris Mattman as the IPMC
chair. He does care deeply on the incubator
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 31 January 2012 00:06, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto
authority over personnel
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
On 01/30/2012 05:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
I've never liked vetoes for this. One person can hold an entire PMC hostage
simply for disliking someone (or worse: subtle corporate concerns masked
otherwise). People have said in
Jukka,
what you currently do in the incubator is just an amazing job. I would
have nominated you for serving as an incubator chair, but it seems
another project has already got you. As I can not nominate you, I need
to say that your work here is great. Thanks.
Cheers
Christian
On Mon, Jan 30,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
On Jan 29, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Deepal jayasinghe wrote:
If he has not resigned, why do we have this vote (or why started this
vote) ? forcing him to resign ?
Because it is very poor practice, IMO, to just keep the
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
On Jan 29, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
On Jan 29, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
FTR: as should be clear from my
+1 looks good. Have fun!
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
the OpenNLP community has voted to graduate and requests that
the IPMC vote on recommending this resolution to the ASF Board.
Community graduation vote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
...I'll update
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Champion
accordingly
Done in
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
...I'll update
http://incubator.apache.org
Thats right. I will suggest that
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
...This is now the site:
http://www.fundwiab.com
I think this is pretty fine
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
I doubt writing some more documentation on
some webpage about yet another set of responsibilities
for yet another role will make a material
difference to anyone's behavior. Under Noel
we have run the Incubator as a
.
From: Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Clarify the role of the Champion as an incubation
coordinator
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Joe Schaefer
Hello,
ognl has left the incubator before a while but it seems there are
incubator ognl mailinglists there. Do they need to be closed after
graduation?
Cheers
Christian
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
-
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-4?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13186587#comment-13186587
]
Christian Grobmeier commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-4
+1
here is then some update needed too (i think):
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Process_Description.html
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Incubator PMC,
Here's the result of discussions that took place around Christmas -
the goal
+1 (binding)
Checked sigs, looked at the artifacts, all well
Cheers!
Christian
2012/1/9 Devin Han devin...@apache.org:
Hi all,
The ODF Toolkit 0.5 is ready for release. This will be our first incubator
release.
We had a preliminary vote in the PPMC, which had great results, including a
+1
+1 good luck!!
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Dear IPMC, dear Community!
The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed implementation
of the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like to start a VOTE
on graduating as a
Something is wrong with the dates of Marvin.
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Marvin no-re...@apache.org wrote:
The next board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 December 2012, 10:00:00 PST.
I have just sent reminder emails to the below addresses, requesting them
to supply board reports 2 weeks
+1 (binding)
Good luck!
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
Please vote on the acceptance of DeltaSpike into the Apache Incubator.
The proposal is available at [1] and its content is also included below for
your convenience.
Please vote:
Wow, exciting proposal.
Curious if infra is already accepting git for this podling. Have your
reached out to them already?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi!
JBoss, The Apache MyFaces CODI team and CDISource would like to propose the
Apache
+1
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
There has been concerns expressed about accumulation of rules without
pruning. In that spirit, I'd like to find out whether the community
feels that dropping the rule would be better than revising it
I am sorry, didn't see the poll options. Thought it was just a heads
up if this needs to be changed.
[X] Drop Suitable Name Search
Cheers
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme
Hello all,
I urgently need to remove some of my workload. Therefore I have
decided remove myself from any political debattes of the ASF. In
addition I have currently less fun in mentoring projects and need to
step back or go to idle mode which is affecting the incubator.
I have told the ooo
Hello,
as I intend to step down as a mentor from Zeta Components, there are
only two mentors left. So this podling needs one more. Who is willing
to help out?
Cheers
Christian
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 9:38 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I do acknowledge that it can be really
hard to get some things changed and you may need a thick skin and lots
of
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
...Let's see if we can find a small group of members of the IPMC who are,
in fact, willing to take seriously the task of
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
And while we are at it, reduce Roles and Rules to a minimum.
Pruning is always useful but when the Incubator ran with fewer rules
and roles, the process ran much less smoothly which took much more
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:00 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 November 2011 22:39, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:05 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, it would make sense to publish the name of the champion in the
listing of podlings:
http
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
...I think the Champion should be an ASF mentor, which I believe
to be consistent with my interpretation of the
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:52 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 November 2011 11:34, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:00 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 November 2011 22:39, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2011, Benson Margulies wrote:
...Someone poses a question about NOTICE files, or IP, or release
structure.
If they are lucky, they get 3 disagreeing responses in short order...
ROFL
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 23, 2011 8:12 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
I can already hear the questions: Can I serve as
a Champion, I am
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
3. The Champion is not necessarily a mentor.
Ah now I know what confused me.
A Champion is not necessarily a mentor - but he should be either on
the IPMC, a Officer or a Member, right?
A Champion cannot be
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:05 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Given the expansion in the Champion role that is being proposed, I
think it would make sense to include an entry for the champion role in
podlings.xml.
+1
Also, it would make sense to publish the name of the champion in the
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
To me a lot of the problem stems from the fact that the reports are
misdirected- instead of informing the board about the activities of
the IPMC, it tells them about the podling's activities, which doesn't
scale
+1 on everything, just a few comments...
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
3. The Champion is not necessarily a mentor.
Not sure if that actually makes sense. I think a Champion is a mentor
by default somehow
4. The podling can elect a new
Which project are you speaking about?
This is the general list at which mich projects are discussed
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Michael Kelleher mj.kelle...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a plan for promoting this project to top level status? If so, is
there a projected timeline?
I would
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Saturday, November 19, 2011, Brett Porter wrote:
...Should we appoint one of the mentors at the start to be the chair of
the PPMC, in the same way as a full project? I would see them as
responsible for
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:39 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
We also don't always document the Champion - it is on the initial
proposal, but only some status pages seem to include the information.
Perhaps we should require it in podlings.xml?
[1]
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:53 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 November 2011 13:54, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:39 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
If we agree that the Champion will have this new responsibility then I
think we should add
It was a *huge* discussion in which incubator fellows explained me the
sense of Champion.
On 21 November 2011 15:08, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:53 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 November 2011 13:54, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:38 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently it reads:
drive the process of incubation forwards which finally leads to an
acceptance vote
The problem is that process of incubation can mean more than just
entering the Incubator, and acceptance could refer to
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Looking at the current list of projects, we have many that exceed that
number. Far exceed that number. In fact the median age is 416 days
and the
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
http://people.apache.org/~rubys/incubator-by-age
I think there are more tools like this around... i think it makes
sense
This time were 7 reports missed (leaving out S4):
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Amber
HISE
Kalumet
Lucene.NET
NPanday
Zeta Components
Stonehenge
SHOULD BE RETIRED.
I am a Mentor of Zeta. This time I have not had the time to push the
report. A
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Excellent plot chart. As with most plot charts, the end result is a
Rorschach test. I'll tell you what I (personally) see in this chart:
a failure
reminder e-mail that usually
comes on the first day of the reporting month. Neither in my inbox nor
the dev-list archive.
Do you want us to report next month instead?
On 2011-11-16 11:57, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
This time were 7 reports missed (leaving out S4):
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 5
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Deltacloud has graduated and can be put off from your list.
Rat is discussing graduation and should be moved from the list too.
The master
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:35 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Just wanted to check what is the procedure for accepting a code donation.
A compamy that uses JMeter has produced a plugin that they would like
to give to JMeter.
I've not seen it yet, but it is apparently about 10 classes written
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:18 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 November 2011 11:39, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
So what do we need (if anything) before we can accept the code?
At least a cooperate cla on file:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.txt
I
+1
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Coming back to this.
It unfortunately seems that there's no (even optimistic) expectation
that Olio will graduate.
So, voting:
[ ] +1
[ ] -1, no because...
Hen
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27 PM, William A.
Leo,
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Leo Neumeyer leoneume...@gmail.com wrote:
cross-posting to incubator in case someone there also had to go through the
git to svn migration and can share their experience.
I already mentioned you should take a look at this tool from Jukka Zitting;
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@thomersonfamily.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
In addition you can ask on wave-dev. They have finally decided to
loose history and do an initial checkin because
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
...For projects developed the Apache way, decision making requires 3
binding +1's. Once the electorate population
I currently look at it. Everything looks good so far, but when running
mvn test I get an error:
[INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
[INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
[INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd
/Users/cg/release-checking/droids-0.1.0-incubating svn
, and that is what is failing.
Commenting the plugin out, or changing it to version 1.0 works just fine.
Other projects are using that same build of buildnumber-maven-plugin and not
having trouble. Not sure why this one is so unique.
I've fixed in svn.
On 10/31/2011 08:47 AM, Christian Grobmeier
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Richard Frovarp rfrov...@apache.org wrote:
Please vote on the release candidate for Apache Droids Incubating, version
0.1-incubating. I've received two binding IPMC +1 votes and 4 non-binding +1
votes. The blockers identified by Marvin and sebb
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:55 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
The incubator site has an .htaccess file containing redirects for many
of the graduated podlings.
However, not all graduated podlings are in the file; the following are
missing:
...
Should redirects be
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
Going by my experience running Clutch, it is mainly because
people do not completely follow the documentation that
has evolved for incubation. Not sure why. There is a lot
of untidiness after
AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
I have added a incubation status page:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/callback.html
(not avail yet, takes a while to sync).
Excellent, thanks
+1
Deltacloud looks very healthy to me.
Good luck guys!
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:42 PM, David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
as described in the discussion thread[1], the Deltacloud community feels
that we are ready to graduate to a top-level Apache project.
To that end, I'd
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
On most months, I have to chase down missing reports.
ETCH, HAMA, HCATALOG (managed to do a release, though), KATO, MANIFOLDCF
(also managed
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
On most months, I have to chase down missing reports.
ETCH, HAMA, HCATALOG (managed to do a release, though), KATO, MANIFOLDCF
(also managed to do a release, though), RAT and WAVE all failed to report
this month.
RAT
Hi all,
I have added a incubation status page:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/callback.html
(not avail yet, takes a while to sync).
Lets start with preparations... Jukka you mentioned you wanted to take
the initiative and ask for mailinglist etc, right?
Thanks
Christian
--
Slowly I begin to understand this is a non-apache package, correct?
otherwise I would expect the link to an ASF git mirror instead
Yeah, I think we need to tweak the stylesheet. The 'Additional Tools'
header doesn't stand out enough, and doesn't make it clear that this is
additional stuff,
Another reason I don't see the need to change visited link colors is
the nature of the docs. I mean they are docs. Do you read docs only
one time? Not me, I read it often, it is unnecessary for know where I
was already. This is only necesasry if I have the same link pointing
to a page a
This usability principle is even more important for documentation.
OK, and if you do not hit the link but scroll over the content then
how do you mark you link visited? Incubator pages are huge, people are
scrolling not clicking back and forth just to mark the link visited.
So you end up
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:49 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Here is a solution which should meet the quest for appealing
and also meet the quest for usability.
It is not complete.
This does not make sure how scrolling people change their link color
to visited. If two colors,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:14 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 October 2011 21:34, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Perhaps someone already used to Apache ways, would like to
take the lead in an incubation process?
I'd certainly be interested in helping as a committer, and could
for clutch, adding this CSS works for me:
#clutch .cool1, #clutch .cool1 a { color:white; }
See http://dl.dropbox.com/u/715349/tmp/clutch.jpg
-Bertrand
Very much +1 on what Bertrand suggests
Cheers
-
To unsubscribe,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 08:39:40AM +0100, ant elder wrote:
I don't want to get in the way of those who are doing all this good work
with the website but my 2c's is I also would prefer visited links to have a
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:53 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it would be useful to use relative links where possible
throughout the Incubator site.
Also, by switching to using h2 id=anchor rather than h2a
name=anchor will avoid having to distinguish links from anchors, at
least in
Unfortunately the pdf is not free and so we cannot look what exactly
has an impact.
Sorry, here is a free link:
http://ix.cs.uoregon.edu/~hornof/downloads/CHI04_Link.pdf
Thank you very much, I will read it pretty soon
Because, if some links are marked visited, and some - even when read
I have not much clue on the legals below, but what I read the past
days makes me feel like Deltacloud is ready to graduate.
Cheers
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:03 AM, David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
the Deltacloud community and mentors feel that we are ready to graduate
to a
http://people.apache.org/~sebb/clutch.html#clutch
OK to change that?
This colour scheme was carefully chosen to assist
with colour-blindness.
I have been meaning to find the old discussion and
development here about that, and add to Clutch notes.
It used to have decent contrast for the
Finally the wonderful bootstrap css is destroyed:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/committer.html
I do not agree to changing the colors of visited links.
The headings now have a different line-height and look pretty ugly
(see Mailing lists heading).
Heading were bold before, and I think we
David,
congratulations to the new release.
Just a comment I cannot see the new release on the website:
http://incubator.apache.org/deltacloud/
Should't it be updated together with the release?
Then I think it is not very good to send the /dist folder link around,
because to my knowledge it
Wow, many cool stuff coming to apache recently.
Hopefully there are some mentors out there. I have hands full with
open source work already.
Cheers
Christian
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
(Sorry for crossposting for this time, please redirect any
Will respond to rest later
Can we change that again, please?
Perhaps the earlier suggestion of creating a branch to test out the
new formatting would now be useful.
+1
If this is stored on p.a.o in a personal directory, we can try
different settings very quickly.
+1
Cheers
Thanks,
David,
At your website:
http://incubator.apache.org/deltacloud/download.html
I read nothing of how to get the release. Instead I am send to
fedorahost for the code.
The very first link (Official releases can be downloaded from the
Apache website) on that page goes to
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:50 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The podling status sumnmary page currently contains details of all
podlings, past and present.
It's already quite long, and it is going to get longer and longer.
Would it be sensible to split the page, perhaps into one page for
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:50 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The new CSS changes the default setting for links, by removing
underlines unless the mouse hovers over the link.
However, this has broken all the internal name definitions.
These now look like links - they are blue, and get
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:39 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 October 2011 20:59, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:
Should be possible as described here:
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/selector.html#attribute-selectors
not sure on browser compatibility though
Thanks very
Is there any reason why we should not format:
h2 a {
text-decoration: none;
color: black;
}
Would need to be applied to h3 etc as well.
h2 a, h3 a, h4 a, h5 a {
text-decoration: none;
color: black;
}
It would also hide links in headings (if there are any)
Have not found a single
h2 a, h3 a, h4 a, h5 a {
text-decoration: none;
color: black;
}
It would also hide links in headings (if there are any)
Have not found a single one.
Besides, it would be really nasty to put links into headings imho
It's not just ones in headings that are affected; any instance of a
The ones I noticed were in headings, but there could now (or in the
future) be other instances that are not in headings.
well, I *hope* this will not be the case. Otherwise there will be
exceptions on the page which finally leads into chaos.
Not sure I follow.
No worries, my comment was
)
* Sergey Grebnov, Windows Phone 7 (sergeyg at bsquare.com)
Sponsors
Champion
* David Nuescheler
* Sam Ruby
Nominated Mentors
* Jukka Zitting
* Christian Grobmeier
* Gianugo Rabellino
* Ross Gardler
* Andrew Savory
Sponsoring Entity
* Apache Incubator
However, we could easily convert to JSON for the published version of the
file.
Transformation to both formats are possible of course
It's really a question of which format is easiest to maintain.
XML of course.
Although JSON is simpler, it does not allow comments AFAIK, which I
think
That would probably be fine - I'd like to see it before endorsing it fully.
It would have been better to do it in a branch.
Agreed.
Actually there was so less comments (most of them positive) that I
didn't think about a branch.
The current half-finished changes have made it difficult for
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:58 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 October 2011 02:02, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
I've not started looking at generating projects/index.xml yet.
Reading the past mails shows me you are +1 to commit
301 - 400 of 615 matches
Mail list logo
