+1
BTW when the project moves over, you should drop my commit rights
(assuming I still have them), since I haven't helped at all. If I
start working on ODE, I'll earn my rights the normal way.
-dain
On Jul 9, 2007, at 12:33 PM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
Hi all,
This is a vote to recommend
Are there some Maven PMC members that could join the IPMC? Maven by
it's very nature seem to bring in a lot of projects so in the long
run I think it will be in your collective best interestes to get more
involved with the IPMC.
-dain
On May 15, 2007, at 9:07 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
+1
I can't wait to start using the final release :)
-dain
On Apr 24, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Michael Dick wrote:
We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a
new release
of OpenJPA.
The vote email thread is available here:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE---THIRD-ATTEMPT--publish-openjpa-0.9.7-
On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:57 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
+42 (which, I believe, is also the average number of messages per
single thread on this list at the moment).
Anyway, I'm definitely in agreement with versioning policy. Podlings
should comply to the latest agreed set at the time of entry, and
I wonder if Jakarta would be willing to mange the specs. When I
think of Java at Apache, I think of Jakarta so it seems like a
natural place to keep specs. Also Jakarta has experience dealing
with lots of small code bases.
just an idea...
-dain
On Jun 7, 2006, at 9:08 AM, James
On May 9, 2006, at 2:14 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
Riddle:
What would Mr. SVN say if he was written in java?
/me *ducks* and runs around the corner
LSD
I think he would say Gee what should I work on now, since I totally
finished writing SVN like 2 years ago ;)
-dain
Did we decide to do this? I am willing to help make the change if I
can.
-dain
On May 5, 2006, at 5:46 AM, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
It's ok, we can deal :) I've chatted with Patrick about it the past
as obviously I like OpenFOO as in Open{SSL,SSH,LDAP,EJB,JMS,ORB}
etc.
/geronimo-activemq-dev/
200603.mbox/%
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vote result:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-activemq-dev/
200603.mbox/%
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
9 +1s and no 0/-1
+1: James Strachan, Jonas Lim, Dain Sundstrom, Alan D. Cabrera, Bruce
Snyder, Fritz Oconer, Hiram Chirino, John
I think we have two cases here that we need to treat differently:
public and private code. In the case of publicly developed code, we
can easily check the public source repository and mailing lists and
say hey, these people did contribute to the project. I the case of
privately developed
On Mar 19, 2006, at 6:25 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 3/19/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:26:04PM +, robert burrell donkin
wrote:
snip
3 there is no indication the form which CLA's and CCLA's are
relevant.
this makes oversight difficult.
+1
-dain
On Mar 19, 2006, at 5:33 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
version can be found here
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run 1
week until
On Mar 15, 2006, at 7:04 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Hiram Chirino wrote:
If the ActiveMQ / ServiceMix community do decide to go under some
other TLP, I'm sure it would not take long for the active
participants of the community to asked to Join the TLP's PMC.
I would certainly hope that
On Mar 16, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Mads Toftum wrote:
-- ensure that the quarterly report is provided
to the Incubator PMC
+1 - although I wonder if it would be worth letting new projects
report
each month for the first 3 months?
+1 good idea
-dain
Noel,
I think this email represents a good example of mixing official
communication of the incubator with your personal agenda to make
these top level projects. Emails like this lead to questions like,
is this required of all podlings or is this just a requirement
because Noel thinks
if they want to continue
incubation and become an Apache TLP or go back to where they were.
-dain
On Mar 14, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
When AMQ entered the incubator as a sponsored project from Geronimo,
the current understanding of incubator rules
On Feb 15, 2006, at 3:09 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Sanjiva,
- Given the, um, strong feelings expressed by so many people about
this
project, how about if we get the Incubator PMC to sponsor this
poddling?
Agreed. That is what I said to the Geronimo PMC, as well. The
Incubator
PMC
Stein wrote:
[trimmed individuals and pmc's from the cc: list]
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 03:22:23PM -0800, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Feb 15, 2006, at 3:09 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Sanjiva,
- Given the, um, strong feelings expressed by so many people about
this project, how about if we get
Makes since. Thanks for spending the time to explain this to me.
This really helps.
Thanks,
-dain
On Feb 15, 2006, at 6:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Dain,
Since you brought this public, I'll post my response along with you
original email. I hope you don't mind...
I don't, but you
On Feb 13, 2006, at 6:17 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 05:40:47PM -0800, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I've heard nothing to provide a reason for not bringing in the
contribution
as a standalone podling, which ServiceMix and others
The all of the links on http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
index.html seem to be broken. I'll try to figure out what is wrong,
but if someone has an idea or is already working on it, please let me
know.
-dain
-
To
-intel.htmlharmony-16-
contribution-classlib-intel/a
-jean
On 2/13/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The all of the links on http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
index.html seem to be broken. I'll try to figure out what is wrong,
but if someone has an idea or is already working
I think ServiceMix is the perfect home for a BPEL engine. Every JBI
implementation that I am aware of has and integrated orchestration
engine exposed via the BPEL specification. I am not worried about
barriers to any committers, accidental too-tight binding or
UNrelated mail on mailing
I have committed the ip-clearance for the XBean donation to Geronimo:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=377477view=rev
If there are no objections, I will commit the code with history on
Wednesday February 15th.
-dain
-
,
-dain
On Feb 13, 2006, at 1:42 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Should be fixed now.
How often does the site update?
I notice it happens very quickly (a matter of a minute, if even
that)
these days after you do the 'svn up
On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I've heard nothing to provide a reason for not bringing in the
contribution
as a standalone podling, which ServiceMix and others can consume.
This
would be in accord with Ken and Mads.
I really detest it when people try to flip the
On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:34 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:42:58PM -0800, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
...
Sybase wants to donate to the service-mix community and the
ServiceMix community wants to work with the code. Any contributor
It should be donate to APACHE. The various people
Niclas,
Although at one time this was true of the transaction manager in
Geronimo, we have done some very minor work to make this optional. I
designed the Geronimo kernel and consider it a design flaw that the
kernel becomes a dependency of the services it manages. This is
something we
On Feb 2, 2006, at 7:29 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
On Feb 1, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
How should the disclaimer be associated?
Well, this is a bit of an issue. Why are the plain jars
available? To
allow automated downloads by Maven? I have an issue with that,
since
+1
-dain
On Jan 30, 2006, at 5:12 PM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
+1
Paul
On 1/31/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X] +1 Release the binary as 4.0-M4
Regards,
Hiram
On Jan 30, 2006, at 12:06 AM, James Strachan wrote:
On the developer list the committers voted to create a
On Dec 22, 2005, at 9:19 PM, Ted Leung wrote:
To us an Apache project is an effort of the ASF. To the majority
of people out there, being an Apache project (rightly or wrongly)
is branding stamp. You might not like it, but that's how many
people treat it. And that's why one of the
On Dec 21, 2005, at 4:21 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Excuse me, but don't we have a -1 on this vote thread already? Is
the idea to get Dain to change his vote by piling on more +1? Or
have I completely missed the Tao of the voting process in Apache?
I thought that after a -1 the discussion
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:13 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:19:21PM -0800, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Give me a break.
No. The incubator PMC has given breaks before and it let to
undesired
side effects so now we're not going to do that anymore.
I'm not trying to hide anything
On Dec 18, 2005, at 6:46 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
This is part of the Incubator Guidelines Documentation project
Noel posted at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/
200512.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When Eddie and I briefly chatted at ApacheCon we agreed that there
-1 I prefer to have a new sub project associated with the TLP
community and use a footer to note incubation status.
BTW would [EMAIL PROTECTED] or activemq-dev-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] be ok, since they contain the word
incubate?
-dain
On Dec 17, 2005, at 8:49 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
state that, but please don't
imply that offering an alternate proposal is anything else. If you
have specific, issues with my proposal, that will be welcome also.
-dain
On Dec 19, 2005, at 10:31 AM, Mads Toftum wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:11:05AM -0800, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
BTW
Count me in.
-dain
On Dec 16, 2005, at 12:44 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Jean Anderson and Eddie O'Neil have volunteered to help redact our
collected
wisdom into a coherent guide. Cliff Schmidt will contribute on the
legal/IP
side. Henri Yandell has volunteered to review as a guinea pig.
My personal preference is to have incubated sub-projects use mailing
lists and websites within the TLP containing a notice header that the
project is under incubation (and may die). My understanding is that
you feel having the email address containing the word incubator
will warn users,
+1
-dain
On Dec 4, 2005, at 7:41 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I repurposed the discussion thread for continuity to call for a
vote. There has been no concern or objection noted in the last two
weeks, so I'll assume that people are comfortable with this.
So what say ye?
[ ] +1 Graduate
Serge,
I added that like a month ago:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO
We really need someone that has permissions to add mailing lists.
-dain
On Jan 2, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Serge Knystautas wrote:
Brian McCallister wrote:
A JIRA project
Brian,
I need to know:
- Project name
- Project prefix
On Jan 3, 2005, at 9:57 AM, Craig Russell wrote:
Hi Dain,
Can you give me a brief rundown on how I can update the JDO JIRA
project? I'd like to file bugs, update the roadmap, etc.
Do you have an account on jira? I couldn't find one with your name.
If you don't, create one and send me your
WOW! Great work!
+1 release the entire suite
-dain
--
Dain Sundstrom
Chief Architect
Gluecode Software
310.536.8355, ext. 26
On Dec 27, 2004, at 10:33 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
Hello,
We at the Directory Project (under incubation here,
http://incubator.apache.org/directory) have been preparing
+1
-dain
On Dec 8, 2004, at 7:26 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
+1 for a more creative name than Apache JDO ;-).
Sanjiva.
- Original Message -
From: Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: [JDO] Project Name
+1 to
On Dec 8, 2004, at 5:26 AM, Brian McCallister wrote:
and a JIRA project?
I'll take care or this one... I just call the project Apache JDO with
the key JDO for now. We can change the name later but not the key, but
JDO should be fine for a long term key.
-dain
On Dec 8, 2004, at 8:21 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Dec 8, 2004, at 5:26 AM, Brian McCallister wrote:
and a JIRA project?
I'll take care or this one... I just call the project Apache JDO with
the key JDO for now. We can change the name later but not the key,
but JDO should be fine for a long
On Oct 19, 2004, at 12:04 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, October 19, 2004 12:01 PM -0700 Geir Magnusson Jr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm happy w/ svn. I really wish I had some minimal support in IDEA,
but
svn stat and svn move make up for it :)
http://svnup.tigris.org/
Hate to be
The FTP Server project uses JIRA for bug reporting. You can find it
here:
http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10571
--dain
--
Dain Sundstrom
Chief Architect
Gluecode Software
310.536.8355, ext. 26
On Oct 14, 2004, at 7:48 AM, Dash, Surajit wrote:
Hi,
I'm reporting
Excellent solution!
-dain
On Sep 24, 2004, at 4:27 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
okey, after discussing this in seven different directions, we
have a clear conclusion, which i'll summarise here:
1. the NOTICE file (or NOTICE.txt) gets created if it doesn't
On Sep 16, 2004, at 7:59 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Collective work Copyright 2004 The Apache Software Foundation.
[AL 2.0 Template]
Derivative work Copyright 2004 Some Other Contributor.
Licensed to the ASF under a contributor agreement.
Copyright 2004 Contributor
Just an idea but, how about someone writes a shell script that does the
change and get someone at IBM to execute it?
-dain
On Sep 15, 2004, at 2:19 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
We've just finished a conference with Jennifer. As I understand it,
her
issues are not with the practice but with how
+1 I was hoping we would have a 170 implementation at apache
-dain
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul,
You could try sending an email to the geronimo development list to try
to solicit more help.
Also on the GBean front, after our discussions in Portland I plan
simplifying the component contract for basic (no-lifecycle aware) beans
to be the same as Pico. The only thing Geronimo specific
[+1] Accept MyFaces into the Incubator
-dain
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
-dain
On Jun 18, 2004, at 8:59 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
The XMLBeans project has been actively developed in incubation for
about 10 months. During this time, the user and developer
community has continued to grow stronger, both in number,
diversity, and degree of cooperation. In addition, the
On Jun 14, 2004, at 7:05 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jun 13, 2004, at 2:23 PM, Tim O'Brien wrote:
I'm fairly certain there is sufficient interest for this, but there
would
need to be a sponsoring entity, champion, and mentor. I don't think
this
would be a problem, but you should take a look at
Patrick,
I have heard a lot of good things about JAM, but have not looked at it
yet. In Geronimo we would like to offer support for annotations in the
GBean service layer, but that would mean using a 1.5 VM. I don't see
us raising the minimum required VM to 1.5 until J2EE 1.5 comes out
+1
-dain
On May 17, 2004, at 2:21 AM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Incubator PMC folks,
I would like to propose a new Apache project named Beehive.
The proposal can be found at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeehiveProposal.
Since the project is being proposed as a TLP with three subprojects,
I've
[X] +1 - The Geronimo project has met the requirements
for incubation and will be recommended to the
board for TLP status
-dain
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
, we need to easily be
able to add them without a total rewrite of a highly coupled system.
It will also allow revolutionary new services to be built and tried out
without requiring big changes to the base server.
Basically good all around...
-dain
/*
* Dain Sundstrom
On Tuesday, August 5, 2003, at 09:23 PM, tetsuo wrote:
By the way, I really didn't like the name, Geronimo. It remembers me
of someone falling from a cliff :)
Is there any J word that is still unused? Like
- Jubilee
- Jun (japanese for excellence, genius;
pure, innocent; conform to,
It's open source Bob, so when it is ready. If you would like to
contribute, we would love to have you and your friends at
jbossgroup.com join. (For those of that don't know, Bob sits on the
jbossgroup.com board)
-dain
/*
* Dain Sundstrom
* Partner
* Core Developers
60 matches
Mail list logo
